State ‘deemed' mine tax data confidential; mining backs bill to make data public again
The Cortez gold mine, one of Nevada biggest. (Photo: Nevada Gold Mines presentation to investors)
For decades, data on gross and net revenues at individual Nevada mines — and the amount of taxes paid on those revenues — have been at the heart of state mining tax debates and legislation.
And for decades, the data was publicly available.
A state Department of Taxation webpage linked to years of the 'Net Proceeds of Minerals Bulletin,' as the annual report is called, for public perusal.
Not anymore.
Asked last week where on its website it had stashed NPOM bulletins, the Nevada Department of Taxation said via email it had determined the reports 'contained confidential taxpayer information that identified tax information for the respective mines' and so 'has been deemed confidential' under Nevada statute.
Though asked repeatedly, the department, through its public information office, declined to say who specifically did the deeming, when, or by what process.
Meanwhile, two Nevada Republican assemblymembers, Bert Gurr, who represents White Pine and parts of four other eastern Nevada counties, and Washoe County's Rich DeLong, are sponsoring Assembly Bill 277, which would reverse the department's decision.
'My understanding is that 'someone' in the Department of Taxation determined that the information was subject to the confidentiality provisions, since the data was not specifically exempted' from the state statute cited by the department, DeLong said via email.
AB277 would explicitly exempt the data from the confidentiality statute, thus making it available to the public.
The Nevada Mining Association supports the bill to make NPOM bulletins public again.
'We are asking for your support for AB 277, the net proceeds on minerals transparency bill,' Nevada Mining Association President Amanda Hilton mentioned while providing an overview of the industry to the Assembly Natural Resources Committee earlier this month.
'This is important to us because we want to make sure that we can continue to have transparency in disclosing to the public what the tax impacts are and what the tax contributions are for our industry,' Hilton said.
Like DeLong, the association says it is at a loss as to why the Taxation Department deemed the reports confidential.
'The Nevada Mining Association does not have insight into why the Department of Taxation made this report confidential two years ago,' the group said in a statement Monday.
Over the years, the industry and its defenders have pointed to the reports to underscore the millions of dollars they pay in taxes, and to show how expensive it can be to produce gold, copper, and other minerals.
The reports also illustrate how declaring expenses reduces a mining operator's tax burden. That system of taxing mining has been singled out by the industry nationally on multiple occasions to argue to Congress that if any federal tax on gold and other 'hard rock' mineral production is ever implemented (none has been), it should be modeled after Nevada's mining tax.
Proponents of higher state mining taxes have pointed to the gross and net revenues data in the annual NPOM reports to decry how the state allows the industry to substantially reduce the taxable value of gold and other minerals by deducting multiple expenses and paying taxes only on net proceeds.
For instance, in any given year, several mines in Nevada deduct enough expenses from the gross value of production that those mines pay no net proceeds on mining taxes at all on hundreds of millions of dollars worth of minerals.
AB277 was referred to the Assembly Revenue Committee. As of Tuesday morning no hearing has been scheduled for the bill.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Hits Back at Republican Thomas Massie: 'Not MAGA'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump launched a scathing attack on Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky, declaring the Republican congressman is "not MAGA, even though he likes to say he is" on Truth Social following Massie's criticism of U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Newsweek reached out to Massie's office via email on Sunday for comment. What It Matters Trump on Saturday evening announced what he described as a "very successful attack" against three Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan The president's decision came after Israel and Iran have exchanged consistent strikes since June 13. Israel had urged the U.S. to target Iran's nuclear facilities, saying that Tehran was moving close to creating a nuclear weapon. Iran maintains that its nuclear program is for civilian purposes—not for weapons. Taking to X, formerly Twitter, after Trump announced the strikes, Massie said, "This is not Constitutional." The strikes have sparked concerns from some Democrats and some Republicans about a wider war breaking out—with some lawmakers accusing the president of violating the U.S. Constitution with the strikes. What To Know Massie and Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, introduced a bipartisan War Powers Resolution last Tuesday in a bid to curb Trump's ability to escalate tensions with Iran. "The Constitution does not permit the executive branch to unilaterally commit an act of war against a sovereign nation that hasn't attacked the United States," Massie said in a press release announcing the resolution. "Congress has the sole power to declare war against Iran. The ongoing war between Israel and Iran is not our war. Even if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution." Massie invited participation from lawmakers across the aisle, underscoring bipartisan concern about unauthorized military actions, Newsweek previously reported. Khanna quickly co-sponsored the measure and publicly called for Congress to reconvene and vote. "Stopping Iran from having a nuclear bomb is a top priority, but dragging the U.S. into another Middle East war is not the solution," Khanna said in a press release. "Trump's strikes are unconstitutional and put Americans, especially our troops, at risk," Khanna added. "Congress needs to come back to DC immediately to vote on Rep. Thomas Massie and my bipartisan War Powers Resolution to ensure there is no further conflict and escalation." The resolution has garnered support from over 40 House members, including Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib, and Pramila Jayapal. MAGA (Make America Great Again) supporter Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, has even signaled support, emphasizing on X that Americans want domestic priorities addressed "not going into another foreign war." Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, endorsed a companion resolution introduced by Senator Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat, stating "No president should be allowed to unilaterally march this nation into something as consequential as war with erratic threats and no strategy." House Minority Whip Katherine Clark stated: "The power to declare war resides solely with Congress. Donald Trump's unilateral decision to attack Iran is unauthorized and unconstitutional." The list remains heavily Democrat, though more Republicans may break with the party in the coming days as the aftermath of Trump's military strikes continue to play out. Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, arrives to speak to the press outside the US Capitol. Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, arrives to speak to the press outside the US Capitol. ROBERTO SCHMIDT/AFP via Getty Images What People Are Saying President Donald Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Sunday: "Congressman Thomas Massie of Kentucky is not MAGA, even though he likes to say he is. Actually, MAGA doesn't want him, doesn't know him, and doesn't respect him. He is a negative force who almost always Votes "NO," no matter how good something may be. He's a simple minded "grandstander" who thinks it's good politics for Iran to have the highest level Nuclear weapon, while at the same time yelling "DEATH TO AMERICA" at every chance they get." He added: "Iran has killed and maimed thousands of Americans, and even took over the American Embassy in Tehran under the Carter Administration. We had a spectacular military success yesterday, taking the "bomb" right out of their hands (and they would use it if they could!) but, as usual, and despite all of the praise and accolades received, this "lightweight" Congressman is against what was so brilliantly achieved last night in Iran. Massie is weak, ineffective, and votes "NO" on virtually everything put before him (Rand Paul, Jr.), no matter how good something may be. He is disrespectful to our great military, and all that they stand for, not even acknowledging their brilliance and bravery in yesterday's attack, which was a total and complete WIN. Massie should drop his fake act and start putting America First, but he doesn't know how to get there — he doesn't have a clue!" Trump concluded: "He'll undoubtedly vote against the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill, even though non-passage means a 68% Tax Increase for everybody, and many things far worse than that. MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER, Tom Massie, like the plague! The good news is that we will have a wonderful American Patriot running against him in the Republican Primary, and I'll be out in Kentucky campaigning really hard. MAGA is not about lazy, grandstanding, nonproductive politicians, of which Thomas Massie is definitely one. Thank you to our incredible military for the AMAZING job they did last night. It was really SPECIAL!!! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN." Representative Thomas Massie on X, formerly Twitter on Sunday: "I introduced a War Powers Resolution on Tuesday, while Congress was on vacation. We would have had plenty of time to debate and vote on this." What Happens Next? The House War Powers Resolution is scheduled for a mandatory floor vote within 15 days under the chamber's rules.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Massie on Iran strikes: ‘No imminent threat' to US authorizing that
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) on Sunday slammed the United States's recent strikes against Iran, saying there was 'no imminent threat' to the U.S. to authorize them. In an interview on CBS's 'Face the Nation,' host Margaret Brennan stated that House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said that ''the Article One power of Congress really allows for the president to do this. It was a limited, necessary, targeted strike,'' of the Iran attacks. 'Well, he's probably referring to the War Powers Act of 1973, but that's been misinterpreted. There were no imminent threats to the United States, which was what would authorize that. And I think that's peculiar to hear that from the speaker of the House,' Massie responded. On Saturday, Trump announced that the U.S. had bombed three Iranian nuclear sites, stepping into an ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel that kicked off the prior week. Massie quickly posted on the social platform X that Trump's bombing of Iranian nuclear sites was unconstitutional. Massie did his interview alongside Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who is a co-sponsor of a war powers resolution with the Kentucky Republican to prohibit U.S. involvement in Iran. 'The tragedy in this country is that we keep entering these overseas wars. We triumphantly declare the mission is accomplished the day after. And then we're left with Americans burdening the consequences for decades,' Khanna said in the 'Face the Nation' interview.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
New Texas law will require Ten Commandments to be posted in every public school classroom
Texas will require all public school classrooms to display the Ten Commandments under a new law that will make the state the nation's largest to attempt to impose such a mandate. Gov. Greg Abbott announced Saturday that he signed the bill, which is expected to draw a legal challenge from critics who consider it an unconstitutional violation of the separation of church and state. A similar law in Louisiana was blocked when a federal appeals court ruled Friday that it was unconstitutional. Arkansas also has a similar law that has been challenged in federal court. Advertisement 4 Gov. Greg Abbott announced Saturday that he signed the bill, which is expected to draw a legal challenge from critics. James Breeden for the NY Post The Texas measure easily passed in the Republican-controlled state House and Senate in the legislative session that ended June 2. 'The focus of this bill is to look at what is historically important to our nation educationally and judicially,' Republican state representative Candy Noble, a co-sponsor of the bill, said when it passed the House. Advertisement Abbott also signed a bill that allows school districts to provide students and staff a daily voluntary period of prayer or time to read a religious text during school hours. 4 The Texas measure easily passed in the Republican-controlled state House and Senate in the legislative session that ended June 2. AP The Ten Commandments laws are among efforts, mainly in conservative-led states, to insert religion into public schools. Texas' law requires public schools to post in classrooms a 16-by-20-inch (41-by-51-centimeter) poster or framed copy of a specific English version of the commandments, even though translations and interpretations vary across denominations, faiths and languages and may differ in homes and houses of worship. Advertisement 4 The Ten Commandments laws are among efforts, mainly in conservative-led states, to insert religion into public schools. Jay Janner/American-Statesman / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images Supporters say the Ten Commandments are part of the foundation of the United States' judicial and educational systems and should be displayed. Opponents, including some Christian and other faith leaders, say the Ten Commandments and prayer measures infringe on others' religious freedom. A letter signed this year by dozens of Christian and Jewish faith leaders opposing the bill noted that Texas has thousands of students of other faiths who might have no connection to the Ten Commandments. Texas has nearly 6 million students in about 9,100 public schools. Advertisement 4 Opponents, including some Christians, say the Ten Commandments and prayer measures infringe on others' religious freedom. AP In 2005, Abbott, who was state attorney general at the time, successfully argued before the Supreme Court that Texas could keep a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of its Capitol. Louisiana's law has twice been ruled unconstitutional by federal courts, first by U.S. District Judge John deGravelles and then again by a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which also considers cases from Texas. State Attorney General Liz Murrell said she would appeal and pledged to take it to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.
