logo
Mercedes-Benz recalls over 92,000

Mercedes-Benz recalls over 92,000

Daily Mail​2 days ago

Mercedes-Benz has recalled more than 92,000 vehicles in the US due to a serious safety issue that could heighten the risk of injury in a crash.
The recall affects 92,851 cars from model years 2023 through 2025, all of which come equipped with panoramic sunroofs. The issue arises from a structural flaw that could cause the car's C-pillar, the rearmost support beam, to fail in certain collisions.
This could put passengers at risk, as their heads might make contact with the pillar, which may not absorb the impact as required by Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards.
In a notice filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) on June 9, Mercedes-Benz revealed that the recall impacts several models, and that those involved may not meet the necessary impact absorption standards. As a result, passengers could be exposed to greater danger in an accident.
What Should Owners Do?
Owners of the recalled vehicles should visit their nearest Mercedes-Benz dealership to have the C-pillar trim and roof lining modified at no cost. Notification letters will be sent out to affected customers on August 4, 2025. For more information, Mercedes-Benz owners can contact customer service at 1-800-367-6372.
How to Check If Your Car Is Affected?
If you're unsure whether your vehicle is part of the recall, you can easily check by entering your car's details into the NHTSA recall database or the USA TODAY recall database for up-to-date information.
Which Models Are Affected?
2025 Mercedes-Benz AMG GLC 63 S E, 2024–2025 Mercedes-Benz AMG GLC43 4MATIC, 2023–2025 Mercedes-Benz GLC 300.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Audi could build plant in US to placate Trump, Spiegel reports
Audi could build plant in US to placate Trump, Spiegel reports

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

Audi could build plant in US to placate Trump, Spiegel reports

BERLIN, June 20 (Reuters) - Volkswagen's premium brand Audi could build a plant at a new location in the United States under scenarios being considered to placate President Donald Trump in the tariff conflict, the Spiegel news magazine reported on Friday. Audi is considering building a plant in the southern U.S., which would be the more expensive option out of a number of scenarios being considered, with company sources estimating costs of up to 4 billion euros ($4.61 billion), the report said. The company was not immediately available to comment on the report. ($1 = 0.8678 euros)

Geely to hold 26.4% stake in Brazilian JV majority-owned by Renault
Geely to hold 26.4% stake in Brazilian JV majority-owned by Renault

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

Geely to hold 26.4% stake in Brazilian JV majority-owned by Renault

BEIJING, June 20 (Reuters) - China's Geely ( opens new tab said on Friday it and its parent Geely Holding ( would take a combined 26.4% stake in a joint venture controlled by its French partner Renault ( opens new tab as the two seek to produce and sell cars jointly in Brazil. The two automakers have entered an agreement that would see Renault take 73.57% in the venture that would focus on producing and distributing cars in Brazil under the Renault and Geely brands. It is also due to make and distribute light commercial vehicles under the Renault brand to "attract new customers", according to a filing by Geely Auto. The deal is subject to regulatory approvals, the company said. Geely and Renault first announced their partnership to produce and sell zero- and low-emission vehicles in Brazil in February. The Brazilian partnership builds on the two companies' thermal engine joint venture headquartered in London and their jointly owned manufacturing plant in South Korea.

How is Tesla expected to remotely control its robotaxis, and what are its limitations?
How is Tesla expected to remotely control its robotaxis, and what are its limitations?

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

How is Tesla expected to remotely control its robotaxis, and what are its limitations?

June 20 (Reuters) - Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab is expected to tiptoe into its long-awaited robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, as soon as Sunday with about 10 of its Model Y SUVs that will operate within strict limits. CEO Elon Musk has said the company is being "super paranoid" about safety and that humans will remotely monitor the fleet. Remote access and control - known in the industry as "teleoperation" - is used in varying degrees by the handful of robotaxi startups operating around the globe. The technology has clear advantages and important limitations. Here are some details of how it works: Teleoperation is the control of machines by humans in a different location, usually over a wireless network. It is used to train robots to operate autonomously, monitor their autonomous activity, and take over when required. The global robotaxi industry is still in test mode, as companies deploy the vehicles in limited geographic areas and continually adjust the artificial intelligence software that controls them. Teleoperation is often used to intervene when a vehicle is unsure of what to do. Alphabet's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab Waymo, for example, has a team of human "fleet response" agents who respond to questions from the Waymo Driver - its bot. "Much like phone-a-friend, when the Waymo vehicle encounters a particular situation on the road, the autonomous driver can reach out to a human fleet response agent for additional information," Waymo said in a blog post last year. Former Waymo CEO John Krafcik told Reuters, "the cars aren't being actively monitored," adding that the software is "the ultimate decision-maker." A Waymo video shows a car asking a remote operator whether a street with emergency response vehicles is open to traffic. When the human says yes, the vehicle proceeds. In contrast, other companies, such as Baidu's Apollo Go in China, have used fully remote backup drivers who can step in to virtually drive the vehicles. Baidu declined to comment. Driving vehicles remotely on public roads has a major potential problem: it relies on cellular data connections that can drop or operate with a lag, disconnecting the vehicle from the remote driver in dangerous situations. Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and autonomous-vehicle safety expert, said that approach could work for a small test deployment of 10 vehicles, such as Tesla's initial effort in Austin, but he called teleoperation "inherently unreliable technology." "Eventually you will lose connection at exactly the worst time," he said. "If they've done their homework, this won't ever happen for 10 cars. With a million cars, it's going to happen every day." Former Waymo CEO Krafcik agreed, adding that the time delay in cell signal makes remote driving "very risky." On the other hand, relying on the vehicle to reach out for help and allowing the vehicle to be the decision-maker are risky as well, Koopman said, as it does not guarantee the vehicle will make the right decision. Waymo declined to comment on the limitations of its approach. Koopman also noted there are limits to how many vehicles one person can safely monitor. A group of Democratic Texas lawmakers asked Tesla on Wednesday to delay its robotaxi launch until September, when a new autonomous-driving law is scheduled to take effect. The Austin-area lawmakers said in a letter that delaying the launch "is in the best interest of both public safety and building public trust in Tesla's operations." Musk for years has promised, without delivering, that its Full Self-Driving (Supervised) advanced driver assistance software would graduate to completely self-driving and control robotaxis. This year, he said Tesla would roll out a paid service in Austin underpinned by an "unsupervised" version of the software. "Teslas will be in the wild, with no one in them, in June, in Austin," Musk told analysts and investors in January. In May, he told CNBC that the robotaxi would only operate in parts of Austin that are safe for it, would avoid difficult intersections, and would use humans to monitor the vehicles. What those teleoperators will do is not clear. For years inside Tesla, company executives have expected to use teleoperators who could take over in case of trouble, said one person familiar with the matter. For instance, if a robotaxi were stuck in a crowded pedestrian area and confused about what to do next, a human teleoperator could take over and guide it, the source said. Tesla advertised for teleoperation positions, saying the company needs the ability to "access and control" autonomous vehicles and humanoid robots remotely. Such employees can "remotely perform complex and intricate tasks," it said in the advertisements. Tesla did not respond to a request for comment. "We are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift," Musk said in a post on X last week while providing a tentative launch date of June 22.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store