Italy votes on citizenship reforms that could open doors for immigrants
Italians headed to the polls on Sunday and Monday to vote in a national referendum that could make it easier for immigrants to apply for Italian citizenship. The proposal aims to cut the required residency period from 10 years to five. But the result depends not just on votes — it hinges on whether enough people show up to cast them, according to a report by The New York Times.
For the referendum to be valid, over 50% of eligible voters must participate. A simple majority is then needed for the law to pass. With voter turnout in past referendums low, observers are unsure whether that threshold will be met.
If approved, the change would allow nearly 1.5 million foreign residents to apply for citizenship, including about 300,000 minors. The proposal is opposed by
Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni
and her right-wing coalition. Progressive parties are backing the change.
As per the report by NYT, the referendum comes at a time when Italy, long a nation of emigrants, is now home to many immigrants from Africa, Asia, Latin America, and Eastern Europe. However,
Italy
still has one of the strictest
citizenship laws in Europe
. Non-EU immigrants can apply for citizenship only after 10 years of uninterrupted residency. Children born in Italy to immigrant parents must wait until they turn 18 and prove continuous residency from birth.
(Join our
ETNRI WhatsApp channel
for all the latest updates)
Supporters say the current law leaves many people living and working in Italy without full rights. 'They pay taxes, they abide by the laws, but they are not politically included,' said Maarten Vink, director at the Global Citizenship Observatory. 'In a democracy, that's not a good principle.'
Live Events
You Might Also Like:
India & Italy agree to deepen ties in aerospace, agri, energy transition
The referendum also highlights changing views in Italian society. Fioralba Duma, an activist from Albania who has lived in Italy most of her life but is not a citizen, told NYT, 'It's a pivotal moment for how Italy sees itself and how it wants to build its future.'
Opponents of the measure argue it would make citizenship too easy to obtain. Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini called it 'dangerous' and said it would extend citizenship 'indiscriminately.'
Low voter turnout could be the biggest hurdle. In 2022, only 20% of voters participated in another referendum. 'The citizens have stopped voting,' said Michele Ainis, a constitutional law professor at Roma Tre University.
The vote also includes four other questions related to labour laws. However, many say public awareness of the referendum is low. Activists have accused Italy's public broadcaster, Rai, of providing limited coverage, though Rai claims it offered more coverage than for the 2022 vote.
You Might Also Like:
Mount Etna erupts: Is it safe to travel to Italy, and will airlines offer compensation for cancelled flights?
Adding to the complexity, many immigrants and those with immigrant roots who support the change will not vote — because they are not yet citizens.
Prime Minister Meloni has said she will go to the polls but will abstain from voting. Other politicians opposing the referendum have said they will not vote at all.
Results are expected after polls close Monday afternoon.
You Might Also Like:
Mount Etna erupts: Tourists urged to heed safety warnings
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Children of ‘anti-English' BJP leaders learn the same language, study abroad: Rahul Gandhi
New Delhi: Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi on Friday advocated English as a means for the underprivileged to get jobs and move ahead in life, a remark that targets the BJP-RSS for what he calls their aversion to the colonial-era official language. 'In today's world, English is as important as your mother tongue - because it will provide employment and boost your confidence,' said Gandhi in a message to the youth on X. He said, "English is not a dam, it is a bridge. English is not a shame, it is power. English is not a chain - it is a tool to break the chains." He also lashed out at leaders from the BJP, whose own wards speak English and study abroad, while the latter dissuade the masses in India from using English. 'The BJP-RSS don't want poor kids of India to learn English - because they don't want you to ask questions, move ahead, and become equal. In today's world, English is as important as your mother tongue - because it will provide employment and boost your confidence,' wrote LoP Rahul Gandhi on X in Hindi. LoP Rahul Gandhi's message on social media also carried a short video with some young men and a list of Union Ministers whose children study in foreign universities, including the University of Pennsylvania, Yale University, Warwick University, Oxford University, Tufts University and the University of London. LoP Rahul Gandhi's remarks come close to Union Home Minister Amit Shah's observation at an event on Thursday that the time is not far when 'English-speaking people would themselves feel ashamed'. Amit Shah's comments, made at a Hindi book's launch, followed a co-speaker's concerns over the perceived threat to Hindi and differences within people over its use. 'Mark my words, there is no crisis. In the coming years, such an Indian society is soon going to become a reality in which English-speaking people would themselves feel ashamed,' said Amit Shah. Half-baked knowledge acquired through foreign languages cannot lead to a complete understanding of Indian culture, history and religion, he said, emphasising Hindi's role as a uniting factor in the country. LoP Rahul Gandhi's remarks on valuing Indian languages also carried a powerful message against the alleged imposition of Hindi on non-Hindi speaking states like Tamil Nadu. 'Every language of India has soul, culture, and knowledge. We have to cherish them, and at the same time, teach English to every child. This is the path to an India that competes with the world, that gives every child an equal opportunity,' said LoP Rahul Gandhi.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Israel-Iran conflict: Who's been targeted? Key Iranian figures killed in Israeli strikes
Israel's missile strikes have delivered a significant blow to Iran's military and nuclear command structure, killing several high-ranking figures since the conflict began on June 13, 2025. Among those killed are top generals and key nuclear scientists, according to Iranian state media and officials. Many of those targeted were closely linked to Iran's nuclear programme and had previously been under Western sanctions. Follow Israel-Iran conflict live updates - June 20, 2025 The escalating conflict entered a new phase on Friday (June 20, 2025), with both sides exchanging strikes one week into the war. As tensions rise, U.S. President Donald Trump said he is considering direct U.S. military involvement, including a possible strike on Iran's heavily fortified Fordow uranium enrichment facility — a site buried deep under a mountain and accessible only to advanced 'bunker-buster' munitions. Amid the military escalation, diplomatic activity is also underway. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is reportedly heading to Geneva for talks with the EU's top diplomat and officials from the UK, France, and Germany, raising hopes for renewed negotiations over Tehran's nuclear ambitions. The situation remains volatile, with both military operations and diplomatic channels developing in parallel. Here is a look at the prominent Iranian figures who have been targeted or killed by Israel during the ongoing conflict.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Why Trump's ‘two weeks' timeline for a decision on Iran is déjà vu for many
US President Donald Trump says he will be ready to make his decision about bombing Iran or not 'within the next two weeks'. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt offered this new timeline during her Thursday afternoon briefing, but some in the room couldn't help but feel a sense of déjà vu, as the phrase sounded more than a little familiar. 'I have a message directly from the president, and I quote,' Leavitt said. ''Based on the fact that there is a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.'' As The New York Times noted, 'two weeks' is one of Trump's most favoured and most ambiguous units of time. Sample this. Trump was asked eight weeks ago whether he could trust Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump replied: 'I'll let you know in about two weeks.' Over the years, the same timeframe has been deployed for tax plans, health care policies, evidence of conspiracy theories, the fight against ISIS, the reopening of coal mines, and infrastructure announcements — all of which he promised to clarify 'in about two weeks.' As NYT puts it, 'It is a slippery thing, this two weeks — not a measurement of time so much as a placeholder. Two weeks for Trump can mean something, or nothing at all. It is both a yes and a no. It is delaying while at the same time scheduling. It is not an objective unit of time, it is a subjective unit of time. It is completely divorced from any sense of chronology. It simply means later. But later can also mean never. Sometimes.' The pressing question now is whether the US is going to bomb Iran? No one knows and we may have to wait two weeks to find an answer to that question. A reporter tried to pin down the timeline, reminding the press secretary of Trump's repeated 'two-week' promises, particularly in relation to Russia. 'How can we be sure he's going to stick to this one on making a decision on Iran?' Leavitt's answer? Essentially, that one situation can't be compared with another. As NYT says, 'This was really a question of metaphysics more than anything else.'
