Judge sides with city of Austin in Statesman PUD case
AUSTIN (KXAN) — A Travis County Civil Court judge sided with the city of Austin, potentially moving forward the Planned Unit Development (PUD) on the former Austin-American Statesman property.
According to an attorney for the Save Our Springs Alliance (SOS), the judge 'did not provide a reason' for the ruling against the organization.
The PUD was approved in 2022 for a development that would include a 275-room high-rise hotel, six towers of residential units and office space.
From 2022: Some concerned about required park space in Statesman PUD conversation
According to the city, PUD zoning is meant 'to preserve the natural environment, encourage high quality development and innovative design, and ensure adequate public facilities and services' and 'must be superior to the development that would occur under conventional zoning and subdivision regulations.'
However, PUD zoning also 'provides greater design flexibility by permitting modifications of site development regulations.'
The lawsuit that was rejected in court Tuesday claimed that Austin City Council violated the Texas Open meetings Act and the Austin City Charter when it approved the PUD for 18.86 acres along the south shore of lady Bird lake.
SOS claimed that the city did not provide adequate public notice regarding 'major changes to City standards.'
The attorney for SOS told KXAN they are 'considering options for appeal.'
KXAN has reached out to the city of Austin for its response to the ruling. We will update this article if a statement is received.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
28 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Senators Markey and Warren decry Trump's Iran strikes as unconstitutional
'Only Congress can declare war — and the Senate must vote immediately to prevent another endless war,' Warren said. Fellow Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey agreed, calling the strike 'illegal' for having lacked congressional approval. He said in a statement that Saturday's attack may set back Iran's nuclear ambitions, but added that not only can the country 'rebuild its program,' it 'will now be highly motivated to do so.' 'A diplomatic solution remains the best way to permanently and verifiably prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon,' Markey said. Chants of 'No More War' broke out at a Bernie Sanders rally in Tulsa, Okla., after the Vermont Senator read Trump's 'alarming' social media post announcing the strikes. 'The American people do not want more war, more death,' he said. Advertisement Massachusetts Peace Action, a Cambridge-based advocacy group, called for state leaders to speak out. The organization specifically called on Congressional leaders to pass the war power resolutions filed by Senator Tim Kaine and Representative Thomas Massie to prevent further US military action. 'We call on Massachusetts political leaders to speak out strongly against President Trump's lawless military adventure,' the organization wrote on Saturday night, shortly after the US attack on Iran. Brian Garvey, the organization's executive director, said an 'emergency event' was being planned outside Park Street Station at 1 p.m. Sunday, in protest of the strikes. Advertisement 'This direct attack by the United States on Iran a dramatic escalation by President Trump,' Garvey said in a phone call Saturday night. 'It's incredibly dangerous, it's unnecessary, and frankly, it's illegal.' Garvey said the founding fathers were explicit in giving Congress the power to declare war, adding that this is 'not how the government is supposed to work.' 'It is perhaps especially terrible because this is a president who ran saying he was going to seek peace,' he said. 'Back in 2016, he said the Iraq War was a big fat mistake. I fear that what he is leading us into could be even worse than that debacle and quagmire.' Garvey said he was 'fearful' for the US service members stationed in the Middle East, and 'outraged' that the strikes threatened their safety. Camilo Fonseca can be reached at
The Hill
38 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senator Fulbright had a vision. His successors must see it through.
Last week, 11 of the 12 members of the Fulbright Board of Directors resigned, citing political interference in awarding Fulbright Scholar awards for the upcoming year. This comes less than two weeks after ten students and six researchers left Sweden after nine months away from home, returning to America to continue their educational and professional paths. Unless something changes, this year's Fulbright research grantees to Sweden, and those to other countries around the world, may be the last to make the trip, as the entire international cultural exchange program budget faces elimination in the budget bill. Since it was founded in 1946, the Fulbright Program has enjoyed bipartisan support because it has always been aligned first and foremost with our national interests. In the words of Sen. J. William Fulbright (D-Ark.), the American politician and statesman who served in the U.S. Senate between 1945 and 1974, Fulbright was designed to be 'a modest program with an immodest aim — the achievement in international affairs of a regime more civilized, rational and humane than the empty systems of power of the past,' as he said when the program was signed into law by President Harry S. Truman. In order to continue this work, Fulbright's successors today must act to restore this important program that has been paying huge dividends for nearly 80 years. The Fulbright scholars in Sweden, including myself, hail from institutions across the country. After a rigorous selection process over the course of a year, they were chosen to represent our country abroad, facing long winter days, to study critical issues such as immunities in malaria infections, potential treatments for chronic kidney disease, root causes of autoimmune disorders, fair uses of artificial intelligence, strengthened safety regulations in long-range rescue operations, long-term sustainability of oceanic food sources, and enhanced access to medical services. The Fulbright Program runs on a tight annual budget of $288 million, representing a minuscule share of America's international relations budget. Scholars and students are deployed to 165 countries around the world. Stipends to grantees are exceedingly modest, covering only room, board and incidental expenses. Limited financial support encourages grantees to explore local resources and even share accommodations. To survive the Nordic winter when the sun appeared only two or three hours each day, the 15 researchers in Sweden spent their free time participating in local sports teams and volunteering at health clinics and community service organizations. Their presence in community activities helped forge lifelong relationships and spread goodwill at a time when America's hard power is frequently questioned abroad. Since the program's inception, Fulbright recipients have gone on to win 62 Nobel prizes, 96 Pulitzer prizes and 17 Presidential Medals of Freedom. Eighty-two have been named MacArthur geniuses and 44 have become heads of state. The list of Fulbrighters is long, distinguished and bipartisan. Fulbrighter Linus Pauling, one of the founders of the fields of quantum chemistry and molecular biology, won both the Nobel Prize in Chemistry and the Nobel Peace Prize. Authors John Steinbeck, Edward Albee and John Updike were Fulbrighters, as is American soprano Renée Fleming. In the eyes of Fulbright, who himself received the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1993, the Fulbright Program was meant to bring a little more knowledge, a little more reason and a little more compassion into world affairs, thereby increasing the chance that nations will learn to live in peace and friendship. The 2025 Swedish Fulbright researchers, representing the best and brightest our country has to offer, have done their part to contribute to this goal. I wish our senators could have seen them in action as I have. At a time when governmental funding priorities are scrutinized for fiscal efficiency, the Fulbright Program stands as a proven investment in education and diplomacy while promoting American values worldwide and shaping future leaders. Fulbright helps build a stronger, smarter, more prosperous United States. Eliminating its funding would be a poor investment in America's future, making the world a more dangerous place in the process. Christie S. Warren, the 2024-2025 Fulbright-Lund Distinguished Chair in Public International Law, is Professor of the Practice of International and Comparative Law and director of the Center for Comparative Legal Studies at William and Mary Law School.
USA Today
38 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump just bombed Iran. We deserve to know why, but don't count on the truth.
You'll pardon me if I don't trust the words that fall out of the president's mouth. We were never given clear information about how close Iran was to developing a nuke. President Donald Trump may have just hurled America into war because he was mad nobody liked his recent military parade. Before you brush off that assertion and defend the June 21 U.S. attacks on three of Iran's nuclear sites − bombings ordered without showing Americans clear evidence or purpose, without congressional approval and without public support − consider who you're dealing with. Trump is a small man forever trying to make himself look big. He's a liar, a fabulist and an impulsive bully. His recent attempts at looking tough involved sending the U.S. Marines to Los Angeles and holding a large military parade in Washington, DC, that did little to impress. Opinion: From massive protests to a puny parade, America really let Donald Trump down Trump had a choice with Iran, and he chose war Israel's attacks on Iran and claims the Iranians were close to develop a nuclear weapon left Trump with a choice: He could study the facts, build a case for the American people and exhaust all diplomatic efforts. Or he could bomb the daylights out of Iranian nuclear sites and pull our nation back into a war in the Middle East. He chose the latter, perhaps because he thought it would make him look mighty. Americans were informed of the attack via words Trump posted on the social media site he owns. He later addressed the nation, saying the objective 'was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity.' 'Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success,' Trump said. 'Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.' How can Americans believe a president who lies like Trump? I certainly hope so, but you'll pardon me if I don't trust the words that fall out of the president's mouth. We were never given clear information about how close Iran was to developing a nuke. And again, this attack didn't have congressional approval or popular support. An Economist/YouGov poll taken between June 13 and June 16 found: 'Only 16% of Americans think the U.S. military should get involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran; 60% say it should not and 24% are not sure. Majorities of Democrats (65%), Independents (61%), and Republicans (53%) oppose U.S. military intervention in Iran.' Yet here we are. The president who ran on repeated assertions that he would bring peace to the world has launched an attack that will undoubtedly put Americans abroad and at home in danger. Opinion: Trump pivots to distractions as polls show collapsing support for his agenda Trump repeatedly promised peace, yet he has now brought us to war In his inaugural address, Trump said: 'We will measure our success not only by the battles we win but also by the wars that we end − and perhaps most importantly, the wars we never get into. My proudest legacy will be that of a peacemaker and unifier. That's what I want to be: a peacemaker and a unifier.' Trump said of his opponent in the presidential race, then Vice President Kamala Harris: 'To make her president would be to gamble with the lives of millions of people. She would get us into a World War III guaranteed because she is too grossly incompetent to do the job.' And here we are, either fully engaged in a war with a powerful Middle-East nation or, at best, on the precipice of one. Americans deserve answers on Trump's decision to bomb Iran House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries released a statement saying: 'Donald Trump promised to bring peace to the Middle East. He has failed to deliver on that promise. The risk of war has now dramatically increased, and I pray for the safety of our troops in the region who have been put in harm's way. President Trump misled the country about his intentions, failed to seek congressional authorization for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East.' Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Americans deserve to know, explicitly, why these attacks took place. We deserve to know what merited the president's decision to launch the attacks without the support of Congress. But how can we expect clear and honest answers from a man who lies as easily as he breathes? Why should we expect this was anything more than a flex to soothe the insecurities of a commander-in-chief who preaches 'America first' while meaning 'Trump first'? Trump ended his comments bizarrely saying: "I just want to thank everyone, in particular God. We love you, God.' 'God help us' would be far more appropriate now. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.
