Earth's atmosphere hasn't had this much CO2 in millions of years

Earth's atmosphere now has more carbon dioxide in it than it has in millions — and possibly tens of millions — of years, according to data released Thursday by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and scientists at the University of California San Diego.
For the first time, global average concentrations of carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas emitted as a byproduct of burning fossil fuels, exceeded 430 parts per million (ppm) in May. The new readings were a record high and represented an increase of more than 3 ppm over last year.
The measurements indicate that countries are not doing enough to limit greenhouse gas emissions and reverse the steady buildup of C02, which climate scientists point to as the main culprit for global warming.
'Another year, another record,' Ralph Keeling, a professor of climate sciences, marine chemistry and geochemistry at UC San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography, said in a statement. 'It's sad.'
Carbon dioxide, like other greenhouse gases, traps heat from the sun and can remain in the atmosphere for centuries. As such, high concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere contribute to higher global temperatures and other negative consequences of climate change, including rising sea levels, melting polar ice, and more frequent and severe extreme weather events.
Atmospheric carbon dioxide has risen sharply since preindustrial times, owing mostly to human activities that pump greenhouse gases into the air.
Decades ago, crossing the 400 ppm threshold was unthinkable. That meant that for every 1 million molecules of gas in the atmosphere, more than 400 were carbon dioxide. The planet hit that grim milestone in 2013. And now, scientists have warned that levels of CO2 could reach 500 ppm within 30 years.
But human society is already in uncharted territory.
The last time the planet had such high levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was likely more than 30 million years ago, Keeling said, long before humans roamed Earth and during a time when the climate was vastly different.
He said it's alarming not only how high CO2 levels have climbed, but also how quickly.
'It's changing so fast,' he told NBC News. 'If humans had evolved in such a high-CO2 world, there would probably be places where we wouldn't be living now. We probably could have adapted to such a world, but we built our society and a civilization around yesterday's climate.'
Carbon dioxide levels are typically represented on a graph known as the Keeling Curve, named for Keeling's father, Charles David Keeling, who began taking daily measurements of atmospheric carbon dioxide in 1958 with instruments atop the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii.
The Keeling Curve famously shows a steep climb since the Industrial Revolution, owing to human-caused climate change.
Ralph Keeling and his colleagues at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography found that average concentrations of atmospheric CO2 in May were 430.2 ppm. NOAA's Global Monitoring Laboratory, which has conducted separate daily readings since 1974, reported an average of 430.5 ppm in May.
Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere are closely monitored to gauge how much humans are influencing Earth's climate. The readings are also an indicator of the planet's overall health.
'They're telling you about your whole system health with a single-point measurement,' Keeling said. 'We're getting a holistic measurement of the atmosphere from really a kind of simple set of measurements.'
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

8 hours ago

• Yahoo

Gray whale numbers decline to lowest since early 1970s, according to new data

The number of Pacific gray whales decreased significantly during the most recent count to the lowest numbers since the 1970s, while the number of whale calves also hit its lowest numbers on record. Gray whales, known for their migrations along the Oregon Coast in winter and spring, dropped to an estimated 12,900 adults and 85 calves in the latest data taken by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. It was a sharp decline from a year ago, when the number of gray whales was estimated at 19,260 for 2023-2024, and calf numbers were estimated at 221 in 2024 and 412 in 2023. "Our main concern and question is why the population does not appear to be demonstrating the same resilience as it has in rebounding from previous downturns," Sarah Mesnick, ecologist and science liaison with NOAA, said. The new data reversed hope from scientists that gray whales were rebounding after they endured an 'unusual mortality event' from 2019 to 2023 and worried instead that whales may be struggling to keep up with a changing environment. "The environment may now be changing at a pace or in ways that is testing the time-honored ability of the population to rapidly rebound while it adjusts to a new ecological regime,' said David Weller, director of the marine mammal turtle division at the NOAA Science Center and an authority on gray whales. Researchers in Mexico reported numerous dead gray whales early in 2025 in and around coastal lagoons as well as few gray whale calves. This suggests that many female whales may not be finding enough food in the Arctic to reproduce. So far in 2025, 47 gray whales have stranded dead on the West Coast, up from 31 in 2024 and 44 in 2023, the last year of the UME. While some of the stranded whales appeared skinny or emaciated, others did not. 'The lead scientists point out that this new estimate stands out because it reflects an extended downward trend in a population that has demonstrated short-term resilience in the past,' Mesnick said. 'The populations have previously rebounded quickly from downturns, including earlier previous UMEs, and we are going to continue to monitor the population.' According to NOAA and under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, UME "involves a significant die-off of any marine mammal population; and demands immediate response." Causes of UME are attributed to infectious disease, biotoxins, ecological factors, human interactions and other undetermined factors. The gray whale population was large, at about 27,430 between 2015-2016. In the following years, a decline started from 2019-2023 to below 15,000 that was considered as unusual mortality event. It appeared that whales might by rebounding after 2023, but the latest numbers dispute that notion. Scientists attributed the die-off to localized ecosystem changes that affected the Subarctic and Arctic feeding grounds. The changes in these areas contributed to malnutrition, reduced birth rates and increased mortality. The migration routes, specifically the California Current ecosystem and the Arctic ecosystem, have experienced significant changes in recent decades as well, officials said. The current research shows a connection between gray whale numbers and changes in sea ice in the Arctic, where most gray whales feed during the summer, NOAA concluded. 'They're migrating from Mexican reproductive ground, or nursery grounds, to foraging grounds in the Arctic,' Mesnick said. 'It's one of the longest migrations on the planet.' Ecosystem changes in the Arctic feeding areas the whales depend on to put on weight and maintain fitness are likely the root cause, Weller said. Decline in calf numbers has been linked to sea ice cover in the Bering and Chukchi seas. In May 2024, a juvenile gray whale washed ashore on a beach in Bandon along the southern Oregon Coast. In 2023, four reported gray whales washed ashore Oregon beaches, one being a calf. Mariah Johnston is an outdoors journalism intern at the Statesman Journal. Reach her at mjohnston@ This article originally appeared on Salem Statesman Journal: Gray whales decline to lowest numbers since 1970s

Yahoo

2 days ago

• Yahoo

Humanity's first influence on climate change could have come much earlier than previously thought

If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. We all know that humans are helping drive climate change. No, we aren't the only cause of the increasing global temperatures, but there's no question that we have had a serious impact over the years. Now, new research estimates that humanity's first influence on global climate change may have come much earlier than previously believed. By most accounts, it's believed that the human fingerprint on global warming really began when modern cars took off. However, our first misstep in the fight against climate change may have come far before the first modern cars roamed the streets. Instead, researchers believe the start of the industrial revolution may have been the tipping point. Today's Top Deals Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 During that time, more factories sprouted up, leading to increased output of greenhouse gases. To dig a little deeper, the researchers believe that the first signs of human influence on climate change likely happened as early as 1885, just before the gas-powered car became a standard part of life. These findings are detailed in a new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. However, it's extremely difficult to tell exactly when we first started to have a noticeable impact on the global climate. While we've done plenty to try to combat climate change in recent years, with a mission set to test a solar umbrella happening later this decade, there's still a long way to go if we truly hope to stop rising sea levels. While some scientists argue that we're far past the tipping point, others aren't sure. But one thing is clear: if we want to truly make a difference, we need to understand where we started to go wrong. Not only can that help us ascertain how much damage we've actually done, but it could help us find ways to go about living in a way that doesn't risk additional climate change pushes, without making us give up the modern luxuries we've come to depend on. One researcher says that had we kept track of the changes in the atmosphere back then like we do now, it's very likely we could have detected the signals of incoming climate change far before it became such a problem. Instead, we'll simply have to accept that the world is what it is now, and that human influence on climate change has been running rampant for centuries at this point. More Top Deals Amazon gift card deals, offers & coupons 2025: Get $2,000+ free See the

Miami Herald

3 days ago

• Miami Herald

‘Glassy seas' reveal largest animal on Earth off the CA coast. See ‘real prize'

Boaters off the coast of California got the chance to see the biggest animal on Earth and the group is calling it a 'once in a lifetime' moment. On June 16, the group set out on the 'misty (P)acific with limited visibility' but with 'all the hope in the world' before eventually coming across a baby humpback whale along with some dolphin friends, according to a Facebook post by San Diego Whale Watch. Later, the skies cleared up, creating 'glassy seas' that revealed a pod of 'curious' bottlenose dolphins that would 'zoom up to the bow swimming with their bellies pointed at the boat,' the group said. Then the showstoppers decided to make an appearance – a mama blue whale, the biggest animal on Earth, and her calf, bystanders said. The group even got the chance to see the 'breathtaking' 25-foot span of the tail in the 'rare' sighting, onlookers said. A baby blue whale is the 'world's biggest' baby, being born at 23 feet and weighing in at 6,000 pounds, the group said. They'll gain 10 pounds per hour by drinking their mama's milk. Blue whales can weigh up to 330,000 pounds and grow to 110 feet long, making their length about the same as the height of a 10-story building, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. They can live up to 90 years, though there was one that famously lived to be 110 years old, according to the nonprofit Whale and Dolphin Conservation. The group said 'blue whales are super rare and never a sure thing' even to the point where 'not too long ago' researchers thought they could be extinct, which made for this sighting to be a 'real prize,' the post said.