Early Illness Plus Sensitization May Spell Trouble for Lungs
Sensitization by age 2 years to an allergen such as cow's milk, egg white, peanut, cat dander, or dust mites may influence how early-life respiratory tract infections affect lung function in adulthood, new research showed. Among sensitized children, each additional month of respiratory tract infection in the first 2 years of life was associated with poorer lung function at age 25 years.
METHODOLOGY:
Researchers analyzed data from a prospective cohort study in Australia that recruited 620 infants (51.1% boys) born between 1990 and 1994 who had at least one parent or sibling with self-reported allergic disease, including asthma.
Parents answered questions until the children were 2 years old about how often their child had had a cough, rattle, or wheeze in the past month.
Skin prick testing was used to determine allergic sensitization at age 2 years.
When participants were 18 and 25 years old, the researchers assessed lung function using spirometry.
TAKEAWAY:
At age 25 years among the participants with sensitization, each additional month of respiratory tract infection early in life was associated with a decrease in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (Z-score, -0.06; P = .055).
= .055). Among nonsensitized participants, each additional month of respiratory illness was associated with an increase in lung function (Z-score, 0.07; P = .012).
= .012). Findings were similar at age 18 years and for other measures of lung function, but there was less evidence of an interaction at age 12 years.
IN PRACTICE:
'Even in the absence of reported chronic respiratory symptoms, close monitoring and prevention of recurrent respiratory infections in children with sensitization may help minimize disease progression and functional impairment, and thereby enable attainment of optimal adult lung function,' the authors of the study wrote.
SOURCE:
Shyamali C. Dharmage, MD, PhD, with The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia was the corresponding author of the study, which was published online on June 2 in Pediatric Allergy and Immunology.
LIMITATIONS:
The study relied on parent reports of respiratory tract infection. The researchers were unable to adjust for gestational age or birthweight because of missing data. Sensitization was assessed against a limited number of allergens.
DISCLOSURES:
The authors reported having no conflicts of interest.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Pro Medicus And 2 Other High Growth Tech Stocks In Australia
In the current Australian market landscape, the ASX 200 futures are indicating a slight dip of -0.2% amid geopolitical tensions and mixed economic signals, while unemployment remains stable at 4.1%. Against this backdrop, high growth tech stocks like Pro Medicus are garnering attention for their potential to thrive in uncertain conditions by leveraging innovation and adaptability to navigate market challenges. Name Revenue Growth Earnings Growth Growth Rating Gratifii 42.14% 113.99% ★★★★★★ Pro Medicus 22.19% 23.49% ★★★★★★ WiseTech Global 20.15% 25.52% ★★★★★★ Wrkr 56.40% 116.83% ★★★★★★ AVA Risk Group 29.15% 108.15% ★★★★★★ Echo IQ 61.50% 65.86% ★★★★★★ BlinkLab 65.54% 64.35% ★★★★★★ Immutep 70.42% 42.39% ★★★★★☆ Adveritas 52.34% 88.83% ★★★★★★ SiteMinder 19.89% 69.58% ★★★★★☆ Click here to see the full list of 47 stocks from our ASX High Growth Tech and AI Stocks screener. Let's dive into some prime choices out of from the screener. Simply Wall St Growth Rating: ★★★★★★ Overview: Pro Medicus Limited is a healthcare informatics company that develops and supplies imaging software and radiology information system services to hospitals, imaging centers, and healthcare groups across Australia, North America, and Europe, with a market cap of A$28.92 billion. Operations: Pro Medicus Limited generates revenue primarily through the production of integrated software applications for the healthcare industry, totaling A$184.58 million. The company's operations span Australia, North America, and Europe, focusing on imaging software and radiology information systems for medical facilities. Pro Medicus, a standout in the Australian tech landscape, exemplifies robust growth with its revenue and earnings forecast to expand at 22.2% and 23.5% per annum respectively, significantly outpacing the broader market's expectations. This performance is bolstered by strategic share repurchases, with a recent buyback of 28,326 shares for AUD 6.35 million enhancing shareholder value. Additionally, inclusion in the S&P International 700 and Global 1200 indices not only underscores its market relevance but also augments its visibility among global investors. The company's commitment to innovation is evident from its R&D initiatives aimed at advancing healthcare technology solutions—a sector witnessing rapid growth due to increasing demand for efficient medical services. Navigate through the intricacies of Pro Medicus with our comprehensive health report here. Explore historical data to track Pro Medicus' performance over time in our Past section. Simply Wall St Growth Rating: ★★★★☆☆ Overview: SEEK Limited operates as an online employment marketplace service provider across Australia, South East Asia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Europe, and other international markets with a market cap of A$8.55 billion. Operations: The company generates revenue primarily through its employment marketplace services, with A$821.40 million from the ANZ region and A$240.90 million from Asia. Amidst a challenging landscape, SEEK has demonstrated resilience with its revenue and earnings poised for significant growth. Despite a substantial one-off loss of A$119.8 million last year, the company's revenue is expected to rise by 9.1% annually, outpacing the Australian market's growth of 5.6%. Furthermore, SEEK's earnings are forecasted to surge by 25.9% per year, notably higher than the market average of 11.6%. This robust financial outlook is underpinned by strategic initiatives and an Analyst/Investor Day that highlighted future prospects, reinforcing SEEK's potential in a competitive sector. Unlock comprehensive insights into our analysis of SEEK stock in this health report. Understand SEEK's track record by examining our Past report. Simply Wall St Growth Rating: ★★★★★☆ Overview: Telix Pharmaceuticals Limited is a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company that develops and commercializes therapeutic and diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals for cancer and rare diseases, with a market cap of A$8.43 billion. Operations: Telix Pharmaceuticals generates revenue primarily from its Precision Medicine segment, which accounts for A$771.11 million, while its Therapeutics and Manufacturing Solutions segments contribute A$9.35 million and A$2.75 million, respectively. Telix Pharmaceuticals has demonstrated a robust trajectory in the high-growth tech sector, particularly through its innovative approaches in prostate cancer imaging. With a staggering annual earnings growth of 858% last year and an expected annual revenue increase of 19.8%, Telix outpaces the Australian market's average growth significantly. Recent strategic product launches, like the AlFluor™ platform and Illuccix®, have not only expanded its portfolio but also fortified its market position by enhancing diagnostic precision and treatment efficacy in oncology. These developments underscore Telix's commitment to advancing healthcare technology, positioning it well for sustained growth amidst evolving medical demands. Delve into the full analysis health report here for a deeper understanding of Telix Pharmaceuticals. Gain insights into Telix Pharmaceuticals' past trends and performance with our Past report. Click here to access our complete index of 47 ASX High Growth Tech and AI Stocks. Have you diversified into these companies? Leverage the power of Simply Wall St's portfolio to keep a close eye on market movements affecting your investments. Enhance your investing ability with the Simply Wall St app and enjoy free access to essential market intelligence spanning every continent. Explore high-performing small cap companies that haven't yet garnered significant analyst attention. Fuel your portfolio with companies showing strong growth potential, backed by optimistic outlooks both from analysts and management. Find companies with promising cash flow potential yet trading below their fair value. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include ASX:PME ASX:SEK and ASX:TLX. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Your AI use could have a hidden environmental cost
Sign up for CNN's Life, But Greener newsletter. Our limited newsletter series guides you on how to minimize your personal role in the climate crisis — and reduce your eco-anxiety. Whether it's answering work emails or drafting wedding vows, generative artificial intelligence tools have become a trusty copilot in many people's lives. But a growing body of research shows that for every problem AI solves, hidden environmental costs are racking up. Each word in an AI prompt is broken down into clusters of numbers called 'token IDs' and sent to massive data centers — some larger than football fields — powered by coal or natural gas plants. There, stacks of large computers generate responses through dozens of rapid calculations. The whole process can take up to 10 times more energy to complete than a regular Google search, according to a frequently cited estimation by the Electric Power Research Institute. So, for each prompt you give AI, what's the damage? To find out, researchers in Germany tested 14 large language model (LLM) AI systems by asking them both free-response and multiple-choice questions. Complex questions produced up to six times more carbon dioxide emissions than questions with concise answers. In addition, 'smarter' LLMs with more reasoning abilities produced up to 50 times more carbon emissions than simpler systems to answer the same question, the study reported. 'This shows us the tradeoff between energy consumption and the accuracy of model performance,' said Maximilian Dauner, a doctoral student at Hochschule München University of Applied Sciences and first author of the Frontiers in Communication study published Wednesday. Typically, these smarter, more energy intensive LLMs have tens of billions more parameters — the biases used for processing token IDs — than smaller, more concise models. 'You can think of it like a neural network in the brain. The more neuron connections, the more thinking you can do to answer a question,' Dauner said. Complex questions require more energy in part because of the lengthy explanations many AI models are trained to provide, Dauner said. If you ask an AI chatbot to solve an algebra question for you, it may take you through the steps it took to find the answer, he said. 'AI expends a lot of energy being polite, especially if the user is polite, saying 'please' and 'thank you,'' Dauner explained. 'But this just makes their responses even longer, expending more energy to generate each word.' For this reason, Dauner suggests users be more straightforward when communicating with AI models. Specify the length of the answer you want and limit it to one or two sentences, or say you don't need an explanation at all. Most important, Dauner's study highlights that not all AI models are created equally, said Sasha Luccioni, the climate lead at AI company Hugging Face, in an email. Users looking to reduce their carbon footprint can be more intentional about which model they chose for which task. 'Task-specific models are often much smaller and more efficient, and just as good at any context-specific task,' Luccioni explained. If you are a software engineer who solves complex coding problems every day, an AI model suited for coding may be necessary. But for the average high school student who wants help with homework, relying on powerful AI tools is like using a nuclear-powered digital calculator. Even within the same AI company, different model offerings can vary in their reasoning power, so research what capabilities best suit your needs, Dauner said. When possible, Luccioni recommends going back to basic sources — online encyclopedias and phone calculators — to accomplish simple tasks. Putting a number on the environmental impact of AI has proved challenging. The study noted that energy consumption can vary based on the user's proximity to local energy grids and the hardware used to run AI partly why the researchers chose to represent carbon emissions within a range, Dauner said. Furthermore, many AI companies don't share information about their energy consumption — or details like server size or optimization techniques that could help researchers estimate energy consumption, said Shaolei Ren, an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of California, Riverside who studies AI's water consumption. 'You can't really say AI consumes this much energy or water on average — that's just not meaningful. We need to look at each individual model and then (examine what it uses) for each task,' Ren said. One way AI companies could be more transparent is by disclosing the amount of carbon emissions associated with each prompt, Dauner suggested. 'Generally, if people were more informed about the average (environmental) cost of generating a response, people would maybe start thinking, 'Is it really necessary to turn myself into an action figure just because I'm bored?' Or 'do I have to tell ChatGPT jokes because I have nothing to do?'' Dauner said. Additionally, as more companies push to add generative AI tools to their systems, people may not have much choice how or when they use the technology, Luccioni said. 'We don't need generative AI in web search. Nobody asked for AI chatbots in (messaging apps) or on social media,' Luccioni said. 'This race to stuff them into every single existing technology is truly infuriating, since it comes with real consequences to our planet.' With less available information about AI's resource usage, consumers have less choice, Ren said, adding that regulatory pressures for more transparency are unlikely to the United States anytime soon. Instead, the best hope for more energy-efficient AI may lie in the cost efficacy of using less energy. 'Overall, I'm still positive about (the future). There are many software engineers working hard to improve resource efficiency,' Ren said. 'Other industries consume a lot of energy too, but it's not a reason to suggest AI's environmental impact is not a problem. We should definitely pay attention.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Meet the tiny Australian Moth that travels 1,000 km and navigates using the stars
An Australian moth follows the stars during its yearly migration, using the night sky as a guiding compass, according to a new study. When temperatures heat up, nocturnal Bogong moths fly about 1,000 kilometres to cool down in caves by the Australian Alps. They later return home to breed and die. Birds routinely navigate by starlight, but the moths are the first known invertebrates, or creatures without a backbone, to find their way across such long distances using the stars. Scientists have long wondered how the moths travel to a place they've never been. A previous study hinted that Earth's magnetic field might help steer them in the right direction, along with some kind of visual landmark as a guide. Related Does cutting off rhinos' horns protect them from poachers? New study supports controversial approach Since stars appear in predictable patterns each night, scientists suspected they might help lead the way. They placed moths in a flight simulator that mimicked the night sky above them and blocked out the Earth's magnetic field, noting where they flew. Then they scrambled the stars and saw how the moths reacted. When the stars were as they should be, the moths flapped in the right direction. But when the stars were in random places, the moths were disoriented. Their brain cells also got excited in response to specific orientations of the night sky. The findings were published Wednesday in the journal Nature. It 'was a very clean, impressive demonstration that the moths really are using a view of the night sky to guide their movements,' said Kenneth Lohmann, who studies animal navigation at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and was not involved with the new research. Researchers don't know what features of the night sky the moths use to find their way. It could be a stripe of light from the Milky Way, a colourful nebula or something else entirely. Whatever it is, the insects seem to rely on that, along with Earth's magnetic field, to make their journey. Related Rare snail that can 'slurp up earthworms like noodles' caught on camera laying an egg from its neck Scientists use special 'squeezing' and electrical probes to collect sperm from endangered kākāpō Other animals harness the stars as a guide. Birds take celestial cues as they soar through the skies, and dung beetles roll their remains short distances while using the Milky Way to stay on course. It's an impressive feat for Bogong moths, whose brains are smaller than a grain of rice, to rely on the night sky for their odyssey, said study author David Dreyer with Lund University in Sweden. 'It's remarkable that an animal with such a tiny brain can actually do this,' Dreyer said.
