US court lets Trump retain control of California National Guard for now

FILE PHOTO: U.S. Marines stand watch as people protest against U.S. President Donald Trump's policies and federal immigration sweeps during a No Kings Day demonstration in Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 14, 2025. REUTERS/David Ryder/File Photo
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court let Donald Trump on Thursday retain control over California's National Guard while the state's Democratic governor proceeds with a lawsuit challenging the legality of the Republican president's use of the troops to quell protests and unrest in Los Angeles.
A three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals extended a pause it placed on U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer's June 12 ruling that Trump had called the National Guard into federal service unlawfully.
Breyer's ruling was issued in a lawsuit against Trump's action brought by Governor Gavin Newsom.
Breyer ruled that Trump violated the U.S. law governing a president's ability to take control of a state's National Guard by failing to coordinate with the governor, and also found that the conditions set out under the statute to allow this move, such as a rebellion against federal authority, did not exist.
Breyer ordered Trump to return control of California's National Guard to Newsom. Hours after Breyer acted, the 9th Circuit panel put the judge's move on hold temporarily.
Amid protests and turmoil in Los Angeles over Trump's immigration raids, the president on June 7 took control of California's National Guard and deployed 4,000 troops against the wishes of Newsom. Trump also ordered 700 U.S. Marines to the city after sending in the National Guard. Breyer has not yet ruled on the legality of the Marine Corps mobilization.
At a court hearing on Tuesday on whether to extend the pause on Breyer's decision, members of the 9th Circuit panel questioned lawyers for California and the Trump administration on what role, if any, courts should have in reviewing Trump's authority to deploy the troops.
The law sets out three conditions under which a president can federalize state National Guard forces, including an invasion, a "rebellion or danger of a rebellion" against the government or a situation in which the U.S. government is unable with regular forces to execute the country's laws.
The Justice Department has said that once the president determines that an emergency that warrants the use of the National Guard exists, no court or state governor can review that decision.
Trump's decision to send troops into Los Angeles prompted a national debate about the use of the military on U.S. soil and inflamed political tensions in the second most-populous U.S. city.
The protests in Los Angeles lasted for more than a week, but subsequently ebbed, leading Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass to lift a curfew she had imposed.
California argued in its June 9 lawsuit that Trump's deployment of the National Guard and the Marines violated the state's sovereignty and U.S. laws that forbid federal troops from participating in civilian law enforcement.
The lawsuit stated the situation in Los Angeles was nothing like a "rebellion." The protests involved sporadic acts of violence that state and local law enforcement were capable of handling without military involvement, according to the lawsuit.
The Trump administration has denied that troops are engaging in law enforcement, saying that they are instead protecting federal buildings and personnel, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers.
The 9th Circuit panel is comprised of two judges appointed by Trump during his first term and one appointee of Democratic former President Joe Biden.
(Reporting by Dietrich Knauth in New York and Kanishka Singh in Washington, Editing by Will Dunham and Alexia Garamfalvi)

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Sun

an hour ago

• The Sun

Israel-Iran conflict escalates with strikes, arrests, and blackout

JERUSALEM: Israel and Iran exchanged fire again on Friday, a week into the war between the longtime enemies. Here are the latest developments: Iran meetings European top diplomats are meeting with Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Geneva on Friday to discuss Iran's nuclear programme. 'I've received several phone calls reassuring me that the Zionist regime would not target' Araghchi en route to Geneva, his adviser Mohammad Reza Ranjbaran said on X. Foreign ministers from France, Germany, Britain and the EU are urging de-escalation, with British Foreign Secretary David Lammy saying the next two weeks are 'a window... to achieve a diplomatic solution'. Separately, the UN Security Council is also due to convene on Friday for a second session on the conflict, at Iran's request with support from Russia, China and Pakistan, a diplomat told AFP on Wednesday. Overnight strikes Israel's military said Friday it struck dozens of targets in Tehran overnight, including what it called a centre for the 'research and development of Iran's nuclear weapons project.' In an upscale neighbourhood of Tehran, some residents were looking out at the night sky from their rooftops, with red blasts lighting up the darkness, AFP journalists saw. In another area, an Iranian cried out through a loudspeaker, with music blasting in the background: 'Death to Israel, death to America!' Iran's Revolutionary Guards said more than 100 'combat and suicide' drones were launched at Israel on Thursday. Trump waiting to decide US President Donald Trump said Thursday he will decide whether to join Israel's strikes on Iran within the next two weeks as there is still a 'substantial' chance of negotiations to end the conflict. The Wall Street Journal reported Trump told aides he approved attack plans but is holding off to see if Iran will give up its nuclear programme. Tehran ally Moscow said any US military action 'would be an extremely dangerous step', while pro-Iran groups in Iraq threatened retaliatory attacks. Dozens of US military aircraft were no longer visible at a US base in Qatar on Thursday, satellite images showed -- a possible move to shield them from potential Iranian strikes. Iran's new intelligence chief Iran appointed a new chief of intelligence at its Revolutionary Guards on Thursday, the official IRNA news agency said, after his predecessor was killed in an Israeli strike last week. Major General Mohammad Pakpour, the commander of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, appointed Brigadier General Majid Khadami as the new head of its intelligence division, IRNA said. He replaces Mohammed Kazemi, who was killed on Sunday alongside two other Revolutionary Guards officers -- Hassan Mohaghegh and Mohsen Bagheri -- in an Israeli strike. Ali Shamkhani, adviser to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was in stable condition, state TV reported on Friday, after he was seriously injured last week. Death toll The body of a woman was recovered on Thursday from a building struck by an Iranian missile four days earlier, taking the overall death toll in Israel to 25 since the war began, according to Israeli authorities. Iran said Sunday that Israeli strikes had killed at least 224 people, including military commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians. Authorities have not issued an updated toll since. Arrests and blackout Iranian police announced the arrest on Thursday of 24 people accused of spying for Israel. Authorities in both Israel and Iran have announced arrests for espionage and other charges since the war began on Friday. Norway-based NGO Iran Human Rights said at least 223 people have been arrested nationwide on charges related to collaboration with Israel, cautioning that the actual figure was likely higher. Iran imposed a 'nationwide internet shutdown' on Thursday -- the most extensive blackout since widespread anti-government protests in 2019 -- internet watchdog NetBlocks said. The shutdown 'impacts the public's ability to stay connected at a time when communications are vital', NetBlocks wrote on X.

Barnama

4 hours ago

• Barnama

60 Pct of Americans Don't Think US Should Get Involved In Israel-Iran Conflict: Poll

Supporters attend Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump's rally in Juneau, Wisconsin, U.S., October 6, 2024. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid WASHINGTON, June 20 (Bernama-Anadolu) -- A majority of Americans do not want the US to get involved in the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, according to a poll released this week. The Economist/YouGov poll found that just 16 per cent of Americans believe the US military should intervene in the conflict, while a clear majority - 60 per cent - oppose involvement and 24 per cent remain undecided, Anadolu Ajansi reported, citing the poll. Majorities across party lines -- 65 per cent of Democrats, 61 per cent of Independents and 53 per cent of Republicans -- oppose US involvement, reflecting broad bipartisan resistance to entering the conflict. bootstrap slideshow The poll was conducted among 1,512 US adult citizens and the margin of error for the overall sample was approximately 3 per cent. US President Donald Trump said Thursday that he will decide on whether or not to carry out strikes on Iran within two weeks. "Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks," Trump said in a statement read aloud by White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt. The announcement came as Trump faces an internal rift within his Republican base over whether or not he should join Israel's campaign against Iran. Prominent voices, including media personality Tucker Carlson, Trump strategist Steve Bannon, Sen. Rand Paul and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, have warned against the president becoming involved in direct military action. Many have voiced criticism that direct involvement would lead to Trump becoming entangled in another costly foreign intervention, something he vocally campaigned against while running for president.

The Star

4 hours ago

• The Star

DC outlook intact for now

Sunway University economics professor Dr Yeah Kim Leng. PETALING JAYA: There is a possibility that the firms involved in the alleged breach involving Nvidia-powered artificial intelligence (AI) chips may face US sanctions, but such measures are unlikely to be applied to Malaysia, says Sunway University economics professor Dr Yeah Kim Leng. Yeah said this is given that many existing data centres (DCs) and those in the pipeline are US-based companies. 'Nvidia, a US company, is seeking new markets to offset its loss of China's market as the Chinese government has banned the use of its chips. 'China is accelerating development of home-grown AI chips, thereby offering an alternative supply unless companies that use them are also sanctioned by the United States,' he told StarBiz. Yeah opined that despite the uncertainties caused by the technological rivalry between China and the United States, the outlook for DCs in Malaysia remained positive given the rising local and global demand for cloud and AI services. 'Malaysia will also benefit from the global firms' diversification of DCs that leveraged on each country's growth opportunities and cost advantages such as availability of cheap energy, land and skilled manpower resources,' he said. According to a Wall Street Journal article, Chinese engineers reportedly flew to Malaysia in March with suitcases full of hard drives containing around 80 terabytes of data to train AI models at local DCs equipped with advanced Nvidia chips. In addressing the alleged breach, the Investment, Trade and Industry Ministry (Miti) said, in a statement on Wednesday, it is in the process of verifying the matter with relevant agencies. It reiterated that servers using Nvidia chips and AI chips are not classified as controlled goods under the Malaysian Strategic Trade Act 2010. 'Malaysia will cooperate with any government that requires assistance in monitoring trade in sensitive goods under the export control of their respective countries,' it said. Given that the allegations were made in March, MIDF Research said it could be a move to 'speed up the process', before the eventually rescinded AI Diffusion Framework that was expected to come into force on May 15. The research house is of the view that the pipeline of DC jobs in Malaysia is unlikely to be impacted by the alleged breach. It noted there is no slowdown or delay in ongoing projects and contractors are actively bidding for new DC construction jobs. 'Just last month, Gamuda Bhd sold 389 acres of land in Port Dickson to Google-linked Pearl Computing Malaysia Sdn Bhd and signed a RM1.01bil external infrastructure contract for enabling works for DC development, while Sunway Construction Group Bhd secured a RM1.16bil contract from a US tech giant to build two DCs,' MIDF Research said in a report yesterday. Microsoft recently reaffirmed its commitment to a RM10.5bil investment in cloud and AI infrastructure in Malaysia, including the development of hyperscale DCs in the Klang Valley. 'We also reiterate that not all DCs are AI DCs and while most of them are AI-ready, they may eventually be utilised for non-AI purposes,' MIDF Research said. It cited the example of YTL Power International Bhd which previously allocated 100MW for AI from its 500MW DC in Kulai, Johor. iFAST Capital research analyst Kevin Khaw Khai Sheng said the long-term prospects of the country's DC sector remains 'quite intact'. 'Ultimately, Malaysia continues to benefit from several competitive advantages –such as abundant water resources for cooling, land, skilled labour and a relatively weak ringgit, which makes the country cost-effective,' he said. Khaw added that, due to Singapore's limited access to such resources, he expected closer collaboration between Malaysia and the city-state. Asked if the alleged breach would affect ongoing tariff negotiations between Malaysia and the United States, Khaw said it would unlikely be a decisive factor given that the country is already negotiating from a weaker footing. 'The alleged breach may add a bit more pressure to our position in negotiations. But ultimately, it depends on how our government handles the situation and works toward securing the best possible outcome. 'From the United States' perspective, Malaysia is not their major competitor. It is actively trying to diversify its supply chain risks – especially in light of tensions with China – and is looking for more allies and partnerships with other countries. Given Malaysia's 'neutral' stance and our geographical advantages, we could still be seen as a potential partner for the United States,' he said. Khaw said the construction sector's outlook remained optimistic with the order book environment set to improve heading into the second half of 2025.