Two sons who blame Cuomo for elderly dad's COVID death endorse Lander for NYC mayor

Two grieving sons who blame then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo's controversial nursing-home edict for the death of their father and scores of others from COVID-19 have endorsed rival Brad Lander for mayor.
Peter and Daniel Arbeeny's dad, Norman, 89, died from COVID after a rehab stint in a nursing home in Cobble Hill, Brooklyn.
Under Cuomo's policy, which was instituted in March 2020, patients who were infected with the coronavirus but stabilized were admitted or readmitted to nursing homes at a time when the facilities were not able to test for the deadly bug or provide adequate personal protective equipment to contain the infection, critics said.
Cuomo, who resigned as governor in 2021 amid a spate of sexual-misconduct accusations he denies, is now the front-runner in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor.
The Arbeeny brothers' endorsement of Lander was held outside the Cobble Hill Nursing Home where their dad had been cared for.
'It is my honor to endorse Brad, because he answered our families call for help during the height of COVID in April of 2020 when the city shut down,' Peter said Monday of the current city comptroller and mayoral candidate.
'Five years ago, when no elected official would meet or stand up for us, Brad Lander was the one public official who fought alongside us to expose Andrew Cuomo's lies, and seek accountability for our father and so many other grieving New Yorkers.nder, the current city comptroller seeking the mayoralty,' the son said.
'Brad has empathy, is a decent, honest and tough person and is exactly what we need in a mayor.'
Lander invited Peter as a guest at last week's mayoral debate. He urged the son to stand up and be recognized and demanded that Cuomo apologize to him and other nursing-home families for the disastrous policy, which was revoked six weeks later, after thousands of vulnerable sick New Yorkers had already been either admitted or readmitted into nursing homes.
'I have so much admiration for Peter and Daniel Arbeeny, who have bravely sought accountability from disgraced ex-governor Andrew Cuomo for five years and are still fighting to honor the legacy of their father, Norman. I'm deeply touched to receive their endorsement today,' Lander said.
During the debate, Cuomo did not apologize for his nursing-home directive.
'Mr. Arbeeny lost a father,' Cuomo said. 'I am very, very sorry for that.'
But Cuomo said Lander and Arbeeny were wrong on the facts.
Cuomo noted Arbeeny sued the state and said legal papers in the case found that no COVID-positive person was sent from a hospital to the nursing home where his father was admitted.
'So it is factually impossible, Brad, that he got COVID, OK, from someone coming from a hospital,' Cuomo said.
Daniel Arbeeny led a class-action federal lawsuit against Cuomo, which was dismissed by a Brooklyn federal judge.
But the COVID-19 controversy continues to haunt Cuomo.
Last week, Cuomo said he not only saw a controversial report on nursing-home COVID deaths in the state while he was governor but may have altered the document before its release – a bombshell confession that contradicts his sworn congressional testimony.
'I did not recall seeing the report at the time. I did see the report, it turns out,' Cuomo told PIX11 News. 'I'm sure if I read the report, I made language changes.'
The mea culpa comes after the Department of Justice earlier this year reportedly opened a criminal investigation into whether Cuomo lied on Capitol Hill when he adamantly denied that he drafted, reviewed, discussed or consulted on the nursing-home report.
Emails obtained by a congressional subcommittee show that Cuomo aides discussed his role in drafting the report and include the former governor's own handwritten edits.
The report downplayed the consequences of Cuomo's March 25, 2020, directive that forced recovering COVID patients into senior care facilities without mandated testing to see if they could still infect others.
The state also initially underreported the deaths of nursing home residents by nearly 50%.
Cuomo has long maintained his administration was following federal guidance when the state Health Department implemented the COVID-19 nursing-home directive and that all COVID deaths were reported.
During his grilling by the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic in June 2024, he denied accusations of mishandling the COVID response and pointed to federal guidance as having hampered his administration's response.
.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Politico

44 minutes ago

• Politico

The gerontocracy gets a big test

SENIOR MOMENT — Keep an eye on the internal election in the House Democratic Caucus next week — it will have far bigger stakes than it might seem. The race to be the top Democrat on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee has important near-term political ramifications since the victor will serve as the foil to Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) on a panel that has seemed as interested in investigating former President Joe Biden's age as current President Donald Trump. But there are also significant institutional implications. The contest will be a test of the future of the seniority system which has been a key feature of how Congress has governed itself for centuries. There are four Democratic contenders, two congressional veterans in their 70s and two congressional newcomers in their 40s. The old guard are 70-year-old Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) was first elected to Congress in 2001 and 76-year-old Rep Kweisi Mfume (D-Md.) who has spent 15 years on Capitol Hill in two stints nearly 25 years apart. The upstarts are 47-year-old Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) and 44-year-old Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas), both of whom were first elected in 2023. The candidates will first try to make their case Monday to the House Democrats' Steering Committee, which will make a recommendation for the full caucus to ratify on Tuesday. At a time when, particularly among Democrats, there is a circular firing squad over issues surrounding age in the aftermath of Biden's presidency and failed reelection campaign, the idea of a system that benefits the old over the young, has drawn scorn in some quarters. After all, some progressives are still embittered over the fact that 74-year-old Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) beat out 35-year-old Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) for this position at the end of the last Congress, shortly after Connolly was diagnosed with cancer. Connolly, who was first elected in 2008, had a positive prognosis at the time. However, within months the cancer proved untreatable and he stepped down as the top Democrat on the committee in March. The Virginia Democrat died in May. Seniority, the concept that the longest tenured member of a committee should be its chair, is not written in any formal congressional rules. It's as much a custom whose strength has ebbed and flowed. It only rigidly determined who became a committee chair for a little over half a century —- the period from the overthrow of the iron fisted Speaker Joe Cannon in 1911 to the post Watergate era in 1974, when rebellious House Democrats ousted three veteran committee chairmen, the youngest of whom was 73. Since then, the seniority system has held increasingly less sway on Capitol Hill. Republicans have imposed term limits for committee chairman whereas Democrats have proved increasingly willing to oust older chairmen who are viewed as enfeebled or simply inadequate. Yet the notion of seniority still has a certain persuasive power in internal debates. As former Rep. Emanuel Celler (D-N.Y.) argued in an essay 60 years ago (written when he had served a mere 38 years in the House and was in his sixth year as chair of the House Judiciary Committee) argued 'the seniority criterion for selecting committee chairmen has the added virtue of being objective. It automatically eliminates the intrigues, deals, and compromises that characterize election campaigns.' It does, though, inherently favor those members in safe seats who face little opposition in primaries or general elections. In the mid 20th century, this made seniority a bugaboo among those reformers in the Democratic Party who wanted to push progressive legislation, particularly on civil rights. After all, the Democrats most likely to be easily reelected year after year were conservative white southerners. Now though, in the third decade of the 21st century, those members of the caucus who most benefit from it are members of the Congressional Black Caucus, who are often in safe districts, many of which are protected from gerrymandering as well by the Voting Rights Act. The question is whether seniority's appeal will continue to dwindle on Capitol Hill next week in the vote. It wouldn't be the first time that Democrats have rejected the committee's most senior member to lead it —- Lynch has already been passed over twice and is considered likely to be rejected yet again. But, of the two top contenders, the difference between passing over Lynch for a veteran like Mfume or newcomers like Garcia and Crockett is significant. House Democrats have elected a number of less tenured members of their conference to top committee slots in recent years but going with Garcia or Crockett, who are only in their second terms in Congress, would set a new benchmark for doing it and further mark the transformation in how congressional power is accumulated and held. After all, for generations, the surest path to power on Capitol Hill was a slow and steady apprenticeship before finally wielding a gavel. More and more, that's not the case. Instead, as Congress has become an increasingly enervated legislative body, the value of playing 'the inside game' has diminished. Seniority's value was that it served as the most objective available proxy to determine legislative gravitas. It was never exact but it was better than the alternatives. No alternative has since emerged for the imperfect system of simply relying on length of tenure. In a social media age, legislative gravitas isn't the only thing that matters anymore — cable news hits and viral posts, both of which are valuable currencies today, can be measured far more precisely. Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@ Or contact tonight's author at bjacobs@ or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @Bencjacobs. What'd I Miss? — Judge orders pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil released from jail: A federal judge today ordered pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil released from immigration detention, more than three months after the Trump administration jailed him while attempting to deport him on foreign policy grounds. U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz determined that Khalil isn't a flight risk or a danger to the community, and lightly rebuked the government, calling its effort to continue seeking his detention 'highly, highly unusual.' — Parliamentarian nixes key pieces of Tim Scott's megabill proposal: The Senate parliamentarian ruled today that several key provisions in Banking Chair Tim Scott's proposed contribution to the GOP's 'big beautiful bill' violate the upper chamber's rules for the budget reconciliation process, according to Budget Committee ranking member Jeff Merkley's office. Scott's proposals to zero out funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, slash some Federal Reserve employees' pay, cut Treasury's Office of Financial Research and dissolve the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board are all ineligible to be included in a simple-majority budget reconciliation bill. — Majority of staff axed at Voice of America: The Trump administration today sent out termination notices to hundreds of employees at Voice of America. Included in that group are employees working for the network's Persian-language service who were called back from administrative leave just last week in the wake of Israel's attack on Iran, according to two people familiar with the decision. The move — which makes official what has long been expected since hundreds of contract employees got termination notices in early May — is a part of the Trump administration's sweeping target to downsize the government and remake America's role in the global order. — Supreme Court revives lawsuits seeking to hold Palestine Liberation Organization liable for terrorist attacks: The Supreme Court has revived lawsuits against the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority over terrorist attacks that killed and injured Americans. The justices today unanimously overturned a ruling from a federal appeals court that Congress violated the Fifth Amendment's guarantee of due process by enacting a 2019 law that expanded the jurisdiction of U.S. courts to hear terrorism-related suits against the PLO and PA. AROUND THE WORLD IN BREACH — Israel's actions in Gaza may have violated the terms of the country's agreement with the EU, the bloc's diplomatic corps found. 'On the basis of the assessments made by the independent international institutions … there are indications that Israel would be in breach of its human rights obligations under Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement,' the European External Action Service (EEAS) concluded, according to a leaked document seen by POLITICO. The EU's top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, was asked to lead a review after more than a dozen countries requested the European Commission look into the potential political and legal ramifications of the conflict. The EU-Israel Association Agreement establishes close relations between the bloc and the Middle Eastern nation, governing cooperation in key industries and bilateral trade. While tearing up the pact entirely would require unanimous support from all 27 EU member countries, four officials confirmed to POLITICO that interim measures, such as paring back trade ties, are being considered and could be passed by a qualified majority of countries. CRISIS MANAGEMENT — Ursula von der Leyen is facing the biggest challenge yet to her authority as European Commission president after political groups threatened to withdraw support over her decision to cancel climate-friendly legislation. 'We are on the brink of an institutional crisis,' Valérie Hayer, chair of the liberal Renew Europe group, told POLITICO. Von der Leyen is from the center-right European People's Party. Although it's the biggest group in the European Parliament, it relies on votes from the Socialists and liberals to get its way. The Commission's ability to introduce EU laws risks being blocked if the groups refuse to play ball. The Commission announced today that it was pulling the Green Claims directive ― a landmark law that would hold companies accountable for unfounded environmental claims ― even though it has already passed through many stages of the legislative process. That move, which the EPP group in Parliament requested the Commission make on Wednesday, was applauded by the right-wing European Conservatives and Reformists and the far-right Patriots for Europe, the group of France's Marine Le Pen and Hungary's Victor Orbán. Nightly Number RADAR SWEEP TRASH OR TREASURE — For centuries, Londoners have combed the banks of the River Thames in search of ancient ceramics and medieval accessories. Known as mudlarkers, they are now documenting their hunts on TikTok. The activity, once done by just a few hobbyists, gained popularity during the pandemic as new enthusiasts began sharing their finds on social media. Now, longtime mudlarkers say they feel pushed out. The permit waitlist now sits at over 10,000 people for just 4,000 spots. Elizabeth Anne Brown reports on the hobby and its future for National Geographic. Parting Image Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.

Yahoo

an hour ago

• Yahoo

Footwear Firms Rejiggering Supply Chains Will See Long-Term Benefits

The threat of higher tariffs may have provided footwear firms with an unintended benefit as they took charge of rethinking their supply chains. That's because U.S. President Donald Trump's return to office for his second non-consecutive term had a built-in expectation that he would make good on his promise to raise tariff rates again. More from WWD Knitwear Brand PH5 Collaborates With Charles & Keith on Capsule Collection The Top Men's Shoe Collections From Pitti Uomo's Spring 2026 Edition May Swiss Watch Exports Slump After U.S. Tariff-led Surge And raise them he did. But this time, footwear firms were better prepared. The footwear industry was under siege in the aftermath of COVID, with shipments on pause amid ongoing supply chain issues. With Chinese production costs rising, some firms were already in the midst of strategizing where else to go even before Trump raised the duty rate on imports from China during his first term back in 2019. But the nature of producing footwear meant moving production to other locations was likely a multi-year process. In the years since COVID, production remains largely in China, although Vietnamese factories had become the go-to place for the manufacture of athletic performance shoes. Indonesia, India and Cambodia are now also growing their footwear production base, as is Mexico and other Latin American countries. Firms in the footwear sector began to move more aggressively their production to other locations outside of China once Trump won re-election in November. And they moved with quick speed to get ahead of any tariff increases. At Wolverine World Wide, less than 10 percent of products are expected to be sourced from China in 2025, down from the mid-teens earlier this year, as the company targets 'near zero' by 2026. Steve Madden Ltd. in May said it had already moved nearly all fall '25 shoe production for its core brands out of China, ahead of its prior mid-teens target for fall '25 and mid single-digits in spring '26. Crocs Inc. CEO Andrew Rees has expressed concern about Vietnam, where its sourcing for the U.S. market is at 47 percent. Vietnam is set to continue with the next round of trade talks with the U.S. later this month. In April, Trump unveiled his plan for global reciprocal tariffs, a move to get countries to re-negotiate their trade agreements with the U.S. Most of those tariffs are on pause through July 9, with the tariff rate set at a temporary 10 percent increase. The exception is China, which saw subsequent increases on some goods as high as 145 percent, but that's now on hold through mid-August as the U.S. and China fine-tune a framework for an agreement that would see duties rise to 55 percent from its current pause rate of 30 percent. Regardless of which trade agreements actually get done, the rethinking of footwear supply chains is expected to be beneficial for down the road. That's true whether tariffs go up or remain the same. And while higher duties impact corporate profits, not to mention higher costs to consumers, moving production to multiple locations allows for better flexibility in keeping goods closer to where they are needed. That's because supply chain 'disruptions are here to stay,' according to Venky Ramesh, AlixPartners' trade and tariff war room expert, who was part of a webinar hosted by AlixPartners. He also spoke about the need for firms to map sourcing and supply chain exposure as well as scenario planning so they can make informed decisions. Other participants also spoke about investing in trade law knowledge, logistics and operations, as well as looking at production components to see if different classifications are possible that could result in lower tariff rates. Best of WWD All the Retailers That Nike Left and Then Went Back Mikey Madison's Elegant Red Carpet Shoe Style [PHOTOS] Julia Fox's Sleekest and Boldest Shoe Looks Over the Years [Photos] Sign in to access your portfolio

San Francisco Chronicle​

an hour ago

• San Francisco Chronicle​

North Carolina Gov. Stein vetoes his first bills. They are on concealed carry and immigration

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — North Carolina Democratic Gov. Josh Stein vetoed his first bills on Friday, blocking for now Republican legislation that would let adults carry concealed handguns without a permit and make state agencies and local sheriffs more active in Trump administration's immigration crackdown. Stein, who took office in January, issued his formal objections to three measures backed by the GOP-controlled General Assembly presented to him last week. The former attorney general also had the option to sign any of them into law, or let them become law if he hadn't acted on the legislation soon. The vetoed measures now return to the legislature, where Republicans are one House seat shy of holding a veto-proof majority. Its leaders will decide whether to attempt overrides as early as next week. Voting so far followed party lines for one of the immigration measures, which in part would direct heads of several state law enforcement agencies, like the State Highway Patrol and State Bureau of Investigation, to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. But one House Democrat ended up voting for the other immigration bill that Stein vetoed. It toughens a 2024 law that required sheriffs to help federal agents seeking criminal defendants. GOP prospects for enacting the permitless concealed gun measure, a longtime aspiration for gun-rights advocates, appear dimmer, because two House Republicans voted against the bill and 10 others were absent. Gun bill would let 18-year-olds carry concealed handgun In one veto message, Stein said the gun legislation, which would allow eligible people at least 18 years old to carry a concealed handgun, "makes North Carolinians less safe and undermines responsible gun ownership." Democratic lawmakers argued the same during legislative debate. Current law requires a concealed weapons holder to be at least 21 to obtain a permit. The person must submit an application to the local sheriff, pass a firearms safety training course and cannot 'suffer from a physical or mental infirmity that prevents the safe handling of a handgun" to obtain the permit. No safety training would be required if getting a permit is no longer necessary. 'Authorizing teenagers to carry a concealed weapon with no training whatsoever is dangerous,' Stein wrote. Gun-control groups praised the veto. Conservative advocates for the bill say removing the permit requirement would strengthen the safety of law-abiding citizens. 'Law-abiding North Carolinians shouldn't have to jump through hoops to effectively exercise their Second Amendment rights," Senate leader Phil Berger said in a press release criticizing the veto and planning for an override vote in his chamber. Permitless carry is already lawful in 29 states, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. North Carolina would also be one of the last states in the Southeast to implement that legislation. Immigration bills focus on state agencies, sheriffs One vetoed immigration bill would require four state law enforcement agencies to officially participate in the 287(g) program, which trains officers to interrogate defendants and determine their immigration status. An executive order by President Donald Trump urged his administration to maximize the use of 287(g) agreements. Stein wrote Friday the bill takes officers away from existing state duties at a time when law enforcement is already stretched thin. The measure also would direct state agencies to ensure noncitizens don't access certain state-funded benefits. But Stein said that people without lawful immigration status already can't receive them. The other vetoed bill attempts to expand a 2024 law — enacted over then-Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper's veto — that directed jails to hold temporarily certain defendants whom ICE believe are in the country illegally, allowing time for immigration agents to pick them up. The vetoed bill would expand the list of crimes that a defendant is charged with that would require the jail administrator to attempt to determine the defendant's legal status. A jail also would have to tell ICE promptly that it is holding someone and essentially extends the time agents have to pick up the person. Stein said Friday while he supports sheriffs contacting federal immigration agents about defendants charged with dangerous crimes that they are holding, the law is unconstitutional because it directs sheriffs to keep defendants behind bars 48 hours beyond when they otherwise could be released for a suspected immigration violation. With the veto of this bill, House Speaker Destin Hall said, Stein sided with the 'most radical elements of his party's base over the safety and security of North Carolinians.' Latino advocates and other bill opponents had urged Stein to veto both immigration measures. They say the legislation would cause Hispanic residents to feel intimidated and fear law enforcement.