Wolf protection downgrade gets green light in EU

EU lawmakers on Thursday gave the green light to downgrading wolf protections in the bloc, which will allow hunting to resume under strict criteria.
Members of the Bern Convention, tasked with the protection of wildlife in Europe as well as some African countries, agreed in December to lower the wolf's status from "strictly protected" to "protected".
The downgrade came into force in March, and the European Commission moved immediately to revise related EU laws to reflect the change.
EU lawmakers approved the move by a majority of 371 to 162, with support from conservative, centrist and hard-right groups.
The law requires a formal rubber-stamp by EU member states -- which have already endorsed the text -- before entering into force, after which states will have 18 months to comply.
Green and left-wing parties voted against a change they denounce as politically motivated and lacking scientific basis, while the parliament's socialist grouping was split on the matter.
The European Union -- as a party to the Bern Convention -- was the driving force behind the push to lower protections, arguing that the increase in wolf numbers has led to more frequent contact with humans and livestock.
But activists fear the measure would upset the recovery made by the species over the past 10 years after it faced near extinction a century ago.
A trio of campaign groups -- Humane World for Animals Europe, Eurogroup for Animals and the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) -- denounced the vote as "a worrying precedent for European nature conservation."
"There is no data justifying a lower level of protection, but the EU institutions decided to ignore science," IFAW's Europe policy director Ilaria Di Silvestre said in a joint statement.
Echoing those concerns, Sebastian Everding of the Left group in parliament said the move "ignores effective coexistence tools".
"Downgrading wolf protection... panders to fear, not facts," he charged.
Grey wolves were virtually exterminated in Europe 100 years ago, but their numbers have surged to a current population of 20,300, mostly in the Balkans, Nordic countries, Italy and Spain.
- No 'licence to kill' -
Commission president Ursula von der Leyen welcomed the results of the vote on Thursday.
"With growing wolf concentrations in some areas, we should give authorities more flexibility to find balanced solutions between the aim to protect biodiversity and the livestock of local farmers," she wrote.
In late 2022, von der Leyen lost her beloved pony Dolly to a wolf that crept into its enclosure on her family's rural property in northern Germany -- leading some to suggest the matter had become personal.
In practice, the EU rule change makes it easier to hunt wolves in rural and mountainous regions where their proximity to livestock and sheepdogs is deemed too threatening.
Von der Leyen's European People's Party (EPP), which spearheaded the change, has stressed that member states will remain in charge of wolf management on their soil -- but with more flexibility than before.
To date, there have been no human casualties linked to rising wolf populations -- but some lawmakers backing the change warn that it may only be a question of time.
Spain's Esther Herranz Garcia, a member of the conservative EPP, cited figures showing that wolves attacked more than 60,000 farm animals in the bloc every year.
"The people who feed our country cannot be expected to work with this fear hanging over them," said France's Valerie Deloge, a livestock farmer and lawmaker with the hard-right Patriots group, where the rule change found support.
Socialist and centrist lawmakers -- while agreeing to back the changes under a fast-track procedure -- struck a more measured tone.
"This is not a licence to kill," Pascal Canfin, a French lawmaker with the centrist Renew group, told AFP. "We are providing more leeway for local exemptions -- wolves remain a protected species."
By Matthieu Demeestere

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

IOL News

an hour ago

• IOL News

Zimbabwe's Kirsty Coventry: Olympic Chief's steeliness shaped by hard knocks

CHALLENGES AHEAD Kirsty Coventry, Zimbabwe's first female and African IOC president, is set to navigate challenges with US President Trump and demonstrate her resilience and leadership skills, as highlighted by her successful career and political experience. Picture: Fabrice Coffrini/AFP Image: Fabrice Coffrini/AFP First impressions can be deceptive but Kirsty Coventry showed that behind a sunny disposition she will have the mettle to deal with the trickiest of people and situations when she succeeds Thomas Bach as president of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) on Monday. Looming large on the horizon of the 41-year-old Zimbabwean -- the first woman and African to occupy the post of the most powerful single figure in sport -- is US President Donald Trump. With Los Angeles hosting the 2028 Olympics, Trump will feature often on Coventry's agenda. Trump has not been shy in giving public dressing downs to world leaders -- notably Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and his South African counterpart Cyril Ramaphosa. Judging by Coventry's initial response, after a crushing first-round victory in the presidential election in March, she may have Trump's measure. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Navigating Challenges and Embracing Failure: Lessons from Coventry's Career 'I have been dealing with, let's say, difficult men in high positions since I was 20 years old,' she said, adding 'communication will be key.' Unlike Trump, though, Coventry embraces the word failure, for it helped forge her stellar career. 'Everything's scary. Embrace that. You have to fail,' Coventry told the swimming team at her American alma mater Auburn University last year. 'I've learned the best lessons by failing, and I have failed at many things. Life has a really good way of humbling you.' At the same time that steely resolve comes to the surface when winning is at stake. 'I was banned from playing card games with the family, because they didn't like to deal with me when I lost,' she said. A Glance at Coventry's CV Suggests Failure in Her Life Has Been Relative Coventry, who had the Olympic rings tattooed on a leg after her first Games in 2000, is a two-time Olympic gold medallist and she has contributed seven of Zimbabwe's overall Games medals tally of eight. She has accrued domestic political experience, as she was Zimbabwe's Minister for Youth, Sport, Arts and Recreation from 2019 to this year. That attracted some flak as she was serving in a government whose election in 2023 was declared to be 'neither free nor fair' by the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ). 'I don't think you can stand on the sidelines and scream and shout for change,' she said in her defence. 'I believe you have to be seated at the table to try and create it.' Her record as a minister has been heavily criticised by the Zimbabwean arts community in particular. Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa, whose predecessor Robert Mugabe labelled Coventry 'a golden girl' and awarded her $100,000 after she came back with a gold medal from Beijing in 2008, hit back. 'Whoever was not impressed by her can appoint someone else when they become president,' said the 82-year-old.

Daily Maverick

an hour ago

• Daily Maverick

SA photojournalist Rashid Lombard wielded his camera and jazz as instruments of resistance and celebration

In documenting pivotal moments in South Africa's journey towards democracy, Lombard grasped the intersection of political life and the cultural world. The click of a camera shutter and the improvisation of a jazz saxophone may seem worlds apart. Yet, in the hands of South African photojournalist and cultural organiser Rashid Lombard, they became inseparable instruments of resistance and celebration. Born in Port Elizabeth (now Gqeberha) in 1951, Lombard began his journey as a photographer during one of the most turbulent periods in South African history. He documented pivotal moments in the country's journey towards democracy, including the release of Nelson Mandela in 1990 and South Africa's first democratic elections in 1994. I am an African studies scholar working at the intersection of creativity, memory and restorative justice. Lombard's work came into sharp focus when I conceptualised and curated the exhibition Martyrs, Saints and Sellouts: The Photographs of Benny Gool, Adil Bradlow and Zubeida Vallie in 2013. Rashid's death on 4 June at the age of 74 marks the end of a life that synced visual documentation of struggle with devotion to the music that sustained – and critically examined – what came after. The journey of a photographer Like so many in South Africa, Lombard's childhood was shattered by the impact of the Group Areas Act of 1950, which segregated South Africans by race. It eviscerated his multicultural boyhood. In 1962, when he was 11, his family relocated to Cape Town. After completing his schooling, he first trained as an architectural draughtsman before moving into industrial photography, beginning his career at a large construction company. He would later become a respected photojournalist. His camera became a witness, capturing not just the dramatic moments of political upheaval, but the humanity of ordinary people living under extraordinary oppression. He photographed for leading global media agencies and also for local anti-apartheid publications like Grassroots and South. If pressed, I would say that my favourite image of his is the one of fellow South African photographer Ernest Cole. The composition demonstrates masterful visual doubling (in a mirror) that illuminates both Cole's life and photography's fundamental nature. This intimate behind-the-scenes image reveals masculine vulnerability – not just Cole's, but potentially Lombard's own exposure. Lombard's achievement lies in capturing this profoundly personal moment between friends. He documents their kinship and connection, a shield against apartheid's brutality. Many other famous South Africans would be captured in his lens – Desmond Tutu, Nelson Mandela, Winnie Madikizela Mandela, Chris Hani, Dumile Feni. But he more often dwelled on everyday people. Lombard worked alongside photographers like Benny Gool, Jimi Matthews, Willie de Klerk and Zubeida Vallie, whose contributions were often overshadowed by white contemporaries. Gool documented the liberation struggle with intimate knowledge of the communities he photographed. Vallie, possibly the only black woman photographing the struggle years in Cape Town, brought unique sensitivity to documenting resistance. Jazz champion What distinguished Lombard from even these contemporaries was his understanding that the struggle for freedom extended beyond the political realm into the cultural, where jazz music thrived. During the 1980s, as black townships burned and international sanctions tightened, jazz clubs and homes became sanctuaries. Here South Africans could express their humanity through music. Lombard captured the musicians and their struggles, decades later publishing his photo book Jazz Rocks. He founded an events company in 1997 and established the important Cape Town International Jazz Festival in 2000. A rich legacy What emerges from Lombard's body of work is a profound understanding of interconnectedness. Between art and politics, between individual expression and collective liberation, between the click of a shutter and the rhythm of a bass line. His photographs capture not just what happened, but what it felt like to live through the transformation of a nation. They show us jazz musicians and protest marchers as performers in democracy's great improvisation, and ordinary moments as extraordinary acts of defiance. For the archive of the anti-apartheid struggle, Lombard's contributions represent something beyond mere documentation. They constitute a visual testimony to both the dream of freedom and its complex, often painful unrealisation. His later images reveal the euphoria of liberation alongside the sobering recognition that political freedom would not automatically translate into economic justice or social equality. In documenting both the struggle and its aftermath, Lombard's rich archive – including more than 500,000 film negatives – becomes a meditation. His photographs ask uncomfortable questions. What does liberation mean when poverty persists? How do we measure progress when cultural expression remains undervalued? They remind us that revolution can be both the raised fist and the extended saxophone, both the protest chant and the syncopated rhythm that makes our hips sway in hope. Lombard's legacy lies in his recognition that freedom has many expressions, and that its struggle extends far beyond political emancipation. He is survived by his partner, Colleen, and children Chevan, Shadley, Yana, Zach and Daniel. They shared not only his life, but the sacrifices that apartheid demanded. Hamba kahle, Rashid, go well. We mourn you through your photographs, which remind us of your life, one lived in the pursuit of justice, art and truth. DM First published by The Conversation. Siona O'Connell is a professor of interdisciplinary studies and African studies at the University of Pretoria. This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.

IOL News

3 hours ago

• IOL News

How South African mainstream media fuels xenophobia

Displaced African migrant workers seek refuge at a warehouse, turned into a shelter by a group of volunteers to house migrant workers who fled Israeli bombardment in southern Lebanon. June 20 marked World Refugee Day. Anthony Kambi Masha Foreigners, especially refugees in South Africa, face numerous challenges, including language barriers, discrimination, xenophobia, and financial difficulties. The perception of refugees is often negative, even when the host country benefits from them. Access to public resources is increasingly tied to citizenship and ethnicity, contributing to marginalisation. Refugees lack the power and voice to overcome these boundaries of exclusion and belonging, which hinder their full contribution to economic growth and development. Refugees face language barriers, discrimination, xenophobia, and financial issues. All South African cities have discourse exclusionary practices like name-calling, discrimination, prejudice, and outright violence and intimidation, but Greater Johannesburg has the most anti-refugee xenophobia. Today, there is a dizzying array of labels to describe those who cross an international border. Humiliating and derogatory name-calling such as makwerekwere, amagrigamba, and amaGhana constitutes a form of bullying and classifies xenophobia towards refugees. Other names are alien and mkeres mooo, meaning an intruder. In isiZulu, refugees are referred to as abokufika, which means people who came from elsewhere. While such a designation may not necessarily be underpinned by malicious intentions, it classifies refugees as outsiders who do not belong to their adopted communities. A study of YouTube videos featuring reports of xenophobic incidents in South Africa shows that discourse on xenophobia is based on the us/them dichotomy, emphasising the positive traits of the ingroup and the negative traits of the outgroup (refugees). The media's role in xenophobic behaviour, including discrimination and violence against refugees, is a complex issue. Traditional media still dominates as a source of news and knowledge about refugees in South Africa, with the internet and social media trailing in terms of public trust in information about refugees. The distribution of the public across different forms of media may reflect the wide reach of radio and television across rural and urban areas. The media's reportage of immigration has possibly exacerbated tensions between native South Africans and African migrants in the country. The media's agenda-setting function influences consumer thoughts about refugees, but it does not necessarily control how they think about these things. It plays a huge role in spreading hostility towards refugees, with the deployment of predominantly negative language in South African tabloid and mainstream print media presenting refugees as a threat, aliens, and outsiders. Social media platforms can influence culture, fostering cross-cultural understanding and potentially reinforcing social divisions. However, they can also amplify xenophobia, particularly in communities like South Africa with pre-existing xenophobic sentiment. A study by Dube and Setlalentoa (2024) found that xenophobia is a significant social pathology in South Africa, affecting migrant learners and causing increased incidents, bullying, school violence, and social exclusion in schools. This highlights the risk of intolerance and prejudice in society. The media spreads hate and division, and people believe it. When news stories about refugees are written, only the bad things are shown. Hardly are refugees seen as victims. South Africa's refugee policy allows refugees to seek employment and access basic services, but they often face discrimination and exclusion from the formal labour market. Refugees, especially those from Africa, are sometimes viewed as a burden on the country's resources and are scapegoated for economic problems. Discrepancies across personalised social media feeds often incorporate harmful stereotypes and make implicit assumptions about people that are problematic from the standpoint of representation. This xenophobic sentiment further exacerbates the challenges refugees face in finding employment. Following apartheid, South Africa has experienced a shift in national identity and nationalism, with politicians refraining from endorsing violence. This is fueled by state action and exclusive conceptions of citizenship, including the notion of South African exceptionalism compared to the rest of the continent. Government institutions target illicit refugees, such as the police force, which arrest and harass refugees. The high level of xenophobia is directed at both youth and older persons who happen to find themselves in the country, black African migrants, and refugees. Common stereotypes include allegations that African refugees import diseases and crime, are labelled as people who steal jobs and women, drain the health care system, and other state resources. Physical and systematic xenophobia contribute to refugees' appalling experiences in South Africa. Murray (2013) reveals that the unsettled circumstances of urban living in the "new South Africa" have proven to be a fertile breeding ground for alarmist fantasies about unwanted refugees that occasionally spill over into genuine moral panics. These moral panics arise at times of political instability and uncertainty, and the fear, apprehension, and anxiety linked to urban disorder can be more easily accommodated if traced to an identifiable cause and attached to a particular socially stigmatised menace. Dr A. K. Masha is a social realist and a leadership catalyst. He writes in his personal capacity.