The reason why men are lifting weights more than ever

Ben Bryant,
The Independent
Paul Faulder is an enemy of cardio. 'It's a hangover from the Eighties,' he says. 'Cardio is dull as anything. I get bored out of my mind. For me, strength training feels like I'm building something that's going to last — whereas doing cardio just feels like burning fuel.' Some might find running appealingly meditative but for Faulder, there is nothing more mindful than perfecting the art of the incline dumbbell press. 'It is a real mindfulness-focused activity,' he explains. 'You pinch your shoulder blades back together. You point your elbows at 45 degrees. You start with the dumbbell over your wrists. Drive your heels through the floor. And now do your set. And by the end of it, you're adding the tempo of a one-second or three-second pause.'
I am taking notes because Faulder is a gains guru. Only a few years ago, he was an 18-stone 'depressed Teletubby' with chronic pain. At the end of Covid-19, he decided to sign up with a personal trainer and fulfil a decades-old dream of becoming as jacked as Arnold Schwarzenegger in Conan the Barbarian. His pictures show that he has achieved his desire: four years on, he stands at six foot four with eight per cent body fat, and a body like a giant baggie of gleaming bronze conkers. 'The benefits it's brought me in business are just phenomenal,' he says. 'It's brought me a new level of mental clarity and focus. I've got loads of energy and people respond to that.' As the CEO of a tech company — Elixir software, which provides software to global pharmaceutical/biotech firms — Faulder has a demanding schedule. He has shaped his company in the image of his sculpted body: 'a lean, potent team that outperforms bloated, sluggish organisations.' And that includes requesting an unusual level of accountability for his board of directors. 'I've now got all my board having full blood panels,' he says.
Wealthy businessmen used to be called fat cats for a reason: there was a time when men at the top of the status tree had a bulging waistline to match their wallets. These days, finance bros deadlift, wear slim-fit quarter-zips, idolise Patrick Bateman and post topless TikToks. Everywhere you look, male role models from neuroscientist Andrew Huberman and fitness influencer Chris Williamson to esteemed statistician Nassim Nicholas Taleb are extolling the benefits of lifting weights, and Gen Z is taking note. Record numbers of Britons are going to the gym, with a 'notable rise in the popularity of strength training', according to trade body UKActive. PureGym's annual statistical report found that a remarkable 89 per cent of 18- to 24-year-olds do some form of strengthening exercise every week. In 2022, ClassPass reported a 94 per cent increase in strength training class reservations compared to the previous year.
'Lately, there's a noticeable shift,' says Daniel Herman, a National Academy of Sports Medicine (NASM) fitness coach and founder of Finchley sports nutrition company Bio-Synergy. 'More men are asking for muscle-building programmes, even those who used to be all about running or cycling. There's a broader cultural interest in strength and a desire to look like they train. 'Leaner but more muscular' is a phrase I hear a lot. They're also often interested in optimising energy, mood, and longevity, not just aesthetics.' Most of Herman's clients are aged between 25 and 45, and in white-collar industries like finance, tech, law and startups. He sees different patterns in the people he coaches. 'Finance guys tend to want visible results fast. Think lean, defined, 'cover model' look,' he says. 'They like numbers and benchmarks: how much they lift, how much they weigh, their body fat percentage. Tech guys often come from a more sedentary baseline and want to undo the desk job.' He goes on to explain that many of these tech guys start with posture correction and general strength, then transition into hypertrophy — the growth of muscle — once they see initial progress.
This represents a challenge to the brainless jock stereotype, which has deep roots. As far back as medieval Britain, men with muscles who toiled in the fields carried the signals of inferior class status on their bodies; physical frailty was a luxury of the effete aristocracy. Today, London's affluent elite are still shy when it comes to strength training. You can find them running or cycling, or perhaps doing high-intensity workouts like F45 and Barry's Bootcamp. Getting shredded is often framed as brutish, tragic or cringe – think Andrew Tate, Zac Efron, or Patrick Schwarzenegger in The White Lotus, whose twinky brother, tellingly, is almost killed by a protein shake.
However, muscles remain an ambiguous symbol of male status. Nowhere is that clearer than in the minds of the most assiduous judges of men: women. A recent X/Twitter poll showed women two pictures of Olly Murs, who has recently undergone a bodily transformation. They were asked whether he was more attractive in his pudgy 'before' photo or his sculpted 'after' shot. The women overwhelmingly picked the former. Too much muscle, my female friends assure me, suggests someone who is vain, a try-hard lacking in spontaneity. The most popular heartthrobs of the current era are often built less like gladiators and more like Roman towel boys — see Timothée Chalamet, Harry Styles or Kit Connor. This is an outcome that confounds the kind of men who prefer the sureties of hard data to the mysterious and capricious desires of women. For them, the mounting evidence that the jocks were right all along is becoming harder to ignore – and now data-driven nerds from Bezos to Zuckerberg are defecting to meathead territory.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Gulf Today

2 days ago

• Gulf Today

Starmer and Reeves have much work still to do

Chris Blackhurst, The Independent Rachel Reeves is to water down plans scrapping her non-dom tax rules amid concerns about the number of wealthy individuals deserting the UK. It must be true, because it's being repeated everywhere — complete with a bland, non-denial from the Treasury: "The government will continue to work with stakeholders to ensure the new regime is internationally competitive and continues to focus on attracting the best talent and investment in the UK." A key item under discussion is said to be the proposal to make non-doms' worldwide assets liable to inheritance tax, or IHT, including those held in foreign trusts. There is no doubt many rich people have gone. One analysis by Bloomberg puts the number of company directors who have left at 4,400 in the past year. Examination of Companies House filings shows departures were 75 per cent higher in April than in the same month last year. The worst affected sectors were finance, insurance and property, all of them popular with non-doms. In the most expensive areas of London, stories abound of shuttered mansions, and a knock-on effect across restaurants, hair and beauty salons, car firms and all the other ancillary services. The UK, once a favoured magnet for the world's billionaires and multi-millionaires, has fallen off its perch. A recent Oxford Economics survey found that 60 per cent of tax advisers expect more than 40 per cent of their non-dom clients to leave within two years of Reeves ending their beneficial status. With them will go their families, close staff - and their money. It was the latter that made previous governments, including Labour, seek to attract them in the first place. If they base themselves in Britain, they are more likely to spend and to invest here. That is why other nations are doing their level best to woo them. It's what the Treasury means when it refers to the new regime being "internationally competitive". What is bizarre and shaming is that this administration did not see it coming. Seemingly, ministers did not realise that non-doms would quit. They did not appreciate that, in today's world, rich people can move freely and easily and work from anywhere. Either they are guilty of extraordinary unworldliness, deluding themselves that wealthy foreigners would carry on living in the UK merely because they like it here - ignoring the effect on their finances; or they simply did not care, and allowed political ideology to prevail. Whatever the answer, they are now engaged in the sort of reversal and damage limitation exercise which is becoming all too familiar where this government is concerned. The question now is: will it be enough? Already, South Africa's richest self-made woman Magda Wierzycka, the billionaire behind UK venture capital fund Braavos, has stated she will shelve plans to leave should the chancellor U-turn on IHT: "I would absolutely stay and it's not about protecting my money from the tax man. I pay all my taxes, but South Africa has foreign exchange controls and I don't know whether [my estate] would be able to pay the IHT bill under the current rules." Whether others are so persuaded, and if Reeves does pull back entirely on IHT, remains to be seen. The problem for her and for Keir Starmer is that the tone has been set. Even if they do climb down, the feeling persists that this iteration of Labour (as opposed to that of Tony Blair, which famously declared it was "intensely relaxed about people getting filthy rich") cannot abide well-off people. The purging of the non-doms followed a pattern. It joined VAT on private schools, the removal of the winter fuel allowance, hitting farmers with their own new IHT bills, and other measures, aimed at the more advantaged end of society. They can afford it, appeared to be Downing Street 's view. That will be hard to shake-off. The hope must be that the attractions of the UK will weigh heavily and the non-doms will not exit and some, many even, will return. Starmer and Reeves, having set their calamitous course, have much work still to do.

Web Release

3 days ago

• Web Release

Bellevue Medical Center Celebrates 15 Years of Leadership

As part of its unwavering commitment to providing advanced, innovation-driven, patient-centered healthcare, and its continued efforts to elevate the standing of Lebanon and its healthcare sector on both the regional and global levels, Bellevue Medical Center (BMC) proudly marked its 15th anniversary with a special dinner, bringing together staff, nursing professionals, physician representatives, media, and the administrative team. The celebratory event underscored the hospital's core belief: success is a collective achievement, forged by the dedication and hard work of every individual. For a decade and a half, Bellevue Medical Center has consistently upheld its renowned high standards of care, navigating Lebanon's profound challenges, including the COVID-19 pandemic, economic crises, and the devastating Beirut Port explosion. Throughout these difficult times, Bellevue Medical Center, has remained steadfast in its commitment to delivering top-tier healthcare, continuously growing and enhancing its services through cutting-edge technologies and investments in artificial intelligence to drive superior patient outcomes. This unwavering dedication demonstrates that even amidst adversity, a strong focus on quality care and human compassion truly makes a difference. Bellevue's journey is marked by groundbreaking achievements, including performing the Middle East and North Africa's first uterus transplants under clinical research in 2018, which notably resulted in successful live births. The hospital's unwavering commitment to global healthcare quality and safety is further evidenced by its multiple accreditations from Joint Commission International (JCI). BMC also received the Excellence in Sustainability Award and earned five certifications from the Arab Hospitals Federation for its environmental leadership, part of the Arab Health Climate Challenge Gold Seal Initiative. Beyond medical innovation, Bellevue Medical Center is deeply committed to the human element of healthcare. Repeatedly certified by Planetree International, BMC champions a patient-centered approach that embraces the body, mind, and spirit. Further testament to this philosophy, Bellevue's CEO, Mr. Nayef Maalouf, was honored with Planetree International's prestigious 'Caregiver of the Year' award in 2023 for his dedication to person-centered care. During the anniversary celebration, Mr. Nayef Maalouf expressed his gratitude to all who have contributed to the hospital's journey. 'Everything we have achieved over the past fifteen years has been possible because of our teamwork, our passion for care, our strong belief in our mission, and the trust of our patients and community even during the toughest times,' Mr. Maalouf stated. 'This celebration isn't just about looking back; it's about moving forward and building the future. We are focused on growing, advancing healthcare medicine for better patients outcomes, and ensuring Lebanon and its healthcare professionals are recognized at both national and international levels.' As it celebrates this milestone, Bellevue Medical Center reaffirms its commitment to innovation, sustainability, and putting patients at the heart of everything it does. With vision and determination, Bellevue continues to be a trusted provider of advanced, compassionate care for Lebanon and the region.

Gulf Today

4 days ago

• Gulf Today

Can I fix the housing crisis? Yes, I can...

Angela Rayner, The Independent In a recent exchange in the House of Commons, I was pressed by one of my Tory shadows on whether we will meet our target of building 1.5 million homes in this parliament. A punchy question from a party whose own record in government on housebuilding was marked by missed targets, failed targets and ultimately, "let's scrap targets altogether". My answer? Underestimate me at your peril. People have done this all my life. But this government has a bold vision to fix the housing crisis and a strategy to deliver both investment and reform. We're overhauling the planning system to speed up approvals and unlock land — a clear statement of intent. So is our commitment to the biggest increase in social and affordable housebuilding in a generation — £39bn over 10 years. And today we are taking another major step to fix a broken system that has held back too many hard-working families — and the country — for far too long. Our new national housing bank will transform housebuilding, using public funds to unlock private capital as a publicly owned arm of Homes England. With £16bn of new government investment, on top of £6bn of guarantees, the bank will attract over £53bn of private investment. That means spades in the ground, cranes in the sky — and around half a million new homes built across the country. Who benefits? People, and the places they live, as well as businesses and the economy. It's a cornerstone of our Plan for Change. We're backing small and medium builders, who are crucial for small community sites, with new lending products that will give them the certainty to plan a pipeline of future projects. We're focused on building more social and affordable homes. The bank will use part of the £2.5bn in low-interest loans announced at the spending review to build properties where they are most needed. And we're also supporting the bigger, more complex projects that help drive growth with infrastructure finance and £5bn in grants for projects that otherwise wouldn't get off the ground. We're giving the bank the tools and the scope to make long-term investments and take smart, calculated risks to reform the housing market and deliver real returns. We know, as a government, and I know, that having a home is the foundation of a stable life. I saw that growing up, living in a council house that for me spelled security. For too many people in this country, however, a home they can afford remains out of reach. We're changing that. We are investing in the skills and jobs needed to build new homes and supporting local leaders and builders to work with urgency. We're tackling the housing crisis we inherited head-on because a safe, decent home is not a luxury — it is a necessity. Our commitment to build 1.5 million homes as part of our plan for change is a stretching target, but not one I will shy away from. To those with doubts, I repeat: underestimate me at your peril. Yes — the road ahead is tough. But we are committed, as this is about more than just numbers. It's about giving fresh hope for millions of people across Britain and creating communities where families can thrive and children grow up in safety. It's about making sure a generation is no longer locked out of homeownership — and ensuring children aren't growing up in temporary accommodation. The shadow of Tory housing failure looms large. The last government failed to meet the challenge. We are rising to it. The new national housing bank is just the latest part of our plan to invest in Britain's future - and back the builders. This Labour government is turning the tide on the housing crisis we inherited, and charting a new course for housing in this country. The foundations of Britain's future are being laid today — so we can write a new chapter that we can all be proud of.