logo
New-look public education funding bill advances toward Alaska House vote

New-look public education funding bill advances toward Alaska House vote

Yahoo06-03-2025

House Majority Leader Chuck Kopp, R-Anchorage (left) talks with Speaker of the House Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham (right) during a break in the Wednesday, March 5, 2025, meeting of the House Rules Committee. Seated at center is Rep. Louise Stutes, R-Kodiak, chair of the committee. (Photo by James Brooks/Alaska Beacon)
Alaska's public schools could receive a major permanent funding increase under a bill that will receive a final vote in the Alaska House of Representatives as soon as next week.
House Bill 69, from Rep. Rebecca Himschoot, I-Sitka, passed the House Rules Committee on a 5-2 vote early Wednesday. Speaker of the House Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham, said debate on the bill will begin Monday in order to give lawmakers enough time to write potential amendments.
HB 69 has been the biggest topic of this year's legislative session so far. If signed into law, the current version of the bill would increase K-12 public school funding by about $250 million annually.
Last year, lawmakers and Gov. Mike Dunleavy approved a $175 million one-time bonus payment for public schools, making the year-over-year increase only about $75 million.
Nevertheless, school districts across the state have said that the increase will help them prevent major cuts to programs and reduce class sizes.
The increase approved by the House Rules Committee is less than Himschoot's original proposal, which would have amounted to a $325 million increase in the first year, with more increases in the second and third years.
Speaking to the committee on Wednesday, Himschoot said she reduced the rise 'in good-faith compromise' with lawmakers who worried about the original cost of the proposal.
As originally proposed, Himschoot's bill would have left schools at the same inflation-adjusted funding level that they received in 2011. Now, schools will be below that level.
HB 69 was originally limited to funding levels, but after closed-door negotiations with Dunleavy administration officials, the bill now includes some policy changes sought by the governor.
Among the key provisions:
Parents will be able to enroll their children in any school within a particular school district. Districts won't be able to limit enrollment to students who live near a particular school.
School districts must adopt rules that limit students' ability to use cellphones in school.
There will be additional hurdles if a school district seeks to eliminate a charter school.
The Legislature will create a task force to investigate further education changes, and the state will commission a report that investigates ways to reduce regulations on school districts.
Dunleavy has proposed an alternative bill, one that includes more favorable treatment for charter schools and home-schooled students. However, that idea from the Republican governor doesn't have support among the members of the predominantly Democratic coalition that controls the House.
On Wednesday, an attempt to amend HB 69 to include the governor's proposal failed by a 3-4 vote of the rules committee, with members of the House's Republican minority caucus on the losing end.
One amendment from House Minority Leader Mia Costello, R-Anchorage, was adopted by the committee after gaining support from House Majority Leader Chuck Kopp, R-Anchorage.
That amendment calls for expanding a Dunleavy-backed reading-education bill to cover students from kindergarten through sixth grade. It currently stops at third grade.
Costello's amendment calls for the state to fund the program with $450 per student, but that funding is subject to legislative appropriation.
Alexei Painter, director of the Legislative Finance Division and the Legislature's chief budget analyst, said fully funding that provision will cost about $22 million per year.
Edgmon, a member of the rules committee, noted that Dunleavy himself has already vetoed funding earmarked to pay for his own reading law, and given that history, the program has questionable benefits.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's move against Iran may draw more criticism from MAGA's anti-interventionists
Trump's move against Iran may draw more criticism from MAGA's anti-interventionists

San Francisco Chronicle​

time7 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Trump's move against Iran may draw more criticism from MAGA's anti-interventionists

President Donald Trump's decision to strike three nuclear sites in Iran could deepen a divide among some of the Republican's supporters, including high-profile backers who had said any such move would run counter to the anti-interventionism he promised to deliver. Notably though, immediately following Trump's Saturday announcement of the strike, some of those who had publicly spoken out against U.S. involvement voiced their support. The lead-up to the move against Iranian nuclear sites had exposed fissures within Trump's 'Make American Great Again' base as some of that movement's most vocal leaders, with large followings of their own, expressed deep concern about the prospect of U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran war. With the president barred from seeking a third term, what remains unknown is how long-lasting the schism could be for Trump and his current priorities, as well as the overall future of his 'America First' movement. Among the surrogates who spoke out against American involvement were former senior adviser Steve Bannon, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., commentator Tucker Carlson and Charlie Kirk, the founder of the conservative youth organization Turning Point. Part of their consternation was rooted in Trump's own vocalized antipathy for what he and others have termed the 'forever wars' fomented in previous administrations. As the possibility of military action neared, some of those voices tamped down their rhetoric. According to Trump, Carlson even called to 'apologize.' Steve Bannon On Wednesday, Bannon, one of top advisers in Trump's 2016 campaign, told an audience in Washington that bitter feelings over Iraq were a driving force for Trump's first presidential candidacy and the MAGA movement. "One of the core tenets is no forever wars,' Bannon said. But the longtime Trump ally, who served a four-month sentence for defying a subpoena in the congressional investigation into the U.S. Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021, went on to suggest that Trump will maintain loyalty from his base no matter what. On Wednesday, Bannon acknowledged that while he and others will argue against military intervention until the end, 'the MAGA movement will back Trump.' Ultimately, Bannon said that Trump would have to make the case to the American people if he wanted to get involved in Iran. 'We don't like it. Maybe we hate it,' Bannon said, predicting what the MAGA response would be. 'But, you know, we'll get on board.' Tucker Carlson The commentator's rhetoric toward Trump was increasingly critical. Carlson, who headlined large rallies with the Republican during the 2024 campaign, earlier this month suggested that the president's posture was breaking his pledge to keep the U.S. out of new foreign entanglements. Trump clapped back at Carlson on social media, calling him 'kooky.' During an event at the White House on Wednesday, Trump said that Carlson had 'called and apologized' for calling him out. Trump said Carlson 'is a nice guy.' Carlson's conversation with Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, that day laid bare the divides among many Republicans. The two sparred for two hours over a variety of issues, primarily about possible U.S. involvement in Iran. Carlson accused Cruz of placing too much emphasis on protecting Israel in his foreign policy worldview. 'You don't know anything about Iran,' Carlson said to Cruz, after the senator said he didn't know Iran's population or its ethnic composition. 'You're a senator who's calling for the overthrow of a government, and you don't know anything about the country.' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene The Georgia Republican, who wore the signature red MAGA cap for Democratic President Joe Biden's State of the Union address in 2024, publicly sided with Carlson, criticizing Trump for deriding 'one of my favorite people.' Saying the former Fox News commentator 'unapologetically believes the same things I do,' Greene wrote on X this past week that those beliefs include that 'foreign wars/intervention/regime change put America last, kill innocent people, are making us broke, and will ultimately lead to our destruction.' 'That's not kooky,' Greene added, using the same word Trump used to describe Carlson. 'That's what millions of Americans voted for. It's what we believe is America First.' About an hour before Trump's announcement, Greene posted on X that, 'Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war.' 'This is not our fight,' she added. 'Peace is the answer.' In another post following Trump's announcement, Greene urged, 'Let us all join together and pray for peace." Alex Jones The far-right conspiracy theorist and Infowars host posted on social media earlier in the week a side-by-side of Trump's official presidential headshot and an artificial intelligence-generated composite of Trump and former Republican President George W. Bush. Trump and many of his allies have long disparaged Bush for involving the United States in the 'forever wars' in Iraq and Afghanistan. Writing 'What you voted for' above Trump's image and 'What you got' above the composite, Jones added: 'I hope this is not the case…' Charlie Kirk Kirk is among those who seemed to have made a quick about-face. About an hour after Trump's announcement, Kirk posted a series of messages on social media supportive of Trump, saying Iran had given the president 'no choice.' Kirk praised Trump for acting 'with prudence and decisiveness" and 'for the betterment of humanity.' Kirk also reposted a 2011 tweet in which Trump had written that 'Iran's quest for nuclear weapons is a major threat to our nation's national security interests. We can't allow Iran to go nuclear.' 'When Trump speaks, you should listen,' Kirk added. It was a different tone from the start of the week, when Kirk said in a Fox News interview that 'this is the moment that President Trump was elected for.' But he had warned of a potential MAGA divide over Iran. Days later, Kirk said that 'Trump voters, especially young people, supported President Trump because he was the first president in my lifetime to not start a new war.' He also wrote that 'there is historically little support for America to be actively engaged in yet another offensive war in the Middle East. We must work for and pray for peace.'

Expect Gov. Hochul's new Parole Board picks to keep letting cop-killers walk free
Expect Gov. Hochul's new Parole Board picks to keep letting cop-killers walk free

New York Post

time7 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Expect Gov. Hochul's new Parole Board picks to keep letting cop-killers walk free

Whatever her other efforts to undo New York state's worst criminal-justice moves of recent years, Gov. Kathy Hochul doesn't seem to be trying to clean up the pro-criminal Parole Board. The just-finished legislative session saw the Senate quietly confirm four of her nominees to the board — two to fill longstanding vacancies, two to finally replace members installed by then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo whose terms had expired some time ago. Going on four years after he resigned in a cloud of scandal, Cuomo picks until now still constituted a majority of the board, in part because Hochul hasn't pushed to put her own stamp on it — perhaps out of a calculation that the progressive, pro-criminal faction that controls the state Senate wouldn't confirm any tough-on-crime nominees, so what's the point? This bunch won't make a difference on the let-'em-loose panel, which has sprung at least 43 cop-killers these last eight years. It likely would've been 44, except the board last month kicked the can until after next week's Democratic mayoral primary on releasing David McClary, the gangbanger convicted of assassinating Police Officer Edward Byrne in 1988. With Cuomo running as tougher on crime than other Democrats, some suggest the delay was a bid to shield him from embarrassment before primary day. Anyway, Hochul's picks, who'll rake in $190,000 for this part-time post, look unlikely to shift the board: Lefty ex-Assemblyman Danny O'Donnell is a former public defender. Darlene Grant Bruce serves on the board of a West Harlem community services nonprofit. Elizabeth Kase is a defense attorney who specializes in cannabis law, and a partner at the politically wired firm Abrams Fensterman. José Gomérez is at best a mystery: The NYPD veteran, born and raised in the Dominican Republic, abruptly resigned as Newburgh police commissioner in May 2024 after less than three years on the job. Yet the simple fact is that the Senate wouldn't have confirmed any Parole Board nominees it hard reason to think might get tough: It certainly balks at the gov's efforts to keep the state's courts from shifting further left. Meanwhile, the Legislature keeps making it easier to qualify for parole, and the 2021 passage of the 'Less is More' law, which Hochul signed in her first months as gov, also made it easier for parole violators to stay out of prison. Bottom line: Hochul's unwilling or unable (or both) to stand up to the left on this front, as on so many others. So bet that Officer Byrne's assassin will soon walk, with a steady parade of freed cop-killers and other bad guys to follow — until New York voters start demanding candidates who'll actually support for law and order.

Thomas Massie Says Iran Attack ‘Unconstitutional' as Trump Divides MAGA
Thomas Massie Says Iran Attack ‘Unconstitutional' as Trump Divides MAGA

Miami Herald

time15 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Thomas Massie Says Iran Attack ‘Unconstitutional' as Trump Divides MAGA

Republican Representative Thomas Massie said that President Donald Trump's decision to bomb three nuclear sites in Iran is "unconstitutional" as the president faces stark division within his own party. Newsweek reached out to the White House via email Saturday night for comment. Israel launched attacks against Iran's capital city of Tehran earlier this month in what it called a "preemptive strike" and warned its citizens of retaliatory bombings from Iran. Military tensions between the two countries have rapidly escalated in the days since as Trump continues to double down that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Taking to X, formerly Twitter, after Trump announced the strikes, Massie said, "This is not Constitutional." Trump announced the military move on Truth Social saying the U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan in Iran. The president said all planes are now out of Iran air space and "safely on their way home." Massie has been a staunch opponent of striking Iran, previously saying he would not back a move to get involved in a "regime change war." Other Republican leaders like Lindsey Graham have urged Trump to go "all in" on Iran. This is a developing story that will be updated with additional information. Related Articles Trump Says US Bombed Iran's Nuclear Fortress of Fordow and Two Other SitesState Dept Starts Exit Flights From Israel as Trump Mulls War EntryB2 Bombers Move Into Pacific As Israel Hits Iran Radar Near Strait of HormuzSatellite Images Show Israeli Strike Damage to Iranian Nuclear Site 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store