Britain's Starmer mistakes South Korean interpreter for president (VIDEO)
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer appears to have mistaken an interpreter with the South Korean delegation at the G7 summit for the country's president.
The mix-up took place during a photo opportunity at the entrance to the summit venue in Canada. A video from the event shows Starmer confidently shaking the man's hand and smiling, while South Korean President Lee Jae-myung stood behind him waiting to be acknowledged.
Starmer held the interpreter's hand for several seconds before the mistake became apparent as President Lee stepped forward. The two leaders eventually greeted each other but then apparently had another moment of confusion as to where to stand for the photo. South Korea, along with Australia and India, participated as guests of the event.
London has denied claims of an embarrassing diplomatic mistake.
Keir Starmer mistakenly shakes hands with a Korean interpreter instead of the President of South Korea (2025) pic.twitter.com/OYDjij1aJ1
The day before, Starmer had to kneel in front of US President Donald Trump to frantically trying to gather up trade papers that hd been dropped by the American leader.
The agenda for the 51st G7 summit included support for Ukraine, the Middle East, sanctions, AI and energy security.
During the summit, Trump had claimed that kicking Russia out of the group was a big mistake and suggested that Moscow's presence in the G8, as it was known, could have helped prevent the Ukraine conflict.
The Kremlin has argued that the G7 has 'lost its relevance' and no longer reflects global economic dynamics.
Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev applauded Trump's criticism of the group and his decision to leave the event early, but stressed that the G7 is a 'dead club.' Writing on X, he claimed that its members had already looked like 'zombies' over a decade ago.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
7 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump believes only ‘agreement' can solve Russia–Ukraine conflict
US President Donald Trump views a negotiated agreement between Russia and Ukraine as the only viable path to ending the ongoing conflict, according to State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce. Trump's efforts to mediate a truce between Russia and Ukraine contributed to the countries restarting direct negotiations in Türkiye last month – talks that Kiev had abandoned in 2022 to focus on its military campaign. Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Friday that while Moscow is not seeking an 'unconditional surrender,' Kiev must acknowledge the 'realities on the ground' and that its negotiating position worsens with each passing day. In a press briefing on Friday, Bruce was asked whether those remarks meant Moscow was not serious about the talks, and how Washington would respond. 'As I've mentioned before, during negotiations, things sometimes progress, things change. That's the whole point of negotiations and conversations: you signal how long you're generally willing to wait, but you also know if someone is serious,' she said, noting, 'At the same time, we've heard some very blunt comments by President Trump about President Putin.' That's where we've landed at this point in comments from both the president and secretary of state – that the only way this is going to end is for the two parties to meet and come to a conclusion and a decision, and some kind of an agreement. She added that while the US remains Ukraine's 'biggest supporter,' the process of peace negotiations is complex and constantly evolving. 'We are clearly making our presence and our care about the situation known... but this is not about reacting to a single quote or online statement,' she said. When asked about Putin's assertion that Russia now holds a 'strategic advantage' in the conflict, Bruce declined to comment on potential punitive measures or new sanctions, reiterating: 'We're not going to listen to what [Russia] says – we're going to watch what they do.' 'Only the president can make the decision about how to proceed. Only he knows all the elements about what's important and how we're going to make a difference,' she said. 'As I term it… there is one guiding hand to the choices that we make. And that would include Russia, Ukraine, and every conflict he's trying to stop.' The spokeswoman added that direct engagement between Moscow and Washington continues behind the scenes, involving 'months now of dealing with the parties directly,' and argued that Trump, as 'the most powerful leader in the world right now,' is better positioned than the public or press to assess the situation.
Russia Today
11 hours ago
- Russia Today
Kiev's sovereignty, worsening positions & ‘final mistake': Key takeaways from Putin's Q&A
Moscow is not seeking the 'unconditional surrender' of Ukraine but wants it to acknowledge the realities on the ground, Russian President Vladimir Putin told the audience at SPIEF 2025, commenting on various aspects of the Ukraine conflict, Russia's goals and potential directions for resolving the crisis. President Putin took part in the plenary session of the annual St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF 2025) on Friday, delivering a major speech and participating in a Q&A session. Here are the key takeaways concerning the conflict in Ukraine:Kiev's surrender Asked whether Moscow expects an 'unconditional surrender' from Kiev – similar to the demand his US counterpart Donald Trump is making of Iran – the Russian president said that was not the case, reiterating Russia's readiness to resolve the conflict through diplomacy.'We are not seeking the surrender of Ukraine. We insist on recognition of the realities that have developed on the ground,' he said. Worsening negotiation positions Russia has consistently attempted to settle the conflict in the then-Ukrainian Donbass, which erupted after the Western-backed 2014 Maidan coup, through diplomatic means, the president said. However, those efforts were repeatedly undermined by Kiev and its backers.'At each stage, we suggested to those with whom we were in contact in Ukraine to stop and said, 'Let's negotiate now. Because this logic of purely military actions can result in your situation getting worse, and then we will have to conduct our negotiations from other positions, from positions that are worse for you.' This happened several times,' Putin said. Foreign-fueled conflict Negotiations held in Istanbul in early 2022, shortly after the conflict escalated, fell apart under pressure from the same 'neocolonial forces,' Putin added.'Those who are guided by old, neocolonial principles, including and above all in Europe, thought that now they would easily profit at the expense of Russia: crush it, destroy it, annihilate it, and receive some dividends from this,' he said. Ukraine's sovereignty Russia has never denied Ukraine's right to exist as an independent nation, Putin said. However, in the years since the Soviet Union's collapse, the country has drifted from the principles on which it originally gained its independence. 'The grounds on which Ukraine became independent and sovereign were set out in the Declaration of Independence of Ukraine of 1991, where it is clearly written in black and white that Ukraine is a non-aligned, non-nuclear, neutral state. It would be a good idea to return to these fundamental values on which Ukraine gained its independence and sovereignty,' he the same time, Putin reiterated his belief that, in a certain sense, all of Ukraine is Russian. 'I have said many times that I consider Russians and Ukrainians to be one people, in fact. In this sense, all of Ukraine is ours,' he said. Obtaining and using a nuclear device of any sort, including a crude 'dirty bomb,' would be a 'final mistake' for Kiev, the Russian president warned. Such an action would trigger a 'mirror response' from Moscow with 'catastrophic' consequences for Ukraine.'Our response will be very harsh and, most likely, catastrophic for both the neo-Nazi regime and, unfortunately, for Ukraine itself. I hope that they will never come to that,' Putin said, adding that Moscow currently has no intelligence suggesting Kiev is pursuing such a military thinned out Kiev's forces are suffering from severe manpower shortages, with units at only 47% of full strength on average, Putin stated. He said Ukraine's attack on Russia's Kursk Region last August – driven by political rather than military reasoning – worsened the situation and further stretched its forces along an expanded frontline. 'They got into Kursk Region. First of all, they lost 76,000 people there. It was a disaster for them,' Putin said. 'In the end, as we said, we drove them out of there, but they created a threat to us... along the entire line of the state border with Ukraine, in two other neighboring regions,' he actions created an additional 1,600 km-long line of contact, he noted. 'They pulled apart all their armed forces. It is hard to imagine bigger stupidity from a military point of view,' he said. Russian troops could go deeper into Ukraine Putin did not rule out the possibility of advancing further into Ukrainian territory to establish a 'buffer zone' protecting Russian border areas from ongoing attacks by Kiev's the defeat of Ukrainian forces in Kursk, Russian troops moved into Ukraine's Sumy Region. According to Putin, the buffer zone there is already up to 12 km deep.'We don't have the goal of taking Sumy, but in principle, I don't rule it out,' he said.
Russia Today
21 hours ago
- Russia Today
UN watchdog report ‘hardly' justification for attack on Iran
Israel's attack on Iran is not justified by the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) latest report, which states there is no evidence that Tehran is developing a nuclear bomb, according to the agency's chief, Rafael Grossi. Israel launched airstrikes against Iran last week, claiming it was on the brink of developing a nuclear bomb. Tehran denied the accusation and responded with retaliatory strikes. Israel's attack came several days after the IAEA Board of Governors declared Iran in breach of its nonproliferation obligations. The resolution cited Grossi's recent report that Iran had enriched uranium to 60% purity, albeit short of the 90% required for weapons-grade material, and was not cooperating with inspectors. Speaking to CNN's Anderson Cooper on Thursday, Grossi stressed that the IAEA's report 'could hardly be a basis for military action.' 'Military action, whomever it comes [from], is a political decision that has nothing to do with what we are saying,' he said. Grossi acknowledged that Iran had failed to provide adequate answers to the agency's inquiries, but emphasized that the IAEA 'do not have any indication that there is a systematic program in Iran to manufacture, to produce a nuclear weapon.' He also noted that enriched uranium alone does not equal a bomb. 'We do not have any evidence that this is ongoing in Iran,' he said. Tehran had previously accused the IAEA chief of betrayal, saying his 'biased report' was used to 'craft' the resolution used by Israel to justify its 'unlawful attack.' US intelligence agencies have also maintained there is no evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon. Nevertheless, US President Donald Trump has dismissed those findings, insisting Iran was 'very close' to getting a bomb when Israel attacked. He has called for Iran's 'unconditional surrender' and warned of possible US involvement if American targets are attacked. Since launching its assault, Israel has hit several Iranian nuclear sites, including in Natanz, Isfahan, and near Tehran. However, the Israeli military reportedly lacks the capability to breach Iran's fortified Fordow facility – built deep within a mountain – and has allegedly asked the US to use its GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs, according to Axios. The White House has insisted that Trump had ruled out direct US participation in the strikes. The Wall Street Journal, however, recently claimed the president has already approved a US attack plan but is yet to give the order. Israel's campaign has drawn widespread condemnation. Moscow has accused West Jerusalem of violating international law and warned that US intervention would escalate the crisis.
