Grant Cardone Says You Don't Have To Be The Boss To Get Rich: 'You Gotta Find Somebody That Is Successful And Still Wants To Be Successful'
Do you have to start your own business to be successful? Although some business owners become very successful, others end up shutting their doors after a few years. That's why Grant Cardone proposed another way to become rich.
"You gotta find somebody that is successful and still wants to be successful," he said.
Here's how you can use this advice to build long-term wealth.
Don't Miss:
Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing —
Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can
Cardone mentioned that you don't need 50 investments to become a billionaire. He said that Steve Jobs only had two investments. Pixar and NeXT were his two major investments before leaving Apple, and once he rejoined Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), that's where he got most of his wealth.
While diversifying your portfolio has benefits, there is the risk of over-diversification. Spreading your time and capital across too many investments can cause you to miss opportunities. Furthermore, you may spread your time too thin and end up with a bunch of slow-growing or declining income streams.
Picking a few good investments instead of having 50 investments can accelerate wealth building if you pick the right investments. It's not a strategy for everyone, but if you know the person behind the company and the growth opportunities, it may be worth considering.
Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: .
The leader plays a decisive role in the company's ability to tap into catalysts and provide long-term returns for patient investors.
If you want to see what type of an impact a leader can have on a corporation's valuation, look no further than Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA). People have been saying that it's overvalued for years. If Elon Musk wasn't leading Tesla, the stock would probably be a lot cheaper. Recently, Tesla stock jumped higher the moment Musk said he would move away from the White House's Department of Government Efficiency to focus fully on Tesla. These trends demonstrate how much value Tesla investors put into Musk's involvement with the company.
Cardone suggested looking for leaders who still want to grow. He also recommended avoiding leaders who are complacent or are on the downswing of their careers.Cardone mentioned having a friend who would have made him billions if Cardone dropped everything to work with him at an early stage of his startup. You don't have to drop everything and put all of your hopes into a single startup, but it demonstrates how much you can grow if you work with the right person when they are getting started with a new venture.
Cardone then mentioned that Warren Buffett didn't start any businesses despite being worth billions. Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK, NYSE:BRK) has relied on strategic acquisitions and investments to generate compounding returns for patient investors.
Buffett started one business – Buffett Partnership Ltd. – in 1956. However, he only put $100 of his money into it and received $105,000 from investors. Right from the beginning, Buffett used strategic leverage and acquisition to grow his empire. You don't always have to start a business and be the boss if you're surrounded by the right people and opportunities.
Read Next:
Image: Shutterstock
UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets.
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report
TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report
This article Grant Cardone Says You Don't Have To Be The Boss To Get Rich: 'You Gotta Find Somebody That Is Successful And Still Wants To Be Successful' originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump and TSMC pitched $1 trillion AI complex — SoftBank founder Masayoshi Son wants to turn Arizona into the next Shenzhen
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Masayoshi Son, founder of SoftBank Group, is working on plans to develop a giant AI and manufacturing industrial hub in Arizona, potentially costing up to $1 trillion if it reaches full scale, reports Bloomberg. The concept of what is internally called Project Crystal Land involves creating a complex for building artificial intelligence systems and robotics. Son has talked to TSMC, Samsung, and the Trump administration about the project. Masayoshi Son's Project Crystal Land aims to replicate the scale and integration of China's Shenzhen by establishing a high-tech hub focused on manufacturing AI-powered industrial robots and advancing artificial intelligence technologies. The site would host factories operated by SoftBank-backed startups specializing in automation and robotics, Vision Fund portfolio companies (such as Agile Robots SE), and potentially involve major tech partners like TSMC and Samsung. If fully realized, the project could cost up to $1 trillion and is intended to position the U.S. as a leading center for AI and high-tech manufacturing. SoftBank is looking to include TSMC in the initiative, given its role in fabricating Nvidia's AI processors. However, a Bloomberg source familiar with TSMC's internal thinking indicated that the company's current plan to invest $165 billion in total in its U.S. projects has no relation to SoftBank's projects. Samsung Electronics has also been approached about participating, the report says. Talks have been held with government officials to explore tax incentives for companies investing in the manufacturing hub. This includes communication with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, according to Bloomberg. SoftBank is reportedly seeking support at both the federal and state levels, which could be crucial to the success of the project. The development is still in the early stages, and feasibility will depend on private sector interest and political support, sources familiar with SoftBank's plans told Bloomberg. To finance its Project Crystal Land, SoftBank is considering project-based financing structures typically used in large infrastructure developments like pipelines. This approach would enable fundraising on a per-project basis and reduce the amount of upfront capital required from SoftBank itself. A similar model is being explored for the Stargate AI data center initiative, which SoftBank is jointly pursuing with OpenAI, Oracle, and Abu Dhabi's MGX. Melissa Otto of Visible Alpha suggested in a Bloomberg interview that rather than spending heavily, Son might more efficiently support his AI project by fostering partnerships between manufacturers, AI engineers, and specialists in fields like medicine and robotics, and by backing smaller startups. However, she notes that investing in data centers could also reduce AI development costs and drive wider adoption, which would be good for the long term for AI in general and Crystal Land specifically. Nonetheless, it is still too early to judge the outcome. The rumor about the Crystal Land project has emerged as SoftBank is expanding its investments in AI on an already large scale. The company is preparing a $30 billion investment in OpenAI and a $6.5 billion acquisition of Ampere Computing, a cloud-native CPU company. While these initiatives are actively developing, the pace of fundraising for the Stargate infrastructure has been slower than initially expected. SoftBank's liquidity at the end of March stood at approximately ¥3.4 trillion ($23 billion). To increase available funds, the company recently sold about a quarter of its T-Mobile U.S. stake, raising $4.8 billion. It also holds ¥25.7 trillion ($176.46 billion) in net assets, the largest portion of which is in chip designer Arm Holdings. Such vast resources provide SoftBank with room to secure additional financing if necessary, Bloomberg notes Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investors should consider this growth stock… it's SpaceX's competition
Rocket Lab (NASDAQ:RKLB) is a US-listed growth stock that gives investors rare access to the commercial space sector. As a vertically integrated launch and space systems provider, Rocket Lab is often compared to SpaceX in its ambition and capabilities. But there's one crucial difference: you can actually buy shares in Rocket Lab, while SpaceX remains private. Rocket Lab delivers launch services, builds small and medium-class rockets, and manufactures spacecraft components for a range of commercial, government, and defense customers. With rapid revenue growth, an impressive order book, and expansion into new markets, Rocket Lab offers public market investors a way to participate in the booming space economy. It targets many of the same opportunities as its more famous, privately held peer. Rocket Lab and SpaceX operate in the same commercial space sector but differ significantly in scale, maturity, and valuation. Rocket Lab's market cap is currently $12.85bn, with trailing 12 months (TTM) revenue of approximately $460m. Despite strong growth — revenue nearly doubled from $240m in 2023 — Rocket Lab remains a smaller, earlier-stage player focused on small to medium launch vehicles and spacecraft manufacturing. Its valuation multiples are extremely high, with a forward price-to-sales ratio of 22.3 times, reflecting investor optimism. SpaceX, by contrast, is a far more mature private company valued at about $350bn. It's projected to generate $15.5bn in revenue in 2025. This is driven by its dominant Falcon 9 launch services and rapidly growing Starlink satellite internet business. SpaceX's valuation implies roughly a 22.5 times multiple on forward revenue. This is broadly in line with Rocket Lab. Focusing on Rocket Lab, the company is projected to deliver rapid revenue growth over the next several years, with estimates rising from $573m in 2025 to $889 in 2026, $1.2bn in 2027, and $1.69bn in 2028. This represents annual growth rates consistently above 30%, and even a jump of nearly 77% in 2030. However, the number of analysts providing forecasts declines sharply after 2027, dropping from 11–14 analysts in the near term to just two or one by 2028 and 2030. The one analyst projecting as far as 2030 sees $4bn in revenue for the year. I had the chance to buy Rocket Lab shares at $15 just two months ago. I missed out as unfortunately my attention had been diverted elsewhere. However, I found another entry point. And personally, I see this as an investment to hold for a very long period. The space industry is still in its early innings, with enormous potential as satellite launches, lunar missions, and in-orbit services become increasingly mainstream. And like any investment, there are risks. Rocket Lab remains loss-making. It's expected to turn a profit in 2026, when it will trade at 620 times earnings. And while this moderates to 140 times in 2027, it's still expensive and introduces plenty of execution risk. However, I certainly believe UK investors should consider this one. It could be a real winner going forward. The post Investors should consider this growth stock… it's SpaceX's competition appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool James Fox has positions in Rocket Lab. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Sign in to access your portfolio
Tom's Guide
26 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
iPhone 17 vs iPhone 17 Pro: How big will the gap be this year for new iPhones?
Apple has spent the past few years giving its iPhone Pro models that extra little push with features not available on the standard iPhone. But that wasn't the case with the iPhone 16, which added enough new capabilities to dash nearly any FOMO you may have felt by not paying up for the iPhone 16 Pro. Will that trend continue this year with an iPhone 17 vs. iPhone 17 Pro comparison? Initial rumors about Apple's iPhone 17 plans paint a mixed picture. While the standard iPhone is set to gain a long-awaited display improvement that will match what the Pro models have delivered for years, the iPhone 17 Pro is set to see the more significant changes, chiefly to its design and cameras. And Apple could be planning a processor surprise, too, that may affect how you weigh the iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro. We're a few months away from the iPhone 17 release, since Apple typically rolls out new phones in September. But enough rumors about all the new models in the works have emerged to give us a good sense of how the iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro might compare. Here's how a potential iPhone 17 vs. iPhone 17 Pro face-off is shaping up, with a special focus on the biggest differences as well as key similarities. Save for the number of camera lenses on the back of each model and the screen size, every iPhone in Apple's lineup tends to look the same. That may be changing with the iPhone 17. Based on leaked renders and CAD drawings, the iPhone 17 will look a lot like past models, though it may have a more prominent camera array than the current iPhone 16. The two rear cameras will still be stacked vertically, though. Apple seems to be taking a different approach with the iPhone 17 Pro, stretching the camera array horizontally across the back of the phone. The three rear cameras will continue to be arranged in a triangular array on the right side of the phone, but other sensors and the flash will be moved to the left. Currently, Pro models come with a titanium frame, and there's some talk of Apple dropping that feature with the iPhone 17 Pro. I'm not sure I totally believe that at this point, given how prominently titanium figures into the branding of Apple's Pro phones. The standard iPhone features a main camera and an ultrawide lens on the back, while the Pro handsets add a telephoto lens to that setup. That isn't changing with the iPhone 17 lineup, though it sounds like the iPhone 17 Pro is in line to get a much bigger improvement to its camera setup. Along with the 48MP Fusion Camera that serves as the main shooter and a 48MP ultrawide camera, rumors tip the iPhone 17 Pro to adopt a 48MP telephoto lens. That's a higher resolution than the 12MP zoom lens on the iPhone 16 Pro, though the trade-off for that higher resolution may be a shorter zoom. The iPhone 17 Pro telephoto camera will reportedly only offer a 3.5x optical zoom compared to 5x on the current model, which doesn't make sense. Meanwhile, the iPhone 17 will still have to rely on its 48MP main camera to approximate a 2x optical zoom, as there's no zoom lens slated for that phone. In fact, it's widely assumed the rear camera setup on the iPhone 17 will be the same as what the iPhone 16 offers. The iPhone 17 Pro is also expected to pick up a new feature not available on the standard iPhone 17. A rumor claims Pro phones will support dual-video capture, allowing you to record video from both the front and back cameras simultaneously. One other camera change could impact both the iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro. All new iPhones are in line to get a 24MP selfie camera, replacing the current 12MP shooter. You'd expect Apple to maintain a minor difference between the standard iPhone and the Pro model this fall by giving those phones slightly different chipsets. If Apple sticks to its pattern from the past couple iPhone releases, the iPhone 17 would get an A19 system-on-chip while the iPhone 17 Pro would benefit from an A19 Pro that offers a little more processing power particularly when it comes to graphics. The differences could be even more stark with the iPhone 17, though. One analyst believes the standard iPhone 17 will continue to use an A18 processor, repeating what Apple did with the iPhone 14. If that's the case, the performance difference between an A18-powered iPhone 17 and an iPhone 17 Pro with an A19 Pro chip could be rather stark. Like the iPhone 16, the iPhone 17 is expected to feature 8GB of RAM to help with all that on-device computing that Apple Intelligence features require. But the iPhone 17 Pro could get a boost in that area. Specifically, multiple analysts are forecasting that the Pro models will get a bump to 12GB of memory, as Apple looks to give the iPhone 17 Pro a performance edge. iPhone 17 pricing is up in the air, given the ever-fluctuating policies about tariffs coming out of Washington. Even before tariffs threatened to raise the cost on devices manufactured in China like iPhones. However, there has been talk of some iPhome 17 models costing more than their predecessors. Regardless of how iPhone pricing shakes out in the fall, it's a safe bet that the iPhone 17 will cost less than the iPhone 17 Pro. Currently, the iPhone 16 starts at $799 while the iPhone 16 Pro has a $999 asking price. That gap in pricing is a pretty good guide, though there is a chance it might widen if the Pro model sees a price hike and the standard phone doesn't. After years of keeping its standard iPhones with refresh rates locked at 60Hz, Apple sounds like it's finally going to deliver a feature that's pretty standard on flagship phones these days — a fast-refreshing display. Multiple reports have the iPhone 17 adopting an LTPO panel for its display, a switch that would enable the phone to offer refresh speeds of up to i20Hz. That means smoother scrolling and more immersive graphics, and it would match a feature the iPhone Pro models have offered since the iPhone 13 Pro. The iPhone 17's fast-refreshing display may not be completely on par with what the iPhone 17 Pro offers, as some reports suggest the refresh rate on the standard model may not be able to scale all the way down to 1Hz. Still, this is one area where the gap between the regular iPhone and the Pro model may close considerably. The iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro displays may have something else in common. Some are expecting Apple to increase the panel on the iPhone 17 to 6.3 inches, matching a boost in screen size introduced with the iPhone 16 Pro last year. However, one new difference in displays could emerge. The iPhone 17 Pro may shrink the size of the Dynamic Island feature, freeing up more screen real estate. It's unclear if that change is coming to the regular iPhone 17. Then again, a more recent report claims all models will shrink the Dynamic Island. The iPhone 17 Pro models are thought to be adopting a vapor cooling chamber as a replacement for the standard heatsinks found in current iPhones. The ideal is that the new chamber would keep the iPhone running smoothly while preventing overheating during processor-intensive tasks — a problem that's flared up with some recent releases. Opinion is divided among rumor mongers as to whether this feature is exclusive to the Pro phones or whether all iPhone 17 models will benefit from the switch. We'll list this feature here for now, though it could shift over to the differences column as we get more information ahead of the iPhone 17 launch. All iPhone 17 models debuting in the fall will ship with the same software on board. And now that Apple has held its WWDC 2025 conference, we have a pretty good idea as to what that software will deliver. iOS 26 largely focuses on introducing a new Liquid Glass interface to Apple's phones, unifying the look of Apple's software across its phones, Macs and other devices. But there are Apple Intelligence updates included with iOS 26, too, such as a more capable Visual Intelligence feature and new additions to Genmoji and Image Playground. While Apple could always surprise us at the iPhone 17 launch with some Pro-specific software capabilities, the same iOS 26 features should work equally well on the iPhone 17 as they do on the Pro. Make no mistake — the iPhone 17 Pro is going to continue to offer more premium features than the iPhone 17, even if the fast-refreshing display coming to Apple's entry-level flagship ticks off a big box that had been separating the two phones. The Pro still figures to have the better camera setup, with more video capture features at your disposal. And if the rumored differences in chipsets pan out, there could be a notable performance gap between the two models as well.
