Your VPN could be giving your browsing data to China, watchdog says
Using a free app to hide your internet traffic? The company behind it could be quietly tied to China, where the government maintains the ability to surveil all user data, according to a report published Thursday by the Technology Transparency Project.
The report accuses 17 Apps — six on Apple's App Store, four on the Google Play Store and seven on both — of having undisclosed ties to China. In several cases, the TTP linked the app developers to a prominent Chinese cybersecurity company, Qihoo 360, which is under U.S. government sanctions.
The apps are all virtual private networks, or VPNs, which allow a user to divert their internet traffic through a company's internet connection. With names like VPNify, Ostrich VPN and Now VPN, none of them make overt references to China or Chinese ownership on the app stores.
VPNs are primarily used to either protect a user's privacy by making it harder for a website to know who's visiting them, or to skirt around censorship measures. But unless a VPN company takes significant steps to automatically and permanently delete its users' search histories, a company is likely to keep records of its customers' internet activity.
That is particularly notable if the company is Chinese, as national law there stipulates that intelligence and law enforcement agencies do not need a warrant to view any personal data that is stored there.
'VPNs are of particular concern because anyone using a VPN has the entirety of their online activity routed through that application,' said Katie Paul, the TTP's director.
'When it comes to Chinese-owned VPNs, that means this data can be turned over to the Chinese government based on China's state laws,' Paul said.
Justin Sherman, a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council who studies data privacy, told NBC News that using a Chinese-owned VPN would be tantamount to handing over one's browsing history to Beijing.
'Capturing data via a VPN could let the Chinese government see everything from websites a person is reading that criticize the Chinese state, to the corporate databases and private portals that person might pull up (and then log into) on the internet for work,' he said.
The TTP, a tech-focused arm of the Campaign for Accountability, an investigative nonprofit that seeks to expose 'corruption, negligence, and unethical behavior,' previously published a report on Chinese VPN apps on April 1. Apple soon took down three of the apps with alleged ties to Qihoo 360: Thunder VPN, Snap VPN and Signal Secure VPN. The other apps — Turbo VPN and VPN Proxy Master, which are also available on the Google Play Store, as well as three others that Google offers — are all still available.
None of the apps are listed as being developed directly by Qihoo 360. Instead, they are developed by Singapore-based companies including Lemon Seed, Lemon Clove, Autumn Breeze and Innovative Connecting. The TTP cited business filings in China that show Qihoo 360 saying it had acquired those companies in 2019, and Corporate registration documents for those companies in the Cayman Islands from March that all list the director as a Chinese citizen who is a top Qihoo 360 employee.
NBC News reached out to developers listed for the 17 apps. Only two claimed not to have ties to China or Qihoo 360. Autumn Breeze, the developer of Snap VPN, which Apple previously removed but is still available on the Google Play store, told TTP it has "no affiliation with Qihoo 360" despite those registration documents, and claims it does not "record, monitor, or retain any user online activity."
"Autumn Breeze fails to explain clear connections to the sanctioned PLA-linked entity that are detailed in publicly available documents," Paul told NBC News.
The other is WireVPN, where an employee claimed in an email to NBC News that the company is 'an independent service' with 'no ties to Chinese entities or government organizations.'
'We are neither affiliated with Qihoo 360 nor any other PRC-based enterprises, and our operations are entirely autonomous,' the employee said.
However, WireVPN's privacy policy makes clear that users are expected to adhere to Chinese law and bans them from 'Violating the basic principles established by the Chinese Constitution' and 'Violating the traditional virtues of the Chinese nation, social morality, rational morality, and socialist spiritual civilization.'
Qihoo 360 didn't respond to a request for comment. But China Daily, a state-run newspaper, has reported that its cybersecurity clients include the Chinese military and 'at least eight ministries' of the Chinese government. In a 2016 press release, the company seemed to indicate it was in the VPN business, saying 'Qihoo 360 also provides users with secure access points to the Internet via its market leading web browsers and application stores.'
Both Apple and Google declined to address the specific apps that TTP highlighted as tied to Qihoo 360 and told NBC News that they follow U.S. laws regarding sanctions. Neither bans VPN app developers simply for following Chinese law.
Peter Micek, general counsel at Access Now, a tech policy and human rights advocacy nonprofit, told NBC News that he was surprised to see the tech companies had potentially overlooked a sanctioned company offering apps under innocuous developer names.
'It seems like this project has done the homework and due diligence that Apple and Google should have done, and it does seem like those ties would constitute indirect contact with, transactions with folks who are sanctioned,' he said. Tech companies can sometimes face significant fines for violating sanctions, Micek said.
Sanctions are put in place by the federal government as a penalty on foreign entities and individuals, preventing U.S. companies and individuals from doing business with them. They are often imposed after a foreign entity or individual is shown to have conducted some sort of condemned behavior or have links to condemned groups, such as cybercriminals or terrorist organizations. Qihoo 360 faced sanctions from the Commerce Department in 2020, which said the company could become involved in supplying materials to the Chinese military. The sanctions prevent American companies from exporting technology or software to Qihoo 360. It's not clear if app stores hosting apps tied to Qihoo could be in violation of those sanctions.
The Commerce Department did not respond to a request for comment.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
5 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
ROSEN, LEADING INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Reddit, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action
NEW YORK, June 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Reddit, Inc. (NYSE: RDDT) between October 29, 2024 and May 20, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 18, 2025. SO WHAT: If you purchased Reddit securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Reddit class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 18, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) changes in Google Search's algorithm and features like AI Overview were causing users to stop their query on Google search; (2) these algorithm changes were materially different than prior instances of reduced traffic to the Reddit website; (3) defendants were aware that the increase in the query term 'Reddit' on search engines was because users were getting the sought after answer from Google Search without having to go to Reddit, and not because they intended to visit Reddit; (4) this zero-click search reality was dramatically reducing traffic to Reddit in a manner Reddit was unable to overcome in the short term; and (5) defendants, therefore, lacked a reasonable basis for its outlook on user rates and advertising revenues. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the Reddit class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ——————————- Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected]
Engadget
an hour ago
- Engadget
Apple is reportedly considering the acquisition of Perplexity AI
Apple's executives are thinking of acquiring Perplexity AI both to get more talent and to be able to offer an AI-based search engine in the future, according to Bloomberg . Adrian Perica, Apple's head of mergers and acquisitions, has reportedly already talked about the idea with services SVP Eddy Cue and the company's top decision-makers with it comes to its AI efforts. It's early stages, however: Apple has yet to talk to Perplexity about a bid, and the internal talks may not even lead to a formal offer. The executives also reportedly discussed an alternative, wherein instead of buying Perplexity outright, it'll team up with the AI company instead. Either way, the idea is to develop an AI search engine powered by Perplexity and to integrate Perplexity's technology into Siri. While Apple has yet to make a formal offer, Bloomberg says it met several times with Perplexity over the past few months. In May, Cue revealed that Apple discussed a possible Safari-integration with Perplexity while on the stand for Google's ongoing Search antitrust case. Cue took the stand due to Apple's long-standing deal with Google to make its search engine the default on the iPhone. (In turn, Apple gets billions of dollars a year — $18 billion in 2021 — from the arrangement.) Cue didn't share any definitive plans, however, including the possibility of an acquisition. If regulators order Apple to end its partnership with Google, purchasing Perplexity would make it easier for the company to develop an AI-based search engine. In addition, it would allow the company to acquire talent needed to be able to catch up with other companies when it comes to artificial intelligence. Apple, like Meta, has been scouting for new AI talent. Bloomberg says it's even competing against the Facebook owner to hire Daniel Gross, the founder of AI company Safe Superintelligence Inc. The company does seem to need help to be able to release the AI features it wants to provide its users. A few months ago, for instance, Apple delayed the rollout of a more powerful Siri that was a key component of its original pitch for Apple Intelligence.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Could Nvidia's Projected 9% Annual Returns Through 2030 Be the Smartest Risk-Adjusted Play in Tech?
Nvidia, the dominant platform provider, offers excellent risk-adjusted returns with its expanding ecosystem moat. The company's transition from chip supplier to full-stack platform mirrors Apple's evolution from hardware to ecosystem dominance. A 9% annual return from a $3.5 trillion company beats speculative moonshots when considering the certainty of execution and multiple growth drivers. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Forget chasing the next artificial intelligence (AI) unicorn. While venture capitalists funnel billions into speculative start-ups, Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) continues to dominate the infrastructure powering the entire industry. A projected 9% annual return may not sound thrilling, but it could be the smartest risk-adjusted investment in tech this decade. According to Coatue Management, an American technology-focused investment firm, Nvidia's market cap could grow from $3.5 trillion today to $5.6 trillion by 2030, implying a 9.6% compound annual growth rate from current levels. That's a far cry from its recent hypergrowth, but it reflects a business that's maturing into its role as the backbone of the AI economy. Here's why Nvidia remains a compelling buy -- even as its pace of growth slows. Think of Nvidia as the Apple of AI. Just as the iPhone represents great hardware backed by an impenetrable ecosystem, Nvidia has built something far more valuable than fast chips -- it has created the core operating system for AI. The company's Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA) software platform has become the default language for AI development, with over 4 million developers now embedded in the ecosystem. Switching to a competitor means rewriting years of code, creating a switching cost that grows stronger every day. But Nvidia isn't stopping at software dominance. The company has systematically expanded into every layer of the AI stack. DGX Cloud lets companies rent AI supercomputers by the hour, democratizing access to massive computing power. New enterprise platforms help businesses deploy AI without armies of data scientists. The Omniverse platform powers everything from factory simulations to digital twins of entire cities, while the majority of automakers now rely on Nvidia's DRIVE platform for autonomous vehicle development. This isn't diversification for its own sake. Each new product strengthens the core GPU business. A company using Nvidia for robotics simulations naturally gravitates toward Nvidia chips for its data centers. The network effects compound with each customer. Yes, 9% annual returns sound pedestrian compared to Nvidia's recent rocket ride. But consider the mathematical reality -- when you're already generating $44 billion in quarterly revenue from a $3.5 trillion base, hypergrowth becomes virtually impossible. What matters is that this 9% comes with something venture-backed AI start-ups can't offer: Certainty. The company's Blackwell architecture was fully booked within months of launch, with shipments stretching into late 2025. In its most recent quarter, data center revenue surged 73% year over year to $39.1 billion, while gross margins -- excluding one-time charges -- hover above 70%. That's the kind of pricing power that competitors can only dream about. And with $54 billion in cash and marketable securities, Nvidia can weather any storm while continuing to invest aggressively. But here's what growth projections might be missing: Nvidia isn't just selling more chips to the same customers. It's expanding the entire AI market. Right now, AI remains largely confined to tech giants and cutting-edge enterprises -- not because of cost, but because of complexity. Nvidia's push to simplify deployment through easier tools, pre-trained models, and plug-and-play solutions removes the technical barriers. When every small business can implement AI without a team of engineers, the addressable market doesn't just grow -- it explodes. Think of local governments optimizing traffic patterns, small manufacturers predicting equipment failures, or family doctors using AI diagnostics. The market expansion opportunity dwarfs any competition concerns. Yes, Nvidia trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 34 -- a premium by traditional standards. And yes, Advanced Micro Devices is gaining ground while cloud giants like Microsoft and Alphabet are building their own AI chips. Meanwhile, U.S. export restrictions have cut off a significant portion of China-related revenue, removing an estimated $8 billion in near-term sales. But what's the alternative? Betting on early stage AI start-ups with no profits, no moat, and unproven demand? Nvidia's valuation isn't cheap, but it reflects something rare in tech: Dominance with durability. Wall Street keeps searching for the next big thing. But the best tech investment of the next decade may not come from a stealth start-up or a buzzy IPO. It's already here, hiding in plain sight. Nvidia, with its projected 9% annual returns, offers what's become rare in technology: Scale, certainty, and sustained innovation. While others gamble on speculative AI plays, Nvidia continues to compound wealth with the dependability of a utility and the velocity of a start-up. The AI revolution isn't slowing. It's accelerating. Every breakthrough, from autonomous vehicles to digital twins, reinforces Nvidia's grip on the infrastructure that powers it all. Sometimes the smartest move isn't chasing the next Nvidia. It's owning the one that already reshaped the future -- and is still just getting started. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. George Budwell has positions in Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Alphabet, Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Could Nvidia's Projected 9% Annual Returns Through 2030 Be the Smartest Risk-Adjusted Play in Tech? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
