logo
Skywell BE11 Driving, Engines & Performance

Skywell BE11 Driving, Engines & Performance

Top Gear21-05-2025

Driving
What is it like to drive?
Sinfully underwhelming. It just about manages to go, stop and turn on command, thus doing the bare minimum to qualify as a 'car'. But ask anything more of it and you might as well be asking a dolphin to operate a forklift truck.
The BE11's shortcomings boil down to the ride and the powertrain. It gets MacPherson struts on the front axle and multi-link suspension at the rear: that should be an assuring combo, but its behaviour is so basic it makes you wonder if Skywell did any setup work at all beyond just bolting it onto the frame.
Advertisement - Page continues below
The body doesn't wallow in corners, but you get jiggled laterally and longitudinally. All the time. Undulating roads cause it to pogo along like a merry-go-round.
Handling-wise, it's vague and distant, with numb steering and a chassis that simply doesn't want to engage. Judge your speed well (translation: slow right down) and very occasionally the Skywell will corner predictably, but more often than not you'll find yourself tugging at the wheel to correct your trajectory, upsetting the ride (again) in the process. Fluid this is not. Crumbs. And the powertrain?
Mildly infuriating, unfortunately. 201bhp sounds like plenty but the BE11's motor is entirely pedestrian, even lacking the 0-30mph chops that make most electric cars perky in urban areas. Venture out onto the open road and it's got just enough oomph to get by (0-62mph in 9.6 seconds is slow, but not glacial), but this isn't a car that belongs in the outside lane unless it's mid-way through a traffic jam.
More annoying is how easy it is to spin the wheels, especially when you're waiting at a junction with a bit of lock on. You only have to prod the accelerator for the grip to momentarily vanish, making you look like a berk with lead feet. Can't be good for tyre life either.
Advertisement - Page continues below
Worst of all though is how lazy it is. Press the throttle, pause, then the power comes. Same for the regen: lift off, wait… then the braking force kicks in. What it gives you is always at odds with what you want from it.
Ostensibly there are Sport and Comfort modes, but they don't seem to do anything. That's pants. Now you're going to tell me the range is diabolical, aren't you?
No, actually. We saw 3.3mi/kWh during our test drive, which points to a theoretical range of more than 280 miles against a claim of 304 from the bigger 86kWh battery. The BE11 had warm weather and gentle country roads on its side, so we'd expect that figure to fall significantly on a longer motorway run or in colder conditions.
The bigger issue is the charging speed: both the Standard and Long Range versions are capped at 80kW, so the promise of a 0-80 per cent top-up in 1h 10m and 1h 23m apiece falls well short of what we've become used to from mainstream EVs that'll have you on your way again in half an hour.
Plug in at home and a full charge will be an overnight job. Nothing wrong with that – 11kW AC is pretty conventional.
Highlights from the range the fastest 150kW Long Range 86kWh 5dr Auto 0-62 9.6s
CO2 0
BHP 201.2
MPG
Price
£39,940 the cheapest 150kW Standard Range 72kWh 5dr Auto 0-62 9.6s
CO2 0
BHP 201.2
MPG
Price
£36,940 the greenest 150kW Long Range 86kWh 5dr Auto 0-62 9.6s
CO2 0
BHP 201.2
MPG
Price
£39,940

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

City eyes UK's first road congestion charge in two decades
City eyes UK's first road congestion charge in two decades

The Independent

time29 minutes ago

  • The Independent

City eyes UK's first road congestion charge in two decades

Oxfordshire County Council has launched a consultation on a proposed £5 daily congestion charge for cars entering parts of Oxford city centre. The scheme aims to reduce traffic, improve bus journey times, enhance safety for pedestrians and cyclists, and cut air pollution. If approved, the temporary charge would begin in autumn and could last up to two years, until August 2026, when a traffic filtering trial is expected to commence. The charge would apply to all cars, including electric vehicles, and be enforced by ANPR cameras, with permits available for residents, blue badge holders, and frequent hospital patients. This would mark the UK's first new road congestion charge in over two decades, with generated income intended to cover operational costs and fund improved public transport services.

Next Toyota Supra And Lexus Twin Might Ditch BMW For Mazda Inline-Six
Next Toyota Supra And Lexus Twin Might Ditch BMW For Mazda Inline-Six

Auto Blog

time37 minutes ago

  • Auto Blog

Next Toyota Supra And Lexus Twin Might Ditch BMW For Mazda Inline-Six

Supra-based Lexus could replace RC and LC Production of the current Toyota GR Supra is set to come to an end next year, but we already know Toyota is working on a successor to this brilliant sports car. Now, rumors have surfaced regarding a Lexus sports car twin for the next GR Supra. Up until this point, the two performance coupes from Lexus – the RC and LC – have not had anything in common with the Supra. But this next generation of Toyota/Lexus sports cars will be different, with the two sports cars expected to share a powertrain – and not one from BMW. 0:05 / 0:09 Nissan's revolutionary self-driving tech hits Japan's streets Watch More Similar Powertrains, Different Seating Layouts Source: Toyota According to Best Car Web from Japan, the Lexus version of the next Supra will be known as the LC+RC Integrated Sports, although this is obviously not expected to be the official name. What we can tell from this name is that the new Lexus sports car could replace both the RC and LC, which have been around for some time. The next Supra is expected to get a 2.0-liter turbocharged hybrid powertrain, with power still going to the rear wheels and either an eight- or 10-speed automatic. No mention was made of a manual gearbox option. The Japanese outlet also said that Toyota is investigating whether it can use Mazda's smooth inline-six engine for the Supra, which the Lexus version would logically use, too. In the Mazda CX-90, this engine makes up to 340 horsepower, but we'd expect a more powerful version in these sports cars. Mazda and Toyota already share powertrains, with the CX-50 Hybrid and RAV4 Hybrid using the same four-cylinder hybrid. Even if their powertrains are the same, one key difference will be the seating layout. Whereas the next Supra is expected to remain a dedicated two-seater model, the Lexus version will be a 2+2. A convertible is also possible. Powertrain And Platform Sharing Can Still Yield Unique Models Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. As we saw with the BMW Z4 and Toyota GR Supra relationship, two cars with the same underpinnings can still look and feel completely unique, with their own driving characteristics. For this reason, we don't expect the new Supra to become an overly sanitized softie, simply because it will have a Lexus sibling. The Supra will likely be sharper and more engaging, whereas the Lexus version will probably be more of a classic grand tourer. The two cars will definitely be uniquely styled, and the Lexus should have better amenities and higher-quality finishes to justify a higher price tag. For now, further details are unknown, but the next-gen Supra is expected to be shown in 2026. If the rumors prove to be true, the Lexus version will show its face around the same time. About the Author Karl Furlong View Profile

Drivers could be charged £5 to enter Oxford city centre
Drivers could be charged £5 to enter Oxford city centre

The Independent

time39 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Drivers could be charged £5 to enter Oxford city centre

A consultation on introducing the UK's first road congestion charge for more than two decades has been launched. Oxfordshire County Council said it is proposing to charge drivers £5 per day to enter parts of Oxford city centre. The Liberal Democrat-run local authority claimed the plan has a series of objectives, such as reducing traffic, making bus journeys faster, improving the safety of pedestrians and cyclists, and cutting air pollution. London and Durham – the only other parts of the UK with congestion charges – introduced their schemes in the early 2000s. A number of other cities have implemented clean air zones, which charge vehicles that fail to meet minimum emission standards. Oxfordshire County Council is proposing to launch the temporary congestion charge in the autumn. It said 'urgent action is needed' to reduce delays to buses, partly caused by the temporary closure of Botley Road since April 2023 because of a Network Rail project to expand the city's railway station. The congestion charge would remain until the introduction of a traffic filtering trial once Botley Road reopens, which is expected to be in August 2026. It could be in place as a temporary measure for up to two years, the council said. The scheme would apply only to cars and be enforced using automatic number plate recognition cameras (ANPR) positioned at six locations. Cars with a permit or day pass would be able to pass through the charging area without paying. The council is planning to make permits available for groups such as residents, blue badge holders, frequent hospital patients, taxis and private hire vehicles. Electric cars will not be exempt from the daily fee as the scheme's purpose would be to 'reduce traffic by reducing the number of car journeys', according to the local authority. The council said income generated by the congestion charge would be used to cover the cost of setting up and operating the system, with any additional money going towards discounted park and ride services and improved bus services. The consultation opened on Monday and runs for six weeks. Jack Cousens, head of roads policy at the AA, said residents need assurances that the scheme will end within two years as there have been 'too many times' when charges that are 'supposedly temporary' are kept because they become 'too lucrative'. He added: 'Ultimately, the aim of the council is to reduce car traffic while creating a better alternative via buses and bikes. 'Expanded park and ride or park and pedal facilities would contribute in a big way towards that ambition.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store