A potential U.S. trade war has breathed some life into the fraught idea of shipping oil through Hudson Bay
Social Sharing
The prospect of a trade war with the United States has forced businesses on this side of the border to consider how to reduce their reliance on what used to be our most reliable partner as both an export market and a source of all manner of goods.
This includes oil. Alberta sends approximately 85 per cent of the oil it produces to the United States for processing and consumer use, according to that province.
Even some Canadian-bound oil flows through the United States along Enbridge's Line 5 pipeline, which runs through southern Manitoba and a corner of North Dakota into Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan and eventually southern Ontario.
The sudden prospect of the U.S. turning off that tap — something Michigan's governor once attempted to do —or reducing Canadian exports through 10 per cent tariffs has immense implications.
A sudden, rash move by the mercurial administration of U.S. President Donald Trump, in terms of oil tariffs or the Enbridge pipeline, would be a serious source of financial concern, even for Canadians who are eager to see the country wean itself off oil production as a revenue source and hasten the transition to a clean-energy economy.
This has Canada suddenly considering its short and long-term export and transport options for an industry that will still be around for a few more decades.
That includes breathing some life into an idea that sounded fanciful mere months ago: Transporting oil across the northern Manitoba muskeg and filling tankers at a port on Hudson Bay.
To be clear, this is an environmentally fraught idea with a price tag likely in the billions and logistics that can charitably be described as implausible.
But in this particular moment, nothing is off the table, including a once-fantastical sounding Alberta-based proposal to thread an oil pipeline parallel to the Nelson River, along the south side of Wapusk National Park and below a section of Hudson Bay itself to a floating, offshore terminal capable of servicing oil tankers with ice-reinforced hulls.
Mike Moyes, Manitoba's environment and climate change minister, declined to rule out the idea of exporting oil through Hudson Bay, even as he stressed the provincial NDP government's energy goals right now include the construction of geothermal heating districts and wind farms.
"We're going to look at every single project on the merits of that project," Moyes said Friday in an interview, stressing he cannot really comment on what he described as a hypothetical Hudson Bay oil shipment proposal.
"There's a lot of consultation that would need to go into that, including with First Nations and other Indigenous communities that would be affected, in addition to a whole variety of municipalities."
PC leadership candidate supports idea
Moyes did acknowledge, however, there is renewed interest in finding new ways to get Canadian oil to market.
"We know that there's lots of different resources in Canada and I know that … with the threat of tariffs kind of hanging over our heads, there is a movement toward trying to be more self-sustaining, and I understand that," he said.
Earlier in the week, Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew brushed off the idea of shipping oil to Hudson Bay, instead noting the province's continued support for strengthening the existing port in Churchill, a town roughly 1,000 kilometres north of Winnipeg.
That Hudson Bay port's unsuitability for oil exports, however, led the former Progressive Conservative government of Heather Stefanson to pledge $7 million toward a study of an alternate oil-and-gas transportation route.
That pledge was cancelled by the Kinew's NDP government, which stated no actual money was ever set aside for it.
Right now, one of the most vocal advocates of shipping oil through Hudson Bay is Wally Daudrich, who owns a hotel and ecotourism company in Churchill and is one of two candidates running to replace Stefanson as PC leader.
Daudrich regularly raises the idea when he speaks to prospective voters in the PC leadership race, arguing an offshore port would permit year-round shipping, and the pipeline along the Nelson River would traverse more stable geography.
"I don't think that this project has any unnecessary risks involved. Russia has been doing it literally for decades," Daudrich said Thursday in an interview.
"What you would end up doing is actually having a floating island offshore that's anchored to the ground and pipes that come up that are buried beneath the tidal zone, like under the ocean floor. They come up and the ships actually load up five miles offshore or 10 miles offshore."
The cost of such a project would be immense, though Daudrich claims it could be built without at no cost to the taxpayers, given interest from export markets.
Even if billions somehow became available, the idea would still face stiff opposition, as Moyes hinted. Environmental activists have warned it would take three days to even reach the site of a Hudson Bay oil spill, let alone clean up such a spill.
"The idea of putting bitumen into Hudson Bay is a terrible idea. There's just no way that Hudson Bay can handle a bitumen spill or a cleanup," said Eric Reder, a campaigner for the Wilderness Committee in Winnipeg, when the Stefanson government pledged money for a study in 2023.
The provincial and federal governments have also devoted all their Hudson Bay coastal infrastructure support to Arctic Gateway's Hudson Bay Railway and the Port of Churchill.
Federal support, however, could swing toward at least the idea of an oil pipeline if Pierre Poilievre's Conservatives form Canada's next government.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
18 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
GOP tax bill would ease regulations on gun silencers and some rifles and shotguns
WASHINGTON (AP) — The massive tax and spending cuts package that President Donald Trump wants on his desk by July 4 would loosen regulations on gun silencers and certain types of rifles and shotguns, advancing a longtime priority of the gun industry as Republican leaders in the House and Senate try to win enough votes to pass the bill. The guns provision was first requested in the House by Georgia Rep. Andrew Clyde, a Republican gun store owner who had initially opposed the larger tax package. The House bill would remove silencers — called 'suppressors' by the gun industry — from a 1930s law that regulates firearms that are considered the most dangerous, eliminating a $200 tax while removing a layer of background checks.
Winnipeg Free Press
22 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
GOP tax bill would ease regulations on gun silencers and some rifles and shotguns
WASHINGTON (AP) — The massive tax and spending cuts package that President Donald Trump wants on his desk by July 4 would loosen regulations on gun silencers and certain types of rifles and shotguns, advancing a longtime priority of the gun industry as Republican leaders in the House and Senate try to win enough votes to pass the bill. The guns provision was first requested in the House by Georgia Rep. Andrew Clyde, a Republican gun store owner who had initially opposed the larger tax package. The House bill would remove silencers — called 'suppressors' by the gun industry — from a 1930s law that regulates firearms that are considered the most dangerous, eliminating a $200 tax while removing a layer of background checks. The Senate kept the provision on silencers in its version of the bill and expanded upon it, adding short-barreled, or sawed-off, rifles and shotguns. Republicans who have long supported the changes, along with the gun industry, say the tax infringes on Second Amendment rights. They say silencers are mostly used by hunters and target shooters for sport. 'Burdensome regulations and unconstitutional taxes shouldn't stand in the way of protecting American gun owners' hearing,' said Clyde, who owns two gun stores in Georgia and often wears a pin shaped like an assault rifle on his suit lapel. Democrats are fighting to stop the provision, which was unveiled days after two Minnesota state legislators were shot in their homes, as the bill speeds through the Senate. They argue that loosening regulations on silencers could make it easier for criminals and active shooters to conceal their weapons. 'Parents don't want silencers on their streets, police don't want silencers on their streets,' said Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. The gun language has broad support among Republicans and has received little attention as House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., work to settle differences within the party on cuts to Medicaid and energy tax credits, among other issues. But it is just one of hundreds of policy and spending items included to entice members to vote for the legislation that could have broad implications if the bill is enacted within weeks, as Trump wants. Inclusion of the provision is also a sharp turn from the climate in Washington just three years ago when Democrats, like Republicans now, controlled Congress and the White House and pushed through bipartisan gun legislation. The bill increased background checks for some buyers under the age of 21, made it easier to take firearms from potentially dangerous people and sent millions of dollars to mental health services in schools. Passed in the summer of 2022, just weeks after the shooting of 19 children and two adults at a school in Uvalde, Texas, it was the most significant legislative response to gun violence in decades. Three years later, as they try to take advantage of their consolidated power in Washington, Republicans are packing as many of their longtime priorities as possible, including the gun legislation, into the massive, wide-ranging bill that Trump has called 'beautiful.' 'I'm glad the Senate is joining the House to stand up for the Second Amendment and our Constitution, and I will continue to fight for these priorities as the Senate works to pass President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill,' said Texas Sen. John Cornyn, who was one of the lead negotiators on the bipartisan gun bill in 2022 but is now facing a primary challenge from the right in his bid for reelection next year. If the gun provisions remain in the larger legislation and it is passed, silencers and the short-barrel rifles and shotguns would lose an extra layer of regulation that they are subject to under the National Firearms Act, passed in the 1930s in response to concerns about mafia violence. They would still be subject to the same regulations that apply to most other guns — and that includes possible loopholes that allow some gun buyers to avoid background checks when guns are sold privately or online. Larry Keane of the National Shooting Sports Foundation, who supports the legislation, says changes are aimed at helping target shooters and hunters protect their hearing. He argues that the use of silencers in violent crimes is rare. 'All it's ever intended to do is to reduce the report of the firearm to hearing safe levels,' Keane says. Speaking on the floor before the bill passed the House, Rep. Clyde said the bill restores Second Amendment rights from 'over 90 years of draconian taxes.' Clyde said Johnson included his legislation in the larger bill 'with the purest of motive.' 'Who asked for it? I asked,' said Clyde, who ultimately voted for the bill after the gun silencer provision was added. Clyde was responding to Rep. Maxwell Frost, a 28-year-old Florida Democrat, who went to the floor and demanded to know who was responsible for the gun provision. Frost, who was a gun-control activist before being elected to Congress, called himself a member of the 'mass shooting generation' and said the bill would help 'gun manufacturers make more money off the death of children and our people.' Among other concerns, control advocates say less regulation for silencers could make it harder for law enforcement to stop an active shooter. 'There's a reason silencers have been regulated for nearly a century: They make it much harder for law enforcement and bystanders to react quickly to gunshots,' said John Feinblatt, president of Everytown for Gun Safety. Schumer and other Democrats are trying to convince the Senate parliamentarian to drop the language as she reviews the bill for policy provisions that aren't budget-related. 'Senate Democrats will fight this provision at the parliamentary level and every other level with everything we've got,' Schumer said earlier this month.
Winnipeg Free Press
22 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Emaciated after 5 years in prison, Belarusian dissident Tsikhanouski vows to fight on
VILNIUS, Lithuania (AP) — Siarhei Tsikhanouski is almost unrecognizable. Belarus' key opposition figure, imprisoned in 2020 and unexpectedly released on Saturday, once weighed 135 kilograms (298 pounds) at 1.92 meters (nearly 6'4') tall, but now is at just 79 kilos (174 pounds). On Saturday, Tsikhnaouski was freed alongside 13 other prisoners and brought to Vilnius, the capital of neighboring Lithuania, where he was reunited with his wife, exiled Belarusian opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, and their children. Speaking to The Associated Press the day after, Tsikhanouski tries to smile and joke, but struggles to hold back heavy sighs recalling what he endured behind bars. 'This is definitely torture,' Tsikhanouski told The Associated Press in the first sit-down interview since his release. Prison officials 'kept telling me: 'You will be here not just for the 20 years we've already given you.' We will convict you again,'' he said. 'They told me that 'You would never get out.' And they kept repeating: 'You will die here.'' One of Belarus's most prominent opposition figures, Tsikhanouski said he 'almost forgot how to speak' during his years in solitary confinement. He was held in complete isolation, denied medical care, and given barely enough food. 'If you had seen me when they threw only two spoons of porridge onto my plate, two small spoons …' he said, adding that he couldn't buy anything anything in the prison kiosk. 'They would sometimes give me a little tube of toothpaste, a little piece of soap as charity. Sometimes they would, sometimes they wouldn't.' A prominent voice of dissent Now 46, Tsikhanouski, a popular blogger and activist, was freed just hours after Belarusian authorities announced that authoritarian President Alexander Lukashenko met with U.S. President Donald Trump's envoy for Ukraine in the Belarusian capital, Minsk. Keith Kellogg became the highest-ranking U.S. official in years to visit Belarus, Moscow's close and dependent ally. Tsikhanouski, known for his anti-Lukashenko slogan 'stop the cockroach,' was arrested after announcing plans to challenge the strongman in the 2020 election and shortly before the campaign began. He was sentenced to 19 years and six months on charges widely seen as politically motivated. His wife ran in his stead, rallying crowds across the country. Official results handed Lukashenko his sixth term in office but were denounced by the opposition and the West as a sham. Lukashenko has since tightened his grip, securing a seventh term in disputed January 2025 elections. Since mid-2024, his government has pardoned nearly 300 prisoners — including U.S. citizens — in what analysts see as an attempt to mend ties with the West. Tsikhanouski credited U.S. President Donald Trump with aiding his release. 'I thank Donald Trump endlessly,' Tsikhanouski said. 'They (the Belarusian authorities) want Trump to at least, a little bit, somewhere, to meet them halfway. They are ready to release them all. All of them!' Many are still behind bars Tens of thousands of people poured into the streets in the aftermath of the August 2020 vote. Thousands were detained, many beaten by police. Prominent opposition figures either fled the country or were imprisoned. At least 1,177 political prisoners remain in custody, according to Viasna, the oldest and most prominent human rights group in Belarus. Among them is Viasna's founder, human rights activist and Nobel Peace Prize winner Ales Bialiatski. Also behind bars are Viktor Babaryka, a former banker who was widely seen in 2020 as Lukashenko's main electoral rival, and Maria Kolesnikova, a close ally of Tsikhanouskaya and charismatic leader of that year's mass protests. A surprise release and an emotional reunion Tsikhanouski called his release 'a dream that's still hard to believe.' On Saturday, he said, guards removed him from a KGB pretrial detention center, put a black bag over his head, and handcuffed him before transporting him in a minibus. He and other prisoners had no idea where they were going. 'To be honest, I still can't believe it. I was afraid I'd wake up and everything would still be the same. I don't believe it, I still don't believe it,' he said, pausing frequently and wiping away tears. Tsikhanouski's children — his daughter, aged 9, and 15-year-old son — didn't recognize him when they were reunited. 'We came in and my wife said to my daughter, 'Your dad has arrived,'' he said, crying. 'At first she couldn't understand, and then she rushed in — she was crying, I was crying … for a very long time. My son too! These are emotions that cannot be described.' Tsikhanouski, who says his health has deteriorated behind bars, plans to undergo a medical examination in Lithuania. He says cold and hunger were 'the main causes of illness' that affected nearly all political prisoners in Belarus, who were subjected to 'especially harsh conditions.' 'There were skin diseases, and everyone had kidney problems from the cold — and no one really understood what was happening,' Tsikhanouski said. 'Blood came out of my mouth, from my nose. Sometimes I had convulsions — but it was all because of the cold, that terrible cold when you sit in those punishment cells.' 'There is no medical care in prison — none at all, just so you know …' he said. Tsikhanouski said conditions slightly improved after the February 2024 death of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny in a prison colony. 'When Alexei Navalny died, I thought, that'll probably be me soon … And then something changed. It was clear that someone at the top said, 'Make sure he doesn't die here. We don't need that problem.' It got just a bit softer … At some point, word came down: Tsikhanouski must be kept alive, not killed.' Pointing the finger at Putin Tsikhanouski blames Russian President Vladimir Putin for propping up Lukashenko, both during the 2020 protests and to this day. Russia supports Belarus's economy with loans and subsidized oil and gas. In return, Belarus has allowed Moscow to use its territory to launch troops and weapons into Ukraine, and hosts Russian forces and nuclear weapons. Tsikhanouski expressed strong support for Ukraine, calling the Kremlin a common evil for both countries. 'If it weren't for Putin, we would already be living in a different country. Putin recognized Lukashenko's victory in the election, he called black white. That is, he refused to see the falsifications,' Tsikhanouski said. 'They help each other. Because of Putin, this illegal government is still in Belarus.' Some analysts have speculated that by releasing the charismatic and energetic Tsikhanouski, Belarusian authorities may be trying to sow division within the opposition. But Tsikhanouski insists he has no intention of challenging his wife's role as the internationally recognized head of the Belarusian opposition, and he calls for unity. 'Under no circumstances do I plan to criticize any Belarusians, condemn or complain about anyone,' he said. Tsikhanouski says he will not stop fighting and wants to return to active work as both a political figure and a blogger. But he is skeptical that Lukashenko, now 70, will step down voluntarily, despite his age. 'I don't know anymore — will he go or won't he?' Tsikhanouski said. 'Many people say nothing will change until he dies. But I'm still counting on democratic forces winning.' ___ Associated Press journalists Elise Morton in London, and Dasha Litvinova in Tallinn, Estonia, contributed to this report.
