Fed's Bowman confirmed by Senate to central bank's top regulatory post
WASHINGTON - Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman was confirmed to the central bank's top regulatory post by the U.S. Senate on Wednesday, where she is expected to push an agenda aimed at easing rules for banks.
Bowman, a former community banker who President Donald Trump nominated to the Fed's Vice Chair for Supervision role in March, has served on the Fed's board as a governor since 2018. She was confirmed by a vote of 48 to 46.
In her new role, Bowman will lead the Fed's efforts to supervise and write rules for the nation's largest and most complex banks. That is expected to include easing leverage rules for large banks, making the annual "stress test" of big banks more transparent, and rolling out simpler capital rules for large firms, according to analysts.
When she testified before lawmakers in April, she said current financial rules have grown "overly complicated and redundant" and impose unnecessary costs on banks and their customers.
She has vowed to be a "pragmatic" regulator, as the Trump administration has made trimming rules in a bid to boost economic growth a top priority.
(Reporting by Pete Schroeder; editing by Diane Craft)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Back in the crossfire: Iraq's Tehran-backed militias prepare to support Iran if US intervenes
An air of uncertainty surrounds US President Donald Trump and potential American involvement in Israel's war against Iran. While Tehran has long been an adversary of Washington and a source of international concern over its nuclear ambitions, Middle East governments and the broader international community have warned the Americans that joining and fuelling the conflict could have catastrophic consequences. As Mr Trump considers whether or not to directly involve US forces, one of Iran's largest support networks remains deeply embedded in Iraq. Powerful militant groups, tied to Tehran through years of military and strategic co-operation, are watching developments closely and escalating their threats of military action to back their ally. It is a big risk and Iraq would pay a heavy price, which it cannot afford. It just started rebuilding its security and stabilising the country Iraqi government source Sources close to the Iraqi government said some of the most prominent militant groups have confirmed this week that US military intervention to support Israel would trigger a retaliatory response. 'They told the government that they would go in and that they disagree with the decision to stand by,' one source said. That is a reference to Baghdad's decision, at the start of this war, not to be part of it. The government does not want to turn Iraq into another battlefield for a regional conflict. One source said that the Iraqi government has 'warned the militias against any involvement,' fearing that it would result in further escalation. 'It is a big risk and Iraq would pay a heavy price, which it cannot afford,' the source added. 'It has just started rebuilding its security and is stabilising as a country.' Iraqi militant factions operate on their own terms, but military action to support Iran would not be straightforward and could result in severe consequences, the government sources added. 'The US know where those factions are based and can easily eliminate them if they chose to,' one source said. 'They can target them one by one.' Hassan Janabi, a former Iraqi ambassador and minister, told The National: 'It is clear that armed factions will see US involvement as an opportunity to carry out attacks on US sites, including the embassy in Baghdad.' Although direct American involvement would not be a surprise, it would 'increase the anger of the Iraqi public, which is hostile to Israel and America, as well as the Iran-aligned armed factions that are ideologically and strategically tied to Tehran,' Mr Janabi added. He added that the Iraqi government led by Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudani is attempting to portray 'solidarity with Iran by condemning the Israeli aggression, because it is ultimately unable to confront the military escalation taking place'. The threat of a full regional war is more serious now than at any point in the past two years. If Mr Trump sends warplanes to support Israel, Iraqi militias are unlikely to be passive. While the threat isn't entirely new and the scale and potential impact of this type of involvement is uncertain, these Iraqi factions, known as Fasael, have undoubtedly been adopting a more serious tone as the conflict intensifies and enters a second week. Powerful Shiite leader Moqtada Al Sadr said on Friday that any decision to attack at any time and against any country "is entrusted to the decision issued by the American president present at any given time. 'This means that the unjust decision will, by divine wisdom and divine power, bring calamity and loss upon the man who issued this decision,' he said. 'It will bring calamity and loss upon him, as has already happened.' On Thursday, the Iran-backed Shiite militia Kataib Hezbollah in Iraq vowed to attack US military bases across the Middle East if the US enters the war. 'We affirm, with greater clarity, that if the United States enters this war, the 'crazy' Trump will lose all the trillions he dreams of seizing from this region,' militia leader Abu Ali Al Askari said in a statement. He added that operational plans had already been drawn up. The escalating threats come after White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Mr Trump will make a decision 'within the next two weeks' and would depend on the outcome of more talks with Iran. 'In light of the substantial chance that negotiations with Iran may or may not take place in the near future, the President will make his decision within the next two weeks.' Just 24 hours earlier, Mr Trump said he had not yet made up his mind, continuing to project an air of strategic ambiguity and avoiding firm public commitments. 'I may do it,' he told reporters. 'I may not do it.' For now, all the indications suggest that Washington is 'reluctant to get directly involved,' one source told The National. 'Trump has repeatedly stated his desire to de-escalate conflicts in the region and end foreign entanglements.' 'Survival mode' Baghdad's view may not align with other capitals in the region, where concern is mounting over a potential US strike on Iran and subsequent retaliation that would make American bases a target. Another Tehran-backed armed faction in Iraq, the True Promise Corps, has also threatened to join the war, intensifying fears that the conflict could spread rapidly across the region. The group, part of a shadowy coalition known as the Islamic Resistance in Iraq, issued a warning Monday that it would strike Israeli targets and its regional allies. 'We declare that all the sites and camps of the entity [Israel] and anyone who supports it in the region are targets for us,' said the group's leader, Mohammed Al Tamimi, in a statement posted on X. Renad Mansour, director of the Iraq Initiative at London's Chatham House, believes Iraq's armed factions are in 'survival mode'. 'The situation has gone beyond their control,' he said. 'They don't know where it's going or where it will end, and it's about surviving effectively.' Baghdad does not want to create instability following years of calm. However, 'what's happening now is risking the equilibrium that Iraq has enjoyed,' Mr Mansour added. 'So for this reason, armed groups – certainly senior PMF groups – have tried to rhetorically signal their support for Iran and condemn Israel.' Meanwhile, Iran has also warned of unleashing 'hell' in the region if the US intervenes militarily. So far, Baghdad believes Washington has little appetite for a direct war. Iraq's powerful militias played an active role early in the Israel-Gaza war, launching attacks on US bases and claiming that they fired rockets towards Tel Aviv. But that momentum shifted following a quiet, unannounced truce that led Iran-backed factions to halt attacks on US forces. The truce, involving Washington, Baghdad and Tehran, was reached in February 2024. It remains to be seen whether or not the US will stand by and watch Iranian missiles continue to strike Tel Aviv. Standing by runs counter to the US government's recent rhetoric about 'hitting hard' and its repeated warnings over Iran's nuclear threat, especially following five failed nuclear talks.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
US rate cuts could come as soon as July, Fed official says
A senior official at the Federal Reserve has suggested that the US central bank should consider cutting interest rates as soon as next month. 'We could do this as early as July,' Fed Governor Christopher Waller said on CNBC. 'That would be my view, whether the committee would go along with it or not.' As a governor on the Federal Reserve Board, Mr Waller holds a permanent vote on the central bank's rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee. Mr Waller and other Fed officials unanimously voted to hold interest rates steady between 4.25 and 4.50 per cent on Wednesday. The Central Bank of the UAE, which follows Fed decisions because of the dollar peg, also held rates steady following the US central bank's decision. Fed officials this week also maintained their forecast for two quarter-point cuts this year before slowing the pace of cuts in 2026. Several officials projected zero rate cuts, pointing to some uncertainty on the future policy path. The central bank has not adjusted interest rates in its last four meetings, largely due to the uncertainty surrounding tariffs. But Mr Waller said the Fed can 'look through' their inflation impact, arguing tariffs would create a one-time inflation bump rather than persistent high prices. Fed Chair Jerome Powell on Wednesday said tariffs could either have a one-off or persistent effect on inflation. Asked by reporters why not cut interest rates this month, Mr Powell said he expected to see 'meaningful' inflation in the coming months. Data shows that the Fed's preferred inflation metric has decelerated for three consecutive months. The PCE (Personal Consumption Expenditures) Price Index rose 2.1 per cent annually last month, one-tenth of a percentage point above the Fed's long-term target. 'The data the last few months has been showing that trend inflation is looking pretty good,' Mr Waller said. He suggested that, if the Fed were to begin cutting rates in July, it should begin slowly. 'But start the process,' Mr Waller suggested. 'That's the key thing. And then if there's some big shock due to maybe the Middle East conflict, we can pause.' Mr Waller added that he is also concerned about the jobs market. While the unemployment rate has remained stable at around 4.2 per cent, Mr Waller said he was concerned about fewer jobs being created. The four-week average of jobless claims is at its highest level since August 2023, according to data from the Labour Department. 'Why do we want to wait until we actually see it crash before we start cutting rates?' he added. 'So I'm all in favour of saying maybe we should start thinking about cutting the policy rate at the next meeting, because we don't want to wait till the job market tanks before we start cutting the policy rate.' The Fed holds its next two-day meeting from July 29 to 30.
Zawya
3 hours ago
- Zawya
Audi could build plant in US to placate Trump, Spiegel reports
Volkswagen's premium brand Audi could build a plant at a new location in the United States under scenarios being considered to placate President Donald Trump in the tariff conflict, the Spiegel news magazine reported on Friday. Audi is considering building a plant in the southern U.S., which would be the more expensive option out of a number of scenarios being considered, with company sources estimating costs of up to 4 billion euros ($4.6 billion), the report said. An Audi spokesperson said that the company aims to build up more of a presence in the United States. "We are currently examining various scenarios for this. We are confident that we will make a decision this year in consultation with the (Volkswagen) group on how this will look in concrete terms," she said in an emailed statement, reaffirming earlier comments made by the company. Audi has no production of its own in the U.S., but Volkswagen has a plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee and one under construction near Columbia, South Carolina. Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs has already racked up hundreds of millions of euros in costs for German carmakers heavily reliant on their export business, according to an industry representative. BMW, Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen are in talks with Washington over a possible import tariff deal , seeking to use their U.S. investments and exports as leverage to soften any blow, sources have told Reuters. ($1 = 0.8678 euros)
