logo
National accused of putting needs of banks before everyday Kiwis

National accused of putting needs of banks before everyday Kiwis

1News29-05-2025

The National Party is being accused of putting the needs of banks before everyday Kiwis after introducing legislation that could mean two big Australian-owned lenders avoid paying millions of dollars in refunds.
One customer said the amendment to lending laws would allow the banks to get off "scot-free" while the minister in charge said it simply allowed the courts to have more discretion in settling disputes.
The Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act (CCCFA) passed its first reading in Parliament last week and included a retrospective amendment relating to consequences for historical disclosure breaches by lenders.
An investigation by the Commerce Commission had found two banks did not disclose the necessary information regarding customer loans. It meant the banks were potentially liable to refund millions of dollars in fees and interest.
'We should just be able to trust our bank'
ADVERTISEMENT
Lawyer Scott Russell, acting on behalf of those taking the class action, said the omission regarded "core business" for the banks.
'It's simple stuff. It's disclosure rules that allow ordinary New Zealanders to understand their financial position,' Russell said.
Anthony Simons, a small business owner, was among the 170,000 customers who' took legal action against ANZ and ASB banks.
'We're just a hardworking Kiwi family trying to pay off our mortgage, struggling sometimes, and we should just be able to trust our bank that they're going to do the right thing in disclosing the right information,' Simons said.
But, after four years battling through the courts, the Government last week passed the first reading of the legislation which changed the rules — retrospectively.
Banks entitled to 'judicial fairness' – Minister
The Minister for Commerce and Consumer Affairs, Scott Simpson, said the bill before Parliament did not affect the class action.
ADVERTISEMENT
'What it does is it gives the courts the ability to use their discretion about what will be a fair and equitable outcome to the case,' he said.
'Banks, no matter what you may or may not think of them, are surely entitled to the same judicial fairness as any other entity or person.'
A Cabinet paper by the minister released last month highlighted the class action against the banks, adding that "addressing these concerns through retrospective legislation is likely to attract criticism".
'Well, there will be criticism because it is retrospective and retrospective legislation is unusual but not completely unknown in our political system,' Simpson said.
Russell claimed it was unfair.
'We've taken it right through to the Supreme Court and, right where we're getting to crunch time, the banks have contacted their mates in the National Party who have agreed to potentially wipe these refunds. It's hundreds of millions of dollars,' he said.
Possible changes 'don't take any rights away from consumers' – banks
ADVERTISEMENT
ANZ and ASB Bank said the proposed amendments to the bill would not halt the current class action – or future cases.
In a statement to 1News, ANZ said the proposed amendments "will not stop the current class action progressing, nor will it prevent potential future cases".
"They will simply confirm that when considering these cases, the court has discretion to decide what a fair outcome should be. This change does not remove the rights and protections of consumers.'
ASB Bank, meanwhile, told 1News that the potential changes "don't take any rights away from consumers, and will not prevent the current court case, or any future cases, from proceeding".
"They simply clarify a confusing piece of legislation and confirm that the court has jurisdiction to decide on an outcome that is fair and reasonable.'
Simpson added that, currently, for cases that occurred between 2015 and 2019, the courts could only hand down one penalty.
'And that is a full refund of all interest and all fees, no matter how small or minor the error or omission was,' he said.
ADVERTISEMENT
But Russell said penalties "are clear under the legislation".
"All of a sudden, those penalties are being wiped out and replaced with something that's not clear which is what is a reasonable penalty.'
While all three coalition parties supported the bill at its first reading, NZ First had concerns about the retrospective aspect and wanted to hear more official advice and public feedback before deciding if it would back the bill entirely.
The issue would now be considered by a Parliamentary select committee.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Destiny Church Protesters Set Flags On Fire In Auckland Rally
Destiny Church Protesters Set Flags On Fire In Auckland Rally

Scoop

time31 minutes ago

  • Scoop

Destiny Church Protesters Set Flags On Fire In Auckland Rally

Article – RNZ Acting Prime Minister David Seymour has denounced today's Destiny Church protest in downtown Auckland. Hundreds have marched from Aotea Square down Queen Street, in what the church billed as a rally 'in defence of faith, flag and family'. Destiny Church said the march was to take 'a bold public stand for Christian values, Kiwi identity and the future of this nation'. Church leader Brian Tamaki claimed 'uncontrolled immigration' in the United Kingdom had led to spikes in crime and a collapse in British identity. Tamaki said the church was building a 'Commonwealth crusade' to 'reclaim Christian nations'. At one point, flags – which an RNZ reporter said appeared to include rainbow flags and flags representing mainstream media – were set alight. Seymour said the church leader's messaging was 'un-Kiwi'. 'What it means to be Kiwi is people come from all over the world, and so long as they come peacefully to build a better world, then they're welcome,' he said. 'Brian Tamaki's various attitudes have all sorts of problems, but at their heart they're un-Kiwi attitudes because they're intolerant and uninclusive.' 'What I take issue with is his attacks on other New Zealander's right to practice their faith just as he has a right to practice his.' Ahead of the march, Tamaki said church leaders had sent an open letter to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon calling for a reversal on a position that the country has no official religion. He said one demand included enforcing a policy of 'no immigration without assimilation' – a phrase also chanted during the protest march. The acting prime minister said Destiny Church was free to criticise the government. 'Christianity has given a lot to New Zealand but some New Zealanders find faith in other teachings, and so long as they are committed to tolerance for all, then that's not a problem,' he said. 'I just want all New Zealanders to know, that if they come here in good faith to build a better society with tolerance of others then they are welcome here. 'And Brian Tamaki certainly has no right to tell you otherwise.' Fire and Emergency crews were called to the march after flags were set on fire. However rally goers then put the flames out with water and the arriving firefighters then left without taking action. Police were stationed at the protest, but said they did not make any arrests. The Destiny marchers were met by counterprotesters – an RNZ reporter said there were about 100 present at one stage – who were waving tino rangatiratanga flags and Palestine flags.

Defence Heads Face Scrutiny Week Hearing, Promise To Be Fiscally Responsible
Defence Heads Face Scrutiny Week Hearing, Promise To Be Fiscally Responsible

Scoop

timean hour ago

  • Scoop

Defence Heads Face Scrutiny Week Hearing, Promise To Be Fiscally Responsible

Defence heads have assured politicians their huge new budget takes into account soldiers actually having to fire their weapons. They fronted up to an even-tempered scrutiny week hearing with MPs at Parliament on Thursday afternoon. Greens MP Lawrence Xu-Nan asked whether the budget boost of $9 billion new spending over four years allowed for buying the likes of replacement Javelin missiles, which cost $400,000 each. Defence secretary Brook Barrington responded that the increased budget meant troops could now move past the approach from the last 50 years of being only partly equipped. "The defence force is actually being provided with funding to ensure that, if we upgrade the capabilty, we are also able to shoot things with it," he said. Along with defence force Chief Air Marshal Tony Davies, Barrington laid out a raft of measures they said would enable them to buy weapons and other systems faster and smarter. "The demand queue is growing," Barrington said. "The longer it takes us to lodge an order, someone else has got their place in the queue before us and some of this stuff takes three years. "You know, you lose your place in the queue... and you're losing time." They felt a sense of urgency, but also had to ensure quality thresholds were set, so that in 3-4 years he was not up before MPs again being told, "We knew we couldn't trust you folk to bloody get your way out of a paper bag", he said. "We've got to find a sweet spot between rigour, confidence and pace." He added defence had already met with 280 people from 174 companies, both last month and this month, and that an industry strategy would be put out soon. They would be fiscally responsible with the billions of taxpayer money, Davies said. To accelerate, they would drop the old approach of trying to get 30 years of life from gear and retreading it, and instead, look at getting a "minimum viable product" quickly out to the field, he said. "Simple... quick... lean." On the personnel front, they had to rebuild forces, he said. The budget and plan had "buoyed" personnel, but their thinned-back ranks still constrained how much notice they needed to deploy, how long they could deploy for and whether they could mount multiple operations. Personnel turnover had fallen to less than seven percent, but vacancy rates in February were about 30 percent, an Official Information Act request (OIA) showed. The army was short 1500 people, Air Force 660 and navy 630. Defence was "over-training" people to hit 100 percent, when it did not need to, so was reviewing how to speed training up, Davies said. The 15-year plan was to add 20 percent to combat forces - or 2500 people - and the only way to do that currently was to cut civilian jobs down, he said. "At the moment, we've got ships tied up that can't go to sea, because we haven't got the sailors. We've got people that are going on their fifth deployment overseas, because we don't have the number of soldiers. "We've got Joint Force headquarters out at Trentham with watchfloors that can't be filled, because we haven't got the uniformed people with those skills. "We need those. The money is tight, still, even with uplifts." An OIA response showed that, in March, a hefty 313 positions were vacant at Joint Defence Services, far more than in other sections. Defence Minister Judith Collins said the point was to be able to defend against anybody who "threatened our people, or our assets". "Our people are not going to have to wave a white flag anymore. They are going to be able to get out there and protect themselves." She said she had told "prime" multinational defence contractors their best bet for getting a share of the business was to involve New Zealand firms. The small firms would not be written "out of the equation", Barrington said. He added the business cases for two very large projects - replacing the 757s and the maritime helicopters - were well advanced. Other business cases would be made short and sharp. The fleet renewal planning was by far the biggest job, but the budget gave the ministry a couple of million dollars extra for teams to do that. "What happens in two years, if the world situation's got worse and we need to step it up again?" Davies said. "How are we going to accelerate our capability acquisition process. It might be that we need to double our efforts there, so we are constantly looking at ways to fine tune it." The budget set aside $155m over four years for new military allowances for deployments and hundreds of millions for more operations.

Destiny Church Protesters Set Flags On Fire In Auckland Rally
Destiny Church Protesters Set Flags On Fire In Auckland Rally

Scoop

time2 hours ago

  • Scoop

Destiny Church Protesters Set Flags On Fire In Auckland Rally

Acting Prime Minister David Seymour has denounced today's Destiny Church protest in downtown Auckland. Hundreds have marched from Aotea Square down Queen Street, in what the church billed as a rally "in defence of faith, flag and family". Destiny Church said the march was to take "a bold public stand for Christian values, Kiwi identity and the future of this nation". Church leader Brian Tamaki claimed "uncontrolled immigration" in the United Kingdom had led to spikes in crime and a collapse in British identity. Tamaki said the church was building a "Commonwealth crusade" to "reclaim Christian nations". At one point, flags - which an RNZ reporter said appeared to include rainbow flags and flags representing mainstream media - were set alight. Seymour said the church leader's messaging was "un-Kiwi". "What it means to be Kiwi is people come from all over the world, and so long as they come peacefully to build a better world, then they're welcome," he said. "Brian Tamaki's various attitudes have all sorts of problems, but at their heart they're un-Kiwi attitudes because they're intolerant and uninclusive." "What I take issue with is his attacks on other New Zealander's right to practice their faith just as he has a right to practice his." Ahead of the march, Tamaki said church leaders had sent an open letter to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon calling for a reversal on a position that the country has no official religion. He said one demand included enforcing a policy of "no immigration without assimilation" - a phrase also chanted during the protest march. The acting prime minister said Destiny Church was free to criticise the government. "Christianity has given a lot to New Zealand but some New Zealanders find faith in other teachings, and so long as they are committed to tolerance for all, then that's not a problem," he said. "I just want all New Zealanders to know, that if they come here in good faith to build a better society with tolerance of others then they are welcome here. "And Brian Tamaki certainly has no right to tell you otherwise." Fire and Emergency crews were called to the march after flags were set on fire. However rally goers then put the flames out with water and the arriving firefighters then left without taking action. Police were stationed at the protest, but said they did not make any arrests. The Destiny marchers were met by counterprotesters - an RNZ reporter said there were about 100 present at one stage - who were waving tino rangatiratanga flags and Palestine flags.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store