Scientists are redefining time itself, starting with the second

Scientists have taken a major step toward the ambitious global goal of 'redefining the second' by the end of this decade. A study published this week details how researchers from six different countries simultaneously compared measurements from 10 optical clocks—an advanced form of timekeeping that is up to 100 times more accurate than the best cesium clocks, which are currently used as the global standard.
The measurements amount to the largest coordinated comparison of optical clocks to date, and significantly reduced the uncertainty between measurements reported in previous studies. This also means that optical clocks are closer than ever to becoming the new standard for timekeeping, a shift that could have a massive ripple effect on everything from meteorology to our understanding of fundamental physics.
Researchers say the findings support 'the advance toward a redefinition of the second and the use of optical standards for international time scales.'
In a nutshell, optical clocks are incredibly accurate instruments that measure the frequency of atoms after they've been excited by lasers. The atoms are first cooled to near absolute zero, then lasers are used to detect their vibrations. Those vibrations are called frequency ratios. This precise frequency then corresponds to the 'tick' of a second. Scientists believe this method yields far more accurate results than the cesium atomic clocks, which have been the global standard for the past five decades. For context, researchers say an optical clock would not gain or lose a second for billions of years. In fact, New Scientist estimates you could wait the current age of the universe four times over, and an optical clock would still be off by less than a minute. Compare that to a typical wristwatch, which can drift over just a few months.
Optical clocks are incredibly precise, but they are also highly complex. There are just around 100 of them in existence worldwide, largely because they are difficult to build, operate, and maintain—they are also susceptible to breakage. Comparing them against each other is notoriously challenging. Different clocks measure the frequencies of different types of atoms, each with its own unique frequency. This means the only way to establish a consistent, highly precise standard is to directly compare the clocks with one another. That's where these most recent findings come in.
Researchers from Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the UK, and Japan collaborated on a European-led project called ROCIT to compare 10 different clocks. The measurements were conducted over a 45-day period in 2022. In the past, smaller-scale optical clock comparisons relied on satellite links to measure differences, but this study used both satellite links and fiber optic cables. That's important because it allows for more accurate measurements.
'Comparing multiple clocks at the same time and using more than one type of link technology provides far more information than the mostly pairwise clock comparisons that have been carried out to date,' VTT MIKES meteorology research center senior scientist Thomas Lindvall said in a statement.
Related: [Refining the clock's second takes time—and lasers]
The fiber optic cables spanned thousands of miles across Europe, allowing researchers to connect the frequency outputs of the various clocks. They accounted for signal noise and other limitations of the instruments during the process. In total, the comparison produced 38 different frequency ratios measured simultaneously, four of them for the first time. The remaining ratios were measured with greater accuracy than ever before, according to the researchers.
'These measurements provide critical information about what work is still needed for optical clocks to achieve the precision and reliability required for use in international timekeeping,' Instituto Nazionale Di Ricerca Metrologica (INRiM) senior researcher Marco Pizzocaro said in a statement. 'Our experiment also showed how optical clocks across Europe can be linked to measure frequency ratios with state-of-the-art precision.'
Although more comparisons are needed before optical clocks can officially become the global standard, researchers are optimistic about the future. The benefits go beyond just improved timekeeping. More precise measurements could help scientists test Albert Einstein's theory of relativity with greater accuracy and offer new insights into the still-mysterious concept of dark matter.
At the same time, scientists are also making headway on entirely new 'nuclear clocks' that might make opticals look like relics. Last year, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) said they were close to completing a nuclear clock prototype that focuses on vibrations, not from a single atom, but from a single nucleus.
'Imagine a wristwatch that wouldn't lose a second even if you left it running for billions of years,' NIST and JILA physicist Jun Ye said last year following news of the prototype. 'While we're not quite there yet, this research brings us closer to that level of precision.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

11 hours ago

• Yahoo

Massive Asteroid Could Hit the Moon, Here's How It Would Impact Earth

There's the good (Earth is no longer at risk of a direct hit from an asteroid dubbed 2024 YR4); the bad (shrapnel could cause extensive damage to orbiting satellites); and the ugly (odds of the asteroid hitting the moon have now increased). A Cornel University study submitted to the American Astronomy Society Journals concludes that, while Earth is no longer in danger of a direct asteroid hit, odds of the asteroid hitting the moon have increased -- from 3.8 percent to 4.3 percent. If those odds play out, NewScientist reports that a direct impact could "shower Earth with a cloud of satellite-destroying shrapnel." The study concluded that, if the asteroid hits the moon, the orbiting satellites could suffer decades worth of damage in a matter of just a few days. Dr. Paul Wiegert, a professor of astronomy at the University of Western Ontario who spearheaded the study, told NewScientist that the study concluded the asteroid could hit the moon at a whopping 29,000 miles per hour. The impact would then create a blast crater just over a half-mile wide, which would make it the largest lunar impact in the last 5,000 years. YR4, an asteroid that's the size of a building, was first discovered in December 2024. Astronomers initially predicted the asteroid would hit Earth on Dec. 23, 2032, and it would have enough power decimate an entire city. But astronomers now say that that science is telling them the asteroid will most likely miss Earth. But our planet is not exactly out of the woods. Astronomers say that, if the asteroid hits the moon, the planet's gravity would siphon upwards of 10 percent of the debris back down to Earth. 'Intuitively, the Earth is actually quite a small target when seen from the moon, and so your intuition is that not very much material would actually hit the Earth," the astronomy professor Wiegert told NewScientist, "but it turns out that the Earth's gravity can focus that material under certain conditions." Perhaps a problem to worry about seven years from now. Massive Asteroid Could Hit the Moon, Here's How It Would Impact Earth first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 20, 2025

Yahoo

19 hours ago

• Yahoo

Let's celebrate: Today is the summer solstice, the longest day of the year

Editor's note: This story was first published on June 21, 2013 Welcome to the best day of the year. Today is the summer solstice, the longest day. In North Jersey, we'll get more than 15 hours of daylight. Go ahead and gloat — that's nearly an hour and a half more daylight than Key West, Florida, will get today. For those who like daylight — pretty much everyone save Dracula — today is a day to celebrate. In past eras, they actually did. "The summer solstice was a carnivalesque feast day," said Pamela H. Smith, a European history expert at Columbia University. "In England, there were bonfires, lots of beer drinking, cannons being fired off, masqueraders — people dressed up as devils and demons. "Days like the solstice were important for ancient peoples in terms of trying to find patterns in nature that were important for their livelihood, like knowing when to plant crops. All cultures had megaliths like Stonehenge," Smith said. The Earth's orbit around the sun is slightly elliptical, but not enough to cause the seasons, said Carlton Pryor, an astronomer at Rutgers University. In fact, at the summer solstice, the North Jersey region is 94.4 million miles from the sun. At the winter solstice, it's only 91.4 million miles away. The seasons are caused by the Earth's axis being tilted at a 23.5 degree angle. When the Northern Hemisphere is tilted toward the sun, the hemisphere receives sunlight more directly, for longer periods, increasing temperatures. More: Make one of these 10 books that are set in New Jersey your next beach read for summer 2025 In winter, the Northern Hemisphere is tilted away — even though it is closer to the sun in miles — so the light is less direct, more angled. The sun is lower in the sky and appears for fewer hours, causing cooler temperatures. On the summer solstice, the Earth's northern axis is tilted at its most extreme angle toward the sun. Today in North Jersey, the sun at its zenith will be at an angle of nearly 73 degrees above the horizon. On Dec. 21, it will be only 26 degrees above the horizon. The Earth's axis tilt also affects where the sun rises on the horizon. Conventional wisdom that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west is true only twice a year — at the spring and fall equinoxes. During the summer solstice, the sun rises at its northernmost point on the horizon. This morning in Hackensack, if you had faced due east, the sun would have risen about 32 degrees to the north (or to your left). At the winter solstice, it will rise 32 degrees to the south of due east (or to your right). Though the summer solstice once triggered celebrations, that's rarely the case anymore. After the Protestant Reformation in Europe, religious leaders started to call for an end to the celebrations. "A lot of Protestant pastors criticized midsummer night's eve, saying people were drinking too much, fighting," Smith said. Another reason we don't celebrate the solstice is the shift from an agrarian lifestyle. "We live in a more urban society, and we have colonized the night," said Sara Schechner, an expert on science history at Harvard University. "So we are not as bound to the cycles of nature in how we go about our lives." This article originally appeared on Summer solstice 2025 is here

Hamilton Spectator

21 hours ago

• Hamilton Spectator

‘The biggest betrayal': A year on, staff grieve Ontario Science Centre's snap closure

TORONTO - In the year since the abrupt closure of the Ontario Science Centre, the cost of a new site at Ontario Place has escalated, its opening date has been pushed back, there is no sign of a temporary location – and the old building's roof that was said to be at risk of collapse appears to be intact. Workers say they've dealt with a rodent and raccoon infestation at a building where science centre materials are stored, and the department that builds exhibits is at a virtual standstill. It's been a year of demoralizing changes, they say. Government officials announced midday on June 21, 2024, that the science centre at its original, east Toronto location would permanently close at the end of the day, citing an engineering report on the state of the building's roof. Critics have blasted the decision, noting that the report presented several options other than full closure, and have suggested the whole plan to move the science centre to a revamped Ontario Place was designed to lessen the heat a more controversial tenant — a waterpark and spa by European company Therme — has generated. Infrastructure Minister Kinga Surma has said she did not want to jeopardize anyone's safety with the science centre's roof panels at risk of collapse. The workers do not buy it. Toronto set a weather record in 2024 with 1,145 millimetres of precipitation, which included two 'once-in-a-century' storms that flooded thousands of homes last summer and the city's snowiest winter in years. 'And the science centre is still standing,' said Raluca Ellis, the president of Local 549 of the Ontario Public Service Employees Union. 'It just seems like it was a manufactured crisis and that's the biggest betrayal.' NDP infrastructure critic Jennifer French also takes issue with stated reason for the closure. 'The roof managed to get through winter snow loads and a lot of rain this spring, and the only thing falling apart is the government's plan for a new science centre,' she said. The opening of the science centre at Ontario Place has already been pushed back from 2028 to 2029. A report from the auditor general late last year found that the cost estimate for building and maintaining the new science centre has increased by nearly $400 million from the government's spring 2023 business case for relocating it. Meanwhile, the government has said it will look for a space to house a temporary science centre until the new one opens. A request for proposals seeking a temporary location was released just days after the abrupt closure. It said the government was working 'expeditiously' to find an interim site and wanted it to open no later than Jan. 1, 2026. No such location has yet been announced, nearly one year later. Jason Ash, of the group Save Ontario's Science Centre, said it is a shame children are missing out. 'The bottom line, one year out from the closure of the science centre on Don Mills Road, is that a generation of Ontario kids and youth are without a world-class institution to learn about STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) education,' he said. 'Regardless of any of the other aspects that enter into the story ... it's a real failure of the government's educational policy to have let down so many children.' The science centre is currently operating two pop-up exhibits at Harbourfront Centre and the CF Sherway Gardens mall in Toronto, and has had staff and small exhibits at various events around the city. The Ministry of Infrastructure said in a statement that it is working with the science centre to 'consider options' for a temporary location. As for the old building, the ministry said Infrastructure Ontario is managing it. 'IO has undertaken preventative measures to maintain integrity of the structure and roof since the facility was closed last year,' the ministry wrote. 'This includes managing snow load in the winter and rainwater and, mechanical repairs and system maintenance to ensure minimal heating and cooling levels.' As workers moved everything out of the old building last fall, one of the new storage locations presented a number of problems. All of the science centre's education materials were moved to a building by Highway 401 in Etobicoke. The building on Resources Road, which has become the science centre's official mailing address, is used as a warehouse of sorts where workers can gather experiments and small exhibits and other goodies for their visits to classrooms. That building had been vacant for more than a decade. Problems began immediately, said four employees with knowledge of what's been happening there. They asked not to be named for fear of repercussion. They said workers discovered mouse, and possibly rat, excrement throughout the basement and on the second floor of the building. And there were also signs of a raccoon infestation, they said. The workers found droppings and little hand prints that suggested a raccoon, or a family of raccoons, was living in the building. The building's manager laid out 'a ton' of rodent traps and one large raccoon trap after workers complained to science centre management, the sources said. There was no running water for a time, with very few power outlets and reams of extension cord snaking throughout the area, they added. Workers also discovered asbestos in the building. 'The entire ordeal moving to Resources Road has been very frustrating,' said one worker. 'The topper was the mouse and raccoon s—t.' The infestation was eventually fixed, the sources said, though it took months. The science centre declined requests for interviews with management, saying no one was available. It referred questions about the problems with the building to Infrastructure Ontario. The Ministry of Infrastructure statement said all pest control and maintenance issues were addressed promptly. 'Given the urgent requirement to find storage suitable for the Science Centre exhibits, artifacts and items in an extremely tight timeline, 101 Resources Road was identified as an available government-owned storage,' the ministry wrote. 'OSC continues to optimize operations, ensuring working conditions consistently meet all health and safety requirements.' The local union declined to discuss problems at the building. Ontario Science Centre CEO Paul Kortenaar pointed to ongoing pop-ups, special events and satellite locations for children to enjoy. 'Planning is underway for our new home at Ontario Place, with a competitive design process for our new flagship location on Toronto's waterfront,' Kortenaar said in a statement. Management is working on a 10-year master plan for the new science centre, he wrote. 'This work reflects our broader vision: we are reimagining what a science centre can be — not only a building, but a dynamic, provincewide platform for learning, discovery and connection.' The connection between management and workers has frayed since the closure. Working from home is not in the employees' DNA, said Ellis, the Local 549 president. 'We are not working in ideal conditions and many ask why we put up with this and the answer is because we love the science centre, but ever since we were shut down, we've lost that essence of what the science centre is,' she said. More than 20 union members have taken buyout packages over the past year, Ellis said, most due to the sudden change in job conditions. And the hope that workers could reunite in person at a new interim location was recently dashed. 'They told me the timeline for the interim location has been changed, that the process has paused and we don't know what the new timeline is,' Ellis said. For union steward Martin Fischer, who works in the education department, the loss of the original building has been 'heartbreaking.' 'It's been extremely difficult,' said Fischer, who describes himself and many colleagues as neurodivergent. 'I'm somebody who needs a physical workplace, I thrived in the environment at the science centre, being with classes a few hours a day, it could be kindergarten, it could be a high school class, it'd be adult and then I'd maybe go talk to the shops to help design and build stuff for the school program, but that's all gone now,' he said. He still goes to schools for presentations, but he also spends a lot of time at home in front of his computer. 'It's just not the same,' he said. Melis Tokgoz, vice president of the local union and an exhibit designer at the science centre, said she too has struggled since the closure. With the fabrication shop shuttered, there are far fewer designs to make, limited largely to the pop-up spots, she said. The science centre is looking at a few spots to restart designing and making exhibits for other science centres, but that work has largely stopped, Tokgoz said. 'We keep getting these reassurances that one day we'll be back in the business of designing exhibits, but again, it is really hard to build that trust when you have no evidence otherwise,' she said. That joie de vivre among employees is missing, she said. 'There's this sense of grief amongst many employees, missing what their jobs once were, missing the fulfilment, and I'm no different.' 'The energy has been sad and melancholic and a bit depressing the whole time.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 20, 2025.