German wine region already excited, bracing for potential Trump trip
Germany is already preparing for a potential US presidential visit, even though it hasn't yet been scheduled, with officials dusting off recipes and considering conversational topics.
After all, Chancellor Friedrich Merz has already sent out an the invitation, saying he will travel to the idyllic Palatinate region to host US President Donald Trump - an area known for its wines.
Trump is unlikely to be impressed by the region's fine Rieslings, as it is well known that the US president is a teetotaler, preferring to consume numerous Diet Cokes during the day. But Merz might like a glass of the well known local wine and the prospect of bringing Trump to the place where his ancestors came from might draw the Republican to accept.
"I have invited him to come to Germany and visit us in his hometown of Bad Dürkheim," Merz said.
The chancellor would travel there with him for a visit of great symbolic significance, for Germany, for trans-Atlantic relations as well as for the personal relationship between the two politicians.
The invitation, amid global tensions, is friendly, but not without calculation.
Merz knows the Palatinate from his military service, Trump knows it – if at all – only from stories.
His paternal grandparents came from Kallstadt in the district of Bad Dürkheim before they emigrated at the end of the 19th century.
Meanwhile in the area itself, known as the Wine Route, locals are fairly relaxed about the possible visit by such a celebrity.
Kallstadt's mayor, Thomas Jaworek, is matter of fact about the possible visit. "I know nothing about any current plans," he says. Sure, a trip is conceivable but - ever practical - he notes that the former Trump houses on Freinsheimer Straße are now privately owned.
"If we go there, the owners would be the first people we ask," says Jaworek.
He would show the US president the "pretty wine-growing village" and take him to the church where Trump's grandparents were baptized. "I don't know if that means anything to him," says Jaworek.
Visually, Kallstadt is appealing, with picturesque garden restaurants and half-timbered hotels. "We've already planted the flowers and spruced everything up for all the guests in the summer."
If it comes to a chat, the mayor would like to talk to Trump about sustainability – especially since Kallstadt, with its Strategy 2030, is a model community in the Palatinate Forest Biosphere Reserve.
"Among other things, a new rainwater retention basin: these are issues that are of concrete concern to us locally."
There is a world of difference between gestures and realities on the ground.
The political dimension of such a visit is difficult to grasp, says David Sirakov, a political scientist. He sees potential for symbolic politics, saying any visit could have an impact "if the personal relationship between the chancellor and the president develops."
But Sirakov, director of the Atlantic Academy Rhineland-Palatinate, notes that with Trump in particular, it's questionable whether "soft factors" such as places of origin or family history have any political relevance.
"He appreciates clear statements and media-effective appearances," says Sirakov. Flower beds and village churches - not so much.
US foreign policy under Trump is characterized by transactional thinking, says Sirakov, with less about a community of values, and more weighing up of interests.
Germany must anticipate this – without currying favour. It is a balancing act: there should be no German appeasement policy, but European realism, he says, firmly.
Merz's invitation, including a regional aspect, recalls former chancellor Helmut Kohl's "saumagen diplomacy." Saumagen is a pig's stomach that's been stuffed with pork, vegetables, herbs and spices and was Kohl's favourite meal.
He invited state guests to his traditional dish in his native Palatinate to negotiate world politics in a pub.
This time, the region is sorely worried about the tariffs threatened by Trump, which would be a severe test for the Rhineland-Palatinate economy.
Meanwhile a partial withdrawal of US soldiers from the Ramstein air base – according to plans not implemented in 2020 – is also worrying to locals.
Ramstein, also in the state, serves as the headquarters for the United States Air Forces in Europe – Air Forces Africa (USAFE-AFAFRICA) and NATO Allied Air Command (AIRCOM). It plays a key role in supporting military operations, particularly those deploying to Eastern Europe and Africa.
Losing it would have serious consequences for the region. "The economic power of the US military presence can be estimated at more than $2 billion per fiscal year," says Ralf Hechler, mayor of the municipality of Ramstein near the base - including wages, rents and contracts for local companies.
"If Trump lands in Ramstein, I would of course be happy to meet him," says Hechler. He has met Merz personally, he says. "And he knows Ramstein because he also served in the German Armed Forces in Kusel and Zweibrücken."
A meeting with a mayor is probably not a priority for Trump. "But it would be important to improve German-American relations," says Hechler. Sure he says, you have to put up with a few things in long-standing friendships. "But you also have to nurture and cultivate them from time to time."
The Rhineland-Palatinate state government notes that Kallstadt is home to the ancestors of both the Trump family and the Heinz family, known worldwide for Heinz Ketchup.
They fled the bitter poverty of the Palatinate to the US in search of a better life and both families founded very successful companies.
"This shows that successful integration can make an immigration country strong." Meanwhile state premier Alexander Schweitzer would take Trump to see Hambach Castle, the cradle of democracy. "He is also happy to offer his services as a Palatinate German/English translator."
Plenty of US presidents have come to the state of Rhineland-Palatinate, from Ronald Reagan in Bitburg to George Bush senior in Mainz, to Bill Clinton in Ingelheim and Barack Obama in Landstuhl. Trump himself made refuelling stops in Ramstein in 2018 and 2019.
Now, though, he could stop and visit a new US hospital being built not far from the air base. It is due for completion in 2027 - perhaps in the presence of Trump with Merz at his side - by then, surely at the latest.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
TACO Trump Punts Decision on Bombing Iran in Wild New Twist
President Donald Trump will decide whether to attack Iran within the next two weeks, and has issued a plea to stave off the backlash in his MAGA base: Trust in Trump. As a MAGA civil war over military intervention threatens to tear his party apart, the president has left the door open to a diplomatic off-ramp. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' he said, in a direct message issued through his White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt. The unexpected twist is reminiscent of the two week window Trump regularly gives Russia to start negotiating a genuine ceasefire with Ukraine. It comes after the president left the nation on edge for days about the possibility that he would help Israel destroy a deeply buried nuclear enrichment facility at Fordow, in northeast Iran, using a 30,000 pound bomb known as a 'bunker buster'. Trump gave numerous mixed messages, insisting the strikes could be imminent and saying it was 'too late' to talk while also insisting that there was scope for negotiations. On Wednesday, he even boasted that 'nobody knows what I'm doing' when it comes to Iran. Tensions escalated this week when he abruptly departed the G7—despite having meetings locked with global allies including Australia and India—to rush to Washington to deal with the issue. For the next three days, he then huddled with his national security advisers to decide whether the U.S. military helps Israel's bombing campaign. But such a move would risk any remaining chance of the nuclear disarmament deal Trump has been pursuing and threatened to tear apart the very base that got him elected. The MAGA civil war over the Iran put conservatives such as pro-Israel war hawks Laura Loomer and Mark Levin on one side, and America First firebrands such as Charlie Kirk, Steve Bannon and Jack Posobiec on the other. 'We can't have another Iraq,' Bannon warned at a breakfast with reporters hosted Wednesday by The Christian Science Monitor. Earlier today, he was spotted at the White House but Leavitt declined to say what he was doing there. The issue also spilled out onto screens this week, with conservative pundit Tucker Carlson—who accused the president of being 'complicit' in the Middle East conflict—skewering Texas Senator Ted Cruz over his support for regime change. Asked what the president would say to those who voted for his 'America First' doctrine and didn't want the nation involved in another foreign war, Leavitt replied: 'Trust in President Trump.' 'President Trump kept America and the world safe in his first term as president, implementing a 'peace through strength' foreign policy agenda,' she said. 'With respect to Iran, nobody should be surprised by the President's position that Iran absolutely cannot obtain a nuclear weapon. He's been absolutely unequivocal about this.' Trump's announcement was immediately mocked online. One critic on social media described it as 'beyond parody' while another joked: 'He's going to announce it during Infrastructure Week when the healthcare plan comes out.' Leavitt was also quizzed about the issue in the briefing room, with one reporter noting that Trump had regularly given Russia two week deadlines on Ukraine, with no outcome. However, she blamed the Biden administration, saying both were complicated global conflicts that the president had inherited.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Boasts ‘Nobody Knows What I'm Doing' as MAGA Civil War Rages
President Donald Trump has boasted that 'nobody knows what I'm doing' when it comes to Iran as a MAGA civil war rages over the prospect of a U.S. military attack. Speaking with reporters for the first time since meeting with his national security council on Tuesday, the president refused to say whether the U.S. is moving closer to helping Israel strike Iranian nuclear facilities. 'You don't seriously think I'm going to answer that question,' Trump said, mockingly. 'Will you strike the Iranian nuclear component, and what time exactly? Sir, sir, would you strike it? Will you please inform us so we can be there and watch? 'I mean, you don't know that I'm going to even do it. You don't know. I may do it; I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Trump's comments come as a MAGA civil war has been brewing for days between pro-Israel war hawks such as Laura Loomer and Mark Levin on one side, and America First firebrands such as Charlie Kirk and Jack Posobiec on the other. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson also entered the fray last week, calling Trump complicit and suggesting that the administration 'drop Israel [and] let them fight their own wars.' Carlson also clashed with Texas Senator Ted Cruz this week, lashing out over Cruz's support for military intervention in Iran despite his apparent lack of knowledge about the country. While a U.S. attack on Iran could have serious consequences for the region, Trump's rhetoric has shifted considerably in recent days, with the president admitting that his patience is wearing thin on finding a diplomatic solution to stop Iran from building its nuclear arsenal. On Wednesday, Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei hit back at the president for his 'absurd rhetoric' after Trump demanded Iran's 'complete surrender' and issued an ominous warning on X: 'The US entering this matter (war) is 100% to its own detriment. The damage will be far greater than any harm that Iran may encounter.' But Trump doubled down on his push for Iran to surrender, telling reporters that Tehran should have negotiated weeks ago. Only now were they rethinking their strategy, he said. 'They even suggested coming to the White House,' he claimed. A U.S. defense official told the Daily Beast it was moving the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group to the Middle East to protect U.S. forces in the region. Vice President JD Vance also posted on X that after showing 'remarkable restraint,' Trump 'may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment.' As the president weighed options, some Democrats on Capitol Hill called for Congress to act. Senator Tim Kaine introduced a resolution to prevent the U.S. from using military force against Iran without congressional approval while several others backed Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders' bill to prevent the use of funds for military force against Iran without congressional authorization. But Democrats were deeply divided over the response to Iran. Senator John Fetterman, who has often bucked his party to fiercely defend Israel, said he would vote against Kaine's resolution. He told reporters he was a 'hell yes' on the U.S. making preemptive strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities. Senate Majority Leader John Thune rejected that the president would need authorization from Congress to strike Iran. 'I think right now the president's within his authorities,' Thune told reporters on Capitol Hill on Tuesday. 'He obviously has a lot of authorities as Commander in Chief to respond to incidents that happen around the world.' Thune said if it goes on for a period of time, there would be discussions on what the role of Congress should be and whether it needed to take action. 'I think right now, let's hope and pray for the best outcome,' he said. Senate Foreign Committee Chair Jim Risch emphasized on Tuesday 'this is not our war' and praised the president for threading the needle when it came to Iran. While the House is not in session this week, in a rare moment of bipartisanship, Republican Rep. Thomas Massie was joined by Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna to introduce a resolution to prohibit the U.S. from getting involved in the conflict. 'This is not our war,' Massie wrote in a post. 'Even if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution.'


Bloomberg
38 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Pakistan Backs Trump for Nobel Peace Prize He's Long Craved
Pakistan said it will nominate US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, a move that may have as much to do with annoying rival India as it does with building stronger ties to Washington. The recommendation is being made for Trump's 'decisive intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis,' according to a social media post on Saturday by Pakistan's government.