Ramaphosa charm offensive helps in sticky meeting with Trump

'But let me end the introductory remarks by thanking you. You may not recall that five years ago, I spoke to you during the Covid period, and it was at a time when the whole world was going through a really cathartic moment, and we asked for assistance and respirators and you kept your word, and you delivered respirators to us.
'We didn't have as many in our country. It really helped to deal, to help us deal with Covid. So I'm here also to say thank you, and to thank the people of America for having helped us during a really difficult time, being this small economy that we are. We needed help from around the world, and you were there to provide that. So thank you very much,' Ramaphosa said.
In his opening address, Trump attempted to intimidate Ramaphosa, claiming that he was respected in some corners but there were some who had little respect for the South African president.
Trump lauded his South African friends who formed part of Ramaphosa's delegation at the request of Trump, golfers Ernie Els and Retief Goosen, several times during the almost hour-long joint media briefing, barely giving Ramaphosa a chance to address some of his accusations.
Trump used most of the engagement, making accusations against South Africa, claiming that there was a persecution of white South African farmers, falling short of calling out Ramaphosa for acts of genocide as he has done in the past.
To push his agenda, Trump ambushed the South African delegation by showing clips of EFF leader Julius Malema chanting 'Kill the Boer' and former president Jacob Zuma also making remarks against white South Africans.
Ramaphosa attempted to push back by remarking that late struggle icon Nelson Mandela had taught South Africans to always pursue peace. On one occasion, Trump joked that he called Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during his working visit in South Africa to ask him what he was doing in South Africa.
When asked what it would take to convince Trump there was no white genocide in South Africa, Ramaphosa stepped in to respond, saying that it would take Trump listening to the voices of South Africans.
'I'm not going to be repeating what I can say. I would say, if there was a farmer genocide, I can bet you these three gentlemen [Rupert, Goosen and Els] would not be here, including my minister of agriculture [John Steenhuisen]. He would not be with me. So it will take him, President Trump, listening to their stories [and] to their perspective.'
Trump quickly jumped in, saying there were 1,000s of stories and documentaries on the persecution of white people in South Africa.
He then played the clips of Malema, also taking out clips of newspaper articles from South African media, including TimesLIVE.
Labelling one journalist as a jerk, Trump blamed the media for failing to tell stories about the so-called persecution in South Africa.
Ramaphosa said South Africa's constitution protected all its people from unfair expropriation, but Trump refused to listen, insisting that white farmers were being killed in South Africa.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Mail & Guardian

34 minutes ago

• Mail & Guardian

Environment minister reflects on his – and the GNU's – first year in office

Minister Dion George. (Photo: Environmentza/X) When George, who was sworn into office on 3 July under the coalition President Cyril Ramaphosa put together after his ANC lost its outright parliament majority — said serving in this government 'has required all of us to work collaboratively – sometimes across vastly different perspectives — toward a common goal: delivering real outcomes for the people of South Africa'. In a media briefing to assess how his department has fared over the past year, George said the GNU has created a situation where departments are increasingly working across silos, 'where ideas are strengthened through debate and collective intelligence', and where the urgency of service delivery is matched by a 'shared will to get things done'. This week analysts George said his department had approached its work 'with a recognition that our environmental mandate is not separate from the economic one, or the social one. They are deeply interconnected.' Protecting natural resources, wildlife Among George's 'big six' priority areas is protecting natural resources and wildlife. Here, he cited his department's significant achievement regarding the protection of the critically endangered 'After learning about the sharp population declines and the human impacts causing them, I called for open, lawyer-free discussions that brought together conservation organisations like BirdLife South Africa and Sanccob [Southern African Foundation for the Conservation of Coastal Birds, industry leaders in the fishing sector and our departmental experts,' he said. This collaborative approach led to a court-ordered agreement to implement island closures around key breeding colonies. 'We amended the small pelagic fishery permit conditions to enforce these closures, ensuring sustainable fishing near vital penguin habitats,' he said. These changes were implemented almost immediately. His department is also tackling the harm caused by bunkering in Algoa Bay, near St Croix Island, once home to the largest African penguin colony in the world. Ship-to-ship refuelling has caused oil spills and underwater noise pollution. After a A coordinated approach has led to prosecutions and a continued decline in rhino poaching incidents, with George noting his department's attention is also turning to species such as 'The lives of these animals are not commodities. They are a vital part of our ecological and cultural identity,' he said. George said his department's efforts were showing that jobs can be created, new industries stimulated and growth unlocked, 'while caring for the planet'. He noted that in the fourth quarter of last year, the agriculture, forestry and fishing sectors recorded a 'remarkable' 17.2% growth, contributing two-thirds of the total GDP growth for that quarter. In the first quarter of this year, these sectors grew by 15.8%. 'These are not just numbers,' he said. 'They reflect thousands of jobs and livelihoods sustained. We increased the number of fish species available to The department's harbour revitalisation programme has created more than 2 300 work opportunities while through expanded support for sustainable aquaculture, 'we're seeing green technology spark new enterprises along our coasts'. George said the recent floods in KwaZulu-Natal and Mthatha in the Eastern Cape are only the latest signs that the time for talk regarding climate change is over. This is why the department finalised the The department secured George said these were not blanket waivers. 'Each exemption comes with firm conditions, including health interventions for affected communities, real-time emissions monitoring, and a firm commitment to transition to cleaner energy sources. We are holding polluters accountable.' The department is working with the presidency and the department of mineral resources and energy to develop a competitive power market, 'bringing independent power producers into the fold. The goal is clear: to deliver both energy security and environmental sustainability.' South Africa has contributed to international environmental governance, and continues to lead. George said it played a major role in negotiating the At the last climate summit in Baku, South Africa 'brokered a deal that balanced the need for ambitious climate action with the reality of our economic conditions', he said, adding that this agreement unlocked green investment for local projects that will support South Africa's just energy transition. 'And in our G20 Presidency year, we are hosting major environment and climate sustainability meetings, positioning South Africa as a leader on the African continent and beyond. These engagements not only strengthen our global voice but also attract investment and expertise.' George said another of his key focus areas has been making his department's systems more efficient, transparent and responsive. It had launched the regulatory efficiency strategy for environmental turbocharge, a set of reforms to speed up approvals for energy and infrastructure projects, 'while still protecting the environment'. His department had identified 11 renewable energy development zones where significantly simplified environmental impact assessments had reduced approval times from 300 days to 147. 'For lower sensitivity areas, we've introduced fast-tracked authorisations that can be processed in around 70 days,' the minister said. The new national web-based environmental screening tool is 'already helping developers identify low-impact sites for projects, streamlining planning and protecting biodiversity'. Since his appointment, George has finalised 162 environmental appeals, '106 of them since our 100-day feedback session', which is a 'testament to our commitment to fairness, transparency and turnaround times'. Although the department is operating in a constrained fiscal environment, it has launched a departmental spending review and implemented firm cost-containment measures. 'But, more importantly, we have begun thinking creatively about revenue generation,' he said. 'Each branch of our department is tasked with identifying savings and new funding streams.' This includes sourcing international donor support for enforcement and anti-poaching, innovative financing mechanisms for green projects and working with the treasury on sustainable budget models. The minister said the South African Forestry Company or Safcol, SANParks and the South African Weather Service are receiving strategic attention to address governance weaknesses and boost their effectiveness. 'We also celebrated the achievement of a clean audit at iSimangaliso Wetland Park — a symbol of what good governance can look like across our sector,' while flagship projects to elevate the country's environmental brand, improve delivery and stimulate economic opportunity have been initiated. George said the department is finalising the national carbon credits and biodiversity offsets framework, which will allow companies to 'offset emissions responsibly', while directing funds into conservation and community development.

Mail & Guardian

34 minutes ago

• Mail & Guardian

Israeli impunity: SA leads global fight for justice

Israel's impunity in its actions against people in Gaza and other Occupied Territories, its neighbours and now Iran is an attack on international law. Being South African can be depressing sometimes. The tremendous highs of our world-beating rugby and cricket teams show what we can do. But our economy doesn't grow, mass unemployment continues, our cities decline and we continue to live in constant fear of crime. The lack of political will to take on and solve even our most basic problems is depressing. But, on the global stage, our government has emerged as the most principled international actor in the face of the ongoing genocide in Gaza. Now that Israel has extended its rampage into Iran, international law is under sustained assault from Israel and its backers in the West and their local proxies here at home. The urgency of the crisis generated by Israel's impunity is rapidly escalating. As Zane Dangor, the courageous and deeply principled director general of the department of international relations and cooperation, recently observed, Israel's attack on Iran 'places the world in grave peril'. South Africa's decision to file a case against Israel at the International Court of Justice in December 2023 marked a bold and brave assertion of international law by a Global South country, rooted in South Africa's own history of apartheid and its constitutional commitment to human rights. The court later found that South Africa had presented a plausible case and ordered Israel to take immediate measures to prevent acts of genocide, placing legal and moral pressure on Tel Aviv and its allies. South Africa's approach to the court resulted in intense pressure from the United States and the strident and often hysterical pro-Western lobby at home, a lobby that has frequently floated conspiracy theories for which it can provide no evidence. For this lobby, Israel is an outpost of the (white) West and is therefore entitled to engage in the mass murder of civilians deemed to be part of the barbarous (and not white) hordes outside the West. Principled critics of Israel and the wider West have repeatedly been slandered as antisemites or dupes of Russia or China. South Africa's approach to the International Court of Justice was said to have been made as a result of a bribe paid to the ANC by Iran. No evidence has ever been produced to support this wild allegation. But while the pro-West lobby at home damages the integrity of our public sphere and has seriously damaged the credibility of parts of our media, the real threat to South Africa came from the US. BizNews is irritating but the US government has real power to damage our country and its people. This is one reason why the formation of The Hague Group on 31 January 2025 was such an important breakthrough. It brought together nine states from the Global South — Bolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Honduras, Malaysia, Namibia, Senegal and South Africa — with the aim of implementing binding legal and diplomatic measures to hold Israel accountable for its persistent violations of international law. It was a significant step forward in the defence of international law and it meant that South Africa was no longer isolated on the world stage. Now, in a pivotal development, this coalition will convene an Emergency Ministerial Conference in Bogotá, Colombia and 15 and 16 July 2025, at the ministry of foreign affairs. The meeting will be co-hosted by South Africa and the progressive government of Colombia, led by Gustavo Petro. A particularly significant development is that a large number of foreign ministers and senior officials will attend from far beyond the founding members of the Hague Group. Governments from across Asia, Africa and Latin America have confirmed their participation. This signals that the coalition in support of Palestine and international law is growing, not only in moral stature, but in geopolitical weight. The meeting is becoming a focal point for a much wider movement of Global South states, along with some others, ready to act against impunity and in defence of international law. The Bogotá meeting is not just symbolic — it has a detailed and operational agenda. As stated in the joint announcement, the Emergency Ministerial Conference will 'centre the legal obligations of states, as determined by the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice (July 2024), to stop all actions that assist in the maintenance of the illegal situation created by Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory' and to support full Palestinian self-determination. Attendees will also work towards the announcement of further 'concrete actions to enforce international law through coordinated state action — to end the genocide and ensure justice and accountability'. The Bogotá meeting will be a significant turning point in international diplomacy. It will assemble ministers and high-level delegations from across Latin America, Africa and Asia to forge a united front. Central to the agenda is enforcing rulings from the International Court of Justice and International Criminal Court — notably the former's July 2024 advisory opinion finding Israel's occupation illegal and the latter's November 2024 arrest warrants for senior Israeli officials on war crimes charges. For the first time in the post-Cold War era, Global South governments are organising not only around development or trade, but around justice and accountability at a global scale. This isn't solely about Palestine; it's about defending the idea that human lives everywhere have equal worth and that all states are answerable under law. This is a direct challenge to the idea that Israel and the US should continue to be granted impunity for their illegal actions. To sustain the momentum, the Hague Group is building political infrastructure — rotating co-chairs, permanent liaisons and a follow-up secretariat. This will not be a one-off summit; it's the beginning of a durable movement for justice enforcement. We must not be naive, though. There will be backlash. At home, Tony Leon will write a sneering opinion piece. BizNews will circulate more conspiracy theories. Frans Cronje will issue dark warnings of the economic costs of thinking for ourselves. Peter Fabricius will write a story about some senator in the US threatening to isolate us economically. William Gumede will say that we need to 'reset' relations with Israel. There will be another Western funded pseudo-academic study claiming that South Africans are critical of the West as a result of Russian and Chinese disinformation. But all this noise is not the real issue. The real issue is that building principled solidarity among countries in the Global South is a direct threat to the impunity of Israel and it will be met with a vicious backlash carried out via the media and various international institutions. We cannot back down in the face of the genocide and ongoing warmongering by Israel, backed by the US, Germany, the United Kingdom and other Western countries. We need to build solidarity across the Global South and with countries in the West willing to take principled positions against genocide and warmongering and for peace, justice and international law. South Africa is taking the lead on this and, working with the progressive government in Colombia, is making a major intervention in international relations. Here, our government is doing the right thing — and we should say so clearly, while not letting up on our criticism of its broader failures. Dr Imraan Buccus is senior research associate at ASRI and research fellow at the University of the Free State.

The Citizen

39 minutes ago

• The Citizen

Floyd Shivambu party‘unlikely to take wings'

Analysts say Floyd Shivambu's party is unlikely to gain the popularity of the EFF and MK party. Former uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party secretary-general Floyd Shivambu's plan to launch a new political party may bring him some support, but it won't have the mass appeal of the EFF, let alone MK, according to experts. They believe Shivambu is not as populist or charismatic as EFF leader Julius Malema or former president and MK leader Jacob Zuma, whose parties are the fourth- and third-largest parties in the country, respectively. Rather, they say, Shivambu is a thinker and strategist who is skilled at working behind the scenes, but not a front-line leader. Shivambu, was removed as secretary-general by Zuma on the pretext that he would be redeployed to the National Assembly, but was subsequently excluded from the list of nine party members to be sworn in as MPs this week. ALSO READ: Floyd Shivambu not on list of MK party members going to parliament Some regard his removal as 'constructive dismissal' and part of Zuma's revenge after Shivambu led an EFF campaign against state capture in which Zuma was a prime suspect. They said his sidelining indicates that in the ongoing public spat between Shivambu and Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla, Zuma has chosen his daughter's side because 'blood is thicker than water'. This is despite the fact that Zuma had earlier condemned Zuma-Sambudla's behaviour towards Shivambu and forced her to make a public apology to him or face disciplinary action. ALSO READ: Shivambu makes public appeal for progressive volunteers Independent political analyst Sandile Swana said: 'I don't see Shivambu's party becoming bigger than the EFF. Of course, there will be people who will move from MK and elsewhere to join Floyd. 'He will get a measure of support, but probably his ambition is to lead the country. That is not going to happen,' Swana said. Another independent analyst Goodenough Mashego said as someone who is not a populist or a great orator, Shivambu would not be able to attract members. 'To put it bluntly, there is no space for whatever Floyd is trying to start. There is no vacuum that Floyd is going to fill,' he said. ALSO READ: Shivambu says money stolen from MK party – and he won't resign Shivambu announced last week that he would establish a political party although he remained an MK member. He said he would undertake a consultation process, including listening to different stakeholders before launching the party. Mashego said Shivambu might face an ideological dilemma as a leftist in trying to appeal to a cross-section of the audience as many South Africans are centrist and want centrist policies. In light of the global outlook, such an approach would make him unpopular with investors and the international community. Shivambu is also an avowed Lennist-Marxist scholar. NOW READ: Does South Africa need a political party led by Floyd Shivambu?