What federal education cuts could mean for the state of Alabama
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (WIAT) — State leaders are giving their take on cuts being made at the U.S. Department of Education.
State Superintendent Dr. Eric Mackey said some programs have already been terminated. One of those programs, the Farm to School Program, brings locally grown veggies to cafeterias.
Dr. Mackey said he has concerns about those cuts. He said his team couldn't reach the U.S. Department of Education yesterday. As Dr. Mackey explained, the department cited staffing issues as the reasoning. Communication has since been restored, and he said it's been resolved. However, there are concerns.
'We're gonna do our work,' said Dr. Mackey. 'Of course, I certainly believe that it's the state government that has the most responsibility for education. And we know that. And, we take that very seriously. And we're gonna continue to serve our students. No matter what happens in Washington.'
Jefferson County EMA encourages planning ahead for severe weather conditions
Mackey assured teachers and parents there won't be disruptions.
'Yesterday, a little bit of money that was used to reimburse some teacher salaries was held up. No teacher in this state is even gonna know whether that money was directed at their salary or someone else's salary,' said Dr. Mackey. 'So, that's gonna be covered. Teachers don't need to worry about anything.'
Gov. Kay Ivey (R) said she is all for shrinking government.
'Truth be known, every state has an education department. And I know we've got a good one in the State Board of Education and local boards that can handle education very well,' she said. 'So, I'm gonna trust President Trump on this one.'
Despite the concerns, Dr. Mackey said he is excited about states having more freedom.
'Maybe this will be the time they can really think about 'what would some innovation look like,' and 'what would some flexibility look like,'' he said. 'It wouldn't necessarily apply to whole states. It might apply to districts to say, 'can a district do this, or do that?' And try something different.'
Dr. Mackey said about 10% of school funding for the state comes from Washington. Even with the cuts, he said he is optimistic about what it could mean for the future of education in our state.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
2 days ago
- CNBC
Here's what your student loan bill could be under new repayment plan in Republicans' 'big beautiful' bill
Republicans' One Big Beautiful Bill Act could result in higher monthly payments for many federal student loan borrowers, a new analysis finds. If the legislation is enacted as drafted, a student loan borrower earning roughly $80,000 a year (the median for a bachelors' degree holder in 2024) would have a monthly payment of $467 under the GOP-proposed "Repayment Assistance Plan," or RAP, according to recent findings by the Student Borrower Protection Center. That compares with a $187 monthly bill on the Biden administration's now-blocked SAVE, or Saving On A Valuable Education plan. No matter their income, borrowers face higher monthly payments under RAP compared to SAVE, the analysis found. For lower incomes, the difference may be just $10 per month; for higher earners, the new repayment plan can be as much as $605 per month pricier. Depending on their income, some federal student loan borrowers also face higher payments on RAP than they would have on the U.S. Department of Education's other income-driven repayment plans, including PAYE, or Pay As You Earn and IBR, or Income-Based Repayment. However, some borrowers on PAYE or IBR plans would have a smaller bill under RAP. For example, a borrower with a roughly $60,000 annual income would pay $250 a month on RAP, and $304 on PAYE, the SBPC found. The House advanced its version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in May. The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions released its budget bill recommendations related to student loans on June 10. Senate lawmakers are preparing to debate the massive tax and spending package. Under the Republican proposals, there would be just two repayment plan choices for borrowers who take out loans after July 1, 2026, compared with roughly a dozen options now. After graduation, those student loan borrowers could either enroll in a standard repayment plan with fixed payments, or a single income-based repayment plan: RAP. Here's a look at other stories affecting the financial advisor business. Under RAP, monthly payments would typically range from 1% to 10% of a borrower's income; the more they earn, the bigger their required payment. There would be a minimum monthly payment of $10 for all borrowers. The new plan would fail to provide many borrowers with an affordable monthly bill — the goal of Congress when it established income-driven repayment plans in the 1990s, Michele Zampini, senior director of college affordability at The Institute for College Access & Success, recently told CNBC. "If Republicans' proposed 'Repayment Assistance Plan' is the only thing standing between borrowers and default, we can expect many to suffer the nightmarish experience of default," Zampini said. Meanwhile, current income-driven repayment plans now conclude in loan forgiveness after 20 years or 25 years. But RAP wouldn't lead to debt erasure until 30 years. "This kind of financial drag could further delay major life milestones like homeownership, starting a family, or saving for retirement," said Doug Boneparth, a certified financial planner and the founder and president of Bone Fide Wealth in New York. He is a member of CNBC's Financial Advisor Council. There's also "an emotional toll" to carrying student debt for so long, said Cathy Curtis, the founder of Curtis Financial Planning in Oakland, California. She is also a member of CNBC's Financial Advisor Council. "It reinforces the feeling of being stuck — especially for those who've already struggled to access opportunity," Curtis said. Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, has said his party's plans would lift the burden on taxpayers of subsidizing college graduates' loan payments. ″[Former President Joe] Biden and Democrats unfairly attempted to shift student debt onto taxpayers that chose not to go to college," Cassidy said in a statement on June 10. He said his committee's bill would save an estimated $300 billion out of the federal budget.
Yahoo
14-06-2025
- Yahoo
Alabama leaders react to proposed cuts at Dept. of Education
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (WIAT) — State Superintendent Dr. Eric Mackey said they are watching for any budget changes at the Department of Education. President Donald Trump's proposed education budget could result in cuts to some state programs. 'The changes are concerning on different levels,' said Dr. Corey Jones, Superintendent of Greene County Schools. Dr. Jones explained that those concerns have to do with federal education cuts. With less than 900 students in his school system, he said funding matters. 'You start looking at eliminating resources that will help any student assimilate and learn into our culture, you're not benefitting that student or their family,' said Dr. Jones. President Trump's proposal includes a $12 billion cut in education funding compared to last year's budget. Dr. Mackey said that would eliminate federal funding for English Language Learners (ELL). 'Again, if the federal funds were to go away. we would lose ground,' said Dr. Mackey. 'Because we would just be using state money to plug a federal hole. But, right now, it doesn't look like Congress is probably gonna do that.' Alabama Law Enforcement Agency announces changes for CDL holders State Education Budget Chairman, Sen. Arthur Orr (R-Decatur), said it's premature to be concerned. He said the state budget is in great shape. 'Our federal government has a $37 trillion operating deficit that is extensive,' said Sen. Orr. 'It's massive. And cuts are gonna have to happen somewhere.' But Rep. Phillip Ensler (D-Montgomery) said that funding is critical. 'Yes, the state should prepare for the worst-case situation. But members of Congress, especially those in the Alabama delegation, should do the right thing and support the U.S. Department of Education,' Rep. Ensler said. Dr. Mackey said they are watching the proposal closely. 'Congress is a kind of slow moving, large body,' he explained. 'And we think that when it's all said and done, we're probably gonna be looking at level funding. So, level funding in an age of inflation is not the best, but it's certainly better than cuts.' Dr. Mackey said the state is at record levels of support for English Language Learners when it comes to state funds. He said the state only relied on federal dollars for those programs five years ago. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
13-06-2025
- Yahoo
Minnesota Title IX investigation escalates after Champlin Park softball championship
The Brief The U.S. Department of Education is escalating its Title IX investigation into Minnesota after the Champlin Park girls softball team won a state championship with a transgender pitcher. Law professor David Schultz says Minnesota and the Trump Administration have very different interpretations of Title IX when it comes to transgender athletes. Attorney General Keith Ellison is suing the Trump Administration, challenging the executive order that MINNEAPOLIS (FOX 9) - The U.S. Department of Education is raising the stakes in its Title IX investigations against the State of Minnesota. What we know The federal government announced an investigation into Minnesota earlier this year. A few weeks ago, they launched a second investigation into the Minnesota Department of Education and the Minnesota State High School League for allowing transgender athletes to play in women's sports. Thursday, officials announced they were accelerating the investigation. Why you should care This, after the Champlin Park girls softball team garnered national attention. The Rebels just won the Class 4A state championship, led by a star pitcher who is transgender. The U.S. Department of Education and Department of Justice announced Thursday they were elevating their investigations into the Minnesota Department of Education. Federal officials say it's because Champlin Park won the state softball title with a male athlete. "If we start to look at the state of interpretation of Title IX, it's not completely clear," said David Schultz with the Mitchell Hamline School of Law. Dig deeper Schultz says Title IX, which prohibits sex-based discrimination and education, is being interpreted very differently by the Trump Administration and the State of Minnesota when it comes to transgender athletes. "It comes down to the federal courts, including possibly the Supreme Court, to render the final interpretation of what Title IX actually requires or what it means," Schultz said. The Minnesota State High School League and Department of Education's position is that Minnesota human rights laws ban discrimination based on gender identity, and that it does not conflict with Title IX. The Trump Administration believes Title IX protects women athletes, and transgender athletes violate that protection. "They're going to have to eventually show that the interpretation of the word sex isn't broad enough to include transgender, and if transgender athletes participate in high school or college sports, their participation actually hurts women, and therefore violates Title IX," Schultz said. What's next So where does this go from here? It's now an expedited investigation, with a resolution expected soon. Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison has an ongoing lawsuit against the Trump Administration, challenging President Trump's executive order banning transgender athletes in women's sports and threatening to pull federal funding to states. The federal government's response is due by June 26.