Higher Food Costs Cause Price Increases in Cafeterias, Affecting University Students; Rising Rice Prices Worsening Situation
KYOTO — Due to the sharp rise in food costs, university cafeterias, which support students' diets, have been forced to increase prices. The impact is serious in Kyoto, where students make up 10% of the population. Although their operators, such as university co-ops, have strived to overcome the difficult situation, it is likely to continue for some time.
Water instead of tea
'We are doing our best … However, we have no choice but to increase prices again.'
In a written announcement, the Kyoto University CO-OP apologized in advance for increasing the prices for a second time of menu items that use rice at seven cafeterias in March, with increases between ¥13 and ¥100. The price rose by ¥55 for a midsize bowl of rice, ¥100 for an ultra-large bowl of rice and ¥90 for a large plate of curry and rice, among others.
In addition to the rising price of food costs, the co-op has been passing on higher labor, utility and distribution costs to the prices of menu items. The co-op has been further affected by the sharply rising price of rice since last year.
Rice is procured jointly by university co-ops nationwide. There may be another price increase in July or August.
The Yomiuri Shimbun
A meal combination including rice in a midsize bowl, soup, a main dish and a small side dish costs ¥605 at a Kyoto University CO-OP cafeteria in Sakyo Ward, Kyoto.
According to a survey by the Kyoto University CO-OP, about 80% of the university's students use cafeterias for lunch as a key part of their diet. Their average payment per meal, however, has remained at around ¥600, indicating that students are likely dealing with the price increases by excluding a small side dish and miso soup from their meals.
'The image of university cafeterias serving affordable meals has completely changed,' said Takahiro Fujii, 21, a fourth-year law student from Kudamatsu, Yamaguchi Prefecture. 'There is also no sign of a price reduction.'
The Kyoto University CO-OP continues to operate on a tightrope, with a deficit of ¥106.6 million in fiscal 2024 and an accumulated deficit of ¥238 million.
To deal with this situation, the co-op in March stopped offering free tea at three cafeterias, even though the service had been popular, and installed water dispensers instead.
The co-op expects this to reduce expenses by more than ¥10 million annually. However, Taichi Abe, who is in charge of the cafeteria division, said with concern, 'The price of rice is rising rapidly, and we cannot foresee what the situation will be like.'
¥500 meals impossible
The Yomiuri Shimbun
The Kyoto City University of Arts cafeteria in Shimogyo Ward, Kyoto, is crowded with students. Prices have been set higher than initially planned due to increased food costs.
On April 10, Kyoto City University of Arts in Shimogyo Ward opened its long-awaited cafeteria just in time for the start of the new academic year. However, the rising cost of food casts a shadow here, too.
When the university relocated to its current location in October 2023, it was unable to have a cafeteria because the limited budget did not allow for constructing a kitchen and related facilities. A year and a half later, the cafeteria was finally opened with the university and the Kyoto city government equally sharing the cost of about ¥120 million.
The cafeteria has been well-received by the students, who often used to get their lunches from convenience stores.
'I hope there will be more menu items,' said Nodoka Yamaguchi, 20, a second-year student in the Faculty of Fine Arts.
The cafeteria is operated by Fujiya Shoji Co. in Nishikyo Ward, which runs cafeterias at about 100 schools, mainly in the Kinki region.
As the university has only about 1,000 students, the company only opens the cafeteria for lunch on weekdays, from 11:30 a.m. to 2:15 p.m., and allows the public to use it as well, in an effort to ensure its profitability.
The set menu items are priced between ¥550 and ¥650.
In initial discussions with the university, the company had planned to offer 'one-coin set meals' priced at ¥500. But it had to abandon the plan due to rising food costs.
Hirohisa Yamamoto, an area manager of the company's sales department, expressed concern, saying: 'We don't want to disappoint students, but if food and labor costs continue to rise, it will be tough.'
¥100 breakfast
The Yomiuri Shimbun
A cafeteria at Ritsumeikan University that offers a ¥100 breakfast is seen in Kita Ward, Kyoto.
Despite higher costs, cafeterias at Ritsumeikan University continue to serve a ¥100 breakfast, which has become more popular recently. This spring, the breakfast was served to more people than in spring 2024.
The cafeteria serving the ¥100 breakfast in the Zonshinkan Hall at the university's Kinugasa Campus in Kita Ward is already crowded before the first class of the day. The ¥100 breakfast consisting of rice in a small bowl, miso soup and two small dishes would usually cost about ¥400.
The very affordable breakfast has been offered since 2013, thanks to supplementary funding from the university's Parents Association of Student Education Assistance.
'As prices are rising for everything, it's not easy to cook for myself,' said Tomoaki Hirabayashi, 20, a third-year law student from Nagano Prefecture. 'I'm grateful that the price is kept at ¥100.'
According to the Ritsumeikan Consumers Cooperative, the breakfast was served on all campuses to a daily average of 1,309 people in the first half of April, up about 17% from 1,120 served in April last year.
The increased cost of food has been offset by reforming various operations such as saving water.
Hiromi Matozaki, a general manager of the cafeteria department, said: 'Outside the university, it's no longer possible to buy an onigiri rice ball or bread for ¥100. We want students to eat well in the cafeterias.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 days ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Singapore Diplomat Bilahari Kausikan Says U.S. Has Long-term Competitive Strategy with China
Bilahari Kausikan, former permanent secretary of the Singapore Ministry of Foreign Affairs, told The Yomiuri Shimbun that the United States' tariff policy is part of a long-term competitive strategy against China, and Washington will continue to have the same policy even after the president changes. The following text, excerpted from his interview, has been edited for flow and you look at various things that [U.S. President Donald] Trump and other members said, Trump seemed to think of [the] tariff as a kind of universal tool. He tried to do several things at the same time. He tried to use the tariff as a tool for national security goals to stop drugs and migrants, to reduce the deficit, bring back manufacturing to the U.S., increase revenue. I personally don't think this policy is sustainable in the long run. The 90-day timeline is running out soon. I won't be surprised if he extended it — in individual cases. I guess they will extend the timeline for major countries like the U.K., Japan, India and China. [The U.S. tariff policy] will slow down the U.S. economy, increase inflation and it will hurt Trump's own base. I think [the tariffs are] dangerous for all of us, at least most of us. But the real danger I think is for low-income countries, and middle-income countries. For example, how did Japan, South Korea and Singapore become high-income countries? The growth path was the normal one — by exports. It is going to become much more difficult for Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand and Malaysia. In fact, it will even become much more difficult for some parts of China. So, I think that's the big danger. Because when you get countries stuck in a real income trap, they will get frustrated. When they get frustrated, there will be a kind of geopolitical problem. The competition between major powers is quite natural. You can see trade policies in the context of broader strategic competition. Why does he [Trump] want to bring manufacturing back to the U.S.? I think these are all preparations for long-term strategy competition with China. Trade is just one instrument. That is why there is really no difference in this trade policy. There is very little difference anyway between Biden and Trump. I don't know who is going to succeed Trump. Whoever it is, more or less should have the same policy because this strategic competition with China is a long-term thing. He's also concerned about transshipment from China, to Southeast Asia to the U.S. That is going to be a big problem for countries like Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia. It's not just a simple method of smuggling or backdooring. There are legitimate reasons why Chinese companies are moving to Southeast Asia. It is not all because of tariffs placed on China or geopolitical tensions. China is becoming a more expensive place to produce for many industries. Some Chinese industries are worried about their own government, so they are trying to move their own business out. Those are very legitimate things, and it is going to be not so straightforward for Southeast Asian countries to deal with it. The U.S. is still a very important market. There is no substitute for the U.S., for anybody. So, every country will make its own calculations — balance or benefit against cost. I don't think we should stop trying to attract Chinese investments or any kind of investment, but we have to be more careful about what kinds of things we work on with China. Economic integration is politically difficult for any country in any region. If you are in a period of slow growth, it is going to become even more politically difficult. And the hard fact is, while we have plans for economic integration, 10 ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) economies are competitive. Some leaders think that they are competitive. We need the integration, but whether we will get it is another matter. You have to make yourself an attractive place for people to want to invest in your country. I think some Asian countries have not done enough to keep themselves attractive. We hope you will continue to invest in ASEAN. Japan is one of the most important partners for all ASEAN countries. And you will continue to be so. We hope you will not lose faith in Southeast Asia and continue to invest here. On the other hand, I think Southeast Asian countries must do what they can to make themselves attractive for Japanese investments. The responsibility is ours. — This interview was conducted by Yomiuri Shimbun Correspondent Takashi Itoda. Bilahari Kausikan Kausikan, 71, joined the Singapore Ministry of Foreign Affairs in 1981. He has held posts such as ambassador to the United Nations and assistant secretary for Southeast Asian affairs. He served as permanent secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs from 2010 to 2013. Since retiring, he has spoken actively about the future of ASEAN and is known as a leading voice in Southeast Asia.
Yomiuri Shimbun
3 days ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Japan, Thailand Should Speak Up to U.S. on Tariffs; Emerging Countries Should Diversify Their Markets
BANGKOK — Former Thai Foreign Minister Parnpree Bahiddha-Nukara told The Yomiuri Shimbun that Japan and Thailand should join hands to talk to the United States over the high tariffs sought by the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump. The following text, excerpted from his interview, has been edited for flow and clarity. *** Trump's tariff policy was unexpected. No one thought that the U.S., which has been promoting free trade and capitalism and was the leader in setting up the world order by supporting international organizations like the WTO and IMF after World War II, [would act this way]. The world was peaceful under this world order. Nowadays, the world situation has changed because capitalism grew fast, and even communist countries have to adapt to it. The U.S. thought that under this circumstance, it was at a disadvantage. The other countries could integrate well with the system that the U.S. established, including China. The U.S. used to be the only power, but China silently grew. The labor cost was cheap so everyone invested in China. Trump thought the situation shouldn't continue like this. So, he came up with 'America First,' having economics lead to security. Trump is a businessman. His concept is that 'When we invest in something, we should have a return and profit.' He analyzed what was the U.S.'s strength and weakness. In countries that can't sell goods well, their economies would be weakening, especially in emerging countries, which are export-oriented. [Taking advantage of this situation,] Trump imposed tariffs as a tool to bring the others to the table to lessen what the U.S. lost [in terms of a trade deficit], or even to gain a surplus. Thailand has a good relationship with the U.S. and Western countries. We have established our relationship with China because we want to trade, and we learned that relying on one side could harm the country's [Thailand's] security. I believe that trade is important, but relationships are more essential, which includes economic, security, cultural, social and geopolitics. If the Thai [tariff] negotiation team thinks like me, they should bring other aspects to the table, too. We [Thailand] have to tell them [the U.S.] how important we are [to the U.S.] in this region. ASEAN is one of the U.S.'s targets because we have large trade surplus with the U.S., and we are exporters. The U.S. thought it's not difficult to talk with ASEAN because ASEAN depends on the U.S. market. Now it is a chance for the U.S. to request ASEAN to purchase their goods. Each ASEAN country has a different level of economic growth. Some countries are closer to the U.S., while the others are not. I think it is hard to unite. We should diversify our market to other countries like those in Africa, South America and the Middle East. The U.S. once forced yen appreciation during the Plaza Accord, but it didn't make the U.S. and Japan hate each other. This situation is similar [now in that the U.S. tries to impose high tariffs on its allies]. Thailand exports cars to the U.S. and faces high tariff rates. Japan can speak on Thailand's behalf against collecting high tariffs from Thailand because it would affect both Thailand and Japan. For automobiles, Japan can tell the U.S. how much Toyota, Mitsubishi and Isuzu invest in Thailand. We should join hands to talk to the U.S. because both of us are impacted. Japan is a big economy in Asia and it has louder voice. That could help a lot. — This interview was conducted by Yomiuri Shimbun Correspondent Tetsuya Mizuno. Parnpree Bahiddha-NukaraParnpree studied at Chulalongkorn University in Thailand, the University of Southern California in the United States and elsewhere before holding government positions related to trade and industrial policy. After serving as a member of Parliament, he served as deputy prime minister and foreign minister from 2023 to 2024. He is 67.
Yomiuri Shimbun
4 days ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Ishiba Strives to Bridge Divide Between U.S., Europe; Takes Neutral Stance to Avoid Impact on Tariff Negotiations
Masamine Kawaguchi / The Yomiuri Shimbun Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba holds a press conference for Japanese and foreign media in Calgary on Tuesday. BANFF, Canada — Throughout the latest Group of Seven meeting, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba was trying to act as a bridge between Europe and the United States, offering support to U.S. President Donald Trump in order to avoid negative repercussions on Japan-U.S. tariff negotiations. Ishiba concluded his first G7 summit meeting in Canada and returned to Japan on a government-owned aircraft on Wednesday. 'The G7 has worked together despite differences in national positions, and its value is evident,' Ishiba said at a press conference with domestic and foreign reporters after the summit. According to government officials, several European countries expressed concerns about the United States' 'America First' policy during first-day discussions on international affairs and the economy, which Trump attended. However, Ishiba refrained from criticizing the United States and limited his comments to general issues, such as emphasizing the importance of free trade in relation to tariff issues. Regarding the conflict between Israel and Iran, Ishiba showed consideration for the pro-Israel United States and said that Iran's nuclear weapon development was behind the conflict. 'The division between the United States and Europe is deep-rooted,' Ishiba reportedly told those in his group. 'That's precisely why it's important to send a message to make Trump feel that 'Japan understands me.'' Avoiding rifts among G7 members is a top-priority for Japan, which as its only Asian member is pushing for its involvement in the Indo-Pacific region to be increased. During the discussions, Ishiba explained to his fellow G7 leaders the moves China is making in stepping up its hegemonic actions and about how North Korea is pushing ahead with its nuclear and missile development and called for a united response on the issues. Ishiba met with the current leaders of Germany and Canada for the first time and focused on building personal relationships with them, agreeing to strengthen security cooperation. In talks with some of the countries present, they are said to have agreed not to allow the United States to become isolated. Ishiba is scheduled to attend the North Atlantic Treaty Organization summit in the Netherlands on Tuesday and Wednesday and is expected to stay in the tough position between the United States and Europe.
