Memorial service scheduled for local student aide killed in I-75 crash
A memorial service has been scheduled for a student aide killed in a crash on Interstate 75.
[DOWNLOAD: Free WHIO-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
A visitation for Jennifer Korleski, 28, will be on Monday in Tipp City, according to her online obituary.
It starts at 4 p.m. at One Hope Church of the Nazarene on W. Main Street in Tipp City. The service begins at 7 p.m.
As previously reported by News Center 7, Korleski died in a multi-vehicle crash on Interstate 75 southbound past State Route 571 early Sunday morning.
She worked as a student aide for Tipp City Schools, her obituary said.
TRENDING STORIES:
The Tipp City School District told News Center 7 that Korleski was known for her kindness, encouragement, and genuine care for students.
'She made a meaningful impact not only at Tippecanoe Middle School but also at Broadway Elementary and LT Ball Intermediate, where she worked previously,' the school district said. 'In each of these schools, she was a steadfast supporter of students and always encouraged them to be their best.'
Everyone who attends is encouraged to be dressed in bold and vibrant patterns 'to celebrate Jenny's eccentric style.'
Her obituary said she 'loved making and trading beaded 'Kandi' bracelets.'
[SIGN UP: WHIO-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Government drops cases against ‘predatory' financial firms
One after another, the debtors were called to stand before the judge. First came Adrian Vega, a painter, and his wife, Natalie, a cleaner. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. Moments later, Andrew Vanderhoof, a mechanic. In rapid succession, three more names were called. Each was being sued by Credit Acceptance Corporation, one of the nation's largest subprime auto lenders, for thousands of dollars. This scene played out last month in Rockford, Illinois, but it has been repeated in courtrooms across the country. Every month, Credit Acceptance files hundreds of lawsuits against borrowers. For two years, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the nation's financial watchdog, has sought to restrain Credit Acceptance, accusing it in a lawsuit of making 'predatory loans to millions of financially vulnerable consumers trying to buy a used vehicle.' But the CFPB's enforcement effort stopped in April when the agency withdrew from the lawsuit. The CFPB's reversal in the Credit Acceptance case reflects how, under the Trump administration, the agency's new approach to enforcement may be felt by consumers nationwide. The agency's withdrawal left only its co-plaintiff, the New York attorney general, to continue the enforcement lawsuit, so any final ruling would affect only New York and not the rest of the country. The first out of the Rockford courtroom were the Vegas, appearing dazed. The judge had ordered them to pay the company $12,797.58. 'It's ridiculous,' Adrian said. His wife's eyes welled up with tears. 'Just … so frustrating,' she said. Credit Acceptance lends money at high interest rates - usually over 20 percent - to customers buying a used car from its network of dealers, which charge an unusually high markup, according to the lawsuit. It repossesses about a quarter of the cars on which it has issued loans, it said. Since President Donald Trump's second term began, the CFPB has moved to terminate or dismiss 18 such enforcement lawsuits, according to research by the Consumer Federation of America, a nonprofit advocacy organization. Those cases had accused banks, mortgage firms and installment lenders of financial abuses and deception. 'These retreats are gifts to predatory lenders and would-be fraudsters,' said Erin Witte, director of consumer protection at the Consumer Federation of America. 'They are being told over and over that they can keep on doing what they are doing.' In a statement, Credit Acceptance officials said 'we categorically reject the portrayal of our business practices as 'predatory.' For over 50 years, we have provided access to credit for individuals who are often overlooked by traditional lenders. … The vast majority of our customers are grateful for and satisfied with the service we provide.' The company disputed some of the specific allegations in the lawsuit and said it was unable to comment on some of the customer experiences reported in this story because it did not have the customers' consent. CFPB lawyers and the agency's press office did not respond to requests for comment for this story. On June 10, Cara Petersen, the acting head of enforcement for the agency, quit after sending a staff email denouncing the Trump administration's efforts to gut the agency. The agency's acting director is Russell Vought, the White House budget director and an author of Project 2025, the right-wing blueprint for reshaping the federal government. 'I have served under every director and acting director in the bureau's history and never before have I seen the ability to perform our core mission so under attack,' Petersen wrote. The Trump administration and its supporters have long campaigned against the CFPB, an agency established by Congress after the 2008 financial crisis. They have argued that the financial watchdog agency overstepped its authority during the Biden administration. Shortly after Trump's inauguration in January, staff from the newly formed U.S. DOGE Service set up shop at the agency's headquarters and the group's leader, Elon Musk, used his social media site X to post 'CFPB RIP,' along with an emoji of a tombstone. In April, the Trump administration attempted to fire 1,400 agency employees, but a judge suspended the move in March. - - - After the CFPB withdrew from the Credit Acceptance suit in April, Erin Kerber, the company's chief legal officer, issued a statement lauding the decision. The case 'never should have been brought in the first place,' she said. 'We are proud to have provided over five million people with the opportunity to own a vehicle through our network of dealers.' The company and its supporters say such firms play an important role because they provide loans to people who may have nowhere else to turn. Critics say the loans set up customers for failure. For some borrowers, a Credit Acceptance loan has been the first step toward a financial setback. In 10 recent court cases filed in Rockford examined by The Washington Post, the borrowers bought cars at prices, set by the dealer, that were above fair market value. When customers failed to keep up with payments, their cars were repossessed. That, however, did not end the company's demand for payment. After the repossessed cars were sold at auction, proceeds did not cover their debt to Credit Acceptance. So even as they lost the car, often within a year, they still owed Credit Acceptance several thousand dollars. 'I was played,' said Erinn Compton, 31, a substitute teacher, who bought a 2014 Chrysler 200 with 95,000 miles two years ago for $8,034. The windows didn't work, she said, and when the driver's window wouldn't roll up, she tried putting in clear plastic. Credit Acceptance said the company had no knowledge of those issues and that Compton 'was present at the dealership to inspect the vehicle.' It was repossessed months later and the proceeds from its sale amounted to $2,200, according to documents. The company said it offered her a chance to resolve the remaining debt for less than was owed. She is being sued for $6,643. Jessie Garner bought a 2017 Hyundai Elantra with a loan from Credit Acceptance. The price for the car was more than $4,000 over the estimate of a 'fair price' from Kelley Blue Book, the auto research firm, assuming the car was in good condition. The engine blew four months later, he said. 'I paid $18,000 for a car I couldn't drive,' Garner said. The company sued him for $18,776. Ingrid Anderson purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Captiva Sport with 138,000 miles on it for $10,285. According to Kelley Blue Book, a fair price for such a car in good condition at that time was much less - about $6,524. Ingrid, who works the counter at Subway at a Love's Travel Stop, enlisted her mom, a church organist, to be a co-signer. Ingrid immediately noticed problems with the car, she said - it emitted black soot and the brake lines needed to be replaced. The car was repossessed. The company said it offered the Andersons a chance to resolve the debt for less than was owed, but they could not afford the offer. The company is suing them for $10,218. 'It's a scam,' said her mom, Carla Anderson, 62. Credit Acceptance said it was not aware of the car's condition and seeks to prevent unfair pricing and the sale of low-quality cars. Ingrid, who is 35 and lives in Tampico, Illinois, with her four children, said she was shocked by the company's methods. 'It's okay for a company to overcharge people with low incomes? Really?' said. 'I know they want their money. But I don't have it.' - - - Credit Acceptance was formed in 1972 by Don Foss, a used-car dealer who aimed to provide loans to car buyers who did not qualify for traditional financing. His was a winning formula. The company went public in 1992 and by 2018, Foss was a billionaire, with a net worth of $1.2 billion, according to Forbes. He died in 2022, and his daughter continues to hold about 15 percent of the company's shares, according to an April company filing. The company works through a network of 12,000 independent auto dealers who sign agreements with Credit Acceptance. They use the company's software to draw up loan contracts and receive marketing assistance. Under the Credit Acceptance system, each borrower's contract is assigned a score, based on personal and financial data, estimating how much the company can expect to collect on the loan. Most of the company's customers have poor credit scores and relatively low incomes - the median was $35,000 annually, according to the CFPB lawsuit. 'It's no secret that having a poor credit history can make getting approved for financing difficult,' according to the company's website. 'Credit Acceptance believes everyone deserves a second chance.' Over the years, the company's practices have been repeatedly criticized by state regulators and consumer watchdogs. In 2019, Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood (D) sued the company, charging that it 'grossly overprices cars' and 'takes advantage of subprime consumers' desperate need for cars.' The company settled the case, paying $325,000 to Mississippi and making a $125,000 charitable donation. A spokesperson said the company did not grossly overprice cars and did not admit to wrongdoing or liability in the case. The next year, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey (D) sued the company, charging that it 'recklessly ignored' that many of its borrowers probably would be unable to pay off the loan, meaning that those customers could lose the car to repossession and get hit with an average debt of $9,000. The company earned 'substantial profits' on the high-risk loans, the lawsuit said. The company settled that case, too, paying out $27 million for affected customers and legal costs. 'This matter was vigorously contested,' according to a Credit Acceptance statement at the time. 'However, Credit Acceptance believes it to be in the best interest of the Company to conclude this litigation.' In 2023, when the CFPB sued Credit Acceptance, it made similar claims. According to the lawsuit, Credit Acceptance provided loans without regard to whether borrowers could afford them. For almost 4 out of 10 loans, Credit Acceptance projected that it would not be able to collect the full amount financed by the loan, the government said. The loans, in other words, were setting up customers to fail. Credit Acceptance 'does not engage in any meaningful analysis for the purpose of developing loan terms that are likely to result in repayment in full by the borrower,' according to the lawsuit. Even though many Credit Acceptance customers could not repay the loan, according to the lawsuit, the company could profit because it incentivized dealers to overcharge for cars and to sell add-on products. The system also increased auto prices for consumers least likely to pay, it said. The company further boosted its revenue with aggressive collection efforts, including repossession, lawsuits and starter interruption devices - also known as 'kill switches' - that enabled the company to prevent a car from starting if a customer became delinquent. While these tactics benefited the company, they harmed customers, the CFPB said. Customers typically face substantial debts on a Credit Acceptance loan even after a car is lost to repossession, the lawsuit said, because the prices they had paid were so high. The average sale of the repossessed cars satisfied only 29 percent of the remaining amounts owed, according to the lawsuit. When Credit Acceptance sues to collect on the remaining debt, moreover, customers rarely prevail in court. They often lack the means to hire an attorney, and while the contracts might be deemed unfair or unwise, they were signed. 'Over and over, repossession, garnishment and bankruptcy result,' according to the lawsuit. - - - To defend itself against the CFPB and in similar cases, Credit Acceptance hired Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, the large New York-based law firm. In papers, the lawyers argued that the CFPB's funding was unconstitutional - a claim that would be rejected by the Supreme Court in another case. It also argued that Credit Acceptance did not bear responsibility for deceiving customers because the loan terms were negotiated by its affiliated dealers, not Credit Acceptance. Credit Acceptance 'does not make loans directly to consumers,' the attorneys wrote in court papers filed in March. 'The company provides software to dealers to facilitate origin of contracts. … However, as an indirect lender, Credit Acceptance has no contact with consumers about a vehicle purchase until after they finalize the terms of their agreements.' In April, the agency filed a motion to withdraw from the case. It was signed by the CFPB's chief legal officer, Mark Paoletta, a Trump appointee, and other attorneys. Several other cases recently dropped by the CFPB similarly had sought to punish business practices it deemed unfair or deceptive. Among the dropped lawsuits was one against Horizon Card Services. The CFPB said the company issued credit cards with a $500 limit that had almost $300 in annual fees - and could only be used in the company's overpriced online store. After the CFPB dismissed the case, the company said the dismissal 'serves as proof that they find their own case to be completely meritless.' Another CFPB lawsuit had charged that Vanderbilt Mortgage, a subsidiary of the nation's largest manufactured home builder, had violated federal law by ignoring 'red flags' that certain consumers would not be able to repay loans on their manufactured homes. 'We appreciate the CFPB's decision to dismiss the lawsuit,' the company said in a statement. 'For 50 years, Vanderbilt Mortgage has proudly protected access to attainable lending services and we remain committed to providing homeownership solutions for hardworking American families.' Eric Halperin, who resigned in February as the CFPB's enforcement director, said: 'Trump's CFPB has abandoned the agency's directive to protect consumers.' - - - After the Vegas left the courtroom, the next to stand at the lectern before the judge was Vanderhoof, the mechanic. Two years ago, his car broke down, and the 34-year-old father of six quickly needed another to commute to his job 70 miles away in Aurora. He stopped at Loves Park Auto, part of Credit Acceptance's network of auto dealers. It was late afternoon, and he felt uneasy about keeping the salespeople from being able to close up shop. He was familiar with some of the staff because he had raced cars with them. He realized later that he should have paid more attention. 'I made the quickest deal I could with the $850 in my pocket,' he said. He ended up with a white 2017 Hyundai Sonata with 96,000 miles on it. He paid $15,105 for the car, which was far more than it was worth. According to Kelley Blue Book at the time, a 'fair price' for such a car was $11,219. The salesperson also signed him up for an extended warranty for the car, for another $1,610, and for 'GAP Protection' for another $1,189, which was supposed to help pay off the car loan in case it was totaled or stolen. In all, he took out a loan of $18,493, with an interest rate of 25 percent. Seven months later, he said, the engine blew, though he was regularly changing the oil as required. When neither the dealer nor Hyundai would fix it, he gave the car back to Credit Acceptance. A manager at Loves Park Auto declined to comment. Credit Acceptance sued Vanderhoof for the remaining balance of $13,548. In court last month, Vanderhoof admitted he owed the company money, but he also asked the judge for permission to speak freely. Vanderhoof told the judge that the company and its dealers should do a better job of ensuring that the vehicles being sold were in good shape. The judge then entered a judgment against him obliging him to pay the full amount. 'What they did to me was insane,' Vanderhoof said after the hearing. He said he supported Trump for president, but he said the CFPB should have continued its lawsuit against the company. 'Absolutely,' he said. 'When it comes to bigger companies, money is the root of all evil, and they don't care how they get it.' Related Content 3-pound puppy left in trash is rescued, now thriving How to meet street cats around the world 'Jaws' made people fear sharks. 50 years later, can it help save them? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Better EV Stock: Ford vs. Tesla
Robotaxis aren't an optional extra for the car industry; they are the future of mobility. One company stands best placed to deliver affordable electric vehicles. The two companies could potentially become partners. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › -The comparison between Ford (NYSE: F) and Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) is valuable and valid because it speaks to where the auto industry is headed and highlights the relative position of each company as it moves toward electric vehicles and robotaxis. Whether it's a legacy automaker (Ford) or a dedicated battery electric vehicle company(Tesla), the key opportunities and challenges are the same. So, which company is better placed to thrive in the future? Tesla's launch of its full-self-driving (FSD) robotaxi is sometimes seen as a tactical move as its electric vehicle (EV) sales and market share come under pressure in 2025, but nothing could be further from the truth. The reality is that major automakers, including Ford, and leading technology companies have invested billions in robotaxis and autonomous driving, and it's an integral part of the future of the auto industry. The reason behind the investment is a recognition that robotaxis have huge profit potential, not least because they offer a long stream of recurring income from ride-per-mile revenue. Another reality is that EVs are not cheap, and if they are the future of the auto industry, automakers need to make them more affordable. They also need to offer robotaxis to make mobility more affordable. However, don't take my word for it. Here's Ford's CEO Jim Farley in 2019 on autonomous driving and robotaxis: "The self-driving system is incredibly important to develop, but it's just one part of building a safe and scalable self-driving service that consumers can trust." Farley went on to outline a timeline for a "commercial self-driving service" in 2021, which Ford would fail to achieve. As for affordable EVs, last year, Farley reiterated the need to offer smaller and more affordable EVs to achieve profitability as an EV maker. The two things are strongly connected. You can't have robotaxi EVs if the vehicles aren't affordable. That's a point that resonated during a recent CNBC interview with Waymo, which has a robotaxi service already in place, yet co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana declined to outline a timeline for the company's profitability. Waymo's lack of profitability means its owner, Alphabet, is going to have to invest significant sums, at a loss, if it wants Waymo to build scale. That creates a huge opportunity for a company like Tesla that is just entering the market and potentially offers a much more commercial and scalable service. Tesla's advantage in scaling robotaxis lies in its ability to transform existing Tesla vehicles into robotaxis, as well as its capability to produce a dedicated robotaxi, the Cybercab. Unlike Waymo, Tesla doesn't need to partner with automakers to build scale. Moreover, Musk has disclosed that Tesla has been in discussions about licensing its FSD to other automakers -- another route to long-term profitability. I'll cut to the chase. If Tesla can make automated driving and robotaxis work, then there's only one winner here, and it's Tesla. First, Ford is a long way from having a profitable EV business. For example, its Model E segment lost $5.1 billion in 2024, and then $849 million in the first quarter of 2025. Ford sold 22,550 EVs in the first quarter, implying it lost almost $38,000 on every EV sold. Moreover, its EV models, the Mustang Mach-E, the F-150 Lightning, and the E-Transit, are far from being affordable EVs. In contrast, Tesla generated $7.1 billion in operating profit in 2024. Despite losing market share amid declining sales, it still dominated the U.S. market, holding 43.5% of the market in the first quarter of 2025. Ford was a distant second with 7.7%. Both Ford and Tesla are planning to release low-cost models in the future, but given Ford's ongoing losses, Tesla's profitability, and its ability to lower its average cost per car, down from above $38,000 in early 2023 to below $35,000 in late 2024, the latter looks far better positioned to do so sustainably. Ford backed off its robotaxi/FSD plans in 2022, following the shutdown of Argo AI by Ford and Volkswagen after years of heavy investment. The company had been created to develop the technology and received billions of dollars in investment from Ford and Volkswagen. For reference, General Motors has also ended robotaxi development. In contrast, Tesla is preparing for the official launch of its unsupervised FSD/robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, this month, and it may be live by the time you read this article. While the launch will be small and highly contained, it still marks the birth of Tesla's robotaxi offering. Musk believes Tesla will have a dedicated, low-cost robotaxi, the Cybercab, in volume production by 2026. Indeed, Ford may end up licensing FSD from Tesla, and to his great credit, Farley has indicated an openness to partnering on FSD. There is no guarantee that Tesla's robotaxi or FSD will be successful, and investors need to closely monitor events. Moreover, Musk has a history of being overly optimistic on such matters. That said, the major automakers have been and are still pursuing the idea of lower-cost EVs and robotaxis and automated driving, and currently, Tesla remains the best-positioned company to meet those aims. It's where the industry wants to be, and Tesla is in pole position. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $373,066!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,158!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $664,089!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet and Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better EV Stock: Ford vs. Tesla was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Daddy's coming home with pole position. Denny Hamlin celebrates new son with top spot at Pocono
Denny Hamlin (11) and Chase Briscoe (19) battle for position during a NASCAR Cup Series auto race at Michigan International Speedway in Brooklyn, Mich., Sunday, June 8, 2025. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya) Denny Hamlin (11) and Chase Briscoe (19) battle for position during a NASCAR Cup Series auto race at Michigan International Speedway in Brooklyn, Mich., Sunday, June 8, 2025. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya) LONG POND, Pa. (AP) — Pocono Raceway paints its signature black rocks outside the garage in gold lettering with a last name and race car number highlighted to honor some of NASCAR's greats. Jimmie Johnson has one. So does Richard Petty, among others. So where's the celebratory boulder for Denny Hamlin, who holds the track record with seven wins and saw another victory thrown out in 2022 because of a disqualification? Advertisement Hamlin laughed when he said Pocono officials told him the requirement was, 'either retire or die.' At 44 years old, Hamlin — who just welcomed a son with fiancee Jordan Fish — should have the prime of his life ahead. As for retirement? What, and miss out on all the fun? Even without a Cup championship on his resume, Hamlin remains a dominant force in the sport and he showed again Saturday why he's the driver to beat on the 2 1/2-mile tri-oval track. Hamlin skipped last week's race in Mexico City following his son's birth and returned without missing a beat, turning a lap of 172.599 mph to take the top spot in Sunday's race. Advertisement 'Truthfully, I'm on a run,' Hamlin said. 'I don't know how else to say it.' Yes, life is good for Hamlin, especially after the couple welcomed their third child, Jameson Drew Hamlin, on June 11. Hamlin shared in a social media post that the baby was delivered at 8 pounds, 4 ounces and was measured at 22 3/4 inches. The name has special meaning: The three-time Daytona 500 champion's given name is James Dennis Alan Hamlin. So his son's name is for James' son and the JD theme is for two men (JD Gibbs and James Dean) who helped launch his career path into NASCAR. Hamlin said a difficult labor and the logistical issues of traveling on short notice to Mexico forced him to miss the race. 'If we were racing at Darlington,' he said, 'I would have been there on race day.' Advertisement The layoff didn't affect Hamlin. He earned his third NASCAR Cup Series victory of the season and 57th of his career on June 8 at Michigan International Speedway and jumped right back into the top spot at Pocono. Maybe some unexpected rest this week helped Hamlin crush it in the No. 11 Toyota for Joe Gibbs Racing. 'He's slept through the night the last three nights in a row. So it's been really, really great,' Hamlin said. If anything keeps Hamlin stirring at night, it's the acrimonious legal fight with NASCAR that continues to drag in court. A federal judge urged NASCAR and two of its teams to settle their lawsuit that spilled over into tense arguments during a hearing this week. 23XI Racing, which is owned by Hamlin and Michael Jordan, is fighting with NASCAR along with Front Row Motorsports. The two teams say the series is a monopoly, but NASCAR has struck back with a countersuit of its own. Advertisement Jeffrey Kessler, an attorney representing the teams, said he was open to a settlement. Hamlin said Saturday at Pocono he also was open to a settlement, but said no offer of one had been made on their side and wouldn't be at least until there is a mediation attempt. Kessler said NASCAR was uninterested in a settlement. 'I have stated publicly cooler heads will prevail,' Hamlin said. 'I can tell you this, this is not on our end that needs cooler heads. I think the difference is they're saying different things on their side. We're prepared to go all the way.' Hamlin is going to try and go all the way and win at Pocono with his fifth pole in 36 races at the track. Hamlin is the 5-1 betting favorite to win Sunday, according to BetMGM Sportsbook. Advertisement 'It's a track that no matter the car we drive or the tires or the aero package, none of that really matters,' Hamlin said. 'You still make speed at this racetrack the same way no matter what car you are driving. I think it's been one of the few tracks I haven't had to change my approach to it depending on the car that I'm driving. I think that's why the success has been sustained.' The rest of the lineup Chris Buescher starts second at Pocono and Carson Hocevar — embroiled in a feud with Ricky Stenhouse Jr., who has vowed retaliation for recent wrecks — is third. John Hunter Nemechek is fourth and Cole Custer fifth. Led by Hamlin, Toyota had six of the top-10 starting spots. Advertisement Pocono sellout Pocono Raceway continued its renaissance with a third straight sellout crowd set for Sunday. The track sold out all frontstretch seating, premium seating, suites, infield camping and the grandstand camping area. It also is the fifth consecutive year that the entire infield camping inventory has been sold out. Pocono President Ben May said the track sold around 50,000 grandstand tickets, around 2,000 suite seats and 3,300 camping spots. NASCAR traditionally ran two NASCAR weekends at the track until 2022. The sellout streak started the next year and it was the first since 2010. 'When you look at this weekend, it's sold out. It's fantastic,' three-time Cup champion Joey Logano said. Advertisement NASCAR expressed at least a cursory interest in adding to its recent string of offbeat race locations — everywhere from Mexico City to a temporary track inside the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum — and floated the idea of holding a race inside a Philadelphia stadium, Franklin Field. The site is traditionally home to the Penn Relays and college football. May said he wasn't necessarily concerned another race within driving distance of the mountains — about 100 miles away — would affect Pocono. 'When you get into center city and Philly proper, it's a stick-and-ball town,' May said. 'I'm very comfortable with Pocono's position on the schedule for a long time.' ___ AP auto racing:
