logo
What Goes Into Making Our Seasonal Flu Jab? – Expert Q+A

What Goes Into Making Our Seasonal Flu Jab? – Expert Q+A

Scoop02-05-2025

Press Release – Science Media Centre
As most seasonal influenza vaccines are made using chicken eggs, the SMC asked experts for background on seasonal flu vaccine manufacture and alternatives to the standard jab.
How are the eggs to make traditional seasonal flu vaccines procured and kept safe from other pathogens, like avian influenza? Why do seasonal flu vaccines work better some years than others? And what other kinds of flu jabs are there?
Most seasonal influenza vaccines are made using chicken eggs.
The SMC asked experts for background on seasonal flu vaccine manufacture and alternatives to the standard jab.
Dr Mary Nowlan, Senior Advisor, Immunisation Advisory Centre (IMAC), comments:
Where do the eggs come from to make the seasonal influenza vaccine?
'Egg-based influenza vaccine manufacture is a well-established process, with chicken eggs being the preferred medium to grow viruses since the 1950s.
'Large quantities of eggs are produced in specific pathogen-free chicken colonies. These are controlled environments in which the hens and the eggs are closely monitored, which means that every step is taken to ensure that these animals are not at risk of being infected by bird influenza strains (including H5N1).'
Why do influenza vaccines work better some years than others?
'Predicting and matching exact influenza strains is an imperfect science, and vaccines that are developed are not always a perfect match for the circulating virus.
'Growing enough virus for millions of doses of vaccine is a slow process, particularly in eggs. As the virus grows in eggs, small changes occur in the virus – known as 'egg-adaption'. This can mean that the virus produced does not completely match the circulating virus, thereby potentially reducing the effectiveness of the vaccine.
'Another reason that the vaccine effectiveness can alter each year is that the wild virus strains have also mutated over the six months since they were selected for the vaccine and a mismatch can also occur. Advances in technology to analyse the circulating strains may have mitigated that risk to some degree, but the unpredictability of influenza virus evolution means mismatches still occur.'
How is it decided which strains are covered by the flu vaccines for the upcoming flu season?
'As the influenza virus continually mutates, vaccine production must take this into account and adjust the virus strains for the following influenza season.
'The Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System collates data from the WHO Collaborating Centres, who in turn receive data from the National Influenza Centres (ESR in New Zealand).
'This provides data for both the Southern and the Northern Hemispheres to help to predict which influenza strains are likely to circulate during their respective flu seasons each year.
'At around six months before the next influenza season, the WHO holds a meeting (in October and April – one for each hemisphere) to decide on the composition of upcoming influenza virus vaccines. Once this has happened, production of the next year's vaccine begins.
'The reason that influenza vaccine is recommended annually is due the constant changes in the influenza virus strains, and therefore the vaccine needs to alter in response. Protection only lasts for a short time.'
What are the alternatives to the standard flu vaccine?
'All the current seasonal influenza vaccines rely on recommendation from the WHO as to which influenza strains are included. Vaccines available in New Zealand include a cell-based vaccine, in which the virus is grown in cell culture rather than eggs, and an 'adjuvanted' vaccine, in which a naturally occurring compound (squalene) is added to induce a stronger immune response in older people who may have a weaker immune response than young adults.
'Further vaccines available internationally but not New Zealand include recombinant influenza vaccines, in which the surface proteins of the virus are produced artificially rather than being isolated from whole viruses. Also available in the Northern Hemisphere is a live attenuated influenza vaccine that is given through a nasal spray, usually to children.'
Why should we be concerned about bird flu in New Zealand?
'Birds, particularly wading birds, carry influenza virus in their guts. Usually this does not make the birds sick. However, some forms of avian flu have become deadly. Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is of significant concern, not only for the risk of spread to humans but for wild and domestic birds and other animals such as livestock. H5N1 is just one strain of avian influenza that can mutate to make animals sick. It has also infected humans who were exposed to sick animals.
'As well as concerns about infection in birds, livestock, and marine mammals in New Zealand, a big concern in humans would be if a HPAI infected someone who is also infected with the seasonal influenza virus. The risk is that the influenza viruses would combine into a strain that is transmissible between humans. This has the potential to cause a pandemic. People who work with animals are encouraged to receive the seasonal influenza vaccine each year to reduce this risk.'
No conflicts declared.
Dr Lisa Connor, Programme Leader, Infection and Vaccinology Group, Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, comments:
Could the ongoing impact of the H5N1 avian flu pandemic on raised chickens overseas have flow-on effects on influenza vaccine availability in NZ?
'One widely used influenza vaccine in New Zealand is the Tetra Fluvac, which provides protection against four different flu virus variants. This vaccine is produced using eggs and is available for free to eligible New Zealanders, making it an accessible and effective option.
'However, it is important to note that there are also other flu vaccines available on the market that do not rely on egg-based production. These vaccines are made using cell cultures and, while not currently funded by the NZ government, they are an alternative for those who require or prefer them. These non-egg-based vaccines are available in New Zealand but are typically more expensive, as they are not covered by the public funding system.
'H5N1, the avian influenza strain, is a significant concern, especially for our bird population, including chickens. Thus, there is the potential to disrupt egg production and, consequently, vaccine production. Fortunately, the availability of cell culture-based vaccines ensures that there are safe, effective, and approved alternatives on the market that do not depend on eggs. This flexibility is reassuring, as it means that if egg production were to be impacted by H5N1 or other factors, we have viable options to ensure continued vaccine supply.
'Overall, the current flu vaccines, including the egg-based Tetra Fluvac can lower the risk of infection and reduce severity of disease from influenza, and many New Zealanders are eligible for free vaccination. Should the situation evolve and potential shortages arise, the availability of mammalian cell culture-based vaccines offers a solid backup. We are fortunate that there are multiple, effective vaccine options in New Zealand, ensuring that the public remains well-prepared to limit infection from influenza, regardless of future challenges.'
No conflicts of interest.
Natalie Netzler PhD, Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, comments:
'The current egg-based vaccines are produced in a manufacturing system that is over 70 years old. However, there is a lengthy lead time needed to secure the eggs required to make the egg-based flu vaccine.
'Following the 2009 influenza pandemic we had a shortage of egg-based vaccines due to a number of issues including slow virus growth of the pandemic strain in eggs and a very high demand coupled with the slow manufacturing process.
'Given that our Indigenous populations all over the world face higher rates of severe influenza compared to non-indigenous groups in the same regions, it is important that we have sufficient vaccine supplies to protect our unique Māori and Pacific communities here in Aotearoa NZ.
'The development of cell-based influenza vaccines is gaining traction. While there are some challenges posed by these newer flu vaccines including higher costs of production, and limited global availability, there are several advantages of cell-based vaccines over egg-based flu shots. These include faster and more predictable rates of production and being able to offer an egg-free option.
'Although our current influenza vaccines are not perfect in that they don't always stop you getting the flu altogether, they do offer protection against severe flu and are highly recommended for those at risk of severe disease, no matter which type of flu vaccine you get.'
Conflict of interest statement: 'I work with several Pacific and Māori organisations and health providers to support our communities to make informed decisions on immunisation.'
Sue Huang, Director, WHO National Influenza Centre, Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR), comments:
What strains are covered in this year's flu vaccines?
'The southern hemisphere influenza vaccines to be used in NZ in 2025:
Egg-based vaccines:
• an A/Victoria/4897/2022 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus;
• an A/Croatia/10136RV/2023 (H3N2)-like virus; and
• a B/Austria/1359417/2021 (B/Victoria lineage)-like virus.
Cell culture-, recombinant protein- or nucleic acid-based vaccines
• an A/Wisconsin/67/2022 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus;
• an A/District of Columbia/27/2023 (H3N2)-like virus; and
• a B/Austria/1359417/2021 (B/Victoria lineage)-like virus.
The recommendation for the B/Yamagata lineage component of quadrivalent influenza vaccines remains unchanged from previous recommendations:
• a B/Phuket/3073/2013 (B/Yamagata lineage)-like virus.
'Interestingly, the influenza vaccine strains recommended by WHO in February 2025 for the use for northern hemisphere countries in 2025-2026 are the same as the NZ's vaccine strains to be used in 2025. This suggests that our vaccine strains match well with the current circulating viruses which would give us optimal protection. Influenza vaccination is the primary tool to protection us against influenza, particularly for those vulnerable groups (elderly, and individuals with underlying conditions).
'At the moment, influenza activity is still at a low level. Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 is the predominant strain followed by influenza B and A(H3N2). For details, see here.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

WHO Warns Of A Health Financing Emergency
WHO Warns Of A Health Financing Emergency

Scoop

time10 hours ago

  • Scoop

WHO Warns Of A Health Financing Emergency

20 June 2025 Speaking at the regular Friday press briefing in Geneva for humanitarian agencies, she warned that as wealthier nations make deep spending cuts, both international aid and national health systems are facing serious disruption. Dr. Chalkidou highlighted recent decisions by the United States, several European governments, and EU bodies to freeze or scale down health aid. WHO forecasts indicate that global health investment is likely to drop by up to 40 per cent this year, down $10 billion from just over $25 billion in 2023. The estimated $15 billion spent on health aid would bring the figure down to the lowest level in a decade. Impacts in developing countries This funding shortage is creating a health finance emergency in many developing countries – particularly in sub-Saharan Africa – which depend on external aid to finance their health systems. In numerous countries, US-financed healthcare programmes were the primary source of external aid, accounting for as much as 30 per cent of current health spending in countries like Malawi, and around 25 per cent in Mozambique and Zimbabwe. Since 2006, external aid per capita in low-income countries has consistently exceeded domestic health spending. Many sub-Saharan nations face soaring debt burdens – some spending twice as much on debt servicing as on health – making reallocation of resources difficult. The consequences are severe: Dr. Chalkidou referred to a survey by WHO showing that countries today are reporting health service disruptions 'not seen since the peak of COVID-19'. Solutions To address this crisis, WHO is urging countries to reduce aid dependency, boost revenue through improved taxation—including health taxes on products like tobacco and alcohol—and work with multilateral banks to secure low-interest loans for cost-effective health investments. WHO also plans to attend the upcoming International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville, where global leaders are expected to address the health financing crisis and hopefully make new commitments.

Govt Launches Suicide Prevention Plan
Govt Launches Suicide Prevention Plan

Scoop

time4 days ago

  • Scoop

Govt Launches Suicide Prevention Plan

A five-year plan aiming to tackle New Zealand's 'stubbornly high suicide rates' has been released today. The plan includes new strategies like peer support roles for mental health patients in emergency departments, and crisis recovery cafés so people don't have to resort to a hospital and can receive care in the community. The SMC asked experts to comment. Jacqui Maguire, Registered Clinical Psychologist, comments: 'New Zealand's suicide statistics remain a source of national shame. The Government's new Suicide Prevention Action Plan signals good intent, but without meaningful detail, it is difficult to assess its true impact. 'The most obvious gap in the plan is workforce development. Peer support and coordination roles are valuable, but the plan does not outline the training and retention of psychologists, social workers and mental health nurses who are needed to meet demand. Across both public and NGO services, workforce shortages, not just budget, are a real constraint. If we do not have qualified professionals we cannot deliver the required scale of care. 'Secondly, I believe the plan could be bolder and more detailed. For example, Every emergency department should have skilled, trained support not just the 8 regions outlined. Peer support is already being trialled, including in Wellington ED, but suicide risk exists nationwide. The alcohol and suicide link is acknowledged, but there is no clear policy action mentioned. For example, will the Plan tackle outlet density or alcohol pricing? We need to ensure therapy is accessible to all. The current model excludes many middle-income earners, who fall outside subsidy thresholds and cannot afford private care. Unless you are under 25 and covered by PIKI, access can be incredibly limited. That is neither equitable nor sustainable. The plan also speaks to hope, wellbeing and prevention yet makes little reference to the deeper drivers of suicide such as loneliness, housing stress, cultural disconnection and income insecurity. If we want significant suicide reduction, these issues are central. While the plan refers to data and information sharing, it does not address the kind of infrastructure needed to enable real-time, coordinated care. Particularly between crisis services and mental health teams. Without this, continuity of care will likely remain fragmented. Advertisement - scroll to continue reading 'The plan sounds promising on paper. However without a clear picture of who is delivering what, and how services will be integrated, it is hard to see how this plan will drive the scale of change New Zealand urgently needs to meaningfully reduce suicide.' No conflict of interest declared. Anthony O'Brien, Associate Professor in Mental Health Nursing, University of Waikato, comments: 'It is encouraging to see this new action plan on suicide. There is some tension between the action areas of the plan, and other areas of policy. Some actions require no funding but have the potential to limit suicide risk. 'For example the role of alcohol is highlighted, but curbs on alcohol advertising are not suggested. There is no plan to act on the role of social media in fueling suicide risk. There is limited recognition in the plan of the increased risk of suicide among people who are not employed, despite the report identifying social determinants contributing to suicide risk. 'It is good to see recognition of how various workforces can respond to suicidal thinking and support for those bereaved by suicide. There could be more recognition of the role of primary health care. It was surprising that the Access and Choice Programme was not included in current health-led suicide prevention supports. Also absent is the role of school nurses who in addition to providing support for students experiencing distress could be mobilised as school-based champions of suicide prevention. 'Given the commitment to measurable outcomes it would have been good to see some recognition of a suicide research strategy.'

Govt Launches Suicide Prevention Plan
Govt Launches Suicide Prevention Plan

Scoop

time4 days ago

  • Scoop

Govt Launches Suicide Prevention Plan

A five-year plan aiming to tackle New Zealand's 'stubbornly high suicide rates' has been released today. The plan includes new strategies like peer support roles for mental health patients in emergency departments, and crisis recovery cafés so people don't have to resort to a hospital and can receive care in the community. The SMC asked experts to comment. Jacqui Maguire, Registered Clinical Psychologist, comments: 'New Zealand's suicide statistics remain a source of national shame. The Government's new Suicide Prevention Action Plan signals good intent, but without meaningful detail, it is difficult to assess its true impact. 'The most obvious gap in the plan is workforce development. Peer support and coordination roles are valuable, but the plan does not outline the training and retention of psychologists, social workers and mental health nurses who are needed to meet demand. Across both public and NGO services, workforce shortages, not just budget, are a real constraint. If we do not have qualified professionals we cannot deliver the required scale of care. 'Secondly, I believe the plan could be bolder and more detailed. For example, Every emergency department should have skilled, trained support not just the 8 regions outlined. Peer support is already being trialled, including in Wellington ED, but suicide risk exists nationwide. The alcohol and suicide link is acknowledged, but there is no clear policy action mentioned. For example, will the Plan tackle outlet density or alcohol pricing? We need to ensure therapy is accessible to all. The current model excludes many middle-income earners, who fall outside subsidy thresholds and cannot afford private care. Unless you are under 25 and covered by PIKI, access can be incredibly limited. That is neither equitable nor sustainable. The plan also speaks to hope, wellbeing and prevention yet makes little reference to the deeper drivers of suicide such as loneliness, housing stress, cultural disconnection and income insecurity. If we want significant suicide reduction, these issues are central. While the plan refers to data and information sharing, it does not address the kind of infrastructure needed to enable real-time, coordinated care. Particularly between crisis services and mental health teams. Without this, continuity of care will likely remain fragmented. Advertisement - scroll to continue reading 'The plan sounds promising on paper. However without a clear picture of who is delivering what, and how services will be integrated, it is hard to see how this plan will drive the scale of change New Zealand urgently needs to meaningfully reduce suicide.' No conflict of interest declared. Anthony O'Brien, Associate Professor in Mental Health Nursing, University of Waikato, comments: 'It is encouraging to see this new action plan on suicide. There is some tension between the action areas of the plan, and other areas of policy. Some actions require no funding but have the potential to limit suicide risk. 'For example the role of alcohol is highlighted, but curbs on alcohol advertising are not suggested. There is no plan to act on the role of social media in fueling suicide risk. There is limited recognition in the plan of the increased risk of suicide among people who are not employed, despite the report identifying social determinants contributing to suicide risk. 'It is good to see recognition of how various workforces can respond to suicidal thinking and support for those bereaved by suicide. There could be more recognition of the role of primary health care. It was surprising that the Access and Choice Programme was not included in current health-led suicide prevention supports. Also absent is the role of school nurses who in addition to providing support for students experiencing distress could be mobilised as school-based champions of suicide prevention. 'Given the commitment to measurable outcomes it would have been good to see some recognition of a suicide research strategy.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store