The Constitutional Court at 30: Time for a critical reflection

Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu
The Constitutional Court is an apex court in the land. Its responsibility is to uphold the country's constitution and to protect human rights. Over the years, significant changes have occurred within this institution. The court has been led by different judges, passed different judgements, and interacted with various high-ranking individuals and political parties. This has earned the court accolades and criticisms from different people.
Having existed since the dawn of democracy, it is the opportune moment to reflect on how the court has performed. In so doing, it is fair to consider both its highs and lows.
In 1993 as the country drew closer to turning a new page by moving from a racial era to the current political dispensation, an interim constitution was passed. It was this interim constitution which guided the first democratic election in 1994. The motivating factor was that at the time the judiciary was predominantly white male. As such, it lacked legitimacy since it did not represent the multiracial South African community. It was necessary, therefore, to establish a court that would protect the Constitution against anyone.
The Constitutional Court formerly opened its doors on 15 February 1995. It then facilitated the adoption of the 1996 constitution which is currently in place. As was expected, the new constitution confirmed the existence of the Constitutional Court which has 11 judges. These include the Chief Justice, Deputy Chief Justice and 9 other judges. It used interim offices before moving to the Constitution Hill in Braamfontein where it currently sits.
The signature case for the court was the case between the state and Makwanyane in 1995 on the death penalty. At the centre of this case was whether it was constitutional or not to use the death penalty under the new political dispensation.
Delivering its judgement on 6 June 1995, the court unanimously agreed that indeed the death penalty was against the country's constitution, especially Sections 10 on human dignity, 11 on the right to life, and 12 on freedom and security of the person. This was a landmark case which saw South Africa ending the death penalty which led to the loss of life of many liberation fighters at the hands of the apartheid operatives and their racist government.
Since then, the court has passed judgements on various cases including equality, violence, socio-economic rights, and political cases. There have also been cases on privacy and religion.
But while it is true that the court has tried its level best to uphold the constitution, and to interpret the constitution as part of its contribution to democratic consolidation, there have been instances where the court has been on the receiving end of the South African public. The question is why has the public been critical of this court? Importantly, what should the court do to redeem its public image?
The first concern about this court is that it spends more time dealing with political cases. Even parliament runs to this court about issues which should be resolved by parliament. In this regard, the concern is that the court is too accessible to politicians. Political parties like the DA have frequented the court about issues which should have been addressed by parliament. This has tarnished the image of the court.
Another accusation against the Constitutional Court is its weaponisation by the political elite. Some judges are accused of being too sympathetic to certain politicians while being excessively harsh against others. The removal of Adv. Busisiwe Mkhwebane from her position as Public Protector and the impeachment of Judge Hlophe were interpreted by the public as evidence of the politicisation of the court. The argument was that the court was used to fight political battles. Whether these accusations are true or not is not the main issue. What is concerning is that the court has lost credibility in the public eye.
The Zondo Commission had many instances which painted the court in a bad light. Firstly, the public was concerned about the appointment of Chief Justice Raymond Zondo to head the Commission. Part of the reason was that Zondo was not the best candidate that was recommended by the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) to President Ramaphosa. Justice Mandisa Maya received the nod. However, Ramaphosa used his constitutional prerogative and appointed Zondo to be the Chief Justice.
As the Commission carried out its work, the Constitutional Court was drawn in. Firstly, Zondo was seen to be lacking objectivity. He was accused of being too harsh against Former President Zuma but too soft on President Ramaphosa. This resulted in Zuma refusing to return to the Commission.
Zondo approached the Constitutional Court directly. Not only did he lay a charge against Zuma, but he also prescribed a sentence of two years. This raised eyebrows because the litigant also assumed the position of a judge. In its judgement, the court forced Zuma to return to the Commission. It also removed his right to remain silent – the same right which had been given to other witnesses like the late Dudu Myeni. Once again, the court was accused of being biased.
When Justice Sisi Khampepe was appointed Acting Chief Justice, she read her judgement against Zuma in an angry tone. She sentenced Zuma in absentia to 15 months in prison. This resulted in the loss of many lives, loss of jobs, and the destruction of the infrastructure. Many businesses which closed in 2021 never recovered. This tainted the image of the court.
Given these instances, the second question about the future of this court becomes relevant. Going forward, the court should take these criticisms seriously, identify those that are factual and act on them, but also consider the rest that have not been substantiated and investigate them to confirm their authenticity.
The two main issues that the court should take seriously include too much accessibility to it by politicians and the weaponization of the court by politicians. Failure to address these would further tarnish the court's public image.
* Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu is Director of the Centre for the Advancement of Non-Racialism and Democracy at Nelson Mandela University.
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

IOL News

39 minutes ago

• IOL News

Floyd Shivambu's consultative process: A potential game-changer for South African politics

MK Party former secretary general Floyd Shivambu's consultative process could reshape South Africa's political landscape Image: Picture: File image In a move that could significantly reshape the South African political landscape, analysts have warned that Umkhonto Wesizwe (MK) former secretary-general Floyd Shivambu could disrupt other political parties as he embarks on a consultative process with the potential to form a new party. The initiative, set to unfold over the coming weeks, aims to engage various political leaders, grassroots activists, and disgruntled constituents. However, many analysts believe this move will challenge the stability of existing parties and potentially pave the way for new political formations. The announcement came on Thursday, shortly after Shivambu was demoted following a tumultuous six-month stint in the party's leadership as the secretary general. Shivambu's demotion was publicly confirmed earlier this month after a controversial private visit to Prophet Shepherd Bushiri in Malawi. The MK party condemned the visit, claiming it was unauthorised and that Shivambu's actions risked damaging the party's image. Shivambu, however, dismissed these allegations, asserting he was dismissed for raising concerns about the embezzlement of R7 million by senior leaders close to former President Jacob Zuma - allegations the MK party has not responded to. Analysts have said this move to consult broadly signals Shivambu's intent to reposition himself within South Africa's political arena, potentially as the architect of a new political force or as a catalyst for realignment within existing structures. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Independent political analyst Joe Mhlanga weighed in on the implications of Shivambu's consultation process, suggesting that it signals a new wave of party realignments. 'If we look back into history, we see that the formation of new parties often results from splinters or breakaways,' Mhlanga explained. 'The ANC, for example, has birthed many parties over the years - the EFF, UDM, MK party, and others. Most recently, even within the MK party, we're witnessing attempts at reorganisation and new formations.' Mhlanga stated that Shivambu's outreach will likely target dissatisfied members within current parties, including those who feel betrayed or disillusioned with their leadership. 'He'll be consulting people who are already constituents of other parties, those unhappy with current leadership or policies, and those who believe that a new party could bring meaningful change,' he said. Mhlanga further warned that this process could trigger significant upheaval within South Africa's political landscape. 'This will disrupt leadership structures, create defections, and foster chaos. There will be betrayals, party splits, and intense public exchanges. 'As the 2026 local government elections approach, expect a wave of political realignments, with many candidates crossing party lines or forming new alliances.' He added that the period leading up to the elections will likely be marked by heightened political activity, media scrutiny, and perhaps even controversy or public outbursts. 'Constituents should anticipate visits from leaders attempting to sway their support. This is the nature of politics - dynamic, unpredictable, and often disruptive,' Mhlanga noted. South African political parties are bracing for a turbulent period as they prepare for the 2026 local government elections.

Daily Maverick

an hour ago

• Daily Maverick

Two South African engineers released from Equatorial Guinea jail over two years after arrest

The long-awaited return of Frik Potgieter and Peter Huxham follows a presidential pardon, months of diplomatic negotiations and international calls for justice. South African Frik Potgieter and dual UK-South African citizen Peter Huxham, oil engineers who had been imprisoned for more than two years in Equatorial Guinea, have finally returned home – freed by a presidential pardon that ends a harrowing ordeal marked by anguish, uncertainty and relentless diplomatic effort. 'This brings an end to an ordeal of anguish, uncertainty and unwavering efforts by many to secure their freedom,' said family spokespersons Shaun Murphy and Francois Nigrini. According to a declaration by the United Nations, Potgieter and Huxham had been unlawfully and arbitrarily detained in the west African country since 9 February 2023, following their conviction and sentencing to 12 years in prison on drug trafficking charges. However, their families believe the true reason behind the arrests lies elsewhere. Just two days before their detention, the Western Cape Division of the High Court had ordered the seizure of a superyacht owned by Teodoro Obiang Mangue, the vice-president of Equatorial Guinea and son of the country's long-time president, Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo. That order followed an earlier court decision to seize two luxury villas in Cape Town also linked to Mangue. Both seizures were connected to a separate legal matter involving another South African citizen allegedly imprisoned unlawfully in Equatorial Guinea. 'Complex' negotiations In July 2024, the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention issued a formal opinion stating that the men's trial had been unfair and that their continued detention was 'arbitrary and illegal'. It called for their immediate release, a call that went unheeded by Equatorial Guinea's president, despite direct appeals from both the incumbent minister of international relations, Ronald Lamola, and his predecessor, Naledi Pandor. Their eventual release, announced on 21 June, followed clemency granted by the president of Equatorial Guinea after months of sustained diplomatic appeals led by the South African government. 'The Government of the Republic of South Africa welcomes the release,' the Department of International Relations and Cooperation said. It expressed 'sincere gratitude' to Equatorial Guinea for granting the pardon and enabling Potgieter and Huxham to reunite with their families. It also recognised the extensive and complex diplomatic work behind the scenes, acknowledging the 'sensitive legal and bilateral dimensions' of the case. Since the men's arrest, the South African government remained actively engaged through official diplomatic channels, regularly appealing for clemency on humanitarian grounds. Special envoys were dispatched, and ongoing engagement was maintained at ministerial level. The department also acknowledged the constructive diplomatic engagement maintained throughout the ordeal. It reaffirmed its commitment to strengthening bilateral ties with Equatorial Guinea, praising the cooperation that allowed consular access and facilitated ongoing dialogue, even amid considerable diplomatic strain. Families express relief and gratitude Since their detainment, the families of Potgieter and Huxham have undertaken extensive efforts to secure their release, including launching the 'Free Frik and Peter' campaign with a dedicated website and online petition to raise awareness and demand urgent government action. They had engaged the South African Parliament, which adopted a unanimous motion calling for their immediate release and condemned their unlawful imprisonment. The families also appealed to the Pan-African Parliament for intervention and sought support from international bodies including the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, which declared their detention illegal and arbitrary. 'We are overwhelmed with relief and joy. The last two years and four months have been unimaginably painful for both our families. Today, we are finally able to say: Frik and Peter are safely back home,' said Murphy and Nigrini. The families extended heartfelt thanks to all who supported them during the long campaign for release, including SBM Offshore, the men's employer, the South African and UK governments, international diplomatic partners, parliamentarians, legal teams, Hostage International, civil society organisations and members of the media. They also specifically thanked Pandor and Lamola, both of whom travelled to Equatorial Guinea as special envoys on behalf of President Cyril Ramaphosa. 'Their return home is the result of collective efforts over many, many months, and we are deeply grateful to everyone who played a role in securing their freedom,' said the families. 'This has been a long and difficult journey. We want to thank every person who stood with us – your support carried us through our darkest moments.' As Potgieter and Huxham begin the process of recovery and healing, their families have asked for privacy. DM

IOL News

2 hours ago

• IOL News

Watchdogs say corruption, cadre deployment worse under GNU

One year after the formation of South Africa's Government of National Unity, civil society watchdogs say corruption is not only ongoing but worse in some departments. Image: IOL Graphics Talk is cheap, and the GNU is proving it. Civil society watchdog, Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse and Accountability Now warns that corruption has not just continued under the coalition government, in some departments, it's getting even worse. The GNU, formed after the African National Congress (ANC) lost its majority in the May 2024 general elections, has come under fire for continuing many of the same practices that plagued previous administrations. The GNU was established after the ANC entered into a coalition with its long-time rival, the Democratic Alliance (DA), and several smaller parties. While the arrangement was praised as a new chapter in South African politics, tensions over corruption cases, policy implementation, governance, and ethics have plagued the coalition from the start. Despite pledges to curb corruption, cadre deployment, and nepotism, these issues have persisted. Others argue that they have even worsened. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Speaking to IOL News, Wayne Duvenage, CEO of the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA), said while there have been signs of improvement in governance, particularly in departments led by the DA - corruption remains rampant. 'In fact, it's worse because the networks that exist within many of the government departments, especially in higher education and transport, are still plundering away. That I can assure you,' Duvenage said. He said that these networks were established during the fifth and sixth ANC administrations and continue to exert influence. Among the most notable scandals under the GNU are allegations involving senior ANC members: Human Settlements Minister Thembi Simelane, who reportedly took a R575,600 loan from the now-collapsed VBS Mutual Bank to buy a Sandton coffee shop while serving as the mayor of Polokwane. Appearing before the Justice Portfolio Committee in Parliament last year, Simelane denied any wrong-doing regarding the controversial VBS scandal and a loan she had taken to buy a coffee shop. President Cyril Ramaphosa has since removed Simelane as Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development following corruption allegations and moved her to Human Settlements. Mmamoloko Kubayi, who was the Minister of Human Settlements was appointed to the portfolio previously held by Simelane. She has also been linked to inflated billing with an Eskom contractor, claims she denies. Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, who has been under investigation by the Hawks for R2.5 million in alleged tender fraud during her tenure at Ba-Phalaborwa Municipality. ANC secretary general Fikile Mbalula has previously defended Ntshavheni, saying that she has to respond to the allegations. IOL News previously reported that speaking at a media briefing three months ago, Mbalula said the party would not be drawn into commenting on the matter suffice to say that the ANC will respond on "something tangible". Accusing the DPCI or Hawks of trying to ruin Ntshavheni's image, Mbalula said law enforcement must not seek to find people guilty through media. Ntshavheni has not said anything regarding the allegations. Despite mounting calls from political parties for Ramaphosa to take action against the two, no action has yet been taken against either minister. Recently, the Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) has faced public backlash following controversial board appointments by Higher Education Minister Dr Nobuhle Nkabane, including figures with strong ANC ties, including Gwede Mantashe's son, Buyambo. The appointments were later withdrawn. The National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) has also been embroiled in corruption allegations. The previous board was dissolved, and the institution placed under administration. A new board has since been appointed, with a mandate to clean up operations. Duvenage acknowledged that the GNU has led to more civil society engagement and less unilateral decision-making than in previous administrations. He pointed to the rejection of a proposed 2% VAT increase as a sign of healthy political contestation. 'It's been going for a year, and it has had its ups and downs, but it has held its ground,' he said. 'The fact that they couldn't steamroll the budget through Parliament is a positive sign.' He added that despite ideological differences, the ANC and DA have managed to hold the coalition together. 'So far, actually, so good,' he added. However, Duvenage admitted that true accountability remains elusive. 'There's a long way to go.' Meanwhile, accountability advocate Paul Hoffman of Accountability Now emphasised the structural weaknesses in prosecuting corruption. 'The Zondo Commission identified more than 1,000 individuals involved in corruption. But the Criminal Justice Administration has done little,' Hoffman said. He criticised the Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC), established to tackle high-level graft, calling it ineffective. Hoffman argued that the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) is not independent enough to deal with serious corruption, as it operates under the control of the Department of Justice. 'The Constitutional Court has said corruption should be handled by a body outside executive control,' Hoffman told IOL News. 'The NPA is not that body.' The DA has previously introduced two bills in Parliament calling for a new Chapter 9 anti-corruption commission, a move Hoffman believes could be transformative, if passed. 'It will need ANC support to pass, requiring a two-thirds majority. Until that happens, the culture of impunity will continue,' he said. The DA has previously put forward two private member's bills to fight corruption and cybercrime. One calls for a new Chapter 9 Anti-Corruption Commission to tackle serious graft and organized crime, while the other proposes a Cyber Commission to deal with digital threats. He added that effective governance under the GNU depends heavily on whether structural reforms are enacted. 'The GNU has improved parliamentary accountability in some ways, like with the budget process. But that's not enough.' Hoffman also tied corruption to South Africa's broader socio-economic crises, including high unemployment, inequality, crime, and poor infrastructure. 'You can't grow the economy while investors are afraid of losing their money to corruption,' he said. 'Addressing corruption is the number one priority.' According to both Duvenage and Hoffman, without institutional reform and political will, South Africa's long-standing issues will remain unresolved. This comes as the GNU enters its second year, the coalition faces mounting pressure to act decisively. IOL Politics