Iran's ‘License Raj' resembles 1960s India — those close to the regime get permits and oil revenues, the educated get no jobs: Jeremy S. Friedman
Jeremy S. Friedman, author of 'Ripe For Revolution: Building Socialism in the Third World', teaches at Harvard Business School. Speaking to Srijana Mitra Das, he discusses the Iran war — and Tehran's economy:
Q. What keeps Iran going, despite decades of sanctions?A. Well, the short answer is, it's not going very well — Iranians aren't starving but the country is also not growing economically. They have an 'over-education' crisis with the most educated population in the region outside Iran but no jobs. The biggest reason for economic stagnation is sanctions. There was hope with 2015's original Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) that Western companies would start investing in Iran.However, even before Donald Trump came along, the United States didn't do that, largely due to the fear of sanctions being reimposed. Investment was thus mostly limited to the energy sphere, even though Iran is not really a petrostate. It has a large, educated population, a diverse economy, a big agricultural sphere and, ironically perhaps, it is a major destination for medical tourism and plastic surgery. I've been to Tehran and it seems like half the people in the airport got nose jobs just before flying out. It is no accident that Iran has its own nuclear program and isn't dependent on foreign expertise — it has the scientific capability many petrostates don't. Essentially, Iran's potential has remained unfulfilled.
Q. Can you describe Iran's socialist trajectory? A. Being a theocracy, many people assume Iran must be conservative. That's not what 1979's Islamic Revolution was though — many of Iran's Islamists were socialist. There was a major socialist movement in the 1940s-50s which fought the Shah who also fought back — the Marxist left was eventually decimated by the secret police. By the 1960s, the Islamists began to step into the vacuum the socialists had left. The latter claimed they'd build an anti-imperialist, egalitarian, developed economy — the Islamists said they'd follow faith and do the same. Eventually, those people made the Revolution — later establishment personalities, like Akbar Rafsanjani, Mir Hossein Mousavi, etc., were socialist-leaning. They imagined Islamism would make Iran developed and equal. Land reform, nationalisation and national plan development began — but in 1980, just a year after the Revolution, Iraq invaded. For the next eight years, Iran was on war footing — rationing meant state control of goods. A huge state sector developed.
In the 1990s, as some groups started dissenting from this arrangement, there was some privatisation but it never fully took effect because being isolated from the world economy, it was hard for Iran to privatise on that scale. Then, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad rebuilt the nuclear program. Sanctions followed, really benefitting those who controlled the ability to produce and smuggle — the Revolutionary Guard. The economy stayed in state hands — and stagnated.
There is some self-sufficiency as, owing to sanctions, they've had to manufacture many things countries would typically import. Iran's export revenue is largely dependent on energy and oil — those with access to government, the Revolutionary Guard and military get foreign items and licenses to manufacture. Similar to the License Raj that India had in the 1960s-70s, Iran has a smaller-scale License Raj now, with oil revenue going into the pockets of those who have the licenses. It's a two-tiered economy — those connected to the state get bits of oil money, monopolies, smuggling, etc. Those with no access to the state — which includes the aspiring middle class who thought they'd progress through education — have no jobs and nowhere to go. Iran is thus a bifurcated economy which depends on connections, not merit.
Q. What role do China and Russia play?
A. Well, a fully candid Iranian regime would say, a very disappointing role. After all the talk about a 'new axis' with China, Russia, Iran and North Korea, Russia and China are clearly not going to be there for Tehran. Iran gave Russia drones to use in Ukraine. Yet, Russia has done very little for it because it doesn't want to jeopardise its ties to Israel and Saudi Arabia.China only really cares about Iran's oil — if Iran disrupted those exports, Beijing would suffer the most and Iran can't afford to alienate it. So, it's a one-sided relationship between Iran, Russia and China, characteristic of the entire axis. China gets what it wants from Moscow but Russia doesn't get what it wants from Beijing. This is more a hierarchy than an axis, with China on top.
Q. What does this Iran-Israel conflict mean for the global energy market?A. With China being the largest consumer of its oil, I'd be surprised if Iran significantly disrupted exports through the Strait of Hormuz. That would change China's attitude towards Tehran. There could be short-term disturbances, especially with Israel attacking Iran's energy infrastructure, sparking retaliation. Yet, it seems Iran doesn't really want a major war — the Iranian regime is afraid if that happens, they'll be overthrown as they are very vulnerable at home. A revolution in Iran, with chaos and potential disruption of energy exports, could be the bigger risk to global markets.
Views expressed are personal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trick or TACO? Why has Trump set a 2-week deadline for Iran?
US President Donald Trump announced he will decide within two weeks whether the U.S. will intervene in the Israel-Iran conflict, hinting at potential negotiations while demanding "unconditional surrender." This delay could be a strategic move to deceive Iran, allow military repositioning, and give Israel time to weaken Iranian nuclear capabilities. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Also Read: The spy dossier that triggered Israel to rain missiles on Iran Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What could be Trump's 14-day Iran strategy? White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday that President Donald Trump will decide whether the US should get involved in the Israel-Iran conflict within the next two weeks. "Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks," Trump said in the statement read out by decision to delay making any decision on the Iran-Israel conflict for two weeks points at his signature approach to deal making -- to make a hard decision and then dilute it or reverse it altogether. He has imposed and then reversed or brought down tariffs on numerous occasions. His style has led to coining of an acronym, TACO, meaning "Trump always chickens out," which was used to describe an investment approach in response to Trump's volatile tariff Trump going TACO with Iran? Trump had claimed on Wednesday that Iran has reached out to negotiate. 'Iran wants to negotiate,' he told reporters. But he quickly added, 'I said it's very late.' According to Trump, Iranian negotiators had even suggested visiting Washington. 'They suggested they come to the White House,' he said. 'But it's difficult.' He appeared unmoved by the offer. 'Two very simple words: unconditional surrender,' Trump said. 'I've had it.' That remark followed his earlier comment: 'Iran's got a lot of trouble and wants to negotiate,' before adding, 'They should have negotiated.'A day after signalling that he was not interested in negotiations with Iran any more, Trump has reversed his stance to say there is still scope for negotiations. Trump faces several challenges: a US involvement in the conflict can result in heavy damage to its assets and soldiers; there is the risk of a wider war breaking out with other players jumping in; and Trump's MAGA base is still unconvinced that the US should get drawn into another foreign finds himself in a complex situation where various pulls and pushes keep him undecided. However, his two-week ploy could actually be a well-planned move. Some experts have told The New York Times that it is also possible that Trump is trying to deceive the Iranians and get them to let their guard down and surprise them with a sudden move. 'That could be cover for a decision to strike, immediately,' James G. Stavridis, a retired Navy admiral and the former supreme U.S. commander in Europe, said on CNN. 'Maybe this is a very clever ruse to lull the Iranians into a sense of complacency.'While Trump keeps the world, including the Iranians, guessing whether the US would join Israel's bombardment of Iran's nuclear and missile sites, the US military has moved some aircraft and ships from bases in the Middle East that may be vulnerable to any potential Iranian attack, two US officials told Reuters on Wednesday. One of the officials said aircraft that were not in hardened shelters had been moved from Al Udeid base in Qatar and naval vessels had been moved from a port in Bahrain, where the military's 5th fleet is per the NYT report, Trump's two-week deadline allows time for a second American aircraft carrier to get into place, giving US forces a better chance to counter the inevitable Iranian retaliation while Israel too will get more time to destroy the air defenses around the Fordo enrichment site, Iran's key nuclear site which can be destroyed only with American latest statement that there's still a substantial chance of negotiations could be aimed at pleasing his European allies. The European powers, who were not part of Iran's nuclear negotiations with the US, had grown increasingly frustrated by the US negotiating strategy in the talks. They deemed some of the demands unrealistic, while fearing the possibility of a weak initial political framework that would lead to open-ended negotiations. Two diplomats told Reuters there were no great expectations for a breakthrough in Geneva, where the European Union's foreign policy chief will also could also believe that the pounding of Iranian nuclear sites by Israel, which is likely to intensify in the two-week period, might soften Iranian position. The plan that the US last offered to Iran was a ban on all uranium enrichment. An Iran weakened by Israeli strikes and facing the threat of the US joining the conflict might be more willing to consider that now.(With inputs from agencies)
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
How do the militaries of Israel and Iran compare amid fears of an all-out war?
TAIPEI: Israeli strikes on Iran and Tehran's reprisals have brought the two Middle East adversaries closer to an all-out war, which also threatens to draw in the United States, at least to some degree. So how do the militaries of Iran and Israel stack up against each other? Iran boasts a large standing force but also relies on proxies and undercover operations that have been severely disabled in recent months by US and Israeli actions. Israel, meanwhile, relies on both subterfuge and robust regular ground and air forces that are apparently unmatched in the region. Though roughly equal in the number of troops, the two militaries bring strikingly different tactics and firepower. Where does Iran stand? On paper, Iran would seem to have an advantage in numbers, with 88 million people and a land area of 1.6 million square kilometers (618,000 square miles) compared to Israel's 9 million people and 22,000 square kilometers (8,500). Militarily, however, those numbers mean little. Iran's troops are divided between the regular armed forces, generally commissioned with guarding Iran's borders and carrying out more conventional military tasks, and the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, including the elite Quds Force, the strategic missile command and the cyberforce. The regular forces command the bulk of the troops — around 600,000 men — and standard equipment, while the Revolutionary Guard has about 200,000 personnel split between various divisions. Along with Iran's proxies, its conventional forces are believed to have been heavily degraded by Israeli and US military operations over the past year. Iran's military equipment is a hodgepodge, including some provided by the Soviet Union and others by the US prior to the 1979 Islamic Revolution, along with more recent Russian additions. With an estimated air strength of 350 antiquated planes in its air force, it lags far behind Israel in both quantity and quality. Iran, however, does have the ability to produce a wide range of UAV's and similar equipment, typified by the Shahed attack drones it has sold to Russia in large numbers for use in the war in Ukraine. On Thursday, an Israeli military official said that Iran used a missile with multiple warheads, posing a new challenge to its defenses. There was no immediate independent analysis of the attack.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Iran's divided opposition senses its moment but activists remain wary of protests
Iran 's fragmented opposition groups think their moment may be close at hand, but activists involved in previous bouts of protest say they are unwilling to unleash mass unrest, even against a system they hate, with their nation under attack. Exiled opponents of the Islamic Republic , themselves deeply divided, are urging street protests. In the borderlands, Kurdish and Baluchi separatist groups look poised to rise up, with Israeli strikes pummelling Iran's security apparatus. While the Islamic Republic looks weaker than at nearly any point since soon after the 1979 revolution, any direct challenge to its 46-year rule would likely require some form of popular uprising. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo Whether such an uprising is likely - or imminent - is a matter of debate. The late shah's son, U.S.-based Reza Pahlavi , said in media interviews this week he wants to lead a political transition, proclaiming it the best chance to topple the Islamic Republic in four decades and saying "this is our moment in history". Live Events Triggering regime change is certainly one war goal for Israel, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressing Iranians to say "we are also clearing the path for you to achieve your freedom". Within a ruling system long adept at quashing public displays of dissent, there are signs it is readying for protests. Mohammad Amin, a member of the Basij militia that is often deployed against protesters, said his unit in Qom had been put on alert to root out Israeli spies and protect the Islamic Republic. However, while the strikes have targeted a security hierarchy that crushed previous bouts of protest, they have also caused great fear and disruption for ordinary people - and anger at both Iranian authorities and Israel, the activists said. "How are people supposed to pour into the streets? In such horrifying circumstances, people are solely focused on saving themselves, their families, their compatriots, and even their pets," said Atena Daemi, a prominent activist who spent six years in prison before leaving Iran. MASS PROTESTS Daemi's concerns were also voiced by Iran's most prominent activist, Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi , in a social media post. Responding to an Israeli demand for people to evacuate parts of Tehran, she posted: "Do not destroy my city." Two other activists Reuters spoke to in Iran, who were among the hundreds of thousands involved in mass protests two years ago after the death in custody of Mahsa Amini, said they also had no plans to demonstrate yet. "After the strikes end we will raise our voices because this regime is responsible for the war," said one, a university student in Shiraz, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of reprisals. Another, who had lost her university place and been jailed for five months after the 2022 protests and who also requested anonymity, said she believed in regime change in Iran but that it was not time to take to the streets. She and her friends were not planning to stage or join rallies, she said, and dismissed calls from abroad for protests. "Israel and those so-called opposition leaders abroad only think about their own benefits," she said. Apart from Pahlavi's monarchists, the main opposition faction outside Iran is the People's Mujahideen Organisation , also known as the MEK or MKO. A revolutionary faction in the 1970s, it lost a power struggle after the shah was toppled. Many Iranians have not forgiven it for then siding with Iraq during the stalemated war of 1980-88 and rights groups have accused it of abuses at its camps and of cult-like behaviour, both of which it denies. The Mujahideen are the main force behind the National Council of Resistance of Iran, which like Pahlavi has cultivated close ties with some Western politicians. At a Paris forum this week, the council's leader Maryam Rajavi reiterated her opposition to any return of the monarchy, saying "neither the shah nor the mullahs". How far opposition groups outside Iran enjoy any support inside the country is uncertain. While there is fond nostalgia among some Iranians for the period before the revolution, it is an era that most are too young to remember. Within Iran, the successive rounds of national protests have also focused around differing issues. In 2009, demonstrators flooded the streets over what they saw as a stolen presidential election. In 2017, protests focused on falling living standards. And in 2022 women's rights were the trigger. Mir-Hossein Mousavi, the election candidate protesters said had been cheated in 2009, has been under house arrest for years and is now 83. His policy was to reform the Islamic Republic rather than replace it - the goal of many protesters in later movements. For opponents of the Islamic Republic inside Iran, those unanswered questions of whether or when to stage protests, what agenda to pursue, or which leader to follow are only likely to grow more pressing as Israel's airstrikes continue.
