Israel says roads to Gaza aid centers are 'combat zones' as sites close for day
GAZA — Aid distribution centers in Gaza will be closed for a day on Wednesday, as the Israeli military warned roads leading to the sites will be considered "combat zones".
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a controversial US and Israel-backed aid network which began operating last week, said it was closing its sites for "update, organization and efficiency improvements works".
In a separate update, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said people would be "prohibited" from entering the distribution centers or traveling on roads leading to them.
Overnight on Tuesday, at least 27 Palestinians were killed by Israeli fire close to a distribution center, according to the Hamas-run Civil Defense Agency.
It was the third deadly incident in as many days to occur on a route to a GHF site.
The IDF said its troops fired shots after identifying suspects who moved towards them "deviating from the designated access routes".In the wake of Tuesday's incident, the director of Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, Atef Al-Hout, said the injured were arriving with gunshot wounds after Israeli forces had opened fire on "crowds of civilians waiting for aid in western Rafa".Hamas-run Civil Defence Agency spokesman Mahmoud Basal said civilians were fired upon by tanks, quadcopter drones and helicopters near an aid site.A foreign medic working in the area described the scene as "total carnage" and said they had been inundated with casualties.In a statement, the IDF said its troops were "not preventing the arrival of Gazan civilians to the humanitarian aid distribution sites."GHF said it would start distributing aid again on Thursday.A spokesperson for the aid group said it had asked Israeli military to "guide foot traffic" near military boundaries to reduce "confusion or escalation" risks, according to Reuters news agency.GHF added it was also working to develop clearer guidance for civilians and enhance training to support their safety."Our top priority remains ensuring the safety and dignity of civilians receiving aid."UN Secretary-General António Guterres called for an "immediate and independent" investigation into the events.Stéphane Dujarric, a spokesman for Guterres, told the BBC the closure of aid centers showed "a lack of clarity of who the GHF is" and a "lack of accountability"."We're seeing armed men around these distribution points. No one knows who they are, who they're accountable for," he said.It comes as the UN warns that more than two million people are at risk of starvation in Gaza, after a total Israeli ban on shipments of food and other aid that lasted 11 weeks.The GHF aims to replace the UN-led aid distribution network in Gaza, following repeated claims from Israel that the UN did not prevent supplies being hijacked by Hamas, which the UN denies.Under the new distribution system, Gazans are required to collect supplies from a small number of centres in areas under Israeli military control and staffed by armed American contractors.Critics say the model has left people needing to walk long distances to the sites and transport boxes weighing 20kg back to their homes or shelters.Dujarric described the GHF as "a demonstration of how not to do humanitarian aid" as it "puts people's lives at risk" by forcing them to make long trips to get food in a militarised zone.He called the strategy "unacceptable" and echoed the head of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (Unrwa), Philippe Lazzarini, who said aid distribution had "become a death trap".The UN and other humanitarian organizations have accused the GHF of failing to uphold humanitarian principles.Also on Tuesday, Reverend Dr Johnnie Moore - a Christian evangelical pastor and prominent supporter of US President Donald Trump - was announced as the new head of GHF.He was appointed to replace its first chief Jake Wood, a former US marine who stood down and criticised the GHF model.Israel launched a military campaign in Gaza in response to Hamas' cross-border attack on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage.At least 54,470 people have been killed in Gaza since then, including 4,201 since Israel resumed its offensive on 18 March, according to the territory's health ministry. — BBC
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
13 minutes ago
- Arab News
BBC's biased coverage of Israel's war on Gaza
Israel's war on Palestinians from the outset has been fought in the media, and even at a more aggressive level since October 2023. Israel has poured huge resources into its propaganda drive, to persuade particularly Western powers that its war and actions were justified. It has denied journalists access to Gaza, and killed over 185 Palestinian media workers in the enclave in this period. Few media networks have been under more sustained Israeli assault than the BBC. Its global reach of 450 million people puts it in the front line of Israeli government efforts. It parades its reputation for impartiality, but as a new data-driven report published last week highlights, when it comes to Palestinians this is far from the case. Some argue the BBC has become complicit in Israel's war crimes. The Gaza coverage has been like walking on eggshells, the BBC refusing to call out what is going on. The abundant use of the passive voice where the party committing the crime is not identified is a notable feature. The report from the Center for Media Monitoring, a Muslim Council of Britain project, examined the BBC's coverage of Israel's war on Gaza primarily between 7 Oct. 7, 2023 and Oct. 6, 2024. For this 12-month window, a total of 3,873 articles and 32,092 broadcast segments were analyzed using AI and human verification. Some of the findings are jaw dropping. BBC presenters shared the Israeli perspective 11 times more frequently than the Palestinian perspective (2,340 vs. 217), even when interviewing neutral third parties, such as humanitarian organizations. That is not even close. BBC article headlines referred to Palestinian casualties just two times more than Israeli casualties, despite there having been 34 times more deaths in Gaza. Some of the findings are jaw dropping Chris Doyle Statistics do not tell the whole story, as BBC editors are quick to point out, but this report highlights alarming patterns of coverage. The absence of proper context is stark. Previous Israeli wars and atrocities in Gaza get scant reference. That 70 percent of the population are 1948 refugees is not there. Even with the Israeli war on Iran, no mention is made of Israel's nuclear arsenal and its refusal to sign up to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The BBC's coverage of international legal issues is incredibly poor, and again favorable to Israel. The BBC rarely used occupation to describe the legal status of Gaza. Only recently did it finally get its international editor to pen a still timid piece on whether Israel had committed war crimes in Gaza. Since the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the fact that he is wanted for war crimes and crimes against humanity is rarely mentioned. Worse, BBC presenters have actively shut down the widespread debate on whether Israel has been committing genocide in over 100 documented cases according to the report. This is extraordinary since the International Court of Justice determined that the situation in Gaza was so serious it had to order provisional measures against Israel to prevent genocide. That was in January 2024 and the situation is considerably worse now. Most human rights groups have determined Israel is committing genocide. The widespread use of genocidal comments from Israeli leaders from the president down is also downplayed. This is extraordinary given that this constitutes a stated intent to annihilate Gaza, vital context when Israel obliterates civilian infrastructure, including the healthcare system. The absence of proper context is stark Chris Doyle Remarkably, according to the report, the BBC never once referred to the Hannibal Directive and the Dahiya doctrine. The former, which we now know was invoked on Oct. 7, allows Israeli forces to launch attacks even if they might endanger hostages' lives, while the latter, certainly deployed in Gaza and Lebanon, permits the widespread destruction of civilian infrastructure. These protocols highlight the mentality of the Israeli armed forces. The report also demonstrated how the BBC's coverage of Russia's crimes in Ukraine was so different to Israeli crimes in Gaza. Israel's attempts to justify its actions were included in 75 percent of articles in that year, but only 17 when it came to Russian actions. Take the killing of journalists. The research found that 62 percent of journalists' deaths in Ukraine were reported, but only 6 percent of Palestinian journalists' killings by Israelis. The BBC's handling of documentaries echoes the above failures. It already withdrew the documentary 'Gaza: How To Survive a War Zone,' which had rave reviews, even in the right-wing media. It then opted not to show a further documentary, 'Gaza: Doctors Under Attack,' on the way in which Israel has targeted the Gaza healthcare system. Just as Western political leaders have given a green light to Israeli crimes and facilitated a climate of impunity that Israel still enjoys in its attacks on Iran, the BBC and other outlets help to create this permissive environment. In fairness, the BBC has many excellent reporters who have succeeded at times in breaching the managerial and editorial firewall against criticism of Israel with compelling storytelling. But in the overall picture, as this report highlights, the BBC simply continues to give this extremist Israeli government an easy ride.
Saudi Gazette
32 minutes ago
- Saudi Gazette
Indian investigators now claim all Pahalgam attackers were Pakistan nationals
DELHI — Indian investigators say all three militants involved in April's deadly attack on tourists near Indian-administered Kashmir's Pahalgam town were Pakistani nationals from the UN-proscribed militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). Police had earlier issued sketches of three men saying two were Pakistanis while one was a local man. The claim by the National Investigative Agency (NIA) came after it arrested two local men for allegedly sheltering the attackers. Pakistan has not commented on these claims. It had earlier rejected involvement in the attacks in which 26 people were killed. The attack in Baisaran, a popular tourist spot, had brought India and Pakistan on the brink of war. The nuclear-armed South Asian neighbors, who have fought three wars over Kashmir, claim the region in full but administer it in parts. The killings on 22 April had sent shockwaves through India and the case was handed over to NIA, a federal investigative forces had launched a major search and combing operation in the region and thousands were detained across Kashmir for three attackers are, however, yet to be a statement on Sunday, NIA said the arrested men had "knowingly harboured the three armed terrorists at a seasonal dhol (hut)" before the 22 April attack. It did not give details of when the arrests took place and as those arrested are in custody, they have not made any statement.A little-known group, The Resistance Front (TRF), allied with the Lashkar-e-Taiba, had initially said it was behind the attack but later disowned days of the attack, India revoked the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, a long-standing water-sharing agreement with Pakistan. Islamabad, in turn, withdrew from the 1972 Simla agreement that sought to settle differences through bilateral negotiations and peaceful followed it by launching air and missile attacks on 7 May, targeting sites it called "terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir".Pakistan denied the claim that these were terror camps and also responded by firing missiles and deploying drones into Indian hostilities between the two countries continued until 10 May when US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire. — BBC
Al Arabiya
34 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Israel says struck to ‘obstruct access routes' to Iran's Fordow
The Israeli military said it had launched air raids Monday to block access to Iran's enriched uranium facility in Fordow which was bombed by the United States at the weekend. A military statement said Israeli forces had 'struck in order to obstruct access routes to the Fordow enrichment site' which US President Donald Trump said had been 'totally obliterated' by the US strikes. There has been speculation that Iran might have moved out some of its known 400-kilogram stockpile of highly enriched uranium before the US bombing of its storage sites in the early hours of Sunday. The International Atomic Energy Agency, which has been monitoring Iran's nuclear program, called earlier Monday for access to the Islamic republic's nuclear sites to 'account for' the uranium. 'There needs to be a cessation of hostilities for the necessary safety and security conditions to prevail so that Iran can let IAEA teams into the sites to assess the situation,' the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, said. Speaking to an emergency meeting of the organization's board of governors in Vienna, he said that 'at this time, no-one including the IAEA, is in a position to have fully assessed the underground damage at Fordow.' Asked about the location of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile on Sunday evening, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel had 'interesting intelligence' but declined to elaborate. 'We're following that,' he told reporters. 'We've been following it very closely... we have interesting intelligence on that which you'll excuse me if I don't share with you.' According to the IAEA, Iran had enriched uranium to 60 percent in 2021, a short step from the 90 percent required for use in a weapon. Israel has maintained ambiguity about its own atomic arsenal, neither officially confirming nor denying it exists, but the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute has estimated it has 90 nuclear warheads.
