logo
Copper IUDs Linked to Higher Risk for STI Than Hormonal IUDs

Copper IUDs Linked to Higher Risk for STI Than Hormonal IUDs

Medscape21-05-2025

MINNEAPOLIS — Copper intrauterine devices (IUDs) are associated with an increased risk for several sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and other vaginal conditions than IUDs containing levonorgestrel, according to a retrospective chart review presented at the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) 2025 Annual Meeting.
'Most prior research focuses on bacterial vaginosis and pelvic inflammatory disease risk in IUD users,' wrote Celeste Traub, medical student at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, Texas, and her colleagues. 'Limited data exist regarding the broader impact of IUDs on other common reproductive tract infections.'
The researchers therefore analyzed data from TriNetX, a group of databases that include information for 56,444,363 patients. They identified 74,219 patients who used the copper IUD without previous use of a levonorgestrel IUD and 451,769 patients who used the levonorgestrel IUD without previous use of a copper IUD. These patients were then matched for age at IUD placement, race, and ethnicity to come up with 73,123 patients in each IUD group. The analysis included only data from within 3 years of IUD placement.
Patients were an average of 30 years old at the time of IUD placement. The cohort included 63.7% White, 21% Hispanic/Latina, 9.9% Black/African American, 5.3% Asian, 0.5% Pacific Islander, and 0.4% Native American patients.
Copper IUDs were associated with a modestly higher risk for chlamydia (risk ratio [RR], 1.41), syphilis (RR, 1.4), gonorrhea (RR, 1.37), and HIV (RR, 1.27) than levonorgestrel IUDs. Copper IUDs were also associated with a higher risk for chronic vulvitis (RR, 1.46), acute vulvitis (RR, 1.41), chronic vaginitis (RR, 1.4), and acute vaginitis (RR, 1.12) than levonorgestrel IUDs.
Risks for anogenital warts, herpes simplex virus 2, candidiasis, and trichomoniasis were not significantly different between copper IUDs and levonorgestrel IUDs. The risk for pelvic inflammatory disease, meanwhile, was lower with the copper IUDs (RR, 0.85) than with the levonorgestrel IUDs.
Despite the large population included, the retrospective design limits what conclusions can be drawn from the findings and there could be unmeasured confounders such as differences in sexual behaviors or socioeconomic factors that affected the results. The study may also have potential selection bias if women who choose different IUD types have different health behaviors.
'These findings highlight the importance of considering vaginal health outcomes when counseling patients about contraceptive outcomes,' the researchers concluded.
'We have thought that one contraceptive mechanism by which hormonal IUDs work is through thickening cervical mucus; this serves as a barrier to sperm,' Hugh S. Taylor, MD, a professor of Ob/Gyn at Yale School of Medicine and chief of Ob/Gyn at Yale New Haven Hospital in Connecticut, told Medscape Medical News . 'It is not surprising that this also serves as a barrier to many STIs.'
He further noted that the study's large size allows the detection of very small differences and highlighted that the risks for any infection with the copper IUD remains small. Further, 'IUDs do not adequately protect against any infection,' Taylor said. 'Barrier methods should be used whenever there is any risk of STI.'
The research was funded by the UTMB Institute for Translational Sciences and the National Institutes of Health. The authors had no relevant financial disclosures. Taylor reported grants to Yale University from AbbVie and Organon unrelated to this research.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hundreds of people raise $84,000 for Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation during annual walk in Pittsburgh
Hundreds of people raise $84,000 for Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation during annual walk in Pittsburgh

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Hundreds of people raise $84,000 for Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation during annual walk in Pittsburgh

Hundreds of people gathered in Pittsburgh's Riverfront Park on Saturday for the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation's annual walk. Participants walked on a one or two-mile course in support of those living with pulmonary fibrosis, a group of progressive lung diseases that cause scarring in the lungs, which limits oxygen intake necessary for major organs to function. Pulmonary fibrosis currently affects more than 250,000 Americans, and 50,000 new cases are diagnosed each year, according to PFF. Organizers say individuals and teams from the Pittsburgh region raised more than $84,000 to advance research for a cure for the life-threatening disease. Download the FREE WPXI News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Channel 11 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch WPXI NOW

Campus notes: June 22, 2025
Campus notes: June 22, 2025

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Campus notes: June 22, 2025

Teagan Graham, Reading, graduated from the University at Buffalo, N.Y., with a bachelor's degree in health and human services/early childhood education. York College The following area students received degrees from York College of Pennsylvania: Master of education: Julianna Kusy, Kutztown; Isabelle Popoter, Spring Township. Master of science in nursing: Elyse Batson, Exeter Township. Bachelor of arts: Isabella Antos, South Heidelberg Township; Lauryn Johnson, Exeter Township; Isabella Hoeltzel, Leesport; Elizabeth Trumbore, Temple. Bachelor of business administration: Gabriel Trevena, South Heidelberg Township. Bachelor of science: Brett Reinert, Douglassville; Haley Akins, Markus Jeschonnek and Brianna Endy, Exeter Township; Alexander LaVerdure, Oley Township;. Bachelor of science in nursing: Morgan Sauers, Gilbertsville; Taryn Boyer, Temple. Items are supplied by the colleges involved.

What's the difference between an extreme heat watch and warning?
What's the difference between an extreme heat watch and warning?

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

What's the difference between an extreme heat watch and warning?

States across the Central and Eastern U.S. are under extreme heat watches and warnings as the areas are facing "dangerous heat," according to the National Weather Service. "Though record high temperatures are expected in the coming days, the duration of the heat, as demonstrated by the numerous record warm morning lows, will make this period especially oppressive," the National Weather Service posted on X June 20. The weather service has issued extreme heat warnings for areas in over a dozen states, as they face the highest temperatures of the year so far. It also issued extreme heat watches in several states and Washington D.C., according to an advisory issued to the agency's website. Here's everything you need to know about the heat wave. Portions of the following states have been placed under an extreme heat warning, according to the National Weather Service: Indiana Iowa Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Missouri Nebraska New York Ohio Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Dakota Vermont West Virginia Areas where dangerous heat is possible are placed under an extreme heat warning and are asked to prepare in case it happens. Areas where dangerous heat "is happening or about to happen" are placed under an extreme heat warning, according to the weather service. While areas that are placed on a watch are asked to reschedule any planned outdoor activities, people in areas placed under warnings are told to avoid any heavy activity and direct sunlight. People facing extreme heat should do the following, according to NWS: Drink plenty of fluids Stay in an air-conditioned room Stay out of the sun Check up on relatives and neighbors Do not leave young children and pets in unattended vehicles Wear lightweight and loose-fitting clothing outdoors Limit strenuous activities to early morning or evening The extreme heat could negatively impact people's health. "Heat-related illnesses increase significantly during extreme heat and high humidity events," according to the National Weather Service. The following factors increase the possibility of a heat-related illness, according to the National Park Service: High humidity High elevation Strenuous activity Age: Infants, young children and people over 65 are more susceptible to heat illness Pregnancy Obesity Heart disease Poor circulation Fever Mental illness Dehydration Sunburn Prescription drug and alcohol use There are multiple forms of heat illnesses, but heatstroke is the deadliest and most dangerous, according to the NPS. The following are symptoms of heatstroke, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Body temperature of 103 degrees or higher Skins that is hot, red, dry or damp Fast, strong pulse Headache Dizziness Nausea Confusion Losing consciousness In the case of a heatstroke, the CDC recommends people do the following: Call 911 immediately Move the person suffering from heatstroke to a cool location Lower the person's body temperature with a cool cloth or bath Do not give the person suffering from a heatstroke water or anything to drink Julia is a trending reporter for USA TODAY. Connect with her on LinkedIn, X, Instagram and TikTok: @juliamariegz, or email her at jgomez@ This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: What's the difference between an extreme heat watch and warning?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store