Alarm over battery cage cruelty met with stonewalling while 95% of SA's laying hens suffer
The response by the Consumer Goods Council of South Africa to an open letter calling for an end to practices that block dialogue and transparency about where our eggs come from and requesting effective engagement, indicates a failure of their own values, including 'accountability' and 'integrity'.
Chicken and eggs have been in local and international news a lot lately – whether it is because egg prices in the US have reached record highs this year due to a bird flu outbreak in the region, or because of the recent abhorrent and horrific cruelty discovered at a local broiler farm – a lot of important issues are being brought to the fore. However, despite these and other increasing issues associated with the farming of animals, and growing global awareness of the need for change, in South Africa concerns are also being raised over industry's deliberate efforts to block reform and maintain inhumane, unsustainable practices in South Africa's poultry, specifically egg, industry.
In the past year there has been a marked increase in stonewalling and bullying by industry leaders and complicity from government bodies. Despite attempts to engage industry role players, the response has been to double down, thereby extending the use of cruel battery cages and withholding vital information that is being used for policy decision-making.
The Consumer Goods Council of South Africa (CGCSA) went so far as to threaten potential litigation against a member of the Southern African Faith Communities Environmental Institute (Safcei) team if they didn't desist from contacting and engaging the CGCSA's members on the issue of hen welfare and egg production. They also advised their members against engaging effectively with civil society on this issue.
In response, Safcei and Animal Law Reform South Africa (ALRSA) wrote an open letter to the CGCSA, calling for an end to practices that block dialogue and transparency about where our eggs come from and requesting effective engagement. The letter is supported by a broader coalition of 24 civil society and nonprofit organisations.
The letter, titled 'Eggsposing Foul Play in South Africa's Egg Industry', details concerns that more than 25 million laying hens in South Africa, the vast majority of the laying flock, are subjected to unnatural and unsustainable conditions and methods of egg production. Hens are crammed into tiny wire cages, enduring a lifetime of suffering without space to express natural, healthy behaviour, denied even the most basic protections that all animals deserve, as contained in the Five Freedoms.
The letter also outlines the problematic lack of transparency and accountability in South Africa's egg industry, undermining the constitutional rights of consumers. For example, in 2020, the South African Poultry Association (Sapa) commissioned the statutory body, the National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC), to conduct a study to assess the viability of the South African egg industry if a policy to end the use of cages was introduced. The industry-funded study claims there would be huge costs and unemployment if the country transitioned to cage-free egg systems.
To give more context on the concentration of the egg industry in South Africa, commercial egg production is dominated by only three major producers: Eggbert, Nulaid and Highveld Cooperative, which command about 51% of the market share. With a gross turnover of R14.5-billion at producer level, eggs are the fourth-largest animal product sector in agriculture. The total value of the South African egg market at retail level in 2024 was estimated to be about R26-billion, dominated by only a handful of big players such as Shoprite-Checkers, Spar, Woolworths, Pick n Pay and MassMart (most of which are CGCSA members). In 2022, on average, retailers increased the price of large eggs by more than 100% sold to the public. More damning is the evidence that they don't pass savings on to consumers, according to the competition watchdog in late 2024. And if the recent news cycle from the US is anything to go by, it is clear that the price of eggs matters as a yardstick when it comes to the economy and political decision-making.
Accordingly, the data behind this NAMC study is undeniably of public interest, yet it remains hidden from consumers. More than 4,000 people have signed a petition demanding its release, but the full report has still not been made accessible to the public. Organisations, including ALRSA, have tried for years to obtain the study through numerous requests to the NAMC, Sapa, the CGCSA and the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development, including using the Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000 and even approaching the Information Regulator. The industry and the government continue to use the findings to promote the use of cages while not granting access to the source information. The official position in South Africa seems to be trying to maintain the status quo until at least 2039, while more than 25.5 million laying hens (95%) are suffering in caged production, with only 5% being cage-free (4% free-range and 1% barn).
Our concerns about the opacity in the industry are further explored in ALRSA's recent ' Scrambling for the Truth ' report, which highlights how many consumers might care about animal welfare, but most lack access to information about food production (specifically eggs) and its impact on animals, human health and the environment. Without this information, consumers remain in the dark and are unable to make informed and ethically aligned choices. An earlier report, ' Laying Down the Facts ', explores how the South African egg industry impacts animal welfare, the environment, food safety, health, social issues and rights, and business practices.
The need to move away from cages for hens is also to be considered in a global context in which more than 30 countries have completely banned some form of caged egg production, and nearly 2,600 public commitments have been made by food corporations around the world to remove cages from their egg supply chains. A number of leading South African businesses have pledged to go cage-free or have already achieved this standard. Considering consumers' experiences in recent years with egg shortages and high prices due to repeated avian flu outbreaks affecting livelihoods and resulting in the mass killing of our national flock, the response by the South African egg industry to these issues is even more concerning.
For all of these reasons, Safcei and ALRSA, along with other co-signatories to the open letter, have called on the CGCSA to take seven actions in accordance with their values: 'Integrity. Excellence. Accountability.' This includes refraining from silencing and intimidatory tactics; promoting transparency; incorporating animal welfare within their purview; promoting consumer and constitutional rights; fostering accountability; refraining from engaging in potentially collusive practices; and encouraging effective engagement with the public and concerned organisations.
We sent the open letter to the CGCSA in February, and while they have still not responded formally more than two months later, they have attempted to distance themselves from the issues raised and shirk accountability. In a statement, the CGCSA dismissed the concerns raised as 'misdirected' and 'not within our scope', failing to acknowledge their direct letter sent to Safcei and their own members on these matters. They also indicated that 'the sector follows regulations', not admitting their extensive efforts (including litigation) in the regulatory space for food products.
It is clear that the CGCSA have either misunderstood the detailed open letter or are deliberately attempting to divert attention and responsibility to other stakeholders. Either way, their initial response indicates a failure of their own values, including 'accountability' and 'integrity'. Despite having 'consumer' in their name, as an industry representative, they appear to be committed to protecting corporate interests at the expense of consumers, the environment and animals.
Our position has not changed: we will continue to seek constructive and evidence-based dialogue and to push for transparency, accountability and meaningful reform in South Africa's poultry industry. The future of millions of hens, human health, consumer rights and environmental sustainability depends on it. DM
Francesca de Gasparis is executive director of the Southern African Faith Communities' (Safcei) Environment Institute. Safcei is a multifaith climate and eco-justice NGO committed to supporting faith leaders and their communities in southern Africa to increase awareness, understanding and action on eco-justice, sustainable living and climate change.
Amy P Wilson is cofounder and acting executive director of Animal Law Reform South Africa, South Africa's first dedicated animal law nonprofit organisation. It uses law and policy as tools to address intersectional issues and ensure justice and protection for all who require it.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
2 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Growing calls for SA to lead the UN in drafting a new Human Rights Treaty
JOHANNESBURG - There are growing calls for South Africa to take a lead role in shaping a new United Nations (UN) treaty on crimes against humanity including apartheid. Human rights groups, including international organisation Madre, are urging government to contribute to the drafting process. The calls come after a two-day dialogue co-hosted by the Nelson Mandela foundation, bringing together lawyers, feminists, and civil society to address the legacy of apartheid and other global atrocities. International lawyer Wendy Isaack said existing laws don't go far enough. "International human rights law is not enough because it does not enable individual prosecution of those that should be held accountable for the crime of apartheid which means inhumane acts committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination on the basis of race, and these acts include murder, torture and assassinations that were committed by apartheid era security forces and agents of the state in South Africa," said Isaack. She said the treaty should be broadly applicable to crimes worldwide. "These matters because when we think of apartheid as a domineering system, as a regime that oppressed black people in SA we also bear in mind that when international law is being developed, this law must also be applicable to other contexts, and at the top of our list are the Israeli apartheid policies and practices in occupied Palestinian territory. And the South African government made this very submission in the international court of justice in the 2014 advisory opinion proceedings," said Isaack. South Africa has previously made similar submissions at the International Court of Justice.
The South African
6 hours ago
- The South African
Cyril Ramaphosa calls for Israel and Iran to talk, not attack
President Cyril Ramaphosa has called for dialogue between Israel and Iran, warning that continued conflict will only lead to further devastation and economic fallout across the globe. Speaking to members of the media on the sidelines of the 30-year anniversary celebration of the Constitutional Court on Friday, Ramaphosa expressed grave concern over the escalating tensions in the Middle East, particularly following reports that the United States may join Israel in potential military action against Iran. The White House said on Thursday that President Donald Trump would decide on 'whether or not to go' with US involvement in the conflict in the next two weeks. Having just returned from the G7 summit in Canada, President Ramaphosa cautioned that the world was entering a dangerous period of heightened geopolitical instability. 'The world has become a very dangerous place now, with all these conflicts that are flaring up into the destruction of infrastructure and loss of life. 'We want to continue calling on all actors that dialogue peace-making is the only way in which to solve problems, the disputes that arise in various parts of the country, including the dispute between Israel and Iran now should be solved through dialogue, and we say that it must happen immediately, without resorting to further air strikes to further bombs,' President Ramaphosa said. Ramaphosa emphasised that continued violence was claiming lives and causing ripple effects across the globe, including here at home. 'Lives are being lost, and it is actually having a devastating blow on the economies of the world because there is now uncertainty and prices are beginning to rise. We are already suffering from price rises in our fuel… We want the conflict to come to an end,' he said. Ramaphosa reiterated South Africa's longstanding foreign policy principle of peaceful resolution through diplomacy, warning that prolonged armed conflict would only deepen global instability. According to reports, Iran and Israel traded strikes overnight, with no signs of de-escalation in their weeklong conflict. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his military's objective was to strike all of Iran's nuclear facilities. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
McKenzie refutes Mqhayi's claims about the South African flag design
Sport, Arts and Culture Minister Gayton McKenzie maintains that the department's archival investigation into the design of the South African flag was correctly credited to the late Frederick Brownell. Image: Leon Muller / Independent Newspapers Sport, Arts and Culture Minister Gayton McKenzie has said the analysis of the original design submissions by Eastern Cape artist Thembani Hastings Mqhayi did not contain any of the elements incorporated into the final design of the South African national flag. 'Based on the available information, the confirmed designer whose draft concept informed the basis for the design of the South African flag during the work of the Joint Technical Working Committee, albeit refined through the subsequent committee process, is indeed the late Mr Frederick Brownell,' he said. McKenzie was responding to EFF MP Eugene Mthethwa, who wanted to know who actually designed the national flag after Mqhayi recently claimed that he designed it, not Brownell. In April, Mqhayi's spokesperson, Bandile Magibili, was quoted as saying Mqhayi owns the design of the national flag. 'I think the word 'claiming' is overused. The design of the flag of the country is indeed Mr Thembani Hastings Mqhayi's design,' he told Newzroom Afrika. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ IOL previously reported that Mqhayi filed papers in the Pretoria High Court in 2022 against the then minister of Sport, Arts, and Culture, Nathi Mthethwa, and the State Herald over the matter. In his written response, McKenzie said a comprehensive investigation into the matter was conducted during the time of Mthethwa, and Brownell was correctly credited with designing the flag. He also said the initial process to design the national flag had involved a public call for entries and consideration of designs from professional design studios, but did not result in an acceptable design. Brownell's contribution emerged from a subsequent process, as he did not contribute to the initial processes, he stated. 'The final design accepted was not one of these initially selected or shortlisted designs, but it emerged from a process that followed the failure of the initial public call and professional studio submissions to gain acceptance.' McKenzie explained that the department's investigation into the matter involved a thorough review and analysis of archival records related to the multi-party negotiations, including about 7,000 design submissions received in 1993. 'The analysis of Mr Mqhayi's original design submissions, retrieved from the archives, has left no room for reasonable doubt: Mr Mqhayi's submitted designs do not contain any of the elements incorporated into the design of the South African national flag. 'Therefore, based on the available information, the confirmed designer whose draft concept formed the basis for the South African flag design during the work of the Joint Technical Working Committee, albeit refined through the subsequent committee process, is indeed the late Mr Frederick Brownell.' McKenzie stated that the design that formed the basis for the final flag design process was based on an initial sketch by Brownell. 'This design was developed during the process led by the Joint Technical Working Committee (convened by Mr Brownell), which was tasked with resolving the flag issue after the initial public and professional design efforts failed. 'Mr FG Brownell did not submit a finished design of the South African flag as we know it today; rather, his initial sketch went through various alterations based on the inputs of the Joint Technical Working Committee, the Transitional Executive Council, and others.' The role of Brownell, as a convener and with the resources of the Bureau of Heraldry available, to interpret the committee's views and inputs, working with artists at the Bureau to produce designs for consideration, leading iteratively to the final design. 'The colour composition and its interpretation were the prerogative of the committees involved in the later stages of the design process and were not derived from any specific submission from the public participation process, including those by Mr. Mqhayi.' McKenzie also said the digitised records showed that Mqhayi submitted three designs, which were both mailed and faxed. 'A comparative analysis of these archived submissions against the final flag design shows significant differences, and his submissions do not contain elements that influenced the final flag design.' This information, he said, was previously made available to Mqhayi through a Promotion of Access to Information Act request. McKenzie also said Mqhayi's claim of flawed procurement processes and his assertion of entitlement to benefits were not supported by the facts of how the flag was designed. 'It is also important to clarify that the process that led to the final flag design was not a procurement process that offered compensation or intellectual property rights to participants. The initial public participation process was a call for submissions, not a competition.' McKenzie said Mqhayi has pursued legal action regarding his claims, but the proceedings have stalled. 'The department maintains that the archival evidence refutes his claims and any legal process he pursues is bound to fail.' In an interview on Saturday, Magibili confirmed that the court action has stalled after Mqhayi's legal representatives withdrew from the matter. Magibili said the matter was compounded by Mqhayi's ill health, but they want McKenzie to intervene. 'We are trying to speak to the minister asking that he assists to resolve the matter without going to court.' He expressed his concerns that the State Herald was briefing McKenzie on the flag despite 'the fraud in the flag occurred in that office'.
