
South Korea ex-PM Han talks up Trump credentials ahead of vote South Korea ex-PM Han talks up Trump credentials ahead of vote
South Korean former prime minister Han Duck-soo speaks during a press conference to announce a presidential bid at the National Assembly in Seoul, South Korea, on May 2, 2025. - Photo: AP
SEOUL: South Korea's former prime minister Han Duck-soo said Wednesday (May 7) he was the best candidate to cut a deal with Donald Trump, as the country faces a snap poll triggered by the impeachment of the ex-president.
The June 3 presidential election will decide who replaces Yoon Suk Yeol, who was removed from office over his ill-fated declaration of martial law in December, which sent South Korea into a period of prolonged political turmoil.
Han, a 75-year-old career bureaucrat and prime minister under Yoon, was acting president but resigned last week and officially announced his presidential bid.
His approval rating is in the single digits.
Han, who spent around two months as acting leader after Yoon was impeached, said Wednesday he was "the most experienced and capable person" to discuss trade issues with the US.
While leading the country, he said he had directly spoken to US President Trump, who he saw as an "amicable" and "proactive" person in "resolving issues with South Korea".
Prime among them are Trump's potentially steep trade tariffs.
Han is one of a host of conservative candidates running against main opposition Democratic Party frontrunner Lee Jae-myung. Analysts say the right needs to unify and run a single candidate if it wants to avert an opposition landslide.
Han was seen as a unifying candidate, having held a range of senior roles across both liberal and conservative governments, including prime minister, finance minister, trade minister and the country's ambassador to the US.
But the country's conservative People Power Party picked former labour minister Kim Moon-soo as their official candidate.
The latest Gallup poll, released on April 25, shows Lee, currently facing multiple criminal trials, leading the race with 38 percent support, while all other candidates, including Han, trail in the single digits. - AFP

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
As the UN turns 80, its crucial humanitarian aid work faces a clouded future
KAKUMA, Kenya (AP): At a refugee camp in northern Kenya, Aujene Cimanimpaye waits as a hot lunch of lentils and sorghum is ladled out for her and her nine children - all born while she has received United Nations assistance since fleeing her violence-wracked home in Congo in 2007. "We cannot go back home because people are still being killed,' the 41-year-old said at the Kakuma camp, where the UN World Food Program and UN refugee agency help support more than 300,000 refugees. Her family moved from Nakivale Refugee Settlement in neighbouring Uganda three years ago to Kenya, now home to more than a million refugees from conflict-hit east African countries. A few kilometers (miles) away at the Kalobeyei Refugee Settlement, fellow Congolese refugee Bahati Musaba, a mother of five, said that since 2016, "UN agencies have supported my children's education - we get food and water and even medicine,' as well as cash support from WFP to buy food and other basics. This year, those cash transfers - and many other UN aid activities - have stopped, threatening to upend or jeopardize millions of lives. As the UN marks its 80th anniversary this month, its humanitarian agencies are facing one of the greatest crises in their history: The biggest funder - the United States - under the Trump administration and other Western donors have slashed international aid spending. Some want to use the money to build up national defence. Some UN agencies are increasingly pointing fingers at one another as they battle over a shrinking pool of funding, said a diplomat from a top donor country who spoke on condition of anonymity to comment freely about the funding crisis faced by some UN agencies. Such pressures, humanitarian groups say, diminish the pivotal role of the U.N. and its partners in efforts to save millions of lives - by providing tents, food and water to people fleeing unrest in places like Myanmar, Sudan, Syria and Venezuela, or helping stamp out smallpox decades ago. "It's the most abrupt upheaval of humanitarian work in the UN in my 40 years as a humanitarian worker, by far,' said Jan Egeland, a former UN humanitarian aid chief who now heads the Norwegian Refugee Council. "And it will make the gap between exploding needs and contributions to aid work even bigger.' UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has asked the heads of UN agencies to find ways to cut 20% of their staffs, and his office in New York has floated sweeping ideas about reform that could vastly reshape the way the United Nations doles out aid. Humanitarian workers often face dangers and go where many others don't - to slums to collect data on emerging viruses or drought-stricken areas to deliver water. The UN says 2024 was the deadliest year for humanitarian personnel on record, mainly due to the war in Gaza. In February, it suspended aid operations in the stronghold of Yemen's Houthi rebels, who have detained dozens of UN and other aid workers. Proponents say UN. aid operations have helped millions around the world affected by poverty, illness, conflict, hunger and other troubles. Critics insist many operations have become bloated, replete with bureaucratic perks and a lack of accountability, and are too distant from in-the-field needs. They say postcolonial Western donations have fostered dependency and corruption, which stifles the ability of countries to develop on their own, while often UN-backed aid programs that should be time-specific instead linger for many years with no end in sight. In the case of the Nobel Peace Prize-winning WFP and the UN's refugee and migration agencies, the US has represented at least 40% of their total budgets, and Trump administration cuts to roughly US$60 billion in US foreign assistance have hit hard. Each UN agency has been cutting thousands of jobs and revising aid spending. "It's too brutal what has happened,' said Egeland, alluding to cuts that have jolted the global aid community. "However, it has forced us to make priorities ... what I hope is that we will be able to shift more of our resources to the front lines of humanity and have less people sitting in offices talking about the problem.' With the UN Security Council's divisions over wars in Ukraine and the Middle East hindering its ability to prevent or end conflict in recent years, humanitarian efforts to vaccinate children against polio or shelter and feed refugees have been a bright spot of UN activity. That's dimming now. Aside from the cuts and dangers faced by humanitarian workers, political conflict has at times overshadowed or impeded their work. UNRWA, the aid agency for Palestinian refugees, has delivered an array of services to millions - food, education, jobs and much more - in Lebanon, Syria and Jordan as well as in the West Bank and Gaza since its founding in 1948. Israel claims the agency's schools fan antisemitic and anti-Israel sentiment, which the agency denies. Israel says Hamas siphons off U.N. aid in Gaza to profit from it, while UN officials insist most aid gets delivered directly to the needy. "UNRWA is like one of the foundations of your home. If you remove it, everything falls apart,' said Issa Haj Hassan, 38, after a checkup at a small clinic at the Mar Elias Palestinian refugee camp in Beirut. UNRWA covers his diabetes and blood pressure medication, as well as his wife's heart medicine. The United States, Israel's top ally, has stopped contributing to UNRWA; it once provided a third of its funding. Earlier this year, Israel banned the aid group, which has strived to continue its work nonetheless. Ibtisam Salem, a single mother of five in her 50s who shares a small one-room apartment in Beirut with relatives who sleep on the floor, said: "If it wasn't for UNRWA we would die of starvation. ... They helped build my home, and they give me health care. My children went to their schools.' Especially when it comes to food and hunger, needs worldwide are growing even as funding to address them shrinks. "This year, we have estimated around 343 million acutely food insecure people,' said Carl Skau, WFP deputy executive director. "It's a threefold increase if we compare four years ago. And this year, our funding is dropping 40%. So obviously that's an equation that doesn't come together easily.' Billing itself as the world's largest humanitarian organization, WFP has announced plans to cut about a quarter of its 22,000 staff. One question is how the United Nations remains relevant as an aid provider when global cooperation is on the outs, and national self-interest and self-defense are on the upswing. The United Nations is not alone: Many of its aid partners are feeling the pinch. Groups like GAVI, which tries to ensure fair distribution of vaccines around the world, and the Global Fund, which spends billions each year to help battle HIV, tuberculosis and malaria, have been hit by Trump administration cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development. Some private-sector, government-backed groups also are cropping up, including the divisive Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which has been providing some food to Palestinians. But violence has erupted as crowds try to reach the distribution sites. No private-sector donor or well-heeled country - China and oil-rich Gulf states are often mentioned by aid groups - have filled the significant gaps from shrinking U.S. and other Western spending. The future of UN aid, experts say, will rest where it belongs - with the world body's 193 member countries. "We need to take that debate back into our countries, into our capitals, because it is there that you either empower the U.N. to act and succeed - or you paralyze it,' said Achim Steiner, administrator of the U.N. Development Program. -- Chehayeb reported from Beirut and Keaten from Geneva. Associated Press writer Melina Walling in Hamburg, Germany, contributed to this report.


The Star
12 hours ago
- The Star
Taiwan welcomes Philippines' visa-free entry for tourists
FILE photo. A Taiwan national flag flutters near the Taipei 101 building at the National Dr Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hall in Taipei, Taiwan, May 7, 2023. - Photo: AP file MANILA: The Manila Economic and Cultural Office, the country's de facto embassy in Taiwan, announced on Thursday (June 19) that Taiwanese nationals will no longer need visas for 14-day tourism visits to the Philippines. The Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) 'sincerely welcomed' the development, noting this was done in the spirit of reciprocity since Taiwan extended its visa-free entry for Filipinos until July 31, 2026. 'The Philippines will now grant visa-free entry to Taiwanese nationals on the principle of reciprocity, facilitating the deepening of exchanges and cooperation between Taiwan and the Philippines in such domains as the economy, trade, investment, and tourism,' the MFA said in a statement. 'This fruitful outcome follows years of active coordination and negotiation between both governments and was made possible through the joint efforts of relevant government departments, the people of Taiwan, and [MFA] concrete implementation of integrated diplomacy,' the MFA added. No new requirements The only requirements for such visits are passports valid for at least six months, confirmed hotel accommodation, proof of financial capacity and a return ticket or a ticket for their next country of destination. But travels into the country lasting more than 14 days or for purposes other than tourism would require a visa. The MFA said improving travel convenience for Taiwanese nationals promotes interactions and exchanges between neighboring countries, which is one of the key priorities of their ministry. The MFA reminded all of its nationals to always abide by the local laws of the Philippines and to be mindful of their personal safety. - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN


Free Malaysia Today
14 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump says Iran has ‘maximum' 2 weeks to avert US air strikes
US President Donald Trump is mulling the prospect of joining the war on Israel's side. (AP pic) JERUSALEM : US President Donald Trump said today that Iran had a 'maximum' of two weeks to avoid possible American air strikes, as Israel claimed it has already set back Iran's presumed nuclear programme by at least two years. 'I'm giving them a period of time, and I would say two weeks would be the maximum,' Trump told reporters when asked if he could decide to strike Iran before that. He added that the aim was to 'see whether or not people come to their senses'. Trump's latest comments indicated he could take a decision before the fortnight deadline he set a day earlier, as he dismissed European efforts to end the conflict and said it would be 'very hard' to ask Israel to cease its attacks. 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this,' he said. A series of blasts were heard in Tehran yesterday as Israel kept up the massive wave of strikes it says is aimed at stopping Iran from developing nuclear weapons – an ambition Tehran has denied. 'According to the assessment we hear, we already delayed for at least two or three years the possibility for them to have a nuclear bomb,' Israel's foreign minister Gideon Saar said in an interview published today. Saar also said Israel's week-long onslaught will continue. 'We will do everything that we can do there in order to remove this threat,' he told German newspaper Bild. 'We already achieved a lot, but we will do whatever we can do. We will not stop until we will do everything that we can do there in order to remove this threat.' As Trump mulls the prospect of joining the war on Israel's side, top diplomats from Britain, France and Germany met their Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi in Geneva and urged him to resume talks with the US that had been derailed by Israel's attacks. French foreign minister Jean-Noel Barrot said: 'We invited the Iranian minister to consider negotiations with all sides, including the US, without awaiting the cessation of strikes, which we also hope for.' But Araghchi told NBC News after the meeting that 'we're not prepared to negotiate with them (the US) anymore, as long as the aggression continues'. Trump also said he was unlikely to ask Israel to stop its attacks to get Iran back to the table. 'If somebody's winning, it's a little bit harder to do,' he said. Any US involvement would likely feature powerful bunker-busting bombs that no other country possesses to destroy an underground uranium enrichment facility in Fordo. On the streets of Tehran, many shops were closed and normally bustling markets largely abandoned yesterday. Over 450 missiles fired Many shops were closed on the streets of Tehran yesterday. (AFP pic) Since Israel launched its offensive on Jun 13, targeting nuclear and military sites but also hitting residential areas, Iran has responded with barrages which Israeli authorities say have killed at least 25 people. A hospital in the Israeli port of Haifa reported 19 injured, including one person in serious condition, after the latest Iranian salvo. More than 450 missiles have been fired at the country so far, along with about 400 drones, according to Israel's national public diplomacy directorate. Iran said last Sunday that Israeli strikes had killed at least 224 people, including military commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians. It has not updated the toll since. A US-based non-governmental organisation (NGO), the Human Rights Activists News Agency, provided a toll yesterday based on its sources and media reports, saying at least 657 people have been killed in Iran, including 263 civilians. Israel's military said it struck missile launchers in southwestern Iran after overnight air raids on dozens of targets including a nuclear research centre. In Israel, sirens sounded in the afternoon after missiles were launched from Iran for the second time yesterday. Iran's Revolutionary Guards said they had targeted military sites and air force bases. Meanwhile, a US navy official said an aircraft carrier will be moved closer to the Middle East next week, making it the third in or near the region. 'Madness' 'This is a perilous moment, and it is hugely important that we don't see regional escalation of this conflict,' said Britain's foreign secretary David Lammy, who earlier stated 'Iran can never develop or acquire a nuclear weapon'. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said that while Iran is the only country without nuclear weapons to enrich uranium to 60%, there was no evidence it had all the components to make a functioning nuclear warhead. 'So saying how long it would take for them, it would be pure speculation because we do not know whether there was somebody… secretly pursuing these activities,' agency chief Rafael Grossi told CNN. 'We haven't seen that and we have to say it.' Arab League foreign ministers gathered in Istanbul late yesterday to discuss the war, Turkish state news agency Anadolu said, on the eve of a weekend gathering of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan warned the escalating confrontation is quickly reaching 'the point of no return', saying 'this madness must end as soon as possible'. Switzerland separately announced it was temporarily closing its embassy in Tehran, adding that it would continue to fulfil its role representing US interests in Iran.