How the US struck Iran's nuclear facilities in Operation Midnight Hammer
When America's B-2 bombers took off from a military base in Missouri and some of them made their way towards the Pacific, flight tracking enthusiasts had noted that was unusual and it would turn out to be intentionally so.
The United States had launched a B-2 bomber "strike package" but to maintain tactical surprise, some of the aircraft very visibly proceeded West and into the Pacific "as a decoy".
"The main strike package, comprised of seven B-2 spirit bombers, each with two crew members, proceeded quietly to the east with minimal communications throughout the 18-hour flight into the target area," General Dan Caine said at a Pentagon briefing on Sunday morning, local time.
Any movement of those B-2 aircraft would have been closely watched because these are the war machines capable of delivering the so-called "bunker busting bombs" that Israel has been wanting deployed in its war against Iran.
Each bomber can carry two "massive ordinance penetrators" bombs in its weapons bay and as the group of B-2s broke east towards Iran they were fully loaded.
After taking off at midnight on Saturday, local time, the B-2s were joined by an escort "support package" 17 hours later, and from there it was just less than two hours until they would be over their targets.
"The aircraft completed multiple in-flight refuelling. Once overland, the B-2 linked up with escort and support aircraft in a complex tightly timed manoeuvrer requiring exact synchronisation ... in a narrow piece of airspace, all done with minimal communications," General Caine said.
At the same time, a US submarine in the region "launched more than two dozen Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles against key surface infrastructure targets", he said.
"As the Operation Midnight Hammer strike package entered Iranian airspace, the US employed several deception tactics, including decoys, as the [escort] aircraft pushed out in front of the strike package at high altitude and high speed, sweeping in front of the package for enemy fighters and surface to air missile threats."
By early Saturday evening Washington time, the B-2s and their escorts crossed into Iranian airspace.
We now know the specific targets for this mission were the Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear sites.
The decoys were set, the three components of American military had come together and were now making their way to their targets to drop the massive payload on the facilities the US and Israel believe are critical to Iran's nuclear potential.
At approximately 6:40pm, Washington time, the lead B-2 dropped two massive ordnance penetrator (MOPs) weapons on the first target, which was the Fordow nuclear facility.
"The remaining bombers then hit their targets as well, with a total of 14 MOPs dropped against two nuclear target areas. All three Iranian nuclear infrastructure targets were struck between 6:40pm and 7:05pm Eastern Time," General Caine said.
"The Tomahawk missiles being the last to strike ... to ensure we retain the element of surprise throughout the operation."
Once the bombs had been released, the aircraft left Iranian airspace and the "package began its return home".
General Caine called the decoy move a "deception effort" and said it was only known to an "extremely small number of planners and key leaders" in Washington and Tampa, Florida where the US Central Command is based.
US President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have said the targets were obliterated, but are yet to provide evidence of the extent of the damage.
General Caine was more measured, saying damage assessments would take some time, but that: "initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction."
Inside Iran, state media initially downplayed the damage, saying they had prepared for the attack, but it is also hard to verify those claims.
General Caine said throughout the mission, the US retained the element of surprise.
"Iran's fighters did not fly and it appears that Iran's surface to air missile systems did not see us," he said.
The president of the United States had spent the week seemingly racing towards a decision on whether to strike inside Iran, only then to issue a single-line statement via his press secretary that he would give himself two weeks to make the decision.
In the end, he took two days.
And from details released on Sunday, local time, at the Pentagon, it appears that the US plan to send its finest war machines to bomb a former ally was very much ready, just waiting to be put in motion.
Mr Hegseth said: "This mission was not and has not been about regime change."
"The president authorised a precision operation to neutralise the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear program and the collective self-defence of our troops," he said.
'The United States does not seek war. But let me be clear we will act swiftly and decisively when our people, our partners or our interests are threatened."
ABC
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Iran ‘threatened Trump with sleeper-cell revenge terrorist attacks inside the United States' days before nuclear strikes
Iran threatened US President Donald Trump that it would activate sleeper cell terror attacks across the United States if he dropped a bomb on nuclear targets when he was at the G7 according to fresh US reports. The shock reports raise questions over whether this was the real reason that the US President left in a hurry cancelling talks with a string of world leaders including Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. NBC has reported overnight that Iran sent a communiqué to Trump in the days before Sunday's shock strikes on its nuclear facilities threatening to activate sleeper-cell terror. The report revealed the message got to Trump through an intermediary at the Group of Seven summit in Canada last week. He then left early June 16 to hold talks with defence officials in the United States and ramped up his rhetoric about the threat posed by Iran. It was in the days after he left the G7 that he slammed US intelligence sources claiming Iran's plan to build a nuclear bomb was not imminent. NBC reported on Monday that the White House did not respond to multiple requests for comment on the sleeper cell threat, and the Iranian Mission to the United Nations declined to comment. Donald Trump has now issued a warning on social media that any Iranian retaliation against the United States 'WILL BE MET WITH FORCE FAR GREATER THAN WHAT WAS WITNESSED TONIGHT.' US officials remain on high alert for any potential retaliation inside the United States with the Department of Homeland Security warning in a statement today that the 'Iran conflict is causing a heightened threat environment in the United States.' The statement said there could be an increased possibility of terrorist attacks 'if Iranian leadership issued a religious ruling calling for retaliatory violence against targets in the Homeland.' There are also warnings over the risk of cyberattacks on U.S. networks that could seek to target current and former U.S. government officials. US officials are on red alert over the threat of sleeper cells in the U.S. amid warnings that the risks have 'never been higher.' The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) warned in a memo sent Saturday from CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott, obtained NewsNation, that 'thousands of Iranian nationals have been documented entering the United States illegally and countless more were likely in the known and unknown got-a-ways.' 'Though we have not received any specific credible threats to share with you all currently, the threat of sleeper cells or sympathizers acting on their own, or at the behest of Iran has never been higher,' Mr Scott added. The memo urged CBP personnel to remain 'vigilant.' NewsNation correspondent Rich McHugh said Friday on the network that 'experts that we've talked to said that should the U.S. join these strikes against Iran, they may try to activate these sleeper cells in the U.S. and the West.' On Sunday, retired Gen. Frank McKenzie, the former commander of U.S. Central Command, said that he believed U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria were 'certainly vulnerable' to retaliatory attacks by Iran. PM addresses sleepr cell threat Speaking in Canberra, the Prime Minister Anthony Albanese responded directly to the sleeper threat and the risk of terror attacks on Americans and here in Australia. 'Precisely why we're calling for a de-escalation,'' he replied. 'Obviously we're opposed to any action against Australians or indeed against anyone else. 'What we want to see as President Trump has said is peace going forward. There's an opportunity for that to occur.' Asked about potential sleeper cells in Australia, the Prime Minister said that there was no change to the current threat level. ' ASIO Director-General and our security intelligence agencies are constantly engaged in monitoring,'' he replied. 'There's been no change in any of the advice that has been issued.' He also appeared to confirm Australia was taken by surprise by the attacks stressing it was 'unilateral' and that he was not warned by US authorities about the top secret mission. UK Prime Minister Keif Starmer has previously noted his Government was given prior warning of the US action in Iran but it had also been directly involved in negotiations with Iran, unlike Australia. 'The UK has been one of the countries that's been at the negotiating table with Iran for many years on its nuclear weapons program,'' Mr Albanese said. 'This was unilateral action.'
Herald Sun
an hour ago
- Herald Sun
Defence shares are booming as Trump, Middle East fuel expectations for government spending
Investors who bought into defence-focused companies and exchange traded funds months before Donald Trump was elected US president are laughing all the way to the bank. As wars intensify and President Trump pressures allies to dramatically increase their defence budgets, hundreds of billions of extra dollars will soon be spent on countries' war machines – and a slice of that will flow to savvy investors. Several global defence stocks have doubled their share price in the past year, while many others have climbed three times more than overall markets in the US, Europe and Australia, which are up eight per cent to 10 per cent. Analysts say the outlook remains strong, with the Israel-Iran conflict the latest in a string of international crises. Unlike last year's AI boom, which largely focused on US companies, the defence boom spans many countries. However, some of the best-known US defence stocks Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin, have generated only meagre returns. This global theme, combined with the fact that Australia does not have a significant listed defence sector, means many investors are looking to exchange traded funds for global exposure, and they have been rewarded so far. Three ASX-listed defence ETFs debuted last year and have climbed between 55 and 74 per cent. The best performer is the VanEck Global Defence ETF. VanEck deputy head of investments and capital markets, Jamie Hannah, said flows into ASX-listed defence ETFs have surged since March as companies including Italy's Leonards SpA, Germany's Hensoldt AG and Britain's Babcock International enjoy 'triple-digit price growth in the last year'. Mr Hannah said government spending is increasing across Europe, the US and Asia-Pacific, providing long-term revenue for defence companies. 'We often hear the term 'arms race' used in everyday contexts, but the literal meaning of countries competing for military superiority essentially describes the current geopolitical predicament,' he said. 'The thing about an arms race is that there is no finish line and no one can ever actually win the race, yet countries, even those unwilling, are compelled to participate in order to maintain national security.' Mr Hannah said the VanEck ETF does not hold any Australian defence stocks, although clients have expressed interest in Droneshield, which is up 18 per cent in the past year. Another Australian stock with defence exposure is Perth-based Austal, which is up 164 per cent over the past year. Backed by the billionaire Forrest family, it's attracted interest from South Korea's Hanwha Group. Other local companies benefiting from defence spending include Codan, up 75 per cent, and Electro Optic Systems, up 109 per cent. Equity Trustees Asset Management head of equities Chris Haynes said Trump 'wants everyone to be more self-reliant'. Mr Haynes noted the June 5 decision by NATO Defence Ministers to strengthen the alliance's deterrence and defence capabilities, through a spending commitment of 5 per cent of GDP. 'In Europe, the NATO directive will require Germany to spend €40bn for a new infantry division,' he said. 'The political will has changed and the German chancellor says spending needs to go to 3-3.5 per cent of GDP. Rheinmetall Ag is a German company that will benefit as a result of this directly.' Investors can buy overseas defence stocks directly through brokers and platforms, but will achieve more diversification buying broader funds that allocate their money throughout the sector. Betashares senior investment strategist Cameron Gleeson said many global defence contractors, including Rheinmetall, BAE Systems and Palantir, have seen a significant increase in orders and new government contracts. 'Investors are seeking exposure to the earnings growth these companies are experiencing, as well as the long tail of innovation that increased defence spending often provides,' he said. 'However, while defence companies are showing strong performance, much of the growth is happening outside Australia. As a result, investors may wish to look beyond the ASX for exposure to more mature global players with diversified revenue streams and government-backed contracts.' Mr Gleeson said investors should not focus solely on defence. 'Consider this sector for a satellite allocation, complementing a well-diversified core portfolio of Australian and international equities,' he said. Stake markets analyst Samy Sriram said defence ETFs are benefiting from investments in Palantir Technologies, which provides AI-powered defence software and sensors and has surged more than 440 per cent in a year. 'Palantir is a major beneficiary of higher defence spending, as it relies on government contracts for revenue,' she said. 'It is the third most traded stock on Stake this year. Firms that are investing in AI will be seen as increasingly important to the defence sector.' Stockspot CEO Chris Brycki said the shift to higher military spending started before Trump's re-election but his victory 'has added fuel to the fire'. Mr Brycki said Germany's defence spending increase is a notable example after it 'broke from decades of fiscal restraint by lifting its post-WWII cap on military spending'. 'This was a major policy shift that signalled how seriously many countries are now taking security,' he said. Originally published as Defence shares boom as wars intensify, company revenues surge Read related topics: Donald Trump
SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
Australia supports US strikes on Iran but 'now is the time for diplomacy', Penny Wong says
Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the world had agreed "Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon" and that Australia "supports action to prevent that". Source: AAP / Lukas Coch Foreign Minister Penny Wong has said Australia supports the United States' attack on nuclear facilities in Iran over the weekend. US President Donald Trump said the unprecedented strikes had "totally obliterated" Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities, while Iranian officials downplayed both the damage and loss of previously enriched uranium. Israel — which started striking Iran on 13 June — declared its support for the US attack, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu describing it as a "bold, righteous, and historic" action. Iran has strongly criticised the attack and said it won't go unanswered. On Monday, Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian said the US "must receive a response ", while Iran's ambassador to the United Nations said the US had "waged a war" against it under an "absurd pretext". Speaking on ABC radio's RN program on Monday morning, Wong said the world had agreed "Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon" and that Australia "supports action to prevent that". Israel has for decades warned Iran was developing a nuclear weapon. Iran has consistently denied that claim, saying its uranium enrichment program is exclusively for peaceful purposes such as energy. International assessments have found no evidence Iran has an active nuclear weaponisation program, and it is a signatory to the UN's Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Israel is not a signatory to the treaty, and is widely believed to possess nuclear weapons itself, but has never confirmed or denied this. Shortly before Israel launched strikes against Iran on 13 June, the UN nuclear watchdog said Iran was in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in 20 years, saying it had failed to provide the agency with "full and timely co-operation regarding undeclared nuclear material and activities". Wong said despite Australia supporting the US strikes, the "key question is what happens next", and urged de-escalation. "Australia says, like so many other countries, we do not want escalation and a full-scale war, and we continue to call for dialogue and diplomacy," she said. Wong was asked if her calls for diplomacy extended to demanding Israel stop its attacks on Iran. "We have seen strikes, we have seen what the US has done, we have seen the destruction, or the debilitation, of these nuclear facilities. Now is the time for diplomacy. Now is the time for de-escalation, and ... that call is to all parties," she said. Wong also appeared on Channel 9's Today program, where she said the US had not made any requests of Australia regarding action in Iran, and wouldn't speculate on the future. She wouldn't say whether or not Pine Gap, Australia's joint intelligence surveillance base with the US in the Northern Territory, played a role in the US strikes on the weekend. Wong said more than 4,000 Australians had registered for help to leave the Middle East — around 2,900 in Iran, and 1,300 in Israel. Australian officials have been deployed to Iran's border with Azerbaijan to assist Australians who were able to cross. "People have to make a judgement about how risky that is. But we urge them to move if they believe they can do so safely," she told ABC's RN. "In relation to Israel, the airspace is closed. There is some prospect of a window of airspace opening. Obviously, that is highly dependent on the situation on the ground. And we are seeking to try and arrange a facilitated flight in the event that the airspace opens." Andrew Hastie, the Opposition's acting foreign affairs spokesperson, reiterated the Coalition supports the US strikes on Iran, telling ABC's RN he was "glad to see that Penny Wong has essentially endorsed our opinion" and "glad we have bipartisanship on this". "Do we support the US in their strikes? Yes, we do. Why? Because we don't want to see Iran getting a nuclear weapon. "We support those strikes, and now we want to see dialogue and diplomacy." — With additional reporting by the Australian Associated Press
