Fed should consider cutting rates as early as July, official says
Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller said Friday that he doesn't expect tariffs to boost inflation significantly so policymakers should be looking to lower interest rates as early as next month.
In a CNBC interview, the central banker said he and his colleagues should move slowly but start to ease as inflation is now longer a major economic threat.
'I think we're in the position that we could do this and as early as July,' Waller said during a 'Squawk Box' interview with CNBC's Steve Liesman. 'That would be my view, whether the committee would go along with it or not.'
The comments come two days after the Federal Open Market Committee voted to hold its key interest rate steady, the fourth straight hold following the last cut in December.
President Donald Trump, who nominated Waller as a governor during his first term in office, has been hectoring the Fed to lower interest rates to reduce borrowing costs on the $36 trillion national debt.
In his remarks, Waller said he thinks the Fed should cut to avoid a potential slowdown in the labor market.
'If you're starting to worry about the downside risk labor market move now don't wait,' he said. 'Why do we want to wait until we actually see a crash before we start cutting rates? So I'm all in favor of saying maybe we should start thinking about cutting the policy rate at the next meeting, because we don't want to wait till the job market tanks before we start cutting the policy rate.'
Whether Waller will be able to marshal much support for his position is unclear.
The FOMC, Waller included, voted unanimously to hold at this week's meeting, keeping the benchmark federal funds rate locked in a target range of 4.25%-4.5%.
According to the 'dot plot' of individual officials' expectations for interest rates this year, seven if the 19 meeting participants said they see rates holding steady this year, two saw just one cut likely, while the remaining 10 expect two or three reductions. The dispersion reflected a sense of uncertainty around policymakers about where rates should head.
Trump has called for dramatic moves, saying he thinks the benchmark rate should be at least 2 percentage points lower and even suggested it should be 2.5 percentage points below the current level of 4.33%.
However, Waller said he thinks the committee should be move slowly.
'You'd want to start slow and bring them down, just to make sure that there's no big surprises. But start the process. That's the key thing,' he said. 'We've been on pause for six months to wait and see, and so far, the data has been fine. ... I don't think we need to wait much longer, because even if the tariffs come in later, the impacts are still the same. It should be a one-off level effect and not cause persistent inflation.'
Other officials have been reluctant to cut as they wait to see what longer-term impact Trump's tariffs have, primarily on inflation but also on the labor market and broader economic growth.
Chair Jerome Powell said repeatedly at his post-meeting news conference Wednesday that he believes the Fed can stay in its wait-and-see mode as the labor market continues to hold up. Inflation data of late has shown little pass-through so far as companies burn off inventory accumulated in the run-up to the tariff announcement, and amid concerns that consumer demand is slowing and reducing pricing power.
Futures market pricing indicates virtually no chance of a rate cut at the July 29-30 meeting, with the next move expected to come in September.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Still early to assess tariff impact on economy, Fed report says
June 20 (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve's latest Monetary Policy Report to Congress, released on Friday, said U.S. inflation is somewhat elevated and the labor market is in solid shape, but suggested that President Donald Trump's tariffs have likely only begun to be felt and repeated the central bank's view that it can wait for more clarity before taking action. "The effects on U.S. consumer prices of the increase in import tariffs this year are highly uncertain, as trade policy continues to evolve, and it is still early to assess how consumers and firms will respond," said the report, which comes ahead of next week's testimony before Congress by Fed Chair Jerome Powell. "Although the effects of tariffs cannot be observed directly in the official consumer price statistics, the pattern of net price changes among goods categories this year suggests that tariffs may have contributed to the recent upturn in goods inflation." So far, though, the effect of tariffs has yet to show up in the official data for some goods, notably cars, though they have weighed on household and business sentiment. The Monetary Policy Report, which comes twice yearly, generally summarizes topics already well known to Fed watchers and market participants. On Wednesday, Fed policymakers wrapped up their rate-setting meeting with a decision to leave the policy rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range where it has been since December. Central bankers want to see how the Trump administration's tariff and other policies affect inflation, the labor market, and the economy broadly before they adjust borrowing costs. Powell said he expects to see "meaningful" inflation in coming months, and policymakers generally see the economy slowing and the unemployment rate ticking up to 4.5% this year. The report said that despite uncertainty the financial system has been "resilient."
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US Senate referee rules against cuts to CFPB, financial regulators in tax and spending bill
WASHINGTON, June 20 (Reuters) - Republican provisions to slash funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and other financial watchdogs violate budgetary rules, the U.S. Senate's nonpartisan referee said on Friday, jeopardizing their inclusion in a sweeping tax-cut and spending bill pushed by President Donald Trump. Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, whose role is to ensure lawmakers follow proper legislative procedure, said a provision to effectively eliminate the budget for the CFPB could not be approved via a simple majority vote in the Republican-controlled chamber. Similarly, provisions slashing the budget for the Office of Financial Research, eliminating the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and cutting pay for Federal Reserve employees were deemed out of bounds and unable to advance via majority support, according to Democrats on the Senate Budget Committee. Republicans had sought to include the policy changes as part of the Senate version of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act. If Republicans opt to keep those provisions, they would need 60 votes to pass in the 100-seat chamber, rather than the simple majority that other elements of Trump's tax and spending package would need under a complex budget process being invoked by Republicans to bypass Democratic opposition. Republicans hold 53 seats in the Senate and Democrats are expected to oppose the provisions. The CFPB receives its funding directly from the Federal Reserve, and can request up to 12% of the Fed's profits. Republicans have complained for years the agency is too powerful and have tried to require its budget be set by Congress, arguing that would make the CFPB more accountable. Under Trump, the CFPB has been drastically curtailed, with several rulewriting and enforcement initiatives being scrapped and the administration attempting to lay off large numbers of agency staff. Many of those efforts are currently being challenged in court. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott, the Republican whose panel drafted the provisions in question, said in a statement he would continue working with MacDonough, without offering specifics on next steps. "I remain committed to advancing legislation that cuts waste and duplication in our federal government and saves taxpayer dollars," he said.
NBC News
3 hours ago
- NBC News
Fed should consider cutting rates as early as July, official says
Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller said Friday that he doesn't expect tariffs to boost inflation significantly so policymakers should be looking to lower interest rates as early as next month. In a CNBC interview, the central banker said he and his colleagues should move slowly but start to ease as inflation is now longer a major economic threat. 'I think we're in the position that we could do this and as early as July,' Waller said during a 'Squawk Box' interview with CNBC's Steve Liesman. 'That would be my view, whether the committee would go along with it or not.' The comments come two days after the Federal Open Market Committee voted to hold its key interest rate steady, the fourth straight hold following the last cut in December. President Donald Trump, who nominated Waller as a governor during his first term in office, has been hectoring the Fed to lower interest rates to reduce borrowing costs on the $36 trillion national debt. In his remarks, Waller said he thinks the Fed should cut to avoid a potential slowdown in the labor market. 'If you're starting to worry about the downside risk labor market move now don't wait,' he said. 'Why do we want to wait until we actually see a crash before we start cutting rates? So I'm all in favor of saying maybe we should start thinking about cutting the policy rate at the next meeting, because we don't want to wait till the job market tanks before we start cutting the policy rate.' Whether Waller will be able to marshal much support for his position is unclear. The FOMC, Waller included, voted unanimously to hold at this week's meeting, keeping the benchmark federal funds rate locked in a target range of 4.25%-4.5%. According to the 'dot plot' of individual officials' expectations for interest rates this year, seven if the 19 meeting participants said they see rates holding steady this year, two saw just one cut likely, while the remaining 10 expect two or three reductions. The dispersion reflected a sense of uncertainty around policymakers about where rates should head. Trump has called for dramatic moves, saying he thinks the benchmark rate should be at least 2 percentage points lower and even suggested it should be 2.5 percentage points below the current level of 4.33%. However, Waller said he thinks the committee should be move slowly. 'You'd want to start slow and bring them down, just to make sure that there's no big surprises. But start the process. That's the key thing,' he said. 'We've been on pause for six months to wait and see, and so far, the data has been fine. ... I don't think we need to wait much longer, because even if the tariffs come in later, the impacts are still the same. It should be a one-off level effect and not cause persistent inflation.' Other officials have been reluctant to cut as they wait to see what longer-term impact Trump's tariffs have, primarily on inflation but also on the labor market and broader economic growth. Chair Jerome Powell said repeatedly at his post-meeting news conference Wednesday that he believes the Fed can stay in its wait-and-see mode as the labor market continues to hold up. Inflation data of late has shown little pass-through so far as companies burn off inventory accumulated in the run-up to the tariff announcement, and amid concerns that consumer demand is slowing and reducing pricing power. Futures market pricing indicates virtually no chance of a rate cut at the July 29-30 meeting, with the next move expected to come in September.
