logo
Middle East tensions push investors to weigh worst-case scenarios

Middle East tensions push investors to weigh worst-case scenarios

The escalating Iran-Israel conflict has mainly impacted oil markets, with Brent crude futures soaring 18% to US$79.04 since June 10. (EPA Images pic)
NEW YORK : Investors are mulling a host of different market scenarios should the US deepen its involvement in the Middle East conflict, with the potential for ripple effects if energy prices skyrocket.
They are honed in on the evolving situation between Israel and Iran, which have exchanged missile strikes, and are poised for action if the US decides to join Israel in its bombing campaign.
That would likely cause an initial selloff in equities and possible safe-haven bid for the dollar on concerns US military action against Iran would send inflation higher, dampening consumer confidence and lessening the chance of near-term interest rate cuts.
The move by the US to deploy B-2 bombers to Guam on Saturday has caught the attention of market participants. While the bombers could be used to deliver the 30,000-pound bombs able to destroy Iran's underground nuclear programme facilities, it is unclear whether the move is tied to Middle East events.
The move 'just underscores the administration's willingness to threaten to intervene,' said Mark Spindel, chief investment officer of Potomac River Capital LLC.
'I think this will help oil prices stay higher; the easy direction for them right now is up at this point,' Spindel added.
While US West Texas Intermediate crude prices (WTI) have climbed some 10% over the past week, the S&P 500 has been little changed, following an initial drop when Israel launched its attacks.
However, if attacks were to take out Iranian oil supply, 'that's when the market is going to sit up and take notice,' said Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B Riley Wealth.
'If you get disruption to supply of oil product on the global marketplace, that is not reflected in today's WTI price and that is where things get negative,' Hogan said.
The White House said on Thursday that President Donald Trump would decide on US involvement in the conflict in the next two weeks. Israeli officials, however, have told the Trump administration they do not want to wait the two weeks and that Israel could act alone before the deadline is up, two sources said.
Analysts at Oxford Economics modeled three scenarios, including a de-escalation in the conflict, a complete shutdown in Iranian production, and a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, 'each with increasingly large impacts on global oil prices,' the firm said in a note.
In the most severe case, global oil prices jump to around US$130 per barrel, driving US inflation near 6% by the end of this year, Oxford said in the note.
'Although the price shock inevitably dampens consumer spending because of the hit to real incomes, the scale of the rise in inflation and concerns about the potential for second-round inflation effects likely ruin any chance of rate cuts in the US this year,' Oxford said in the note.
Oil impact
The biggest market impact from the escalating conflict has been restricted to oil, with oil prices soaring on worries that the Iran-Israel conflict could disrupt supplies. Global benchmark Brent crude futures have risen as much as 18% since June 10, hitting a near five-month high of US$79.04 on Thursday.
The accompanying rise in investors' expectations for further near-term volatility in oil prices has outpaced the rise in volatility expectations for other major asset classes, including stocks and bonds.
But other asset classes, including stocks, could still feel the knock-on effects of higher oil prices, especially if there is a larger surge in oil prices if the worst market fears of supply disruptions come true, analysts said.
'Geopolitical tensions have been mostly ignored by equities, but they are being factored into oil,' Citigroup analysts wrote in a note.
'To us, the key for equities from here will come from energy commodity pricing,' they said.
Stocks unperturbed
US stocks have so far weathered rising Middle East conflict with little sign of panic. A more direct US involvement in the conflict could, however, spook markets, investors said.
As the days pass, Potomac River Capital's Spindel said, markets have become increasingly focused on the Middle East.
'The stock market can only digest one thing at a time, and right now we're all focused on if, whether and when the US enters this conflict.'
Economists warn that a dramatic rise in oil prices could damage a global economy already strained by Trump's tariffs.
Still, any pullback in equities might be fleeting, history suggests. During past prominent instances of Middle East tensions coming to a boil, including the 2003 Iraq invasion and the 2019 attacks on Saudi oil facilities, stocks initially languished but soon recovered to trade higher in the months ahead.
On average, the S&P 500 slipped 0.3% in the three weeks following the start of conflict, but was 2.3% higher on average two months following the conflict, according to data from Wedbush Securities and CapIQ Pro.
Dollar woes
An escalation in the conflict could have mixed implications for the US dollar, which has tumbled this year amid worries over diminished US exceptionalism.
In the event of US direct engagement in the Iran-Israel war, the dollar could initially benefit from a safety bid, analysts said.
'Traders are likely to worry more about the implicit erosion of the terms of trade for Europe, the UK, and Japan, rather than the economic shock to the US, a major oil producer,' Thierry Wizman, Global FX & Rates Strategist at Macquarie Group, said in a note.
But longer-term, the prospect of US-directed 'nation-building' would probably weaken the dollar, he said.
'We recall that after the attacks of 9/11, and running through the decade-long US presence in Afghanistan and Iraq, the USD weakened,' Wizman said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel strikes Tehran's Evin prison in largest attack yet; Iran warns US but holds fire — for now
Israel strikes Tehran's Evin prison in largest attack yet; Iran warns US but holds fire — for now

Malay Mail

time32 minutes ago

  • Malay Mail

Israel strikes Tehran's Evin prison in largest attack yet; Iran warns US but holds fire — for now

'Viva la liberdad!' Israeli minister posts with video of blast at prison Iran threatens retaliation against US, no action taken yet Oil prices barely budge on first day after US joins war TEL AVIV, June 23 — Israel targeted Evin prison in Tehran today, one of the most potent symbols of Iran's governing system, in what Israel called the most intense bombing yet of the Iranian capital, a day after the United States joined the war by blasting nuclear sites. Iran repeated earlier threats to retaliate against the United States. But it had yet to so in a meaningful way more than 24 hours after US bombers dropped 30,000-pound bunker-busters on its underground nuclear sites, while US President Donald Trump openly mused about overthrowing the Iranian government. Oil prices barely budged on the first trading day after the US joined the war, suggesting traders doubted Iran would follow through on threats to disrupt oil supplies from the Gulf. The Mizan news outlet of Iran's judiciary confirmed that the prison had been hit. It said part of the building was damaged but the situation was under control. A video posted by Israeli foreign minister Gideon Saar on X showed an explosion at a building with a sign identifying it as an entrance to Evin prison in northern Tehran and the accompanying words: 'Viva la libertad!' — Spanish for 'Long live liberty.' Reuters could not immediately verify the video. Evin has been the primary prison for housing political detainees and security prisoners, notably since Iran's 1979 revolution, and the site of executions that remain potent symbols for the opposition. It is where several high-profile foreign prisoners are also held. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz made clear that Israel was no longer limiting its attacks to its initial stated targets such as Iran's nuclear programme and missiles, and would go after the Tehran government's ability to maintain power. 'The IDF is currently striking, with unprecedented force, regime targets and governmental repression bodies in the heart of Tehran,' he said in a statement. There were conflicting reports on Iranian media about the full extent of strikes on Tehran, a city of 10 million people where much of the population has fled after 10 days of bombing. Tasnim news agency reported a strike at an electricity feeder station in the Evin neighbourhood. Power company Tavanir reported some areas in the capital saw electricity cuts. Iran's student news network reported that Shahid Beheshti University, one of the main universities in Tehran, had also been hit. The university's public relations office denied it. Limited options Since Trump joined Israel's campaign by dropping massive bunker-buster bombs on Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday morning, Iran has repeatedly threatened to retaliate. But while it has continued to fire missiles at Israel, it has yet to take action against the United States itself, either by firing at US bases or by targeting the 20 per cent of global oil shipments that pass near its coast at the mouth of the Gulf. 'Mr Trump, the gambler, you may start this war, but we will be the ones to end it,' Ebrahim Zolfaqari, spokesperson for Iran's Khatam al-Anbiya central military headquarters, said today in English in a recorded video statement. Trump's administration has repeatedly said that its aim is solely to destroy Iran's nuclear programme, not to open a wider war. But in a social media post yesterday, Trump spoke of toppling the hardline clerical rulers who have been Washington's principal foes in the Middle East since Iran's 1979 revolution. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' he wrote. Experts surveying commercial satellite imagery said it appeared that the US attack had severely damaged the site of Iran's Fordow nuclear plant, built inside a mountain. Trump called the strike a 'Bullseye!!!' 'Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran,' he wrote. More Israeli strikes Israel's airstrikes on Iran have met little resistance from Iranian defences since Israel launched its surprise attack on June 13, killing many of Iran's top commanders. In an apparent effort to limit panic, Iran has released few images of the damage since the initial days of the bombing. The internet has largely been down for days, making it difficult for information to circulate within Iran and abroad. The Israeli military said a missile launched from Iran early today had been intercepted by Israeli defences. Air raid sirens blared overnight in Tel Aviv and other parts of central Israel. But Iran's ability to retaliate is far more limited than a few months ago, since Israel inflicted defeat on Iran's most feared regional proxy force, Hezbollah in Lebanon. Iran's most powerful client ruler, Syria's Bashar al-Assad, fell soon after. Iran's most effective threat to hurt the West would be to restrict global oil flows from the Gulf, but oil prices have not shot up to crisis levels. After briefly jumping above US$80 (RM343) a barrel at the open, Brent crude futures were up just 0.5 per cent to US$77.38 in this morning's trading, having even at one point even been down on the morning. Prices are still above the level before Israel started its attacks this month. Traders said even that premium could fade. 'It's worth noting that the current geopolitical risk premium — now exceeding US$10 per barrel — cannot be sustained for long without a tangible supply disruption,' said Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy for Saxo Bank. Iranian lawmakers have discussed shutting the Strait of Hormuz that leads into the Gulf, though no decision has been taken. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio played down the threat. 'It's economic suicide for them if they do it. And we retain options to deal with that,' he said. — Reuters

Euro area bond yields edge up after US attacks on Iran nuclear sites
Euro area bond yields edge up after US attacks on Iran nuclear sites

Free Malaysia Today

time2 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Euro area bond yields edge up after US attacks on Iran nuclear sites

An Iranian closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the crucial conduit for 20% of global oil and gas shipments, has emerged as the key economic risk for markets. (EPA Images pic) LONDON : Euro zone government bond yields rose today as investors worry about the potential inflationary impact of an escalation in the Middle East but wait to see if Iran will retaliate against US attacks on its nuclear facilities. US President Donald Trump warned Tehran it would face more devastating attacks if it does not agree to peace. Markets were also awaiting the release of the flash composite purchasing managers' index for Germany and the euro area. German 10-year government bond yields, which serve as the benchmark for the wider euro zone, rose 2 basis points (bps) to 2.53%. The yield on benchmark US 10-year notes was up 2 bps at 4.40%. Oil prices jumped to their highest since January. Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg, said that a protracted disruption of oil and gas exports from the Gulf region 'seems unlikely'. An Iranian closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the crucial conduit for around 20% of global oil and gas shipments, is the key economic risk for most market watchers. 'However, trying to throttle energy exports from the Gulf region would be a high-risk strategy for Tehran,' Schmieding added, arguing that such a move would likely upset China and many other countries that do not usually side with the US. Money markets priced in a European Central Bank (ECB) deposit facility rate at 1.79% in December compared to 1.77% late Friday. The yield on two-year German government bonds – more sensitive to expectations for ECB policy rates – was up one bp at 1.87%. Italy's 10-year yields rose 1.5 bps to 3.54%. The Italian yield gap versus Bunds – a market gauge of the risk premium that investors demand to hold Italian debt – widened to 101 bps.

UN nuclear chief warns of ‘very significant' damage to Iran's underground facility Fordow
UN nuclear chief warns of ‘very significant' damage to Iran's underground facility Fordow

Malay Mail

time3 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

UN nuclear chief warns of ‘very significant' damage to Iran's underground facility Fordow

US used its biggest conventional bombs on nuclear sites Extent of underground damage at Fordow is unclear Iran said it would take 'special measures' on nuclear material Grossi said Iran must inform IAEA of such steps VIENNA, June 23 — US bombing probably caused 'very significant' damage to the underground areas of Iran's Fordow uranium enrichment plant dug into a mountain, though no one can yet tell the extent, UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said today. The United States dropped the biggest conventional bombs in its arsenal on Iranian nuclear facilities on Sunday, using those bunker-busting munitions in combat for the first time to try and eliminate sites including the Fordow uranium-enrichment plant dug into a mountain. 'At this time, no one, including the IAEA is in a position to have fully assessed the underground damage at Fordow,' Grossi said in a statement to an emergency meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency's 35-nation Board of Governors. The IAEA has not been able to carry out inspections in Iran since Israel started its military strikes on nuclear facilities there on June 13. 'Given the explosive payload utilised and the extreme(ly) vibration-sensitive nature of centrifuges, very significant damage is expected to have occurred,' Grossi added. Beyond the level of damage done to Fordow's underground enrichment halls, one of the biggest open questions is the status of its stock of enriched uranium, particularly its more than 400 kg of uranium enriched to up to 60 per cent purity, a short step from the roughly 90 per cent that is weapons grade. That is enough, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick, though Iran says its intentions are peaceful and it does not seek atom bombs. Iran did, however, inform the IAEA on June 13 that it would take 'special measures' to protect its nuclear materials and equipment that are under so-called IAEA safeguards, the oversight provided for by the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Grossi said. — Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store