Queensland government may not release taxpayer-funded drug testing review after axing service
The Queensland government is refusing to say if it will publicly release an independent taxpayer-funded evaluation of the state's now-axed drug checking sites.
The former Labor administration commissioned the University of Queensland (UQ) to assess the services, including whether they reduced harm and contributed to early warnings about the circulation of dangerous illicit substances.
Documents show the evaluation, which was due to be handed to the government late last week, cost taxpayers $453,286.
Drug checking services allow individuals to submit small samples of substances, meant for personal use, for testing by health professionals.
In April this year the CheQpoint testing sites in Brisbane and on the Gold Coast closed their doors after the LNP opted not to provide ongoing government funding.
Mobile drug checking at future schoolies celebrations on the Gold Coast has also been scrapped.
Despite other states recently starting drug checking services, the Queensland premier and health minister have repeatedly said they do not support the measure.
Last week a spokesperson for health minister Tim Nicholls said the UQ evaluation report "will be considered by Cabinet", which could mean it is kept confidential.
When asked yesterday if the report would be released, Queensland Premier David Crisafulli said he had not seen it and the government's views on pill testing "haven't changed".
"I should have a read of it for sure, but I make the point that our policy position won't change," Mr Crisafulli said.
The Loop Australia is a not-for-profit group of chemists and health workers involved in delivering the services.
Its chief executive Cameron Francis called on the government to release the report, and said a similar evaluation of Canberra's drug checking service was made public.
He said the report would "show the community" the benefits of drug testing.
"I know what some of the data in the report would contain, because it is the data that our service has provided to the evaluators," he said.
"We know that around one in four people that come through the service will use less drugs after talking to one of our staff members, we know that we refer large numbers of people into ongoing support or treatment."
Queensland Opposition Leader Steven Miles said Mr Crisafulli should listen to the health experts who say pill testing saves lives.
"They're calling for this report to be released," Mr Miles said.
"But he won't listen because he's caved into the far-right ideologies of his party — now Queenslanders are paying the price."
Queensland's pill testing closures came as deadly synthetic opioids called nitazines continued to circulate in Australia causing overdoses and deaths.
Mr Francis said evidence showed testing improved public safety.
"Without drug checking we've got no way of warning the community about the dangerous drugs that are circulating until people have either overdosed, ended up in hospital or passed away," he said.
Australia's first fixed-site drug checking service opened in Canberra in mid-2022.
Victoria started pill testing at music festivals late last year and plans to open a clinic in mid-2025.
New South Wales has also kicked off a 12-month drug checking trial at some music festivals.
Medical groups and harm minimisation experts have slammed the Queensland government's closure of drug checking services.
In April, Queensland Chair of the Royal Australian College of GPs (RACGP), Dr Cathryn Hester, said the state did not have overdose monitoring or early warning systems.
"I fear that once these drug testing services end, we will see more overdoses because the people taking them, including young people with their whole lives ahead of them, simply don't know what they're ingesting," Dr Hester said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Canberra RSPCA under strain after dogs give birth to 26 deformed puppies in three weeks
Backyard breeders and complacent pet owners are being put on notice after the RSPCA in Canberra was forced to euthanise puppies born with severe deformities. The animal rescue group has reported a surge in heavily pregnant female dogs being surrendered to ACT facilities, with three mothers delivering 26 puppies between them in the last three weeks alone. "I think the biggest challenge that we're seeing right now is the financial crisis," Rhiannon Kwateng from RSPCA ACT said. "A lot of people just don't have the funds to do the things like de-sexing." But unplanned pregnancies and backyard breeders are contributing to avoidable harmful outcomes among some newborn puppies, according to the RSPCA. "We've seen unfortunately a little of puppies born where three of the puppies were born without the roof of their mouths and noses," Ms Kwateng said. "Unfortunately, those puppies wouldn't be able to thrive, and they wouldn't be able to survive so we've had to kindly euthanise them." That's on top of an unplanned litter of ten puppies surrendered to the facility in January who were diagnosed with parvo virus shortly after birth. "That is such a deadly virus and very difficult to treat, especially for vulnerable newborn puppies," Ms Kwateng said. "And we did have to make the decision to euthanise that litter of puppies." Desexing costs start at a few hundred dollars but rise according to the size of the dog. But without it, the burden can fall on rescue groups where resources are wearing thin. The RSPCA ACT's Weston facility is currently caring for 280 animals — double the number at the same facility two years ago. Ms Kwateng said it's a "massive stretch" on resources. "When you have 40 puppies plus the existing adult dogs, it is constant work from the moment the team gets here to the moment they leave," she said. "It's 60-plus mouths to feed, to clean, to socialise, to love, to walk, it's a massive challenge." The facility is also struggling with a portion of its kennels currently out of operation because of a broken underground heating system, which the RSPCA said was crucial for vulnerable pets living through Canberra climates that drop well below zero. But among the warnings, there are some happy endings. Two puppies were adopted from an unplanned litter of nine were adopted on Saturday. One of them, Hippo, went home with Forde couple Kane Rattley and Emma Hanlin. "[He'll go] straight home, warm cuddle, heater on, cuddle up on the couch probably watching some movies getting him used to the new house," Mr Rattley said. "We've looked at so many previously and looked online, but he's the only one where we've gone 'he's the one!'" Ms Hanlin said. "You just kind of know." The RSPCA said it was breaking the cycle of irresponsible pet ownership by desexing all of its puppies up for adoption.
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Victorian Liberal leader Brad Battin says party infighting is over as focus shifts to 2026 election
Victorian opposition leader Brad Battin has conceded some Liberal Party MPs have focused more on internal rivalries than voters, but has said his team will be unified heading into the election in 2026. Mr Battin described the party's decision to provide former leader John Pesutto a $1.55 million loan to avoid bankruptcy, a policy he supported, as a "line in the sand" that signalled a renewed focus on winning government. The long-running fight between Mr Pesutto and fellow Liberal MP Moira Deeming, who successfully sued her former leader for defamation, has divided the party. It became a proxy battle in a broader ideological struggle for control of the party. In an interview with the ABC, Mr Battin said he was speaking to every MP individually following the decision to provide Mr Pesutto a financial lifeline, stressing the need for unity. "You've been elected as a local member of parliament. You've got the self-discipline to get there. You just need now to put that into team unity." Asked whether MPs who failed to be team players would face consequences, Mr Battin said voters would ultimately decide. "The consequences are, you lose the election. It's a pretty simple consequence." The Coalition has not won a Victorian election since 2010 and has been crippled by infighting. A common criticism is that too many MPs are focused more on getting to parliament rather than winning government. "I think there's always an element of that, because it's been publicly perceived as that,'' Mr Battin said. The Berwick MP said it was incumbent on MPs to reflect on why they were elected. "What things did you want to see change in the state? And can you do it from opposition? If the answer is yes … then you're probably in the wrong job." Mr Battin challenged Mr Pesutto's leadership six months ago after his supporters undermined Mr Pesutto's position, but Mr Battin reiterated throughout the interview that his team was now united. He hinted that the frontbench team could change but would not say if Mr Pesutto or Ms Deeming would be included in a revamped shadow cabinet. Ms Deeming had proposed an alternative to the party loaning Mr Pesutto money, including delaying his court order debt if her preselection was guaranteed. Mr Battin declined to comment on that or complaints to the state's anti-corruption watchdog, citing legal advice not to speak publicly on the matter. While expressing confidence in the team he would take to the election, Mr Battin said some MPs would need to reflect on their future. "People have to make decisions about time served in parliament, if they want to stay or not,'' he said. The Coalition must add 16 seats at next year's November election to win office. The task is big, but after three terms of Labor, there is a genuine chance for the Liberals, Mr Battin believed. "We've got one chance coming up in about 16 months. It's our opportunity to ensure we prove to Victorians we're ready." He said the party would now focus on policy, with internal disputes hopefully behind him. Mr Battin admitted the long-running conflict between Mr Pesutto and Ms Deeming took a toll on him, including sleepless nights. "It takes a physical and mental challenge on you … but it's resolved my drive. I know what I need to do to win at the next election." He doesn't regret how he handled the matter, stressing that it was a dispute between two individuals. Some MPs criticised Mr Battin for a lack of leadership in failing to resolve the crisis sooner, while others were angered by his decision to support the loan to Mr Pesutto, highlighting the party's ongoing divisions. "I know what I need to do to win at the next election. I need to get the right policy settings, have the right processes with my team, ensure we're a united front, and send a message to Victoria that we're ready to govern."
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Dogs are increasingly given anti-anxiety drugs for behavioural issues, but do they need them?
Two-and-a-half-year-old rescue dog Mabel is sweet and happy when her owner, veterinarian Amy Lee, is at home. But when Dr Lee is gone, Mabel can be a whole different animal. "She wouldn't eat when I wasn't home. She would bark, she would whimper, she would cry. She sometimes wouldn't toilet," Dr Lee said. "When we went overseas recently, for the first time in her life, she escaped the yard because there was a dog sitter with her and not our family." Now, Mabel is one of many dogs on a medication called fluoxetine — a type of antidepressant sold under the brand name Prozac. For Dr Lee, being able to prescribe fluoxetine for dogs like hers has been "a godsend". While Dr Lee is comfortable with providing anxiety medicines to dogs like Mabel at her clinic in Blacktown, NSW, she said it wasn't suitable for every animal. Dr Lee takes dog owners through one-hour long consultations about their pet's history and behaviours before deciding whether to prescribe medication. But this isn't standard across the veterinarian sector, with some vets only getting a 15-minute appointment to make the decision. This is creating concerns from some in the industry about how many dogs are going onto anti-anxiety medication as a first-line treatment. A study looking at millions of canine medical records in the US from 2010 to 2020 found a 10-fold increase in behavioural problems, and an increase in antidepressant medications. Dr Lee says she's seen an increase in dogs at her clinic with behavioural issues like aggression, separation anxiety as well as problematic behaviours. Although Australia-wide data on use of drug therapies for animals is not recorded by groups like the Australian Veterinary Association, there is evidence that their use is on the rise. Australian pet pharmacy YourPetPA listed fluoxetine on its website as its third "best selling" prescription medication. But Paul McGreevy, a veterinarian and a researcher of animal behaviour at the University of Sydney, said the real issue for the dogs was the management by their owners. "The danger is that pet owners demand a medication to resolve a problem, when the problem is actually them," he said. Dogs, he noted, have different needs and wants to humans, which we struggle to respond to, and instead, we "expect the dogs to adapt to our way of life". "If you want a dog, expect it to do doggy things, and expect it to have doggy needs," Professor McGreevy said. Michelle Rassool, a behavioural veterinarian who works in both general practice and a behavioural clinic, said many owners were at their wits end with their dog's behaviour when they came to her. "The average person gets a dog to have a friend, and they are normally not skilled in behaviour modification," she said. "People should be aware that there are multiple options for intervening in behaviour. Instead, Dr Rassool suggested positive behavioural training, changes to the environment, and changes to what the owners expect from their dog could all help create a better dog-owner relationship. "Is the dog getting enough exercise? Are they fulfilled? "If we've got a dog that's worried about being left alone, we don't just give medication and leave it alone. "Our goals are always to use medication to leverage change and then look at weaning off or reducing where we can." Dr Rassool said training needed to occur long-term to give dogs the best chance not to develop behavioural problems. "Going to a couple of weeks of puppy school is not going to cut the mustard," she said. "Most people should continue to go to — at a minimum — a weekly training session for that dog's first year because there's so much developmental change." Dr Lee noted that using positive reinforcement, rather than negative, was also extremely important to ensure the behaviour didn't become worse. "If you've got a dog and you use either a combination of punishment and positive [reinforcement], or if you use just punishment, you're actually more likely to end up with aggression in your dog," she said. "[Negative reinforcement] will work for a while because the dog doesn't want to be punished, but because they're not solving the underlying emotions it will eventually make the behaviour worse." Getting the balance right between appropriate training and medication can be life or death for dogs. "Behaviour problems are the biggest killer of young dogs," Professor McGreevy said. "Is that because they're they are not medicated correctly? Arguably. But is it possible that they were managed inappropriately to begin with?" Navigating the fine line of when medication might be appropriate is something Dr Lee is very aware of at her clinic. "I've got a patient that I treat now — Stannis — and he's one of my favourites because when he used to come in … he could have been euthanised in a pound somewhere for being unmanageable," she said. Now, although Stannis will likely need ongoing anxiety medication, his owners have also undertaken significant behavioural work, and according to Dr Lee "his quality of life is so great". "Those are the cases that just make your heart so full because you see people who believe in their dogs, and do the work." Check out What the Duck?! presented by Dr Ann Jones to look at our modern dogs and what we've created and subscribe to the podcast for more.
