Three years on: How Russia's invasion reshaped energy prices across Europe

Three years ago, on 24 February, Russia invaded Ukraine. The war is still ongoing and has had a significant impact on energy prices, with the share of Russia's pipeline gas in EU imports dropping from over 40% in 2021 to about 8% in 2023, according to the European Council.
A massive Russian military build-up and escalating hostile rhetoric in 2021, signalling a planned attack on Ukraine, had already triggered a sharp surge in energy commodity prices throughout the year. While European governments implemented various policies to ease the impact on households, household energy prices continued to rise gradually throughout 2021 and surged further following the invasion.
Selecting a baseline for price comparisons is challenging. To better illustrate the impact of price fluctuations on households, we use multiple comparisons based on the Household Energy Price Index (HEPI), compiled by Energie-Control Austria, MEKH, and VaasaETT.
The "Pre-Invasion One-Year Average" represents the 12-month period from February 2021 to January 2022, while the "Three-Year Post-Invasion Average" covers from February 2022 to January 2025.
During the pre-invasion period, the average residential end-user electricity price in EU capitals was 20.5 c€/kWh, rising to 26.5 c€/kWh in the post-invasion period - an increase of 29.5%.
During this period, Amsterdam saw the highest increase, with electricity prices rising by 76%, followed by Rome (74%) and Vilnius (64%).
"Fossil fuel-dependent markets like the Netherlands faced higher volatility, highlighting the role of energy diversification and regulatory frameworks in price stability," Ivana Rogulj, Wolfgang Eichhammer, and Stavros Spyridakos, senior experts at the Institute for European Energy and Climate Policy (IEECP), told Euronews Business.
Dr. Yousef Alshammari, President of the London College of Energy Economics, noted that natural gas accounts for 45% of Italy's electricity mix, while renewables contribute no more than 30%.
Among the capitals of Europe's top five economies, London (47%) recorded the second-largest increase after Rome. Paris (30%) was slightly above the EU average (29.5%), while Berlin (19%) experienced a more moderate rise.
In contrast, Madrid saw a slight decline (0.4%) in electricity prices between the pre-invasion and post-invasion periods.
Regarding why households in Spain have been significantly less affected by the surge in electricity prices, Rogulj, Eichhammer and Spyridakos explained: "Spain's significant wind, solar, and hydro capacity reduced reliance on fossil fuels, limiting exposure to external price shocks.
"Spain's regulated electricity tariff (PVPC) balanced price volatility by linking retail electricity prices to longer-term wholesale market averages, protecting consumers from extreme short-term fluctuations", they added.
When non-EU capitals are included, Oslo recorded the steepest decline, with electricity prices falling by 10%, followed by Budapest (-9%) and Bucharest (-8%). These cities stand out as exceptions to the overall trend of rising electricity prices across Europe.
The changes are in euros, not local currencies, which may affect the results.
These results indicate that Western and Northern Europe experienced the sharpest electricity price hikes, while Baltic and Eastern European capitals also saw significant increases. In contrast, Southern Europe faced more moderate price changes.
IEECP experts Rogulj, Eichhammer, and Spyridakos stated: "Nordic countries benefit from renewable electricity production from hydropower, geothermal, and wind, reducing exposure to fossil fuel price volatility."
Comparing electricity prices from early 2021, when the market was more stable and before tensions between Russia and Ukraine escalated, to January 2025, reveals significant increases. Households in EU capitals paid 36% more for electricity in January 2025 compared to January 2021.
When Kyiv is excluded from the analysis, Amsterdam records the highest increase, with electricity prices rising by 89% over this four-year period. Significant increases were also observed in Vilnius (81%), Brussels (77%), and Bern (76%).
On the other hand, Budapest (-13%) was the only capital where prices declined.
Among the top five economies, London saw the highest surge, with electricity prices rising by 66%, followed by Rome (60%) and Paris (45%).
If we compare January 2022 to January 2025, household electricity prices, including taxes, increased by only 3.4% on average across EU capitals. In the EU, the highest increase was recorded in Vilnius (53%), followed by Paris (34%).
In the non-EU capital Bern, prices rose by 69% over the same period.
Several cities experienced notable declines in electricity prices over the past three years. Oslo saw the sharpest drop at 25%, followed by London (-21%) and Bucharest (-20%) and Copenhagen (-20%).
As the line chart below illustrates, electricity prices fluctuated significantly in the capitals of the top five economies following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Over the past four years, Rome experienced the highest recorded level, reaching 68.7 c€/kWh in October 2022, compared to 43.7 c€/kWh in July 2022.
Similarly, London's electricity prices peaked at 64.2 c€/kWh in August 2022, before dropping to 39.5 c€/kWh the following month.
Paris had the most stable prices over this period.
We only have gas price data for October 2021 before the invasion, while the full dataset is available from January 2022 onward. This means we cannot calculate a pre-invasion average, but the available data still provides valuable insights into price trends.
In October 2021, the residential end-user gas price in EU capitals averaged 8.5 c€/kWh. By January 2022, it had already increased to 11.3 c€/kWh, before peaking at 16.5 c€/kWh in September 2022, the highest level recorded in the past three years.
As of January 2025, prices had declined to 11.1 c€/kWh, slightly below January 2022 levels, yet still significantly higher than pre-invasion prices.
Stockholm recorded the highest three-year post-invasion average (February 2022– January 2025) at 28.7 c€/kWh, followed by Amsterdam at 21.6 c€/kWh.
The nature of Sweden's gas market plays a crucial role in this dynamic.
Throughout 2022, households in Amsterdam were hit the hardest by surging gas prices. That year, the annual average gas price in Amsterdam reached 31.0 c€/kWh, significantly higher than Stockholm's 23.9 c€/kWh, despite Stockholm leading in the three-year average.
Rogulj, Eichhammer, and Spyridakos from the IEECP also attributed rising gas prices in the Netherlands to the suspension of production at the Groningen gas field due to earthquake risks.
Budapest (2.6 c€/kWh), Belgrade (4.1 c€/kWh), and Zagreb (4.7 c€/kWh) recorded the lowest three-year average gas prices.
In Prague, the three-year average gas price was 110% higher than in October 2021, followed by Berlin (97%), Dublin (86%) and Amsterdam (77%), while the EU average stood at +37%.
Dr. Cyril Stephanos from acatech, the National Academy of Science and Engineering, pointed out that Germany had no operational LNG terminals at the time of Russia's attack on Ukraine.
"Both Germany and Austria have been highly dependent on natural gas imports from Russia", he said.
These have been partially substituted by increased supplies from Norway and through the LNG market. "However, LNG imports tend to be more expensive than pipeline gas due to the additional costs of compression, transportation, and decompression", he added.
IEECP experts also emphasised that seeking costly alternatives led to sharp price hikes.
In contrast, Budapest (-26%) and Bucharest (-9%) saw lower gas prices compared to October 2021.
Despite recent price stabilisation, gas prices in EU capitals were still 31% higher in January 2025 compared to October 2021. Warsaw saw the sharpest increase (109%), followed by Lisbon (77%) and Berlin (72%).
Gas prices were highly volatile throughout 2022, with Amsterdam experiencing significant fluctuations. However, starting in 2023, prices became more stable compared to 2022, particularly in Amsterdam and the top five European economies.
Dr. Alshammari explained that multiple measures taken across Europe have contributed to cooling down natural gas prices. These measures include filling gas storage to nearly 100% capacity, securing alternative suppliers, implementing a price cap on Russian gas, which still allows European countries to import, and adopting energy efficiency measures to reduce energy demand.
Professor Jan Osicka, Program Director of Energy Policy Studies at Masaryk University in Czechia, believes that the EU has managed the crisis well.
"The solidarity mechanism has worked, the internal market has remained functional and its design hasn't been tampered with too much", he said.
However, Rogulj, Eichhammer, and Spyridakos emphasise that long-term price stability depends on global supply dynamics and the acceleration of renewable energy integration, especially in the gas sector.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

8 minutes ago

• Yahoo

'Craziest' reversal of fortune puts Mavs on path to Flagg after all the Doncic drama

FILE - Duke forward Cooper Flagg celebrates after scoring against the Houston during the second half in the national semifinals at the Final Four of the NCAA college basketball tournament, Saturday, April 5, 2025, in San Antonio. (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson, File) FILE - Dallas Mavericks CEO Rick Welts, left, and team Governor Patrick Dumont, center, watch the team play against the Toronto Raptors in the first half of an NBA basketball game in Dallas, April 11, 2025. (AP Photo/LM Otero, file) FILE - Dallas Mavericks CEO Rick Welts, left, and team Governor Patrick Dumont, center, watch the team play against the Toronto Raptors in the first half of an NBA basketball game in Dallas, April 11, 2025. (AP Photo/LM Otero, file) FILE - Duke forward Cooper Flagg celebrates after scoring against the Houston during the second half in the national semifinals at the Final Four of the NCAA college basketball tournament, Saturday, April 5, 2025, in San Antonio. (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson, File) FILE - Dallas Mavericks CEO Rick Welts, left, and team Governor Patrick Dumont, center, watch the team play against the Toronto Raptors in the first half of an NBA basketball game in Dallas, April 11, 2025. (AP Photo/LM Otero, file) DALLAS (AP) — Dallas Mavericks CEO Rick Welts wasn't thinking even for a second about Cooper Flagg when he started a staff meeting before the draft lottery by saying the club was entering the most important offseason in franchise history. The longtime NBA executive and relatively new leader on the business side of the Mavs was thinking about the lingering fallout of the widely reviled Luka Doncic trade, not the club turning a 1.8% chance into winning the rights to draft the teenaged star from Duke. Dallas is set to make that pick Wednesday night. Advertisement 'Never, ever did anybody in our organization ever even say what would happen if we win. That's a waste of time,' Welts told The Associated Press recently. 'Like, it's unbelievable. It was hard to even get your head around.' The self-inflicted wounds were numerous after general manager Nico Harrison's stunning decision to send Doncic to the Los Angeles Lakers for Anthony Davis in early February. Fans were incensed. Season-ticket holders were canceling. Potential new sponsors were telling Welts they'd have to think about it. Just like that, the Mavs had a vision to sell of a potential superstar who could someday be the face of the franchise — as Doncic was, and fellow European superstar Dirk Nowitzki before him. Just like that, despair turned to hope for plenty of people, including those under Welts who had spent weeks dealing with the wrath of a spurned fan base. Advertisement 'It's got to be the craziest reversal of fortune,' Welts said. 'It would match any in the league's history.' Before the Doncic trade, Welts had already made a decision to raise season-ticket prices. He told the AP he had to back off on the size of the increase as he watched the visceral reaction unfold. Welts has seen plenty in nearly 50 years with the NBA, including time in the league office and stints with Phoenix and Golden State. Magic Johnson's HIV announcement. Accusations of widespread drug use in the early 1980s, when he says there was a widespread belief that the league would fail. That's not to say the Doncic fallout didn't have a profound impact on the 72-year-old Welts, who had come out of retirement to replace Cynt Marshall just a month and a half earlier. It just means he has weathered a few storms. Advertisement And now the Naismith Basketball Hall of Famer isn't so sure he's ever seen the sun come back out so quickly. 'The thing that I learned through all of this experience was what I knew was like this amazing emotional tie between this team and these fans was even stronger than I think anybody who hadn't lived here and been a part of it could ever imagine,' Welts said. 'Just the outpouring of pure joy and the idea of a generational player that could change our fortunes for the next 15 years would land with us by pure luck.' Harrison's widely panned decision on Doncic was compounded by an injury to Davis in his Dallas debut, followed by Kyrie Irving's season-ending knee injury a month later. The Mavs made the play-in tournament and won at Sacramento before their season — mercifully, perhaps — ended in a loss at Memphis with the No. 8 seed at stake. Part of what made the Doncic deal so hard to believe was unloading a 25-year-old superstar in his prime nine months after leading Dallas to the NBA Finals for the first time in 13 years. The Mavs lost to Boston in five games last June. Advertisement Harrison's reasoning was prioritizing defense, and his belief that Davis and Irving were a good enough tandem to keep Dallas as a championship contender. Flagg's potential gave that notion a boost. 'I feel like I'm a broken record, but the team that we intended to put on the floor, which you guys saw for 2 1/2 quarters, that's a championship-caliber team,' Harrison said. 'And so you might not like it, but that's the fact, it is.' Welts, who believes the Mavs have work to do to bring their basketball and business sides together, will spend plenty of time during the early days of the Flagg era sharing his vision for a new arena. It's a big reason Welts took the job, after spending seven years with Golden State on an arena plan that moved the Warriors across the bay to San Francisco from Oakland. He says all the talks are focused on keeping the team in Dallas. Advertisement While the casino-centered Adelson and Dumont families of Las Vegas, in the middle of their second full year as owners of the Mavs, wanted gambling to be part of the formula for a new arena, the political realities in Texas have shifted the focus away from that idea for now. There's a new focus for Welts in what seems certain will be the final stop in an eventful NBA career: building everything around another potentially generational star after the Mavs jettisoned the one they had. 'Don't make this sound like I'm suggesting that everyone is forgiven,' Welts said. 'Luka will always be a big part of what this organization is. But for a large number of fans, it is a pathway — it's not a pathway, it's like a four-lane highway into being able to care about the Mavericks the way they cared about the Mavericks before.' ___ AP NBA:

Forbes

13 minutes ago

• Forbes

A Belgian Minister Wants To Link Migration And Trade Cooperation

Belgium's Minister of Asylum and Migration, Anneleen Van Bossuyt in Brussels, on June 5, 2025. ... More (Photo by NICOLAS MAETERLINCK / Belga / AFP) / Belgium OUT (Photo by NICOLAS MAETERLINCK/Belga/AFP via Getty Images) A Belgian nationalist politician has said the European Union should try to coerce countries, particularly those in the developing world, to cooperate more with the bloc's deportation agenda, by threatening to take away tariff exemptions or expedited visa procedures if they don't. The suggestion - linking trade and asylum policy - is just the latest in a series of similar statements, as the EU, as well as the U.K., look to deport more people back to their countries of origin. Speaking to the U.K.'s Financial Times newspaper, Belgium's minister for migration, Anneleen Van Bossuyt (described by the FT as a 'rightwing nationalist politician') said the EU should 'make more use of the leverage' it has. By this she means that the EU should threaten developing countries - very often the countries of origin of people seeking shelter in Europe - with taking away favorable trade arrangements or other cooperations, if those countries do not help to reduce the amount of irregular migrants in Europe. The statement, while slightly more transactional than the language typically used by European ministers, sits neatly with the dominant trend in Europe when it comes to irregular migration. Pressure has been building for years to reduce the number of irregular migrants on the continent, as right-wing parties gain electoral support and other anti-immigration groups dominate the political conversation. Earlier in 2025, the European Commission, in apparent deference to these concerns, announced it is developing a framework for the creation of 'return hubs' or reception facilities outside the EU where people can be deported. Such a system would be a radical step, as it would see people removed to countries they have no connection to or support in, and likely falls afoul of the EU's own obligations not to remove people to a situation they may face harm or danger. From the point of view of deportation-minded politicians, the obvious solution is to send more people to their countries of origin. This is complicated, however, as many countries refuse to accept people returned against their will, while still others lack capacity or infrastructure to receive people back. In this context, Anneleen Van Bossuyt's comments are unsurprising, as there has been considerable focus on the EU's perceived 'inability' to send people away, and policymakers are scrambling around for other levers to pull. Earlier in June, the EU announced plans to reform the bloc's visa system, wherein around 60 foreign countries benefit from visa-free travel. The idea is to make it easier to suspend or cancel that 'benefit' if a country falls afoul of the EU, including if that country is the source of an increased number of asylum seekers. Likewise, the government of the United Kingdom has announced it intends to review its own visa system, with an eye to tying it to the issue of irregular migration, thereby pressuring foreign countries to accept more deportation flights. With all this in mind, the comments in the FT from Anneleen Van Bossuyt - while made by a 'right-winger' - are very much in keeping with the political approach of the U.K. and EU's leadership overall.

Yahoo

17 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Oil Volatility Remains High After U.S. Struck Iran's Nuclear Sites

Oil erased earlier gains on Monday, but volatility remains high after the U.S. struck the core of Iran's nuclear infrastructure, stoking fears of disruptions to a vital route for global energy flows. In mid-morning trade, Brent crude was down 0.1% to $76.91 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate edged 0.2% lower to $73.66 a barrel. Both contracts had jumped around 3% earlier in the session. The European benchmark gas contract at the Dutch TTF hub rose 0.5% to 41.16 euros a megawatt-hour. Zuckerberg Leads AI Recruitment Blitz Armed With $100 Million Pay Packages Millions of Résumés Never Make It Past the Bots. One Man Is Trying to Find Out Why. A New Meatpacking Plant's Novel Pitch to Attract American Workers Bank of New York Mellon Approached Northern Trust to Discuss Potential Merger Tesla's Robotaxis Are Here: What You Need to Know 'Markets are still waiting to see what Iran will do next,' analysts at Peak Trading Research said. 'Hormuz is still open, trade is flowing, Iran's crude production facilities were untouched.' Brent has gained more than 10% since Israel's initial attack on Iran on June 13, with Goldman Sachs now estimating a geopolitical risk premium of $12 a barrel. The future price direction remains sensitive to Tehran's next move. Market watchers say the country could either pursue diplomacy or retaliate–potentially by targeting U.S. bases in the Middle East or through allied militias across the region. The market's biggest concern is that Iran could disrupt flows through the Strait of Hormuz–a vital artery for about a quarter of the world's seaborne oil and one-fifth of global liquefied natural gas flows. Tehran holds a strategic position on the northern side of the strait, and could try to close it by attacking ships or laying mines. So far, vessels linked to the U.S. have been passing through the strait without incident, according to the U.K. Maritime Trade Operations agency. However, Goldman estimated Brent could briefly peak at $110 a barrel if flows through the waterway were halved for a month and remained 10% lower for the following 11 months. A drop in Iranian supply by 1.75 million barrels per day could instead push Brent to a peak of around $90 a barrel. While OPEC could tap more than 5 million barrels a day of spare capacity to help cushion potential supply shocks, analysts note that most of the cartel's spare oil belongs to Gulf producers who rely on the Strait of Hormuz for exports. 'Any obstruction to the waterway may lead oil prices to spike to three digits, even though some of the crude volumes from the Gulf could be diverted via pipelines located in the UAE and Saudi Arabia,' said Amena Bakr, Kpler's head of Middle East energy and OPEC+. Only about 5 million barrels a day of oil exports could be diverted through Saudi Arabia's East West Pipeline and the United Arab Emirates' Adcop pipeline, out of a total of around 15 million barrels a day that typically pass through the strait, according to the data firm. Meanwhile, there are no indications that the OPEC+ alliance will call an emergency meeting before gaining more clarity on the situation and its impact on global supply, Bakr said. Still, persistently high levels of electronic interference continue to disrupt vessel signals and recent data suggests that some tankers are hesitating or diverting course near the Strait of Hormuz in response to growing regional uncertainty, according to Kpler. Commercial vessels transiting the strait and surrounding waters also face greater risks of misidentification or collateral damage following the U.S. strikes, as Yemen's Houthi rebels had threatened to target American ships in the Red Sea if Washington entered the conflict. While prospects of a global energy supply shock have increased, such a scenario still isn't the most likely outcome, according to Kallum Pickering, chief economist at Peel Hunt. 'Aside from the OPEC shocks in the 1970s, past escalations in the Middle East suggest that disruptions to energy markets tend to resolve quickly,' he said. Write to Giulia Petroni at Chinese Stocks and American Exchanges Head for a Breakup What Israel's Soaring Markets Are Saying About the Iran War Eyeglasses With Built-In Hearing Aids: This Just Makes Sense A Toy Maker Sued Trump Over Tariffs and Won. Its Operations Are Still in Tatters. Ordinary Investors Are Souring on Big Tech Sign in to access your portfolio