South Korea has got a new president, but the challenges remain

Despite Lee Jae-myung's election as president of South Korea, the challenge of healing the national divide and kick-starting growth in Asia's fourth-largest economy remains read more
South Korea's President Lee Jae-myung takes his oath during his inauguration ceremony at the National Assembly in Seoul on June 4. Reuters
Lee Jae-myung of the liberal Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) is the new occupant of Cheong Wa Dae, the presidential palace in Seoul, also known as the Blue House. He won the snap presidential election on June 3. Lee succeeds Yoon Suk-yeol, the now-disgraced former president from the conservative People Power Party (PPP), whose short-lived declaration of martial law in December led to his impeachment and unanimous removal from office by the Constitutional Court.
With Lee's election, the chaos, confusion, and confrontation that have defined the past six months in South Korea has supposedly ended. But has it really? I'll answer that shortly.
Key Issues in the Election
The presidential election wasn't due until 2027 and wouldn't have happened this early under normal circumstances. But that changed on the night of December 3, 2024, when former President Yoon shocked the nation by declaring martial law. The move triggered mass protests, and on December 14, parliament voted to impeach him.
Under the South Korean Constitution, a snap election must be held within 60 days of the Constitutional Court upholding the impeachment and formally removing the president.
Given this backdrop, Yoon's failed martial law bid became the defining issue of the election, pushing all others to the sidelines. Lee campaigned on promises to strengthen democracy and heal a divided nation. He also vowed to prosecute those involved in Yoon's martial law attempt and implement stricter limits on a president's ability to declare such powers.
However, other pressing issues remain for Lee to address, without the typical two-month honeymoon period usually granted to South Korean presidents. These include a faltering economy, spiraling prices, the unpredictable trade policies of Donald Trump, worsening ties with North Korea, and the delicate balancing act between China—South Korea's biggest trading partner—and the US, its key strategic ally.
A Foregone Conclusion
Because the election was framed from the start by the failed martial law, the People Power Party was on the defensive. The result, therefore, felt like a foregone conclusion. Unsurprisingly, it unfolded along expected lines.
Lee Jae-myung of the DPK was elected the 21st President of the Republic of Korea, defeating Kim Moon-soo of the ruling PPP.
Here's what happened:
According to the National Election Commission (NEC), 79.4 per cent of the country's 44.4 million eligible voters cast their ballots—the highest turnout since the 1997 presidential election. Lee Jae-myung secured 49.4 per cent of the vote. Kim Moon-soo of the PPP came second with 41.2 percent. Lee Jun-seok of the Reform Party, a PPP splinter group, received 8.3 percent. Kwon Young-guk of the hastily formed Democratic Labor Party trailed far behind with 1 percent.
Strongest in Decades
When Lee lost the 2022 presidential election to Yoon Suk-yeol by the narrowest margin in South Korea's democratic history (47.83 per cent to 48.56 per cent), many declared his political career over.
But just a year later, in the 2024 legislative elections, he led his party to a resounding victory, securing 173 seats—a two-thirds majority. When Yoon declared martial law on December 3, Lee seized the moment. He stormed the National Assembly in a dramatic late-night session to pass a resolution opposing the declaration, forcing Yoon to reverse his decision within hours. Lee's popularity surged, and, as widely expected, the 61-year-old was swiftly inaugurated on Wednesday, June 3.
In a rare occurrence, Lee and his party now control both the presidency and parliament. This dual control makes him one of the most powerful presidents in South Korea's democratic history. It could prove to be a double-edged sword—more on that later.
For now, a unified government offers Lee an opportunity to govern assertively until the next legislative election in 2028. He won't need many conservative votes to advance his agenda, while the conservative party itself is mired in internal crisis.
The Reality Bites
Lee's victory might have seemed inevitable given the conservatives' disarray. The PPP was so divided it struggled to even nominate a candidate before settling on Kim, a former leftist turned far-right firebrand.
Given these dynamics, the PPP should have suffered a crushing defeat. But it didn't. And that's the sobering reality.
South Korea remains politically fractured, and the post-election crisis is as serious as it was before—if not more so.
Fragile Victory
Despite an 8-point margin, Lee's victory is more fragile than it first appears.
Here's a closer look:
If Reform Party candidate Lee Jun-seok (8.3 per cent of the vote) had not run, the gap between Lee and the PPP would have been much narrower.
Excluding two southwestern provinces—DPK strongholds where Lee won over 80 per cent—his lead over the PPP was just 26,000 votes out of nearly 35 million cast.
In Seoul, the nation's capital and economic hub, the combined conservative vote exceeded Lee's by 0.5 percent.
Rise of the Far Right
The right-wing, and especially the far-right, remains a potent force. In conservative heartlands, their support has only grown.
The two conservative candidates—Kim (41.15 per cent) and Lee Jun-seok (8.34 per cent)—together garnered more votes than Lee Jae-myung (49.42 per cent).
Exit polls show far-right appeal is especially strong among young men. Three-quarters of men in their twenties voted for the two far-right candidates, compared to just over 58 per cent of women in that age group who supported Lee.
In the 30s age bracket, around 60 per cent of men voted conservative, while 57 per cent of women voted for Lee.
2017 vs 2025
This isn't South Korea's first post-impeachment snap election. In 2017, following the impeachment of conservative President Park Geun-hye, liberal Moon Jae-in won.
History repeated in 2025. Another conservative president was impeached, and another liberal won.
But 2017 didn't mark the end of conservatism in South Korea. The same could be true in 2025—if conservatives are willing to reform and rebuild.
Decoding Lee Jae-myung
If there's one word that defines Lee Jae-myung, it's 'survivor'. He's endured extreme poverty, two suicide attempts, a near-fatal assassination, numerous criminal charges, and the martial law crisis.
Now comes his toughest test: leading a deeply divided nation through a host of internal and external challenges.
Lee, largely unknown outside South Korea, rose from hardship. According to his memoirs, he was the fifth of seven children in a dirt-poor family. Forced to leave school at 14, he worked in factories, suffering a workplace injury that left his left arm impaired. In 1982, he gained university admission on a full merit scholarship and later passed the notoriously difficult bar exam to become a lawyer.
His rags-to-riches story resonates in a country that went from war-torn poverty to economic powerhouse in one generation.
Boon or Bane
Lee has cultivated an image as a pragmatic reformer focused on economic inequality. His journey from child laborer to lawyer to political leader is inspiring to many.
But he's also polarising. Though he maintains his innocence, he faces multiple criminal charges, including bribery and election violations. He's seen by critics as a radical populist with little respect for democratic norms or institutional checks.
Whether he becomes a reformist statesman like Kim Dae-jung—or another strongman—depends on his choices in the months ahead.
Challenges Ahead
Despite the peaceful conduct of this snap election, South Korea faces a long list of pressing issues:
Domestically:
Deep political and societal polarisation
A slipping economy, with a 0.3 per cent contraction in quarter 1 and possible recession in quarter 2
Skyrocketing consumer prices
One of the world's lowest birthrates and a rapidly ageing population
An urgent need for institutional reform, including a proposed shift to a four-year presidential term with re-election
Externally:
Navigating between China (biggest trading partner) and the US (strategic ally)
Restarting dialogue with North Korea after three years of deteriorating ties
Coping with US President Donald Trump's unpredictable trade policies
Managing the North Korea–Russia military partnership
Most urgent of all: healing the national divide and kick-starting growth in Asia's fourth-largest economy.
And What If…
As the celebration fades, Lee faces a sobering reality.
He is still on trial in the Supreme Court for election law violations. The trial was postponed to avoid influencing the vote. A conviction could have disqualified him from running.
Now that he's president, the law states he cannot be prosecuted for criminal offenses—except for treason or insurrection. But it's unclear what happens if he's found guilty. That uncertainty may hang over his presidency for months to come.
The author is a multi-disciplinary thought leader with Action Bias and an India based impact consultant. He is a keen watcher of changing national and international scenarios. He works as President Advisory Services of Consulting Company BARSYL. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Hans India

27 minutes ago

• Hans India

US attacks on Iran: S. Korean finance ministry to hold emergency meeting

Seoul: South Korea's finance ministry said on Sunday it will hold an emergency meeting to assess the economic impact of U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and the escalating conflict in the Middle East. The meeting was to be chaired by acting Finance Minister Lee Hyoung-il, according to the ministry. Officials are expected to discuss the potential effects of the Iran-Israel conflict on the South Korean economy and explore measures to mitigate possible adverse outcomes. Separately, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy also held a related meeting to examine the implications of the U.S. attacks on South Korea's trade, energy and supply chains, reports Yonhap news agency. South Korea relies entirely on energy imports, with the majority sourced from the Middle East. U.S. President Donald Trump said on Saturday (U.S. time) that American warplanes have bombed Iran's three key nuclear facilities, marking a major escalation in the ongoing war between Iran and Israel. The presidential National Security Council convened on Sunday to discuss ways to minimise the impact of the Middle East crisis following the United States' strikes on nuclear facilities in Iran, the presidential office said. National Security Adviser Wi Sung-lac held the meeting with presidential aides on foreign affairs and security after the U.S. conducted precision strikes on three key nuclear facilities in Iran in an escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. During the meeting, Wi stressed the importance of protecting the lives and safety of the Korean people and ensuring the stability of daily life, according to presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung. "He urged close communication and cooperation among relevant ministries to minimize the impact of the recent series of developments in the Middle East on the Korean Peninsula's security and economic conditions," Kang said.

Business Standard

an hour ago

• Business Standard

US strikes on Iran spark global concern, calls for restraint, diplomacy

UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said he was gravely alarmed by the use of force by the United States AP Washington The US strike on Iran fuelled fears that Israel's war with Tehran could escalate to a wider regional conflict, and other countries began reacting Sunday with calls for diplomacy and words of caution. President Donald Trump had said Thursday that he would decide within two weeks whether to get involved. In the end, it took just days to decide, and Washington inserted itself into Israel's campaign with its early Sunday attack. It remained unclear early how much damage had been inflicted, but Iran had pledged to retaliate if the US joined the Israeli assault. Some have questioned whether a weakened Iran would capitulate or remain defiant and begin striking with allies at US targets scattered across the Gulf region. Here is a look at reaction from governments and officials around the world. United Nations UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said he was gravely alarmed by the use of force by the United States. There is a growing risk that this conflict could rapidly get out of control with catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region, and the world, he said in a statement on the social media platform X. I call on Member States to de-escalate. There is no military solution. The only path forward is diplomacy. New Zealand New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters urged all parties to return to talks. He wouldn't tell reporters Sunday whether New Zealand supported President Trump's actions, saying they had only just happened. The three-time foreign minister said the crisis is the most serious I've ever dealt with" and that critical further escalation is avoided. Diplomacy will deliver a more enduring resolution than further military action, he said. China A flash commentary from China's government-run media asked whether the US is repeating its Iraq mistake in Iran. The online piece by CGTN, the foreign-language arm of the state broadcaster, said the US strikes mark a dangerous turning point. History has repeatedly shown that military interventions in the Middle East often produce unintended consequences, including prolonged conflicts and regional destabilization, it said, citing the American invasion of Iraq in 2003. It said a measured, diplomatic approach that prioritizes dialogue over military confrontation offers the best hope for stability in the Middle East. Japan Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is expected to hold a meeting with key ministers Sunday afternoon to discuss the impact from the US attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, according to Japan's NHK television. Japan's largest-circulation newspaper Yomiuri is distributing an extra edition on the attack in Tokyo. South Korea South Korea's presidential office said it would hold an emergency meeting Sunday to discuss the security and economic ramifications of the US strikes and potential South Korean responses. Australia Australia, which shuttered its embassy in Tehran and evacuated staff Friday, continued to push for a diplomatic end to the conflict. We have been clear that Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programme has been a threat to international peace and security, a government official said in a written statement. We note the US President's statement that now is the time for peace. The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Mint

an hour ago

• Mint

North Korea fired multiple rounds with rocket launches in Yellow Sea after South Korea holds air drills with US, Japan

A day after South Korea conducted joint air drills with the US and Japan, North Korea fired over 10 rounds of rockets into the Yellow Sea on Thursday morning from Sunan near Pyongyang in a north-westerly direction, according to South Korea's military. South Korea typically classifies the weapons used by North Korea's military as short-range ballistic missiles. Under UN Security Council resolutions, North Korea is prohibited from using ballistic missiles, Reuters reported. The missiles were launched from Pyongyang's upgraded 240-millimeter multiple rocket launcher, which was unveiled last year and is believed to be capable of striking South Korean population centers, comprising the Seoul metropolitan area, New York Post report said. A South Korean military official informed local media, 'The projectiles, believed to be multiple launch rockets, flew tens of kilometers before falling into the Yellow Sea." The official mentioned South Korean and US intelligence are closely monitoring details. South Korea, the US, and Japan held their first trilateral military air exercise on Wednesday under the administration of Lee Jae Myung, who was elected earlier this month. Tensions on the Korean Peninsula have escalated in recent months, after North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's growing alignment with Russian President Vladimir Putin. North Korea has reportedly supplied weapons and up to 15,000 troops to support Russia's war in Ukraine. South Korean officials fear Pyongyang may receive economic assistance and advanced military technology in return, potentially boosting its weapons development programmes. Kim has also continued to advance his nuclear and missile capabilities. This year, North Korea successfully constructed two 5,000-ton naval destroyers, with Kim describing the new warship as 'convincing proof of the rapid transformation of our Navy". One of South Korea's largest megachurches on Friday stated that its live-streamed worship service on YouTube was briefly hacked, during which the North Korean flag was displayed. A government agency stated that it is currently investigating the incident, AFP reported. The incident took place on early Wednesday morning, when the livestream of the service by the Onnuri Church was suddenly filled with the North Korean flag, accompanied by what seemed to be Pyongyang's music, the report added. The flag was shown for nearly 20 seconds, a church official said, adding that the incident had been informed to the police. In a separate statement, the church stated, 'During the early morning worship service on June 18, an unexpected video was broadcast due to a hacking incident. We are currently conducting an urgent investigation into the cause of the incident and will take appropriate measures as soon as the situation is clarified.'