BMW vs Geely: Brands in local fight over trademarks
The Geely EX5 mid-size electric SUV is already on sale, but a trademark dispute could force it to be renamed.
Two months after acceptance of the 'Geely EX5' trademark was published by IP Australia on December 17, 2024, BMW submitted a notice of intention to oppose Geely's filing on February 17, 2025.
It has until July 29, 2025 to provide evidence to support its opposition.
It appears BMW's opposition to the nameplate is due to the similarity with its long-running X5 nameplate.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
"BMW Group protects its well established reputation in its premium products which are highly regarded and valued by consumers," said a BMW Group Australia spokesperson when asked about the trademark opposition.
"We are aware of the application and are considering our options and do not otherwise wish to comment on the related legal processes."
But no opposition has been recorded yet for a subsequent Geely filing made on December 23, 2024, of which acceptance was published on May 24, 2025, for simply 'EX5'.
Geely has also filed to trademark 'Geely EX2' and 'Geely EX3', which may also fall afoul of BMW given it sells models wearing the X2, iX2, X3 and iX3 nameplates.
"Geely Auto Australia is aware of an opposition regarding the trademark of one of its model names. As this is a legal matter, we will not be making any further comments at this stage," said a Geely Auto Australia spokesperson.
The EX5 is known in China as the E5, and is sold under the Geely Galaxy sub-brand, which also offers the L7 electric vehicle (EV) and the Starship 7 EM-i plug-in hybrid (PHEV), the latter of which was recently spied testing in Australia.
Galaxy branding isn't used here.
Geely isn't the first automaker to find itself in a trademark dispute.
Audi, for example, opposed trademark applications by Chinese brand Nio in 2023 for the ES6, ES7 and ES8 nameplates, which it argued would be "likely to deceive or cause confusion" and were "substantially identical or deceptively similar" trademarks to its own.
The German brand sells vehicles under the S6, S7 and S8 nameplates.
It was ultimately unsuccessful in forcing Nio to change its nameplates, though the Chinese brand nevertheless still has yet to enter the Australian market.
MG is now launching vehicles with very similar nameplates to Audi models, with the MGS5 EV already on sale and the MGS6 EV due on sale here in 2026. Audi sells both S5 and S6 model variants.
Audi didn't respond to our requests for comment following the publication of the MGS5 EV trademark earlier this year. We've also contacted the company about the subsequent filing for MGS6 EV.
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
The Geely EX5 mid-size electric SUV is already on sale, but a trademark dispute could force it to be renamed.
Two months after acceptance of the 'Geely EX5' trademark was published by IP Australia on December 17, 2024, BMW submitted a notice of intention to oppose Geely's filing on February 17, 2025.
It has until July 29, 2025 to provide evidence to support its opposition.
It appears BMW's opposition to the nameplate is due to the similarity with its long-running X5 nameplate.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
"BMW Group protects its well established reputation in its premium products which are highly regarded and valued by consumers," said a BMW Group Australia spokesperson when asked about the trademark opposition.
"We are aware of the application and are considering our options and do not otherwise wish to comment on the related legal processes."
But no opposition has been recorded yet for a subsequent Geely filing made on December 23, 2024, of which acceptance was published on May 24, 2025, for simply 'EX5'.
Geely has also filed to trademark 'Geely EX2' and 'Geely EX3', which may also fall afoul of BMW given it sells models wearing the X2, iX2, X3 and iX3 nameplates.
"Geely Auto Australia is aware of an opposition regarding the trademark of one of its model names. As this is a legal matter, we will not be making any further comments at this stage," said a Geely Auto Australia spokesperson.
The EX5 is known in China as the E5, and is sold under the Geely Galaxy sub-brand, which also offers the L7 electric vehicle (EV) and the Starship 7 EM-i plug-in hybrid (PHEV), the latter of which was recently spied testing in Australia.
Galaxy branding isn't used here.
Geely isn't the first automaker to find itself in a trademark dispute.
Audi, for example, opposed trademark applications by Chinese brand Nio in 2023 for the ES6, ES7 and ES8 nameplates, which it argued would be "likely to deceive or cause confusion" and were "substantially identical or deceptively similar" trademarks to its own.
The German brand sells vehicles under the S6, S7 and S8 nameplates.
It was ultimately unsuccessful in forcing Nio to change its nameplates, though the Chinese brand nevertheless still has yet to enter the Australian market.
MG is now launching vehicles with very similar nameplates to Audi models, with the MGS5 EV already on sale and the MGS6 EV due on sale here in 2026. Audi sells both S5 and S6 model variants.
Audi didn't respond to our requests for comment following the publication of the MGS5 EV trademark earlier this year. We've also contacted the company about the subsequent filing for MGS6 EV.
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
The Geely EX5 mid-size electric SUV is already on sale, but a trademark dispute could force it to be renamed.
Two months after acceptance of the 'Geely EX5' trademark was published by IP Australia on December 17, 2024, BMW submitted a notice of intention to oppose Geely's filing on February 17, 2025.
It has until July 29, 2025 to provide evidence to support its opposition.
It appears BMW's opposition to the nameplate is due to the similarity with its long-running X5 nameplate.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
"BMW Group protects its well established reputation in its premium products which are highly regarded and valued by consumers," said a BMW Group Australia spokesperson when asked about the trademark opposition.
"We are aware of the application and are considering our options and do not otherwise wish to comment on the related legal processes."
But no opposition has been recorded yet for a subsequent Geely filing made on December 23, 2024, of which acceptance was published on May 24, 2025, for simply 'EX5'.
Geely has also filed to trademark 'Geely EX2' and 'Geely EX3', which may also fall afoul of BMW given it sells models wearing the X2, iX2, X3 and iX3 nameplates.
"Geely Auto Australia is aware of an opposition regarding the trademark of one of its model names. As this is a legal matter, we will not be making any further comments at this stage," said a Geely Auto Australia spokesperson.
The EX5 is known in China as the E5, and is sold under the Geely Galaxy sub-brand, which also offers the L7 electric vehicle (EV) and the Starship 7 EM-i plug-in hybrid (PHEV), the latter of which was recently spied testing in Australia.
Galaxy branding isn't used here.
Geely isn't the first automaker to find itself in a trademark dispute.
Audi, for example, opposed trademark applications by Chinese brand Nio in 2023 for the ES6, ES7 and ES8 nameplates, which it argued would be "likely to deceive or cause confusion" and were "substantially identical or deceptively similar" trademarks to its own.
The German brand sells vehicles under the S6, S7 and S8 nameplates.
It was ultimately unsuccessful in forcing Nio to change its nameplates, though the Chinese brand nevertheless still has yet to enter the Australian market.
MG is now launching vehicles with very similar nameplates to Audi models, with the MGS5 EV already on sale and the MGS6 EV due on sale here in 2026. Audi sells both S5 and S6 model variants.
Audi didn't respond to our requests for comment following the publication of the MGS5 EV trademark earlier this year. We've also contacted the company about the subsequent filing for MGS6 EV.
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
The Geely EX5 mid-size electric SUV is already on sale, but a trademark dispute could force it to be renamed.
Two months after acceptance of the 'Geely EX5' trademark was published by IP Australia on December 17, 2024, BMW submitted a notice of intention to oppose Geely's filing on February 17, 2025.
It has until July 29, 2025 to provide evidence to support its opposition.
It appears BMW's opposition to the nameplate is due to the similarity with its long-running X5 nameplate.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
"BMW Group protects its well established reputation in its premium products which are highly regarded and valued by consumers," said a BMW Group Australia spokesperson when asked about the trademark opposition.
"We are aware of the application and are considering our options and do not otherwise wish to comment on the related legal processes."
But no opposition has been recorded yet for a subsequent Geely filing made on December 23, 2024, of which acceptance was published on May 24, 2025, for simply 'EX5'.
Geely has also filed to trademark 'Geely EX2' and 'Geely EX3', which may also fall afoul of BMW given it sells models wearing the X2, iX2, X3 and iX3 nameplates.
"Geely Auto Australia is aware of an opposition regarding the trademark of one of its model names. As this is a legal matter, we will not be making any further comments at this stage," said a Geely Auto Australia spokesperson.
The EX5 is known in China as the E5, and is sold under the Geely Galaxy sub-brand, which also offers the L7 electric vehicle (EV) and the Starship 7 EM-i plug-in hybrid (PHEV), the latter of which was recently spied testing in Australia.
Galaxy branding isn't used here.
Geely isn't the first automaker to find itself in a trademark dispute.
Audi, for example, opposed trademark applications by Chinese brand Nio in 2023 for the ES6, ES7 and ES8 nameplates, which it argued would be "likely to deceive or cause confusion" and were "substantially identical or deceptively similar" trademarks to its own.
The German brand sells vehicles under the S6, S7 and S8 nameplates.
It was ultimately unsuccessful in forcing Nio to change its nameplates, though the Chinese brand nevertheless still has yet to enter the Australian market.
MG is now launching vehicles with very similar nameplates to Audi models, with the MGS5 EV already on sale and the MGS6 EV due on sale here in 2026. Audi sells both S5 and S6 model variants.
Audi didn't respond to our requests for comment following the publication of the MGS5 EV trademark earlier this year. We've also contacted the company about the subsequent filing for MGS6 EV.
Content originally sourced from: CarExpert.com.au
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
4 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Ford might develop future engines with outside firms, says executive
A senior Ford executive thinks customers no longer separate brands based on their petrol and diesel engines, and this might lead to the automaker developing new engines with suppliers or, maybe, rivals. According to Automotive News John Lawler, Ford's vice chair overseeing strategy, partnerships and alliances, told the Bernstein Strategic Decisions Conference, 'I don't think that consumers really think about powertrains the way they did 30 years ago'. He told the conference, 'Where [internal combustion engines] defined what a vehicle was — the horsepower, the displacement, the torque and everything about the vehicle — I think a lot of that is gone'. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Part of this, Mr Lawler believes, is down to electrification, which allows automakers to increase power and torque, while reducing CO2 emissions, with hybrid or plug-in hybrid drivetrains. Mr Lawler posits this might lead automakers, including Ford, to develop next-generation engines with other companies. Doing so would save money that could help them compete with Chinese automakers. According to the vice chair, Ford needs 'to be competitive against them not only on speed of development, software capability, electrical architecture capability, but also overall electrification capability'. In 2022 Renault merged its Horse drivetrain division with that of Geely's Aurobay in the hopes of attracting customers for its engines and transmissions outside of the two automakers' stable of brands, which include Dacia, Volvo, Zeekr, and Lotus. It should be noted engine and drivetrain sharing between rival automakers, while not the norm, isn't completely unheard of. In the early 2000s Ford developed a V6 turbo-diesel in conjunction with the PSA Group, which was used in a wide variety of vehicles, including Australian Ford Territory, as well as the Citroen C5, Peugeot 407 and 607, and a whole host of Jaguar and Land Rover models. Other times, manufacturers just sign a supply agreement to fill a hole in their drivetrain lineup, such as when Toyota Europe used BMW diesel engines in the 2010s for a number of models, including the RAV4. Small manufacturers often rely exclusively on engines from other car makers, with Lotus, for example, using mills from Rover, Toyota and Mercedes-Benz. Ford is no stranger to collaborating with other car makers in other areas too. It currently shares a number of platforms with the Volkswagen Group, with the Volkswagen Amarok based on the Ford Ranger, and Volkswagen Transporter based on the Ford Transit Custom.
Perth Now
4 hours ago
- Perth Now
Ford might develop future engines with outside firms, says executive
A senior Ford executive thinks customers no longer separate brands based on their petrol and diesel engines, and this might lead to the automaker developing new engines with suppliers or, maybe, rivals. According to Automotive News John Lawler, Ford's vice chair overseeing strategy, partnerships and alliances, told the Bernstein Strategic Decisions Conference, 'I don't think that consumers really think about powertrains the way they did 30 years ago'. He told the conference, 'Where [internal combustion engines] defined what a vehicle was — the horsepower, the displacement, the torque and everything about the vehicle — I think a lot of that is gone'. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Supplied Credit: CarExpert Part of this, Mr Lawler believes, is down to electrification, which allows automakers to increase power and torque, while reducing CO2 emissions, with hybrid or plug-in hybrid drivetrains. Mr Lawler posits this might lead automakers, including Ford, to develop next-generation engines with other companies. Doing so would save money that could help them compete with Chinese automakers. According to the vice chair, Ford needs 'to be competitive against them not only on speed of development, software capability, electrical architecture capability, but also overall electrification capability'. In 2022 Renault merged its Horse drivetrain division with that of Geely's Aurobay in the hopes of attracting customers for its engines and transmissions outside of the two automakers' stable of brands, which include Dacia, Volvo, Zeekr, and Lotus. Supplied Credit: CarExpert Supplied Credit: CarExpert It should be noted engine and drivetrain sharing between rival automakers, while not the norm, isn't completely unheard of. In the early 2000s Ford developed a V6 turbo-diesel in conjunction with the PSA Group, which was used in a wide variety of vehicles, including Australian Ford Territory, as well as the Citroen C5, Peugeot 407 and 607, and a whole host of Jaguar and Land Rover models. Other times, manufacturers just sign a supply agreement to fill a hole in their drivetrain lineup, such as when Toyota Europe used BMW diesel engines in the 2010s for a number of models, including the RAV4. Small manufacturers often rely exclusively on engines from other car makers, with Lotus, for example, using mills from Rover, Toyota and Mercedes-Benz. Supplied Credit: CarExpert Supplied Credit: CarExpert Ford is no stranger to collaborating with other car makers in other areas too. It currently shares a number of platforms with the Volkswagen Group, with the Volkswagen Amarok based on the Ford Ranger, and Volkswagen Transporter based on the Ford Transit Custom. Going the other way, the Ford Transit Connect is based on the Volkswagen Caddy, and the European Ford Explorer and Capri EVs are based Volkswagen MEB architecture. Prior to all this, Ford jointly developed a 10-speed automatic transmission for use in full-size pickup trucks with cross-town rival GM. MORE: Everything Ford
The Age
8 hours ago
- The Age
Shadow fleets and ‘grey-zone' sabotage: The communication battleground beneath the waves
In October 2023, damage to the Balticconnector gas pipeline and telecom cables linking Estonia, Sweden and Finland made headlines. Official statements were cautious, but satellite data later tracked a Chinese-flagged vessel suspiciously close to the damage zone. A similar pattern repeated off the coast of Denmark's Bornholm island just months later. Each time, attribution proved elusive – but not implausible. Loading CSRI executive director Andrew Yeh said the involvement of commercial shadow fleets was consistent with grey-zone doctrine. 'Undersea cables underpin prosperity and security in the digital age,' he said. 'We cannot afford to be naive about the unprecedented threat that China and Russia's grey-zone operations pose to the UK's undersea infrastructure. The Baltic Sea is a peculiar theatre for modern maritime competition. At first glance, it's a crowded body of water – shallow, narrow, hemmed in by nine countries, six of them NATO members. But that congestion is precisely what makes it a high-stakes flashpoint. It has become a transport lifeline for Vladimir Putin's Russia, both in terms of exports and imports, and strategically. About 60 undersea cable systems crisscross the Baltic, with more added each year. These cables don't just power Netflix in Norway or Zoom in Zeebrugge – they form the encrypted foundation of NATO's command networks, trans-Atlantic data flows, and even the control systems for power grids and offshore wind farms. Yet NATO admits that it can't see everything. Much of the Baltic's maritime domain isn't covered by the automatic identification system that tracks commercial ships. Vessels operating 'dark' – without beacons, under false flags or masking their activity – have found freedom in the grey. That's where Task Force X comes in. Onboard Alliance, we're watching unmanned surface vehicles such as the Saildrone Explorer and Martac's Devil Ray glide in formation with crewed vessels. These aren't science-fair toys. They're the spear point of a NATO-wide effort to fill the surveillance gaps in increasingly contested waters. This week in The Hague, the issue will be high on the agenda of world leaders as they come together to discuss and debate European security and, in particular, the rate of spending needed to keep the continent safe. Data from the new systems and unmanned vehicles taking part in these exercises will be fed directly to a screen in real-time during the summit, showcasing the technology's effectiveness in enhancing NATO's understanding of the Baltic region. Leaders will also be asked to endorse a new rapid adoption action plan to ensure NATO's defences remain fit for purpose in an era of rapidly evolving threats and disruptive technological advancements. Task Force X is designed to integrate uncrewed systems – surface, subsurface and aerial – into NATO's maritime task groups. It's a lesson in agility, drawn from the US Navy's successful experiments in the Persian Gulf and Red Sea. But where those missions focused on anti-terrorism and anti-piracy, this one is squarely about deterring sabotage, especially to undersea infrastructure. The recent spate of attacks has accelerated the mission's rollout, with several NATO nations contributing commercial off-the-shelf systems upgraded with AI detection, sonar arrays and encrypted communications. 'The idea is to decentralise detection,' says Captain David Portal of Allied Maritime Command. 'We use autonomous vessels to track anomalies – dark ships, unexpected activity around known cable routes – and then feed that data into a real-time, pan-alliance picture.' The goal? To spot suspicious activity before the cable is cut – not after. What makes this different from past NATO initiatives is its scope. Task Force X isn't just plugging in new drones – it's part of a broader 'digital ocean vision', which seeks to use AI, big data and machine learning to create a living, learning map of NATO waters. Simon Purton, the head of innovation at NATO's Allied Command Transformation, says the organisation has moved with unprecedented speed following the disruptions to undersea infrastructure in the past year, integrating the allies' capabilities with scalable platforms to provide situational awareness, and deterrence, 24/7. 'The future that we see for the military exists in our industry ... in academia ... in our science and technology labs,' he says. 'So what we're trying to do then is create some tangible delivery on that, and also make sure that things are operationally relevant.' Loading Onboard the ship Alliance, that transformation is tangible. In the ship's command centre, researchers and officers watch sonar feeds and machine-learning-driven anomaly alerts. On-screen blips mark every commercial vessel. More worrying are the gaps – ship tracks that go dark near critical cable corridors, only to reappear hours later, far from where they should be. The stakes aren't abstract. In January, foreign ministers from Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania issued a joint communique pledging to 'intensify maritime patrols' after more confirmed sabotage incidents. While none pointed fingers directly, the language was unequivocal: this was the work of hostile actors. Russia, for its part, denies involvement. But few NATO commanders are buying that narrative. Australia's vast digital economy, worth billions of dollars, relies almost entirely on a surprisingly small and vulnerable network: just 15 known international subsea cables. These vital conduits, stretching to international hubs such as Singapore and Hawaii, carry 99 per cent of the nation's data traffic. It is one of the many reasons NATO is working with its 'Indo-Pacific 4' partners – Australia, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand. A NATO official tells me that the need to protect critical undersea infrastructure is a 'topic of increasing concern' in both the Euro-Atlantic and the Indo-Pacific. 'For this reason, we are sharing information and best practices about how we are going about it,' the official says. 'We also see potential for co-operation ... specifically in the area of technology development to allow us to better survey our critical undersea infrastructure.' With its blend of national contributions and off-the-shelf tech, the exercises are designed to deter further mischief, not through confrontation, but through visibility. The thinking is simple: if you can be seen, you can be deterred. Still, Task Force X is not without challenges. As with any move towards automation, there are questions around command authority, cyber vulnerabilities and even the ethics of allowing AI to classify potential threats. But few aboard Alliance seem bogged down in philosophical hand-wringing. The pace of experimentation is brisk. The political appetite, sharpened by recent attacks, is real. As I disembark under a steely Nordic sky, one thing is clear: the front lines of conflict are no longer just on land, sea or air. They are digital, invisible and, increasingly, underwater.
