Mulilo dodges questions over R9. 5 billion battery tender linked to ex-Eskom COO
Both the BBC and NUM raised concerns that Mulilo, chaired by Jan Oberholzer, former Eskom Chief Operating Officer, may have had an unfair advantage.
Image: File picture
Mulilo Energy, the company recently awarded a multi-billion-rand battery storage contract under South Africa's Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme, has dodged IOL's questions regarding concerns over the bidding process.
IOL previously reported that the contract, which forms part of the government's efforts to enhance the country's energy security through battery storage, sparked criticism from the Black Business Council (BBC), the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM), and political parties.
Both the BBC and NUM raised concerns that Mulilo, chaired by Jan Oberholzer, former Eskom Chief Operating Officer, may have had an unfair advantage.
Oberholzer served as Eskom's COO from 2018 until July 2023, a period marked by challenges for the utility, including financial difficulties and worsening load-shedding.
"Oberholzer's company had an unfair advantage as he had access to privileged information about Eskom's requirements that other bidders did not have (as an insider)," BBC CEO Kganki Matabane said.
Meanwhile, the NUM described the situation as 'a clear case of a revolving door—where an individual transitions from a position of immense public influence at a state-owned entity to a private company that benefits directly from policies and initiatives he once championed.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
What we asked
How do you respond to the BBC's claim that Mr. Oberholzer's former Eskom role gave Mulilo an unfair advantage?
The NUM says this looks like a 'revolving door' between Eskom and private companies. What is your response?
The MK Party has asked for transparency regarding the bidding process. Could you please share how Mulilo ensured fairness and openness? What due diligence did Mulilo perform on its leadership and potential conflicts of interest before bidding for this government contract?
What Mulilo answered
Mulilo emphasised that the contract was awarded through a government-led process and directed all procurement-related inquiries to the Independent Power Producer Office (IPPO) and the Department of Electricity and Energy for comment.
"We note the media interest following the announcement that Mulilo has been awarded preferred bidder status for four projects under the Battery Energy Storage Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme (BESSIPPPP).
"As this was a Government-led process, we encourage that all procurement-related enquiries should be forwarded to the Independent Power Producer Office (IPPO) and the Department of Electricity and Energy for comment.
"As a South African company deeply committed to our country's energy transition, Mulilo remains focused on delivering solutions that support energy security, create socio-economic value, and accelerate the shift to a sustainable, low-carbon future."
Minister of Electricity and Energy Kgosientsho Ramokgopa has reportedly defended the awarding of the tender to Mulilo, saying the process was subjected to 'rigorous legal, technical, and financial due diligence, consistent with national legislation and the prescripts of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, including the objectives of ensuring that public procurement fosters inclusive growth for previously marginalised communities, including women and youth,' the department said, according to Moneyweb.
IOL
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
Will SA bear the cost of Eskom's R257bn air quality compliance?
Cooling towers at an Eskom coal-based power station in Duhva. Image: Mike Hutchings/Reuters SOUTH Africa's electricity crisis is about to get worse, not just because of load shedding, but because of the staggering cost of cleaning up Eskom's toxic air pollution. In a tense engagement with the National Council of Provinces (NCOP) Select Committee on Agriculture, Land Reform and Mineral Resources, Eskom executives dropped a bombshell: full compliance with stricter air quality laws would cost R257 billion in capital expenditure and R6.3bn per year in operational costs — potentially hiking electricity tariffs by 10%. Even more alarming? Without compliance, 22 gigawatts of Eskom's coal fleet — nearly half its capacity — could be forcibly shut down after 2030 due to sulphur dioxide violations. The revelations came as Eskom's chief executive, Dan Marokane, and Deputy Minister of Electricity and Energy, Samantha Graham-Mare, faced tough questions from MPs over the utility's financial constraints, its slow transition to cleaner energy, and the devastating health impacts of coal pollution on communities. Eskom has already spent R3bn on emission reduction projects, with another R15.6bn allocated over the next five years. But this is a drop in the ocean compared to what is needed. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Marokane admitted that while Eskom currently met SO² and nitrogen oxide limits, post-2030 regulations present an existential threat. The utility's proposed 'compromise' solution — focusing on SO² reductions at Kusile and Medupi, along with particulate matter upgrades at six other stations — would still require R77bn in capital and R2.1bn per year in operational costs. But even this plan is in jeopardy. Only R15.6bn has been budgeted for emissions projects over the next five years — far short of what's needed. Perhaps the most damning admission came from Deidre Herbst, Eskom's Senior Manager for Environment, who revealed that retrofitting the aging coal fleet for full compliance could take up to 14 years and more than R257bn — only for many of these plants to be decommissioned shortly afterward. 'Given the time frames, refitting most plants would be imprudent, constituting fruitless and wasteful expenditure,' Herbst said. Several power stations — Matla, Duvha, and Kriel — will shut down before flue-gas desulfurisation (FGD) plants can even be installed. Others, such as Lethabo, Tutuka, Matimba, and Kendal, will close shortly after FGD completion. 'Majuba and Matimba are in sparsely populated areas, limiting the health impact and cost benefit,' Herbst said — an utterance that drew sharp criticism from MPs who accused Eskom of downplaying the health risks to rural communities. MPs did not hold back in their criticism. DA MP Nico Pienaar demanded answers on why R40bn was being spent on diesel generation — money that could instead fund FGD plants. 'What happens if the new FGD plant isn't built and diesel turbines aren't closed, as per the World Bank agreement?' he asked. The DA's Sune Boshoff was even more scathing: 'Gauteng looks terrible when the wind blows. Is Eskom not wasting money on upgrading structures that won't exist much longer?' She slammed the projected 10% tariff hike to fund compliance, asking why alternative technologies and international funding were not being aggressively pursued. The EFF's Moses Kennedy pressed Eskom on whether independent health impact assessments had been conducted near Kendal, Matla, and Duvha stations, where residents suffer from chronic respiratory illnesses. Herbst admitted that while health benefits from cleaner stoves had been studied, power station health assessments were still lacking. Eskom's much-touted Just Energy Transition (JET) also came under fire. The state-owned utility's air quality offset programme — meant to provide cleaner energy alternatives to 96 000 households in Mpumalanga — has reached only 5 500 homes so far. Herbst claimed the rollout would accelerate, but MPs remained sceptical. Meanwhile, Northern Cape representatives Henri van den Berg (FF+) and Patricia Mabilo (ANC) pushed for green hydrogen and ammonia projects, arguing that they could create jobs. Deputy Minister Graham-Mare revealed that the EU had pledged €7bn for energy transition projects, including aviation sector decarbonisation. But with coal-dependent regions such as Mpumalanga facing massive job losses, MPs questioned whether the transition was truly 'just'. Marokane hinted at a controversial solution: nuclear energy. 'Most countries are building nuclear,' he said, suggesting that South Africa's Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) should reconsider its stance. 'Nuclear stimulates economies and industrialisation.' Yet, with Eskom's finances in shambles and R50bn earmarked for new technologies — including a Medupi FGD plant — the feasibility of nuclear expansion remained doubtful. Eskom's dilemma is clear: Spend R257 billion to comply with air quality laws, raising tariffs by 10%. Risk 22 GW of shutdowns if they don't comply, plunging SA into darkness. Face public outrage over health impacts and job losses in coal regions. As Deputy Minister Graham-Mare admitted, 'This is about balancing interests with limited resources.' But for millions of South Africans choking on coal pollution and struggling with soaring electricity costs, that balance feels dangerously skewed. The question remains: Will Eskom clean up its act—or will South Africans pay the price for its failure? Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
EEskom employees pocket R3bn in overtime during turbulent year
Electricity and Energy Minister Kgosientsho Ramokgopa has disclosed that R10 million was paid to Eskom board members and R3 billion in overtime to employees. Image: Henk Kruger / Independent Newspapers ESKOM employees pocketed R3 billion in overtime during the 2023/24 financial year. This was for work outside the normal working hours that was approved for an emergency during a standby period, breakdown of plant, pre-arranged plant maintenance, commissioning of plant, authorised construction work on site or critical personnel shortages only for short periods not exceeding one month, among other things. 'Approximately 92% of the workforce is eligible for overtime,' said Electricity and Energy Minister Kgosientsho Ramokgopa. He was responding to parliamentary questions from EFF MP Mandla Shikwambana, who enquired about the annual expenditure on overtime for Eskom employees and the circumstances under which overtime was paid. Shikwambana also wanted to know whether the 22 board meetings, averaging two meetings per month, as reported in the 2024 annual report, were pre-planned and the reasons for not planning them. He also asked the total remuneration of each board member and whether the board members were subject to individual performance reviews. The board of directors was paid more than R10 million in board fees. He said 22 board meetings were held, and at least 10 were pre-scheduled for the period between April 2023 and March 2024. He said non-executive directors had not been paid per meeting but had received a fixed annual fee based on their committee allocations. 'This fixed fee implicitly covered participation in up to eight scheduled board meetings. The remaining 14 meetings that exceeded the planned schedule did not attract any additional fees.' Board chairperson Mteto Nyati was paid R1.3m, Fathima Gany R1,081,000, Claudelle von Eck R1,061,000, Clive Le Roux R1 058 000 and Tryphosa Ramano R1,018,000. Electricity minister Kgosientsho Ramokgopa, Image: Jairus Mmutle/GCIS Other board members - Leslie Mkhabela, Busisiwe Vilakazi, Bheki Ntshalintshali, Tsakani Mthombeni, Ayanda Mafuleka and Lwazi Goqwana - were paid amounts ranging from R933,000 to R676,000. Ramokgopa said the amounts paid included fees for both board meetings and sub-committee meetings. The additional meetings had been convened on an ad hoc basis to address urgent and time-sensitive matters that had required the immediate attention of the board. 'Several of these engagements had been necessitated by unforeseen and evolving developments. These additional meetings had not resulted in any additional payment of fees to the non-executive directors,' he said. The additional meetings had primarily dealt with the group chief executive recruitment, National Transmission Company of South Africa board of directors recruitment, and the unbundling matters. CAPE TIMES
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Eskom financial report reveals board fees over R10 million and R3 billion in employee overtime
Electricity and Energy Minister Kgosientsho Ramokgopa has disclosed that R10 million was paid to Eskom board members and R3 billion in overtime to employees. Image: File The Eskom board of directors was paid more than R10 million in board fees during the 2023/24 financial year, while the entity's employees pocketed R3 billion in overtime during the same period. This was disclosed by Electricity and Energy Minister Kgosientsho Ramokgopa when he was responding to parliamentary questions from EFF MP Mandla Shikwambana, who enquired about the annual expenditure on overtime for Eskom employees and the circumstances under which overtime was paid. Shikwambana also wanted to know whether the 22 board meetings, averaging two meetings per month, as reported in the 2024 annual report, were pre-planned and the reasons for not planning them. He also asked the total remuneration of each board member and whether the board members were subject to individual performance reviews. In his written response, Ramokgopa said employees pocketed R3.03 billion during the 2023/24 financial year He said the payment was for work outside the normal working hours that was approved for an emergency during a standby period, breakdown of plant, pre-arranged plant maintenance, commissioning of plant, authorised construction work on site or critical personnel shortages only for short periods not exceeding one month, among other things. 'Approximately 92% of the workforce is eligible for overtime,' Ramokgopa said. He said 22 board meetings were held, and at least 10 were pre-scheduled for the period between April 2023 and March 2024. He said non-executive directors had not been paid per meeting but had received a fixed annual fee based on their committee allocations. 'This fixed fee implicitly covered participation in up to eight scheduled board meetings. The remaining 14 meetings that exceeded the planned schedule did not attract any additional fees.' Ramokgopa also said the additional meetings had been convened on an ad hoc basis to address urgent and time-sensitive matters that had required the immediate attention of the board. 'Several of these engagements had been necessitated by unforeseen and evolving developments. These additional meetings had not resulted in any additional payment of fees to the non-executive directors,' he said. The additional meetings had primarily dealt with the group chief executive recruitment, National Transmission Company of South Africa board of directors recruitment, and the unbundling matters. Board chairperson Mteto Nyati was paid R1.3m, Fathima Gany R1,081,000, Claudelle von Eck R1,061,000, Clive Le Roux R1 058 000 and Tryphosa Ramano R1,018,000. Other board members - Leslie Mkhabela, Busisiwe Vilakazi, Bheki Ntshalintshali, Tsakani Mthombeni, Ayanda Mafuleka and Lwazi Goqwana - were paid amounts ranging from R933,000 to R676,000. Ramokgopa said the amounts paid included fees for both board meetings and sub-committee meetings. 'The non-executive directors were remunerated by way of a fixed annual fee, which was determined based on their allocation to specific committees. This fee structure was not linked to the number of meetings attended. In addition to the fixed fee, non-executive directors were reimbursed for any reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the execution of their duties,' said the minister. He further said that a collective assessment approach was currently in place based on the principle of a board of directors functioning as one unit. 'The last collective performance assessment of the board was undertaken in the financial year of 2024, and the outcomes of this assessment were shared with the shareholder representative.' [email protected]
