Alberta introduces plan to allow people with disabilities to work and receive benefits
The Alberta government announced a new support program for people with disabilities that starts next year, but without releasing how much benefits will be.
The new Alberta Disability Assistance Program (ADAP) will start July 2026. It will co-exist with the current Assured Income for the Severely Handicapped (AISH), which will still be available for people who cannot work due to a disability.
"For those with a disability who can work, the supports offered through AISH fall short," said Jason Nixon, Minister of Seniors, Community and Social Services, on Tuesday.
"Those individuals will be much better served through a program that offers robust employment supports, generous earning exemptions, and ultimately a path toward greater independence."
The government hasn't released the financial details of the new plan nor the criteria that will be used to evaluate clients.
Nixon said the government needs to do more consultation before releasing those additional details.
About 77,000 Albertans receive AISH each month. The government said about 10,000 recipients have some form of employment but believe more would work if their benefits weren't clawed back.
A single person on AISH receives $1,901 each month.
Nixon said there will be a single application process for benefits. The government will decide what program to put an applicant in depending on their disability.
If an applicant becomes eligible for ADAP, they can reapply for AISH if their condition changes in a way to impede their ability to work.
No transparency
People currently on AISH will be evaluated to determine if they qualify for ADAP.
Those recipients still keep the health benefits they were eligible for under AISH, even when they make enough money through employment to no longer need monthly payments
Nixon said the province will increase supports for ADAP recipients to help them secure employment and get employers to offer more opportunities to people with disabilities.
Marie Renaud, the NDP opposition critic for community and social services, said the government is creating a second program to move more people off AISH using criteria that hasn't been disclosed to the public.
"What they've done is given themselves the ability to go through this list and say "you go there, you go there, you go there, you go there," when we know this process is not transparent," she said.
"People are waiting for months to even get a decision.The appeal process is not even accessible."
Renaud said Alberta doesn't have legislation to ensure workplaces are accessible.
She said people with disabilities have higher rates of unemployment and the government doesn't appear to have made the investments to change that.
Trish Bowman, the CEO of Inclusion Alberta, said the lack of details accompanying Tuesday's announcement could alarm people who rely on AISH. She said they have to be involved in consultations about the changes to avoid any of what she calls "unintended consequences."
"There will absolutely be apprehension from people as this goes forward that they may be moved off of AISH to a program that provides potentially a lower level of support," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
9 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Iranian Canadians and others watch and worry after U.S. strikes on nuclear sites
Iranian Canadians and Jewish groups turned worried eyes to the Middle East on Sunday, as U.S. strikes against three Iranian nuclear sites raised fears of escalating violence. Nimâ Machouf, a member of a Montreal Iranian women's association, said family members in Iran are living 'from one bomb to another.' 'I'm very worried because this will only accelerate the violence in the region,' she said in a phone interview. 'It will further aggravate the problem and take us further away from peace.' Machouf, who is also an epidemiologist and former NDP candidate, believes the strikes will only hurt the people who are fighting to free themselves from Iran's repressive regime. Attacks from other countries means that Iran's people 'are not protected by their government, nor protected by others, by the international community,' she said. 'So people feel abandoned by everyone, everywhere.' The United States inserted itself in Israel's war against Iran early Sunday as it launched strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites. Prime Minister Mark Carney wrote on social media that U.S. military action was designed to alleviate the 'grave threat' Iran's nuclear program represents to international security. 'Canada has been consistently clear that Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon,' he wrote. But Carney said the situation in the Middle East was 'highly volatile,' and urged the parties to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution. The interim president of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs described Iran's nuclear program on Sunday as a 'grave danger to global peace and security.' 'Eliminating this threat is an essential step toward achieving a safer Middle East and a more secure and peaceful world,' wrote Noah Shack, who urged the federal government to 'stand strong against the Iranian threat.' Kaveh Shahrooz, a lawyer and a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, says many Iranians are worried about the impact the U.S. decision will have on civilians. 'I think there's quite a bit of (concern) simply because there's a lot of unknowns,' he said. Shahrooz said Iran's regime offers virtually no protection to its own citizens in the form of air raid sirens or shelters, and internet has been cut off. 'So there's a lot of fear about what we will find out once internet connection is restored and we're able to talk to our families again,' he said. He said feelings among Canada's Iranian diaspora vary, from anger at the strikes to support for U.S. actions. 'Among the people who are not supportive of Iran's regime, I think there are some who are cheering and who are saying this was long overdue,' he said. 'And they're happy to see the Iranian regime's nuclear program effectively dismantled and to see that regime humiliated.' Machouf, on the other hand, called any suggestion that Israel will 'liberate' Iran's people a 'masquerade' and said regime change must come from within. Gur Tsabar, a spokesperson with Jews Say No to Genocide, said a rally called 'Hands Off Iran' was organized for Sunday afternoon in Toronto to demand sanctions on Israel and a two-way arms embargo. He described recent Israeli and American actions in Iran as 'beyond disturbing.' Tsabar said the rally scheduled for Sunday afternoon is co-organized by 16 groups, including the Iranian Canadian Congress, Palestinian Youth Movement, Jews Say No to Genocide and a number of labour unions. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 22, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Hamilton Spectator
10 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Mark Carney's minority government has an unexpected partner in the Conservatives — for now
OTTAWA—There's a new coalition in town. If the last Parliament was dominated by the Conservatives' insistence that the Liberal-NDP alliance had spun the country into an irreversible state of disarray, the opening weeks of the latest session has put a new pact on the map. 'It appears to me, and it remains to be seen, that (Prime Minister) Carney's new majority coalition is Liberal-Conservative, delivering Pierre Poilievre's policies with a more friendly face,' said the Green Party's Elizabeth May on Monday, as she raised the alarm over C-5, the Liberals' major projects bill. The Grit-Tory co-operation around that bill, which led to the proposed legislation being bulldozed through Parliament this week, prompted members of other federal parties to make the same dig. The Bloc Québécois warned of a 'new cross-party alliance,' while the NDP accused both parties of joining forces to steamroll over environmental protections and Indigenous rights. Of course, there is no actual coalition at play. But charges of one, combined with a fledgling Carney government pulling the Liberals away from the left, means the Conservatives must make a new case as to why they are still the top alternative in a post-Justin Trudeau world. 'Mark Carney is governing like a Progressive Conservative. So where's your opportunity?' said Tim Powers, a former Conservative strategist and chair of Summa Strategies. Carney's 'One Canadian Economy' bill, which proposes, in part, to grant Ottawa temporary powers to fast-track major resource and infrastructure projects, contains some promises that are not altogether different from what Poilievre pledged during this year's campaign. Rapidly spurring Canadian resource projects and accelerating approvals were key commitments in the Conservatives' platform, even if they were accompanied by other promises like scrapping the industrial carbon price and repealing the Liberals' contentious Impact Assessment Act. Bill C-5 is unlike any piece of legislation we have seen in Canada federally. Because Bill C-5 doesn't go that far, it doesn't have Poilievre's complete approval. And while his decision to be the Liberals' dance partner this week quickly drew the ire of other opposition parties, others believe it wasn't a damaging move. 'Canadians ultimately want them to work together,' said Shakir Chambers, a Conservative strategist and vice president at the public affairs firm Oyster Group. 'If you're going to co-operate on some things, co-operate on the things that you have been championing, even pre-election, to move forward and get them passed.' Powers said Poilievre now has heavyweights in his caucus like Edmonton Northwest MP Billy Morin, the former chief of Enoch Cree Nation, to push back against narratives that the Conservatives aren't attuned to concerns from Indigenous communities about the bill. MPs are expressing reservations about the push to fast-track major development projects. The Liberals, too, don't seem particularly bothered by the 'coalition' barbs. 'I don't take them very seriously,' London Centre Liberal MP Peter Fragiskatos told the Star. 'I'm very glad (the Conservatives) are coming to the game and playing a constructive role. It's been a very long time since they've done that,' Liberal MP and former House Speaker Greg Fergus said. Nevertheless, the early weeks of Canada's 45th Parliament have offered a few glimpses into where the Conservatives see their lines of attack. One emerged this week in the form of the Trudeau-era target that zero-emission vehicles should make up 20 per cent of new car sales starting in 2026, growing to 100 per cent by 2035. 'Well, somebody wants to tell you where to go and how to get there,' Poilievre said in a five-and-a-half minute video posted on social media Thursday. 'It's the Liberal government's new attempt to ban your gas-powered vehicles.' Conservative Deputy Leader Melissa Lantsman introduced a defeated motion this week, calling on the Liberals to scrap the policy and posting on social media that 'the government has no place in the driveways of Canadians.' The policy is not a 'new attempt,' nor is it a flat-out 'ban' on gas-powered vehicles: it's a regulatory scheme aimed at incentivizing the sale of more EVs. 'That's another thing that Justin Trudeau was focused on,' Powers said. 'Guys, wake up! And girls. Justin Trudeau is gone. He's gone. There's a new Liberal leader, and he's not giving you much ammunition.' But Chambers said zeroing in on the EV mandate is a natural next step for a party focused on buoying the oil and gas sector. 'It's a good point to attack,' Chambers said. 'If you bring back … the industrial carbon tax issue, again, opposing the EV mandate kind of fits with that overall blanket of policy ideas.' Other issues the party focused on this week, such as bringing forward a motion imposing a lifetime ban on ArriveCAN contractor GCStrategies, were more successful. But Chambers said that the past few weeks of Parliament have mostly been a 'test run', and that Canadians are currently focused on more pressing issues like affordability, trade disruptions and international conflicts. That's where he says Poilievre's focus should lie as he prepares for a fall session, where it's expected that the Conservative leader will make his triumphant return to the House of Commons after a summer byelection, revamp his shadow cabinet with fresh faces, and set Carney's first federal budget in his sights. He'll also have to factor in the Conservative party's national convention, set to be held next January, where he will face a leadership review following his election loss. Powers said that by the time the calendar rolls over into September, he wants to see more 'maturity' from the party. 'I think Conservatives need to lead a little bit again in thought, not just in (social media) clip, and in meme,' Powers said. 'Poilievre's a smart fellow. How can he do that? Where can he put a marker down?'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
‘Luxury' apartments deceived low-income seniors, Washington attorney general alleges
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – Washington Attorney General Nick Brown filed a lawsuit against several apartment complexes, and their property management firms for allegedly 'deceiving' low-income seniors. Attorney General Brown filed the lawsuit Friday in Snohomish County Superior Court against the California-based property management company FPI Management and the owners of five apartments in Western Washington, including Vintage Housing Holdings and AMCAL multi-housing. The suit alleges that the property management firms engaged in 'unfair and deceptive practices,' impacting hundreds of senior tenants. Passenger in custody after alleged bomb threat on plane at Seattle-Tacoma airport According to the Attorney General's Office, FPI and the property owners advertised their apartments as 'low-income' units for tenants 55 and older. However, over the course of several years, FPI and the property owners failed to disclose to their low-income senior tenants that their rent would be calculated and increase in the future, while also misrepresenting the quality of the apartments, the availability and quality of apartment amenities such as pools and fitness areas along with safety at the properties. Now, Attorney General Brown argues these issues violate the Consumer Protection Act. 'No sense of safety': Portland man stranded in Tel Aviv amid Israel-Iran conflict 'Housing is particularly important for older Washingtonians, and it's hard for them to move once they've signed a lease,' Attorney General Brown said in a statement Friday. 'It's egregious to convince vulnerable populations they're getting quality living when in reality they are stuck with properties in disrepair that also end up costing more than they expected over time.' According to Brown, the property owners participate in the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program and receive tax credits in exchange for setting aside some apartment units for tenants below a certain income threshold. Under the tax credit program, the maximum rental rates are set every year by the United States Department of Housing Urban Development, based on the rise or fall of the area median income in the county of the property, the Attorney General's Office said, noting, 'This is unlike other forms of housing assistance, in which the amount of rent a tenant will pay is based on their own income, and not the income of other people in the area.' Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Attorney General Brown claims that FPI and the property owners did not explain to prospective tenants that their rent will be calculated based on the area median income, which is 'often significantly more' than Social Security or pension incomes most seniors rely on. This leads to tenants often paying 'an unsustainable portion' of their income on rent with little living expenses for food, transportation or medical expenses, Brown's office explained. Additionally, the Attorney General alleges that the property owners misrepresented the quality of their buildings by marketing them as 'luxury' or 'resort style,' at complexes including Vintage at Everett, Mill Creek and Tacoma. Some tenants moved in to find dirty units with broken appliances, leaks, mold, worn carpets and torn flooring among other issues. Multnomah County DA Vasquez on final city budget, prosecuting protesters Other promises of quality amenities such as pools, fitness centers and computer rooms, either did not exist, were inoperable or permanently closed, the attorney general's office furthered. The apartment complexes were also not as secure as advertised, Brown's office alleges, noting many of the complexes had no one monitoring who was entering the sites, leading to trespassing and other crimes on site along with frequent prowling in parking lots. With this lawsuit, the attorney general seeks an injunction to stop the property owners from continuing their 'unlawful' practices, and to provide restitution to the impacted tenants along with a civil penalty of $12,500 for each Consumer Protection Act violation. KOIN 6 News reached out to FPI Management. This story will be updated if we receive a response. AMCAL declined to comment on the litigation. In a statement to KOIN 6 News, Vintage Housing Holdings said, 'Vintage Housing disputes the Attorney General's allegations and will address them in court. Vintage Housing has been a part of providing housing in Washington for over 25 years. We take seriously our role as providers of affordable housing to seniors and the communities we are part of. We will work with our property manager, FPI, to address any issues. We are unable to comment further on pending litigation.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
