CMPD prepares for Saturday's ‘No Kings' protest: What to expect in Charlotte this weekend
CHARLOTTE (QUEEN CITY NEWS) — Charlotte is gearing up for a weekend of activism as the city braces for a large protest planned in Uptown on Saturday.
The event, dubbed the 'No Kings' Rally and March, is part of a broader national movement protesting what organizers describe as 'authoritarianism, billionaire-first politics, and the militarization of democracy.'
Charlotte immigration attorney responds to planned ICE protest over the weekend
CMPD issued a public statement this week acknowledging the planned demonstration and is taking steps to ensure public safety while respecting citizens' rights to peacefully assemble.
'The safety of Charlotte residents and visitors is our top priority,' CMPD said in the public alert. 'We're committed to protecting everyone's right to peacefully gather and encourage everyone coming to Uptown to enjoy the city responsibly.'
The 'No Kings' protest is scheduled to begin at 11 a.m. on Saturday, June 14, at First Ward Park, located at 301 E. Seventh Street
After opening speeches from community leaders, protesters will begin a 1.4-mile march through Uptown. The event is expected to end around 2 p.m.
Organizers said this rally is a response to growing concerns over immigration enforcement tactics and broader political and economic issues. It also reflects solidarity with demonstrations taking place across the country this week in response to the federal government's approach to immigration enforcement
Attendees can reportedly expect a peaceful demonstration, with:
Volunteer marshals in neon vests
Water stations and snacks
First aid tents
An emphasis on nonviolent action
Charlotte's planned No Kings rally to slam 'billionaire politics,' champions peaceful protest
We are committed to nonviolent action, and we expect all participants to seek to de-escalate any potential confrontation with those who disagree with us. Signs and chants must not incite violence, and signs may not portray swastikas in any form. While there is always an inherent risk to protesting, we are encouraging a family-friendly event
No Kings Charlotte: Naked Emperor Rally and March
There will likely be road closures and heavy foot traffic in Uptown between 11 a.m. and 2 p.m., so plan accordingly if you're heading downtown or commuting through the area.
Saturday's rally in Charlotte is part of a larger movement, with simultaneous protests planned in nearby cities and towns such as Rock Hill, Concord, Monroe, Statesville, and Mooresville.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
43 minutes ago
- The Hill
Mahmoud Khalil vows to continue protests after release from detention
Mahmoud Khalil is vowing to press on in his fight for the pro-Palestinian cause after he was released from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention over the weekend. His arrest three months ago 'felt like a kidnapping' as officers would not produce a warrant or give him any information, Khalil, a green card holder and the former lead negotiator for Columbia University's pro-Palestinian encampment, said in his first interview since his release with The New York Times. In the airport when he returned to New York City on Saturday, he was greeted by supporters whom he told he would not stop fighting, despite the government's ongoing efforts to deport him. The Trump administration is using a rarely cited provision of immigration law that says a person can be deported if the secretary of State determines they are a threat to U.S. foreign policy. 'It was very ironic. I literally laughed,' Khalil said. 'What did I do that I'm a foreign policy threat to the United States? Did I, like, damage, the U.S.-Israeli relationship? Because it doesn't appear so.' While the Trump administration has attempted to crackdown on Palestinian activism, Khalil told The Times it has only become stronger since his arrest. 'He actually advanced the movement 20 years,' he said. Khalil, who missed the birth of his first child while in detention, has not seen his case dismissed, but a judge ruled he is not a flight risk and could be free with bail until a final ruling is made. He was the first but not last of several pro-Palestinian college activists arrested by immigration authorities, accused of engaging in antisemitic activities. 'I was not doing anything antisemitic,' he told The Times. 'I was literally advocating for the right of my people. I was literally advocating for an end of a genocide. I was advocating that the tuition fees that I and other students pay don't go toward investing in weapons manufacturers. What's antisemitic about this?'
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump's immigration policy is a resounding success
The Democrats' decisive defeat in 2024 exposed their catastrophic failures on immigration, yet they are doubling down on the chaos with calculated recklessness. By fueling anti-ICE riots and pushing lawless policies, they have declared war on America's safety and its citizens. Meanwhile, President Trump is demolishing them on this issue, as Americans rise up against the Democrats' dangerous, self-destructive illegal immigration agenda. Trump's 'Worst Goes First' policy is doing precisely what Democrats wouldn't — putting Americans first. In Trump's first 100 days, 75 percent of ICE arrests targeted criminals with convictions or pending charges, according to data from the Department of Homeland Security. This relentless crackdown is making communities safer, despite Democrats' cries of 'fascism.' The border numbers don't lie. In May 2025, border encounters crashed to 8,725 — a staggering 93 percent drop from May 2024, when 117,905 crossed under Biden. The real shocker? Not a single illegal border-crosser was released into the U.S. in May 2025, compared to more than 62,000 dumped into the country in May 2024 under Biden. Americans are fed up. A New York Times poll shows 87 percent support deporting illegal immigrants with criminal records. Even 63 percent back deporting those who entered illegally under Biden, and 55 percent want all illegal immigrants removed. These numbers obliterate Democrats' delusions. Legal immigrant voters may be turning on Democrats harder than anyone else. In 2020, they favored Democrats by 32 points on the immigration issue. Now they trust Trump and Republicans more by a net 8 points — an astonishing 40-point swing, per CNN's Harry Enten. The verdict is clear: Americans—and immigrants—are done with Democrats' lawless and calculated sabotage of border enforcement under Biden. They are rallying behind Trump's bold, results-driven vision of law and order. While Trump's immigration policies deliver results, Democrats are consumed by petty theatrics. Their obsession with stunts is endangering Americans. Rep. Lamonica McIver (D-N.J.) has been indicted for obstructing law enforcement during a DHS operation. Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) turned a Homeland Security press event into a circus, only to be detained for his antics. These aren't isolated incidents — they comprise a pattern of Democrats prioritizing showmanship over safety. In Wisconsin, Judge Hannah Dugan was indicted for allegedly helping an illegal alien evade Immigration and Customs Enforcement. A judge betraying the very laws she's sworn to uphold? It is a disgrace that undermines trust in the justice system and cripples law enforcement. The contrast is stark: Trump delivers results, while Democrats play games with American cities fuel chaos, shielding dangerous criminal illegal aliens and crippling law enforcement. By refusing to work with immigration agents to hand over immigrants who have been arrested, these jurisdictions simply force them to go looking for them in neighborhoods — endangering both citizens and non-criminal illegal migrants, as well as wasting resources. Meanwhile, violent illegal alien offenders exploit these policies to escape justice. Worse, sanctuary policies push the lie that illegal entry is harmless. It isn't. Under Title 8 of the U.S. Code, illegal entry is a crime, and re-entry after deportation carries even more severe penalties. Ignoring these laws doesn't just erode the rule of law — it sends a reckless message: Break the law, face no consequences. Sanctuary cities don't protect — they endanger. Americans deserve better. Illegal immigration isn't just a border crisis. It is an all-out assault on America's sovereignty and safety. Under Biden, individuals from over 160 countries, including terror-sponsoring nations, stormed the border. Many destroyed their identification papers in order to avoid being vetted. Hostile regimes such as Venezuela and Cuba refuse to share intelligence, leaving America vulnerable. The result? Criminals and potential terrorists have been slipping through, endangering American lives. And to call them 'undocumented' instead of 'illegal' isn't compassion — it's a blatant lie. Democrats are intentionally whitewashing lawbreaking to push mass amnesty, all to secure a permanent voter base. This isn't policy — it's a reckless power grab that jeopardizes national security for the sake of political control. The price? Potentially catastrophic. Democrats' relentless obstruction of Trump's immigration policies is nothing short of a betrayal of America. By championing open borders and sanctuary cities, they have turned their backs on safety, security, and the rule of law. While Americans overwhelmingly demand stronger enforcement, Democrats bow to radical ideologies, leaving our nation exposed and vulnerable. Their reckless, self-serving agenda is an insult to every American. But in 2026, voters will again deliver a clear verdict: no more lies, no more chaos, no more betrayal. Ford O'Connell is an attorney, a veteran Republican operative and political analyst, and adjunct professor at George Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management.
2 hours ago
What to know about debate over protesters and ICE agents wearing masks amid immigration crackdowns
CHICAGO -- President Donald Trump and his allies have repeatedly called for mask-wearing at protests to be banned and for protesters whose faces are covered to be arrested, with the most recent push following demonstrations in Los Angeles over immigration raids. Legal experts told The Associated Press there are a variety of reasons people may want to cover their faces while protesting, including to protect their health, for religious reasons, to avoid government retaliation, to prevent surveillance and doxing, or to protect themselves from tear gas. With legislative action happening across the U.S., they say it's only a matter of time before the issue returns to the courts. Protesters, meanwhile, have voiced anger over footage of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents covering their faces at immigration raids and masked officers at the Los Angeles protests, calling it a double standard. Here are some things to know about the debate over face masks: At least 18 states and Washington, D.C., have laws that restrict masks and other face coverings in some way, said Elly Page, senior legal adviser with the International Center for Not-For-Profit Law. Since October 2023, at least 16 bills have been introduced in eight states and Congress to restrict masks at protests, according to the center. Many of these laws date back to the 1940s and '50s when many states passed anti-mask laws as a response to the Ku Klux Klan, whose members hid their identities while terrorizing victims. Amid protests against the war in Gaza and the Republican president's immigration policies, Page said there have been attempts to revive these rarely used laws to target protesters, sometimes inconsistently. Trump's calls to arrest protesters for wearing masks came as federal agents were seen donning masks while conducting raids in Los Angeles and other U.S. cities. Democratic lawmakers in California have introduced legislation aiming to stop federal agents and local police officers from wearing face masks amid concerns that ICE agents were attempting to hide their identities and avoid accountability for potential misconduct during high-profile immigration raids. The issue also came up at a congressional hearing on June 12, when Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a Democrat, criticized ICE agents wearing masks during raids, saying: 'Don't wear masks. Identify who you are.' Republican federal officials have maintained that masks protect agents from doxing. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin called the California bill 'despicable." Geoffrey Stone, a University of Chicago law professor, said the U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that the right to free speech includes the right to speak out anonymously. But he said how it should apply to protesters wearing masks remains 'an unresolved First Amendment question.' For Stone, that raises a key question: Why should protesters and ICE agents be subject to different rules? 'The government doesn't want them to be targeted because they engaged in their responsibilities as ICE agents,' Stone said. 'But that's the same thing as the argument as to why you want demonstrators to wear masks. They want to wear masks so they can do their 'jobs' of engaging in free speech properly. The same rationale for the officers wearing masks should apply to the protesters.'
