After intense hearing and controversial emails, Senate committee recommends confirming OSBE nominee
The Senate Education Committee has voted to confirm one of Republican Gov. Kevin Stitt's newest nominees to the Oklahoma State Board of Education after an intense hearing where senators decried an email campaign aimed at derailing the nomination.
The emails compared Chris Van Denhende to the former leader of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev — a description Senate President Pro Tempore Lonnie Paxton, R-Tuttle, and other top Republicans called deeply unfair.
Paxton said the messages were written 'by people who feel empowered by a keyboard' who 'send emails at 2 or 3 in the morning' and called their content 'unfair, hateful opposition.'
'If you shared those things … then you are part of the problem,' he said during the committee meeting on Thursday, May 15.
The committee ultimately voted 9-2 to advance Van Denhende's confirmation to the full Senate. Two far-right senators, Sen. Dusty Deevers, R-Elgin, and Sen. Kendal Sacchieri, R-Blanchard, opposed the nomination. Paxton and Senate Majority Floor Leader Julie Daniels, R-Bartlesville — who both sit on the committee by nature of their leadership positions but rarely attend — both voted to advance Van Denhende's nomination.
Van Denhende was one of three members appointed to the board in February by Stitt in a shakeup that replaced three previous members. Republican state schools Superintendent Ryan Walters, the chair of the board and the head of the Oklahoma State Department of Education by nature of his elected position, criticized Stitt's action and has clashed with the new board members during two meetings since their appointment.
Van Denhende and his fellow new board members have faced a wave of backlash, particularly online, from people who say they support Walters.
Sen. Regina Goodwin, D-Tulsa, who sponsored Van Denhende's appointment, opened the hearing by praising him: 'If Governor Stitt and Regina Goodwin can agree, there must be something darn, darn good about this man.'
Van Denhende is the chief financial officer for Mint Turbines and Southwest Fuel Systems in Stroud. He previously served for about four years as a regent for the Regional University System of Oklahoma before joining the state Board of Education.
'I am returning to the state what the state gave me in education,' he said about his service on state education boards.
A few minutes later, Deevers — one of only four known members of the Legislature's far-right Freedom Caucus — began peppering Van Denhende with questions about whether he disagreed with Walters' approach to education, what role he thought the state Board of Education played — and if it had the right under law to hold Walters accountable, if he supported Walters' initiatives, and about controversial social studies academic standards Walters successfully pushed through the board in February.
In response to Deevers' questioning, Van Denhende said the board has the constitutional responsibility to vote on issues that come before it. He also said he had 'little issue' with specific content in the standards, although he added he thought 2020 election-denial language quietly inserted by Walters at the last minute 'doesn't need to be in the standards.' Van Denhende said the process used to pass the standards bothered him.
Van Denhende previously has said he believes the new board members were deceived during their first meeting when Walters told them they had to vote that day on the standards — when they really had up to two more months to do so — and that he failed to tell them about last-minute changes made to the standards. The members were not provided with a copy of the completed standards until 4 p.m. on the day before the 9:30 a.m. board meeting.
Deevers said he'd vote against Van Denhende's nomination because 'there's been a disservice done to our board.'
After Deevers finished his line of questioning, three Republicans, including Paxton, spoke out against what they said were personal attacks against Van Denhende and his family, both in emails sent to legislators and in a conservative blog post opposing the nomination.
Pugh said he'd received emails comparing Van Denhende to Gorbachev. With his voice rising as he spoke, Senate Education Committee Chair Adam Pugh, R-Edmond, expressed anger similar to that of Paxton.
'It is absolutely the duty of a state board member to ensure that the agency fulfills it mission,' Pugh said. 'Now, how we go about holding elected officials accountable, I fear we've moved ourselves from a republic to a direct democracy, where it is 'do exactly as I say, or else.' That's actually everything that the founding fathers were against.'
Turning to Van Denhende, Pugh said, 'You do not work for me, nor do you work for any member of this committee. You do not work for the governor of Oklahoma, though he certainly has the power to fire you. … You also, much to the surprise of people who filled my inbox with nonsense, don't work for the state superintendent of education. You work for 4 million Oklahomans.'
Asked afterward about the email attacks mentioned by the senators, Van Denhende said, "Apparently there was something that went out that bombarded the Senate Education Committee on my nomination today. I overnight became a green woke Marxist. I'm not really sure how that came about."
The drama continued outside the meeting room at the Capitol after the 45-minute confirmation hearing. Daniels and Sacchieri appeared to have a heated conversation, while down the hallway, a lobbyist for the Oklahoma State Department of Education, Lindsey McSparrin, was speaking with Sen. Dave Rader, R-Tulsa, who was upset about the campaign being used against Van Denhende, whom Rader said he's known for 50 years. State Education Secretary Nellie Tayloe Sanders hugged Van Denhende.
At least two, and perhaps three, more of Stitt's nominees await confirmation hearings before the Senate committee. The Legislature must finish its work, including those hearings, by May 30.
The committee also approved, by a 9-0 vote, the nomination of Rainey Williams to the University of Oklahoma Board of Regents. Williams is a businessman and investor with ties to OU Health Inc. He's also the president of Oklahoma City-based Marco Capital Group, an investment partnership. University of Oklahoma President Joseph Harroz attended the hearing in support of Williams.
This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: OK Senate committee recommends Chris Van Denhende's OSBE appointment
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
24 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
GOP tax bill would ease regulations on gun silencers and some rifles and shotguns
Advertisement Republicans who have long supported the changes, along with the gun industry, say the tax infringes on Second Amendment rights. They say silencers are mostly used by hunters and target shooters for sport. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'Burdensome regulations and unconstitutional taxes shouldn't stand in the way of protecting American gun owners' hearing,' said Clyde, who owns two gun stores in Georgia and often wears a pin shaped like an assault rifle on his suit lapel. Democrats are fighting to stop the provision, which was unveiled days after two Minnesota state legislators were shot in their homes, as the bill speeds through the Senate. They argue that loosening regulations on silencers could make it easier for criminals and active shooters to conceal their weapons. Advertisement 'Parents don't want silencers on their streets, police don't want silencers on their streets,' said Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. The gun language has broad support among Republicans and has received little attention as House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., work to settle differences within the party on cuts to Medicaid and energy tax credits, among other issues. But it is just one of hundreds of policy and spending items included to entice members to vote for the legislation that could have broad implications if the bill is enacted within weeks, as Trump wants. Inclusion of the provision is also a sharp turn from the climate in Washington just three years ago when Democrats, like Republicans now, controlled Congress and the White House and pushed through bipartisan gun legislation. The bill increased background checks for some buyers under the age of 21, made it easier to take firearms from potentially dangerous people and sent millions of dollars to mental health services in schools. Passed in the summer of 2022, just weeks after the shooting of 19 children and two adults at a school in Uvalde, Texas, it was the most significant legislative response to gun violence in decades. Three years later, as they try to take advantage of their consolidated power in Washington, Republicans are packing as many of their longtime priorities as possible, including the gun legislation, into the massive, wide-ranging bill that Trump has called 'beautiful.' 'I'm glad the Senate is joining the House to stand up for the Second Amendment and our Constitution, and I will continue to fight for these priorities as the Senate works to pass President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill,' said Texas Sen. John Cornyn, who was one of the lead negotiators on the bipartisan gun bill in 2022 but is now facing a primary challenge from the right in his bid for reelection next year. Advertisement If the gun provisions remain in the larger legislation and it is passed, silencers and the short-barrel rifles and shotguns would lose an extra layer of regulation that they are subject to under the National Firearms Act, passed in the 1930s in response to concerns about mafia violence. They would still be subject to the same regulations that apply to most other guns — and that includes possible loopholes that allow some gun buyers to avoid background checks when guns are sold privately or online. Larry Keane of the National Shooting Sports Foundation, who supports the legislation, says changes are aimed at helping target shooters and hunters protect their hearing. He argues that the use of silencers in violent crimes is rare. 'All it's ever intended to do is to reduce the report of the firearm to hearing safe levels,' Keane says. Speaking on the floor before the bill passed the House, Rep. Clyde said the bill restores Second Amendment rights from 'over 90 years of draconian taxes.' Clyde said Johnson included his legislation in the larger bill 'with the purest of motive.' 'Who asked for it? I asked,' said Clyde, who ultimately voted for the bill after the gun silencer provision was added. Clyde was responding to Rep. Maxwell Frost, a 28-year-old Florida Democrat, who went to the floor and demanded to know who was responsible for the gun provision. Frost, who was a gun-control activist before being elected to Congress, called himself a member of the 'mass shooting generation' and said the bill would help 'gun manufacturers make more money off the death of children and our people.' Advertisement Among other concerns, control advocates say less regulation for silencers could make it harder for law enforcement to stop an active shooter. 'There's a reason silencers have been regulated for nearly a century: They make it much harder for law enforcement and bystanders to react quickly to gunshots,' said John Feinblatt, president of Everytown for Gun Safety. Schumer and other Democrats are trying to convince the Senate parliamentarian to drop the language as she reviews the bill for policy provisions that aren't budget-related. 'Senate Democrats will fight this provision at the parliamentary level and every other level with everything we've got,' Schumer said earlier this month.
Boston Globe
33 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
GOP can't include limits on Trump lawsuits in megabill, Senate official rules
'Individual district judges -- who don't even have authority over any of the other 92 district courts -- are single-handedly vetoing policies the American people elected President Trump to implement,' Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, chairm of the Judiciary Committee, said in announcing the proposal in March. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Republicans are pushing their bill to carry out Trump's agenda through Congress using special rules that shield legislation from a filibuster, depriving Democrats of the ability to block it. But to qualify for that protection, the legislation must only include proposals that directly change federal spending and not add to long-term deficits. Advertisement The Senate parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, makes such judgments. She ruled that the measure did not meet the requirements, according to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. 'Senate Republicans tried to write Donald Trump's contempt for the courts into law -- gutting judicial enforcement, defying the Constitution, and bulldozing the very rule of law that forms our democracy,' Schumer said in a statement. 'It was nothing short of an assault on the system of checks and balances that has anchored this nation since its founding.' Advertisement Senate Republicans sought to target the preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders that often block administration policies. Republicans in the House passed a measure in their version of their party's major policy bill to impose limits on federal judges' power to hold people in contempt. The actions came as federal judges have opened inquiries about whether to hold the Trump administration in contempt for violating their orders in cases related to its aggressive deportation efforts. The decision on Sunday is part of a broader review MacDonough is conducting of the Republican-written legislation, which includes large tax cuts and reductions in social programs such as Medicaid and food stamps. She ruled that Republicans could include in their bill a divisive measure that would block states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., opposes that provision and has said he intends to introduce an amendment to try to kill the measure. MacDonough also rejected a GOP plan to push some of the costs of nutrition assistance, formerly known as SNAP, onto the states, a ruling that has sent Republicans back to the drawing board to find another strategy for covering tens of billions of dollars of the bill's cost. She was expected to work into the week evaluating the measure and instructing Republicans to strip out any provision she deems out of order, including whether they can use a budget trick that would make extending the 2017 tax cuts appear to be free. Advertisement If Republicans fail to remove the measures she deems out of order, Democrats could challenge the bill on the floor, forcing Republicans to muster 60 votes to advance it. That would effectively kill the legislation since Democrats are solidly opposed. This article originally appeared in
Associated Press
39 minutes ago
- Associated Press
GOP tax bill would ease regulations on gun silencers and some rifles and shotguns
WASHINGTON (AP) — The massive tax and spending cuts package that President Donald Trump wants on his desk by July 4 would loosen regulations on gun silencers and certain types of rifles and shotguns, advancing a longtime priority of the gun industry as Republican leaders in the House and Senate try to win enough votes to pass the bill. The guns provision was first requested in the House by Georgia Rep. Andrew Clyde, a Republican gun store owner who had initially opposed the larger tax package. The House bill would remove silencers — called 'suppressors' by the gun industry — from a 1930s law that regulates firearms that are considered the most dangerous, eliminating a $200 tax while removing a layer of background checks. The Senate kept the provision on silencers in its version of the bill and expanded upon it, adding short-barreled, or sawed-off, rifles and shotguns. Republicans who have long supported the changes, along with the gun industry, say the tax infringes on Second Amendment rights. They say silencers are mostly used by hunters and target shooters for sport. 'Burdensome regulations and unconstitutional taxes shouldn't stand in the way of protecting American gun owners' hearing,' said Clyde, who owns two gun stores in Georgia and often wears a pin shaped like an assault rifle on his suit lapel. Democrats are fighting to stop the provision, which was unveiled days after two Minnesota state legislators were shot in their homes, as the bill speeds through the Senate. They argue that loosening regulations on silencers could make it easier for criminals and active shooters to conceal their weapons. 'Parents don't want silencers on their streets, police don't want silencers on their streets,' said Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. The gun language has broad support among Republicans and has received little attention as House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., work to settle differences within the party on cuts to Medicaid and energy tax credits, among other issues. But it is just one of hundreds of policy and spending items included to entice members to vote for the legislation that could have broad implications if the bill is enacted within weeks, as Trump wants. Inclusion of the provision is also a sharp turn from the climate in Washington just three years ago when Democrats, like Republicans now, controlled Congress and the White House and pushed through bipartisan gun legislation. The bill increased background checks for some buyers under the age of 21, made it easier to take firearms from potentially dangerous people and sent millions of dollars to mental health services in schools. Passed in the summer of 2022, just weeks after the shooting of 19 children and two adults at a school in Uvalde, Texas, it was the most significant legislative response to gun violence in decades. Three years later, as they try to take advantage of their consolidated power in Washington, Republicans are packing as many of their longtime priorities as possible, including the gun legislation, into the massive, wide-ranging bill that Trump has called 'beautiful.' 'I'm glad the Senate is joining the House to stand up for the Second Amendment and our Constitution, and I will continue to fight for these priorities as the Senate works to pass President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill,' said Texas Sen. John Cornyn, who was one of the lead negotiators on the bipartisan gun bill in 2022 but is now facing a primary challenge from the right in his bid for reelection next year. If the gun provisions remain in the larger legislation and it is passed, silencers and the short-barrel rifles and shotguns would lose an extra layer of regulation that they are subject to under the National Firearms Act, passed in the 1930s in response to concerns about mafia violence. They would still be subject to the same regulations that apply to most other guns — and that includes possible loopholes that allow some gun buyers to avoid background checks when guns are sold privately or online. Larry Keane of the National Shooting Sports Foundation, who supports the legislation, says changes are aimed at helping target shooters and hunters protect their hearing. He argues that the use of silencers in violent crimes is rare. 'All it's ever intended to do is to reduce the report of the firearm to hearing safe levels,' Keane says. Speaking on the floor before the bill passed the House, Rep. Clyde said the bill restores Second Amendment rights from 'over 90 years of draconian taxes.' Clyde said Johnson included his legislation in the larger bill 'with the purest of motive.' 'Who asked for it? I asked,' said Clyde, who ultimately voted for the bill after the gun silencer provision was added. Clyde was responding to Rep. Maxwell Frost, a 28-year-old Florida Democrat, who went to the floor and demanded to know who was responsible for the gun provision. Frost, who was a gun-control activist before being elected to Congress, called himself a member of the 'mass shooting generation' and said the bill would help 'gun manufacturers make more money off the death of children and our people.' Among other concerns, control advocates say less regulation for silencers could make it harder for law enforcement to stop an active shooter. 'There's a reason silencers have been regulated for nearly a century: They make it much harder for law enforcement and bystanders to react quickly to gunshots,' said John Feinblatt, president of Everytown for Gun Safety. Schumer and other Democrats are trying to convince the Senate parliamentarian to drop the language as she reviews the bill for policy provisions that aren't budget-related. 'Senate Democrats will fight this provision at the parliamentary level and every other level with everything we've got,' Schumer said earlier this month.
