US in talks to launch more satellites from NZ
By Phil Pennington of RNZ
The US military is holding talks with New Zealand about launching more satellites from this country.
The US Space Force is moving to deploy hundreds more satellites that will - among other things - support America's nuclear command-control-and-communications (NC3) system.
It is not known what types of satellite it might wish to launch from New Zealand, but the Pentagon has signalled for several years its interest in diversifying launches into clear southern hemisphere skies, and elsewhere outside the US.
Congress ordered a report two years ago on the benefits of using partner countries' spaceports for rapid launch in a war or other crisis. Efforts to get the report through the US embassy have failed.
There are now new talks, with US Space Force General Brigadier Kristin Panzenhagen at the forefront.
"We are looking at international partnerships as potential ways to get our satellites to orbit," she said in an interview with the Mitchell Institute thinktank.
Talks were in their very early stages.
"So we've been talking to some of our allies and partners about their launch capability, whether it's existing capability - so for example, you know, Japan has existing capability, Rocket Lab is launching out of New Zealand, Ariane Space out of French Guyana."
The US wanted to "see what we may be able to do for enhancing each other's resiliency".
She said Sweden and Britain were also in the talks. The UK has no working spaceports, but is trying to build six of them.
The Pentagon has repeatedly told lawmakers - in pleas for more space funding - that it was in a race against China to achieve space superiority by 2027.
The US could end up helping design new spaceports offshore, so its launches would not face technical barriers, Panzenhagen added.
The 2023 report to Congress aimed to assess launch capability and "the shared costs and technology between the United States and allies, including if investments from the Pacific Deterrence Initiative and the European Deterrence Initiative could be considered for allied spaceports".
As the US pivots away from Europe and more towards the Indo-Pacific, it is pouring billions more into the Pacific Deterrence Initiative for the likes of missiles in Guam, drone experiments, and "military construction", documents showed.
Launches out of Mahia for the Pentagon and US space spy agency NRO have been mostly for experimental missions so far.
But the US relies on its two spaceports at home - at Cape Canaveral in Florida, and at Vandenberg base in California - for actual missions, including 'cannot fail' operations.
Retired Space Force colonel Charles Galbreath, now a senior fellow at the Mitchell institute, interviewed the general on YouTube last week, and spelled out why accelerating launches mattered so much.
"Launch, and the assured access to space that it represents, is foundational to space superiority and leveraging the unique benefits of the space domain.
"If you can't get to space, you can't control it," Galbreath said. Diversification and speed
Space Force is not only diversifying, but speeding up. In its latest exercise, a launch that once took two years was down to just 10 weeks, Galbreath heard.
International diversification is being paired with bringing more companies on board, often smaller ones, rather than the usual massive 'primes' like Lockheed.
For instance, Rocket Lab US has just been elevated into a fast-lane of its National Security Space Launch (NSSL) programme.
New Zealand is also linked in through its space research within the Five Eyes intelligence group, including a role in current tests of satellite comms to ships.
This comes under the umbrella of what US media calls the "Pentagon's global meta-network" - or CJADC2 - or combined joint all-domain command and control - essentially, a satellite-linked network for faster shooting.
The New Zealand Defence Force has recently been going to more US-led CJADC2 exercises or taking a bigger role, including in ones that build "kill chains" and "kill webs".
The head of US nuclear forces Admiral Charles Richard underlined the link between JADC2 (now called CJADC2) when he spoke to Congress in 2022.
"A subset of what JADC2 is doing is for nuclear command and control," Richard said.
"The two systems have to be overlapped to a great extent so that we can have integration."
Both CJADC2 and nuclear command-control-and-comms expect to benefit from the launch of hundreds of satellites into low-orbit, to get away from reliance on a handful of large, hugely expensive and vulnerable large satellites in higher orbit, according to official US documents.
A big CJADC2-linked exercise in Australia in August - Talisman Sabre - aims to advance how 19 countries including New Zealand share communications through a single system, which occurred for the first time last year.
Defence and Space Minister Judith Collins talked up the commercial opportunities for New Zealand firms to help out the Pentagon last year.
But last week's survey of the space industry that Collins released - which covered its potential to double by 2030 to be worth $5 billion a year - barely mentioned defence.
Collins said: "I have not engaged directly with the Space Force on launching from New Zealand."
Company leaders in the defence industry praised her appearance at an industry event last Friday. "Judith Collins is a rock star," said one online. "Capable of doing the work publicly and behind closed doors," said another.
RNZ asked if it could attend the event to hear her speak, but was declined.
Launches are checked and approved by national security officials and National Security and Intelligence Minister Christopher Luxon.
But Luxon diverted questions about NC3 to the Defence Ministry.
Collins has been approached for comment.
The US Embassy said it had "nothing further to provide".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
6 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
'She's wrong': Trump contradicts spy boss on Iran nuclear programme
US President Donald Trump said on Friday (local time) that his Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was wrong in suggesting there was no evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon. Trump contested intelligence assessments relayed earlier this year by his spy chief that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon when he spoke with reporters at an airport in Morristown, New Jersey. "She's wrong," Trump said. In March, Gabbard testified to Congress that the US intelligence community continued to believe that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon. "The (intelligence community) continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon," she said. On Friday, Gabbard said in a post on the social media platform X that: "America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree." She said the media had taken her March testimony "out of context" and was trying to "manufacture division." The White House has said Trump will weigh involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict over the next two weeks. On Tuesday, Trump made similar comments to reporters about Gabbard's assessment. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has justified a week of airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military targets by saying Tehran was on the verge of having a warhead. Iran denies developing nuclear weapons, saying its uranium enrichment programme is only for peaceful purposes. In March, Gabbard described Iran's enriched uranium stockpile as unprecedented for a state without such weapons and said the government was watching the situation closely. She also said that Iran had started discussing nuclear weapons in public, "emboldening nuclear weapons advocates within Iran's decision-making apparatus." A source with access to US intelligence reports told Reuters that the assessment presented by Gabbard has not changed. They said US spy services also judged that it would take up to three years for Iran to build a warhead with which it could hit a target of its choice. Some experts, however, believe it could take Iran a much shorter time to build and deliver an untested crude nuclear device, although there would be no guarantee it would work. Trump has frequently disavowed the findings of US intelligence agencies, which he and his supporters have charged - without providing proof - are part of a "deep state" cabal of US officials opposed to his presidency. Gabbard, a fierce Trump loyalist, has been among the president's backers who have aired such allegations. The Republican president repeatedly clashed with US spy agencies during his first term, including over an assessment that Moscow worked to sway the 2016 presidential vote in his favour and his acceptance of Russian President Vladimir Putin's denials.
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Trump to decide US' Israel-Iran action in next two weeks
President Donald Trump will decide in the next two weeks whether the U.S. will get involved in the Israel-Iran air war, the White House said, raising pressure on Tehran to come to the negotiating table. Citing a message from Trump, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters: "Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks." The Republican president has kept the world guessing on his plans, veering from proposing a swift diplomatic solution to suggesting the U.S. might join the fighting on Israel's side. On Wednesday (local time), he said nobody knew what he would do. A day earlier he mused on social media about killing Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, then demanded Iran's unconditional surrender. The threats have caused cracks in Trump's support base between more hawkish traditional Republicans and the party's more isolationist elements. But critics said that in the five months since returning to office, Trump has issued a range of deadlines - including to warring Russia and Ukraine and to other countries in trade tariff negotiations - only to suspend those deadlines or allow them to slide. "I think going to war with Iran is a terrible idea, but no one believes this 'two weeks' bit," Democratic Senator Chris Murphy said on the social media platform X. "He's used it a million times before to pretend he might be doing something he's not. It just makes America look weak and silly." Leavitt told a regular briefing at the White House that Trump was interested in pursuing a diplomatic solution with Iran, but his top priority was ensuring that Iran could not obtain a nuclear weapon. She said any deal would have to prohibit enrichment of uranium by Tehran and eliminate Iran's ability to achieve a nuclear weapon. "The president is always interested in a diplomatic solution ... if there's a chance for diplomacy, the president's always going to grab it," Leavitt said. "But he's not afraid to use strength as well I will add." BYPASSING CONGRESS? Leavitt declined to say if Trump would seek congressional authorization for any strikes on Iran. Democrats have raised concerns over reports on CBS and other outlets that Trump has already approved a plan to attack Iran, bypassing Congress, which has the sole power to declare war. Leavitt said U.S. officials remained convinced that Iran had never been closer to obtaining a nuclear weapon, saying it would take Tehran just "a couple of weeks" to produce such a weapon. Leavitt's assessment contradicted congressional testimony in March from Trump's intelligence chief, Tulsi Gabbard. She said then that the U.S. intelligence community continued to judge that Tehran was not working on a nuclear warhead. This week, Trump dismissed Gabbard's March testimony, telling reporters: "I don't care what she said. I think they were very close to having one." On Wednesday, Trump lieutenant Steve Bannon urged caution about the U.S. joining Israel in trying to destroy Iran's nuclear program. Israel bombed nuclear targets in Iran on Thursday and Iran fired missiles and drones at Israel after hitting an Israeli hospital overnight, as a week-old air war escalated and neither side showed any sign of an exit strategy. Leavitt said Trump had been briefed on the Israeli operation on Thursday and remained in close communication with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. She said Iran was in "a deeply vulnerable position" and would face grave consequences if it did not agree to halt its work on a nuclear weapon. Iran has been weighing wider options in responding to the biggest security challenge since its 1979 revolution. Three diplomats told Reuters that Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi have spoken by phone several times since Israel began its strikes last week.
1News
2 days ago
- 1News
'Nobody knows': Trump won't say if he will move forward with strikes on Iran
US President Donald Trump would not say whether he has decided to order a US strike on Iran, a move that Tehran warned anew would be greeted with stiff retaliation if it happens. "I may do it, I may not do it," Trump said in an exchange with reporters at the White House. "I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do." Trump added that it's not "too late" for Iran to give up its nuclear program as he continues to weigh direct US involvement in Israel's military operations aimed at crushing Tehran's nuclear program. "Nothing's too late," Trump said. "I can tell you this. Iran's got a lot of trouble." "Nothing is finished until it is finished,' Trump added. But "the next week is going to be very big— maybe less than a week". ADVERTISEMENT Trump also offered a terse response to Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's refusal to heed to his call for Iran to submit to an unconditional surrender. This photo released on Wednesday, June 18, 2025, by the official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, shows Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. (Source: Associated Press) "I say good luck," Trump said. Khamenei earlier warned that any United States strikes targeting the Islamic Republic will "result in irreparable damage for them" and that his country would not bow to Trump's call for surrender. Meanwhile, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth told lawmakers Wednesday that the Pentagon was providing possible options to Trump as he decides next steps on Iran. Trump said Tuesday the US knows where Khamenei is hiding but doesn't want him killed — "for now". "He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now," Trump said. ADVERTISEMENT Trump's increasingly muscular comments toward the Iranian government follow him urging Tehran's 9.5 million residents to flee for their lives as he cut short his participation in an international summit earlier this week to return to Washington for urgent talks with his national security team. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds including what will happen to food after supermarket blaze, Trump's dithering over the Middle East, and winter car care tips. (Source: 1News) Trump said that the Iranian officials continue to reach out to the White House as they're "getting the hell beaten out of them" by Israel. But he added there's a "big difference between now and a week ago" in Tehran's negotiating position. "They've suggested that they come to the White House— that's, you know, courageous," Trump said. Iran's mission to the United Nations refuted Trump's claim in a statement on social media. "No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House. The only thing more despicable than his lies is his cowardly threat to 'take out' Iran's Supreme Leader." The US president said earlier this week Russian President Vladimir Putin offered to serve as a mediator with Iran. But Trump said he told Putin to keep focused on finding an endgame to his own conflict with Ukraine. "I said, 'Do me a favour, mediate your own'," Trump said he told Putin. "I said, 'Vladimir, let's mediate Russia first. You can worry about this later'." ADVERTISEMENT (Contributor/Getty Images) The comments were a shift from Trump who earlier this week said he was "open" to Putin's offer to mediate. Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said earlier Wednesday that Moscow has cautioned Washington against offering direct military assistance to Israel. "We are warning Washington against even speculative, hypothetical considerations of the sort," Ryabkov said, according to the Interfax news agency. "That would be a step drastically destabilizing the situation as a whole." The Russia-Iran relationship has deepened since Putin launched a war on Ukraine in February 2022, with Tehran providing Moscow with drones, ballistic missiles, and other support, according to US intelligence findings. Trump is also facing deep skepticism about deepening US involvement in the Mideast crisis from some of his most ardent supporters. Trump during his 2024 run for the White House promised voters he would quickly end the wars in Ukraine and Gaza and keep the US out of costly conflicts. Steve Bannon, who served as a senior adviser to Trump during his first administration, on Wednesday said the administration should tread carefully. ADVERTISEMENT "This is one of the most ancient civilizations in the world, ok?" Bannon told reporters at an event sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor. "With 92 million people. This is not something you play around with. You have to think this through. And the American people have to be on board. You can't just dump it on them." Bannon and other Trump allies, including Turning Point USA's Charlie Kirk and conservative pundit Tucker Carlson, have raised concerns that direct US involvement in the conflict could be seen as a betrayal to some members of Trump's coalition and potentially cause a schism in MAGA world. To be certain, some Trump backers are supportive of the president taking military action against Iran and downplay the risk of the US getting mired in a conflict. "In terms of US involvement in military action, there is zero possibility of American boots on the ground in Iran," Senator Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said. Trump pushed back at the notion that deepening US involvement could impact his standing with bis base. "My supporters are more in love with me today, and I'm in love with them more than they were even at election time when we had a total landslide," Trump said.
