Destiny Church Protesters Set Flags On Fire In Auckland Rally

Article – RNZ
Acting Prime Minister David Seymour has denounced today's Destiny Church protest in downtown Auckland.
Hundreds have marched from Aotea Square down Queen Street, in what the church billed as a rally 'in defence of faith, flag and family'.
Destiny Church said the march was to take 'a bold public stand for Christian values, Kiwi identity and the future of this nation'.
Church leader Brian Tamaki claimed 'uncontrolled immigration' in the United Kingdom had led to spikes in crime and a collapse in British identity.
Tamaki said the church was building a 'Commonwealth crusade' to 'reclaim Christian nations'.
At one point, flags – which an RNZ reporter said appeared to include rainbow flags and flags representing mainstream media – were set alight.
Seymour said the church leader's messaging was 'un-Kiwi'.
'What it means to be Kiwi is people come from all over the world, and so long as they come peacefully to build a better world, then they're welcome,' he said.
'Brian Tamaki's various attitudes have all sorts of problems, but at their heart they're un-Kiwi attitudes because they're intolerant and uninclusive.'
'What I take issue with is his attacks on other New Zealander's right to practice their faith just as he has a right to practice his.'
Ahead of the march, Tamaki said church leaders had sent an open letter to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon calling for a reversal on a position that the country has no official religion.
He said one demand included enforcing a policy of 'no immigration without assimilation' – a phrase also chanted during the protest march.
The acting prime minister said Destiny Church was free to criticise the government.
'Christianity has given a lot to New Zealand but some New Zealanders find faith in other teachings, and so long as they are committed to tolerance for all, then that's not a problem,' he said.
'I just want all New Zealanders to know, that if they come here in good faith to build a better society with tolerance of others then they are welcome here.
'And Brian Tamaki certainly has no right to tell you otherwise.'
Fire and Emergency crews were called to the march after flags were set on fire. However rally goers then put the flames out with water and the arriving firefighters then left without taking action.
Police were stationed at the protest, but said they did not make any arrests.
The Destiny marchers were met by counterprotesters – an RNZ reporter said there were about 100 present at one stage – who were waving tino rangatiratanga flags and Palestine flags.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Spinoff

an hour ago

• The Spinoff

Pornographic deepfakes are ruining lives. What are we doing about it?

They're made and spread quickly, cause intense harm and mostly target younger women and girls, but creating and sharing pornographic deepfakes is, in most cases, totally legal. Act MP Laura McClure's member's bill wants to change that. Content warning: This piece discusses suicide and sexual exploitation. The pictures were surprisingly easy to make. All she had to do was upload a photo of herself onto a website found through a quick search, and let it spew out AI-generated images of her naked in the bedroom, the bathroom, the kitchen – there was even a tool to make her appear more childlike. Her body may have been imagined, but for all intents and purposes, it was imagined to be her. It was a first for parliament when Act MP Laura McClure presented a doctored image of herself nude to the House in mid-May, but according to Netsafe, these pornographic deepfakes are now popping up and ruining lives almost daily. They're quick to make, cause incredible emotional damage and they mostly target younger women and girls, but they're not illegal, and there's no way of knowing exactly how many New Zealanders are being harmed by them. A member's bill drafted by McClure would criminalise the creation of these images by adding amendments to the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015 and Crimes Act 1961 to expand the definition of 'intimate visual recordings' to include those that have been synthesised. McClure told The Spinoff the bill was born from numerous discussions with parents, school teachers and advocates whose daughters and students had been impacted by pornographic deepfakes. The stories McClure heard were deeply upsetting – in one instance, a 13-year-old girl had attempted suicide on school grounds after being deepfaked in this way. At a school in North Canterbury, 15 girls had explicit deepfaked images of themselves shared on social media. In one Auckland school, a group of 50 girls in the year 10 cohort were targets of this. One teen girl of Muslim faith was deepfaked naked as a 'joke', McClure said. The experience was not only 'deeply offensive' for the girl, but it had a significant impact on her relationship with her family. 'It's something that schools are really struggling to tackle, because there is a grey area in our legislation,' McClure said. 'There is no real way that victims of this can get any justice and real support, because the support isn't there when it's not a crime.' With near-daily calls being made to Netsafe about these images, chief online safety officer Sean Lyons told The Spinoff the fear they instil in targets is 'huge', and can be 'emotionally and psychologically damaging in the very worst ways for many people'. The online safety organisation works with targets and perpetrators to remove this online content and impose civil sanctions (typically a fine) where possible, and while larger platforms such as Pornhub are typically responsive in these cases, others exist solely for the purpose of sharing these images. 'We know the amount of harm that these things cause is directly related to just how long it's up there – just how long people perceive that people can see this really does amplify the harm that individuals feel,' Lyons said. The homespun logic that if you don't take a risqué image of yourself, then you won't be a victim of being seen in a sexually compromising position without your consent is no longer true, Lyons said – now, anyone can be a victim of image-based abuse. In some ways, having a pornographic deepfake of yourself made and posted online can be far more damaging than if the image was real, lawyer Arran Hunt told The Spinoff. 'You have no choice as to that image being created in the first place,' he said. 'It's completely out of your hands.' Hunt has been long advocating for our laws to catch up with this technology because as it stands, no one has been successful in taking a deepfake case down a criminal legal pathway. It all comes down to the intention, Hunt said, and the creation of pornographic deepfakes is typically driven by desire for 'financial gain, a laugh, peer pressure, attention – to cause harm is often not actually the reason they're doing it'. When the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015 was amended in 2022 to include unauthorised posting of an intimate visual recording, Hunt was one of many submitters in the select committee process who suggested the definition of this material should include synthesised images. The suggestion didn't make it past the submissions phase, and Hunt worries it will take the death of a 'blonde white female' for our laws to catch up. Hunt said the onus needs to be on the creator of the image, rather than the app or platform that generates it. 'If Little Johnny is creating deepfakes of somebody else and it's causing them harm, then Little Johnny should be facing the court,' Hunt said. 'Not just that we'll have a meeting with Little Johnny's parents and hopefully he stops doing it because he's a menace.' McClure's bill is a member's bill, so it's sitting in the biscuit tin, waiting for a chance to be plucked and introduced to parliament. After telling the Herald in May that he was not considering adopting it as a government bill, justice minister Paul Goldsmith will be meeting with McClure in July to discuss the bill. It's been 'frustrating' waiting for change, McClure said, but a meeting with the minister is a 'positive step forward'. 'What I do think the government needs to consider is, do we want to put these preventions in place now while the issue is just emerging and starting to grow, or are we going to be reactive when a young girl takes her life?'

Otago Daily Times

3 hours ago

• Otago Daily Times

US attack on Iran will worsen conflict: prof

The United States attacks on three principal nuclear sites in Iran will likely worsen conflict in the Middle-East, the University of Otago's leading international relations academic says. It comes after US President Donald Trump confirmed yesterday that US forces struck Iran's three principal nuclear sites: Natanz, Esfahan and Fordow — six bunker buster bombs were dropped on Fordow, while 30 Tomahawk missiles were fired against other nuclear sites. University of Otago international relations Professor Robert Patman said that it would be naive to assume this attack would lead to any wind-down of the conflict. "I think it's reflective of the fact that Mr Trump and his administration are living in something of a bubble. "The idea that Iran is going to roll over after being hit by six bunker buster bombs and about 30 cruise missiles I think is fantasy. "I think this whole operation is based on a very shaky operating assumption that you can eliminate the threat by bombing it away." Prof Patman said Iran, over the years, had "never said it wants nuclear weapons". "It says it wants what many other countries have, which is a civilian nuclear energy generation capacity." Mr Trump was dealing with a "crisis of his own making". "He had a perfectly workable deal called the US-Iran nuclear deal, which was negotiated by the Obama administration, but Mr Trump proceeded to walk away from that — and of course, Iran no longer felt bound by its terms." Iran had the knowledge to reconstruct its nuclear capability if it so desired, Prof Patman said. "We have knowledge that most of the material at these sites was evacuated sometime ago. "So have the US just used very expensive bombs to little effect? "We don't know," he said. "I think many Middle Eastern countries will be pretty upset with Mr Trump because this could become a region-wide conflict now, particularly if the Iranian leadership decide they're going to make his life very difficult by targeting American personnel and interests." Prof Patman called the strikes against Iran "likely illegal". "Iran has said repeatedly that it is a victim in this situation. It's not the aggressor. "As the victim, under Article 51 of the UN Charter, it's got the right of self-defence," he said. New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Defence Minister Judith Collins said yesterday the government was pursuing all options for assisting New Zealanders stranded in Iran and Israel. As part of government efforts to pursue all options for assisting New Zealanders in harm's way, government personnel and a C-130J Hercules aircraft are being deployed to the Middle East and will stand ready to assist if needed. The government was also in discussion with commercial airlines to assess how they may be able to assist. The situation in the Middle East was "fast-moving" and it will take several days for the C-130J Hercules, scheduled to leave Auckland today, to reach the region, they said. Mr Peters called for "diplomacy", saying that would be the path to peace in the Middle East — not further "military action". There were estimated to be about 50 New Zealanders in Iran and 80 in Israel, he said. Last week, the last remaining New Zealand diplomats in Iran fled the country after the government made repeated calls for New Zealanders to stay out of Iran. Meanwhile, all New Zealanders in the Middle East — not just in Iran and Israel — were urged to register on SafeTravel. Prof Patman said while these initiatives were good and necessary, New Zealand could be doing far more on a world stage. "New Zealand has got an international reputation for, first of all, wanting the abolition of nuclear weapons, but also for pursuing its own non-nuclear security policy. "This US attack on Iran, in my view, is a reckless and illegal act — it's likely to make the world less secure rather than more secure. "It's time for New Zealand to press for the reform of the UN Security Council. "The UN Security Council should not be a bystander because one of its key members is breaking international law."

Scoop

11 hours ago

• Scoop

US Starts New Horror Show For Israel

The Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa is calling out for New Zealanders to condemn the US bombing of Iran. PSNA Co-Chair, Maher Nazzal, says he hopes, but does not expect, that the New Zealand government will be critical of the US for its war escalation. 'Israel has once again hoodwinked the United States into fighting Israel's wars. 'Israel's Prime Minister has declared Iran to be on the point of producing nuclear weapons since the 1990s. It's all part of his big plan for expulsion of Palestinians from Palestine to create a Greater Israel, and regime change for the entire region.' 'Israel knows Arab and European countries will fall in behind these plans and in many cases actually help implement them.' 'It is a dreadful day for the Palestinians. Netanyahu's forces will be turned back onto them in Gaza and the West Bank.' 'It is just as dreadful day for the whole Middle East. Trump has tried to add Iran to the disasters of US foreign policy in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan. The US simply doesn't care how many people will die.'