In 12 Years, This $40 Billion High-Speed Rail Line in Texas Has Not Laid a Single Foot of Track
The decade-plus battle to bring high-speed rail to Texas could soon be over. On Tuesday, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy delivered a blow to the project, known as Texas Central Railway, by rescinding a $63.9 million federal grant. Duffy called the project "a waste of taxpayer funds."
The Texas Central Railway was unveiled in 2013 as a fully privately funded high-speed rail project connecting Dallas and Houston. Originally estimated to cost $10 billion, the project would be able to shuttle passengers between the state's two largest cities in 90 minutes (versus nearly four hours in a car).
Like other high-speed rail projects before it, Texas Central has run into project delays and cost overruns. By 2019, the project's investors updated their original cost estimates to $20 billion. In 2020, project estimates were updated again to $30 billion. A 2023 analysis by Baruch Feigenbaum, senior managing director of transportation policy at Reason Foundation (the nonprofit that publishes Reason), estimates that the project's operating and construction costs will be at least $41.6 billion.
In September 2024, the Biden administration awarded Amtrak a $64 million grant to move the project forward. Despite this federal support, Japanese investors backed out of the project after claiming to have lost $272 million.
Kleinheinz Capital Partners, an investment firm headed by Fort Worth businessman John Kleinheinz, "bought its Japanese investors out of the project in January," reports The Texas Tribune, to become the rail line's controlling interest. Andy Jent, a representative of Texas Central, told the Tribune that the project had acquired 25 percent of the land it needed to build the route.
Despite Tuesday's announcement from the Transportation Department, which also directed Amtrak to rescind project leadership, the project appears ready to forge ahead. "We agree with Secretary Duffy that this project should be led by the private sector, and we will be proud to take it forward," Kleinheinz Capital said in a statement.
"Our interpretation of what the Department of Transportation released a couple of days ago is that number one, they don't want Amtrak leading this project," Jent told the Texas House of Representatives' Transportation Committee on Thursday. "We also don't believe that that's in the best interest of the state of Texas or in the best interest of this project."
Despite the optimism, the project faces a long route to completion.
The rail line has yet to lay a single foot of track or acquire the necessary permits to begin construction. In 2020, the Federal Railroad Administration issued a final environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy Act, which did "not grant any kind of construction approval or permit. Neither does this final rule, by itself, grant any permission or authority" for the company to operate. "The publication of this final rule is the beginning for [Texas Central Railroad], not the end, of its continuous obligation to demonstrate compliance with the regulation."
As of January 2024, the project had not received the necessary permits from the federal Surface Transportation Board to begin construction. The city of Houston has not approved a terminal site for the train, but Dallas has spent $1.5 million on an economic feasibility study for the project, Dallas City Council member Omar Narvaez told KERA News.
The project has also faced opposition from the state government. In 2017, Texas lawmakers passed a law prohibiting the Texas legislature from appropriating funds "related to the planning, facility construction or maintenance, security, or operation of a high-speed rail project operated by a private entity."
In June 2022, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that Texas Central could use eminent domain for the rail line, which has been met with staunch opposition from Texas landowners. This legislative session, state Rep. Brian Harrison (R–Waxahachie) introduced a bill that would prevent a private entity that operates high-speed rail from using eminent domain. Lawmakers are also considering a bill sponsored by Rep. Cody Harris (R–Palestine), which would make it impossible for state funds to be used to pay for the alteration of roadway because of high-speed rail construction.
Jent told lawmakers on Thursday that he still considers the project alive, but Kleinheinz is not, at this time, "proposing construction of the project." Once the developers give the green light, Jent expects that it will take six months to finalize project planning. During that time, Texas Central would secure more financing and submit a final permit to the Surface Transportation Board. Jent expects it would then take 80–86 months to complete construction of the project.
This estimation is a bit ambitious, Feigenbaum tells Reason. With the project's cost ballooning from $10 billion to over $40 billion, "I don't see how they're going to come up with" the funding that's needed for the rail line, he says. In his testimony to lawmakers, Jent said that he expects the Japan Bank for International Cooperation to "provide some form of financing" in the future (although the bank is not funding the project right now).
Feigenbaum says the project, which was essentially dormant before, will likely become dormant again.
The post In 12 Years, This $40 Billion High-Speed Rail Line in Texas Has Not Laid a Single Foot of Track appeared first on Reason.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
8 hours ago
- New York Post
Biden ‘talking in the quiet car,' asking for ice cream on Amtrak rides to DC office
He may be out of office, but he's still driving people crazy. Former President Joe Biden has been overheard asking for frozen treats while commuting on Amtrak to his government-provided DC office — where little known work is being done — as well as allegedly forgetting a top rule of the train. 'He was talking in the quiet car!' a disbelieving Amtrak regular vented to The Post. The 82-year-old former chief executive, who rode the route back and forth to Delaware during his 36 years in the Senate, also has gotten rusty on the cafe car's offerings. Biden recently asked for ice cream — his favorite snack — but had to settle for a muffin. Amtrak's 'quiet car' is the second on the Acela — behind first class — and its code of conduct is enforced by conductors and passengers who brusquely hiss 'shhhhhh!' at violators. A second witness who has seen Biden chatting in the quiet car argued it wasn't his fault. 'If he's talking, it's because he's constantly approached,' said this person, noting that whispered exchanges are allowed. '[That] is always a criticism of him — that he's too soft spoken! No winning.' The ex-president's travels have been captured in a stream of photos from fellow riders — and even a brief May 8 interview with CNN's Dana Bash. The Amtrak he was on was stopped last week due to a track issue outside of Baltimore and fellow riders flocked to the Democrat for selfies. Biden, who dropped his re-election bid last year amid a mutiny by allies over his perceived cognitive decline, has been visiting DC roughly once a week for meetings, the Wall Street Journal reported last month. 5 Several alums of the Biden White House say there's intrigue into what exactly he is doing most weeks at his temporary office a short distance from DC's Union Station. The General Services Administration pays for the office until July, meaning Biden will have to relocate soon if he intends to continue commuting to the capital. 'It's really a mystery,' one former Biden aide said of his activities while visiting DC, noting that staff still working for Biden 'avoid answering.' 'They're supposed to be setting up library stuff but no one has heard anything,' this person said. 'We're all wondering the same thing because he doesn't go to restaurants or anything public around here.' A source familiar with Biden's activities said that at the office he conducts meetings with staff and former staff and passes the time calling members of Congress and other Democratic leaders. 'He's also been attending events which are sometimes coordinated through the office,' the person said. 5 'He was just in Galveston, Texas, to attend a Juneteenth service as a recent example. Separately, he's working on his book and library and foundation phases of post-presidency.' They were unaware of any plans to find a new DC office when the federally provided space ends next month. Sources tell The Post the family faces financial difficulties after losing his $400,000 presidential pay. He has struggled to find takers for his offer to give speeches for $300,000 — a figure first reported by The Post — while his son Hunter Biden, who formerly raked in millions from abroad, admits to.
The Hill
11 hours ago
- The Hill
Gabbard's standing in Trump World comes into question
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's strength and standing within the Trump administration is coming under question after the president twice publicly brushed off her testimony that Iran is not close to developing a nuclear weapon, and amid reports of tensions between the two. President Trump nominated Gabbard as his intelligence director despite some doubts from both parties, and her anti-war stance fits in with the MAGA movement's aversion to getting the U.S. sucked into foreign conflicts. But the two are not longtime allies, and she increasingly appears to be on the outside looking in as Trump crafts his policy on the Israeli-Iran war. 'She was rewarded for sticking by Trump during the 2024 election and being a fierce advocate for him, particularly as it relates to military intervention,' one Trump ally said of Gabbard, explaining why Trump nominated her to the intelligence post. A video Gabbard posted on social media last week following a visit to Hiroshima, the Japanese city where the U.S. dropped an atomic bomb near the end of World War II, has come under heavy attention in Trump World. In the more than three minute video, which was posted to her personal account on social platform X, Gabbard details the devastating consequences of nuclear warfare and accuses 'political elite and warmongers' of 'carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers.' Some saw Gabbard as getting ahead of the White House's messaging on Iran and Israel when it came to the video. 'It's not a time for politics, but for pragmatism,' the Trump ally said, noting the decisions Trump has to make on whether to involve the U.S. directly in the war by bombing the Fordow nuclear facility. That facility is buried in an Iranian mountain, and only U.S. bombs and flights may be able to get to it. Gabbard's office has pushed back hard on any suggestion of a split. Olivia Coleman, Gabbard's press secretary, called such reporting a 'lazy regurgitation of a fake news story' disputed by the White House and Vice President Vance. 'While the Director is busy briefing the President, Vice President, and national security cabinet every day on the ongoing conflict, The Hill continues to spin lies made up by bored, irrelevant anonymous sources with nothing better to do than sow fake division,' Coleman said in a statement. 'The Director remains focused on her mission: providing accurate and actionable intelligence to the President, cleaning up the Deep State, and keeping the American people safe, secure, and free.' Vance this week praised Gabbard as 'a veteran, a patriot, a loyal supporter of President Trump and a critical part of the coalition he built in 2024.' But there are also questions from some in Congress about Gabbard's role. The intelligence director was set to appear before Senate Intelligence Committee leaders this week only to abruptly cancel. 'We were told that she was called to meetings at the White House,' Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) told reporters Wednesday. 'So her presence before the Intelligence Committee was canceled today. It'll be postponed to a different time.' Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the vice chair of the panel, said he has 'no idea what our policy is right now towards Iran other than chaos.' But he also offered some support for Gabbard and her delivery of intelligence information, while questioning whether Trump is listening to her enough. 'I will say this, there has been no change in the intelligence from what Gabbard did say that was true back in March, that [there is] no evidence that Iran had moved towards a weapon, and the point that the president may be taking action with no consultation — we've seen about endless wars in the Middle East, how this happens. And again, I have no idea what his plan is, what our plan is.' 'If this president wants to completely ignore the intelligence community, we are playing in dangerous ground, and this is exactly the way we got ourselves into Iraq,' he said. Gabbard has long cautioned against U.S. intervention in foreign wars — a position that aligned the former progressive darling with the 'America First' mantra when it comes to foreign policy. Trump said Thursday he would decide whether to take direct action in the next two weeks, a sign he is still holding out hope for a diplomatic solution. Gabbard has been in attendance for meetings this past week in the Situation Room, but Trump has reportedly leaned more on the counsel of officials like Secretary of State Marco Rubio, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine. 'The president hears all voices across the country, and he makes decisions based on his instincts. And he has always said diplomacy is his first option,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday. Trump raised eyebrows this past week with his remarks about Gabbard when he was asked about her testimony from March indicating that Iran was not as close to developing nuclear capabilities as Israel claimed. 'I don't care what she said. I think they were very close to having one,' Trump told reporters on Air Force One in the wee hours of Tuesday morning. On Friday, Trump more explicitly said Gabbard was 'wrong' in her assessment about Iran's nuclear ambitions. Gabbard was also absent from a meeting at Camp David earlier this month between Trump and his national security team. Gabbard was on National Guard duty at the time, and her allies have noted that she was in attendance for White House meetings the next day. Well before the latest flare up between Israel and Iran, Gabbard had been critical of Trump during his first term for pulling out of the Iran nuclear deal and assassinating a top general. Though the latest video didn't reference the matter, some in the White House saw it as off-message — a quality known to irritate the president. Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) said that while Gabbard's anti-interventionist stance could depart from Trump's on the Iran-Israeli war, Gabbard's pattern in office has been to curate intelligence to suit the White House's prerogatives rather than to contradict the president. 'It seems like she's, at times, on the other side of things from the president, which, you know, I didn't vote for her,' he said. 'She tends to find the answer, and then goes and tries to find the evidence to support her answer. [That's] exactly the opposite way you should be analyzing national security issues, right? You should start with the intelligence and then try to come to the conclusion. … she goes to the conclusion first and then tries to come up with the evidence to support her conclusion. That's not helpful to this president or any president.' An administration official said it is Gabbard's job to provide Trump with timely, accurate and actionable intelligence, and she will continue to do so. The White House has shunned any suggestion Trump has lost faith in any member of his national security team — remarks that come amid reporting that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has also not played a key role in mapping out a response. 'President Trump's Peace through Strength foreign policy is a tried-and-true approach that keeps America safe and deters global threats,' White House communications director Steven Cheung said in a statement. 'Efforts by the legacy media to sow internal division are a distraction that will not work,' Cheung added. 'President Trump has full confidence in his entire exceptional national security team.'
Miami Herald
12 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Acura Launches Killer Integra Lease Deal for June
As prices for new cars continue to rise year over year, it's harder to find lease deals that are worth considering, especially when it comes to luxury cars. These high-priced sedans and SUVs carry lofty price tags, which lead to higher lease payments and down payments. However, if you're willing to forgo the panache that comes with German badges, then we suggest checking out more affordable options from Japanese automakers like Acura. One particular lease deal that Acura has going on for the month of June is on the entry-level Integra. The current nationwide lease deal is for $369 per month for 48 months, with $3,799 due at signing. The offer includes a mileage limit of 10,000 miles per year. If you currently own a 2015 or newer Acura or a competitor from rival brands, you can get a sweeter deal of $359 a month for 48 months, with $2,999 due at signing. The rival brands include Audi, BMW, Cadillac, Chevrolet, Ford, Genesis, GMC, Honda, Hyundai, Infiniti, Kia, Lexus, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Subaru, Toyota, Volkswagen, and Volvo. The Integra is Acura's latest entry in the compact car segment and the most affordable car in the automaker's lineup. It competes well within the segment with rivals like the Audi A3, BMW 2 Series, and Lexus IS, but it brings its own take on luxury by adding a healthy dose of performance. Under its hood is a 200-horsepower, turbocharged 2.0-liter engine that can be connected to either a CVT or a six-speed manual transmission. There are no major changes for the 2025 model year. Shopping for the Acura Integra is easy, as there are only three different trim levels to choose from: Base, A-Spec, and A-Spec Technology. The lease deal in question is for the base Integra with a CVT and a $34,195 MSRP, which includes the destination charge, but the taxes, title, license, and doc fees are extra and will vary depending on your region. If you would rather minimize your upfront costs when leasing a 2025 Acura Integra, we have estimated the payment with $0 down. By dividing the $3,799 due at signing over the 48-month term (approximately $79.15), the estimated payment equates to around $448 every month. *This $0 down figure is an estimation. Official $0 down lease offers from Acura may differ based on their specific calculations, credit approval, and potential money factor adjustments. Always obtain an official quote directly from Acura. Lease offers can vary based on location and specific vehicle configuration (trim level, options, etc.) and are subject to credit approval. The advertised payments typically exclude taxes, title, registration, and other potential fees. To take advantage of this lease offer or get an official quote tailored to your buying needs (including an official $0 down quote), visit the official Acura website here. *Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. The information presented herein is based on manufacturer-provided lease offer information, which is subject to frequent change and may vary based on location, creditworthiness, and other factors. We are not a party to any lease agreements and assume no liability for the terms, conditions, availability, or accuracy of any lease offers mentioned. All terms, including but not limited to pricing, mileage allowances, and residual values, require direct verification with an authorized local OEM dealership. This article does not constitute financial advice or an endorsement of any particular lease or vehicle. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
