UN nuclear chief warns of ‘very significant' damage to Iran's underground facility Fordow
US used its biggest conventional bombs on nuclear sites
Extent of underground damage at Fordow is unclear
Iran said it would take 'special measures' on nuclear material
Grossi said Iran must inform IAEA of such steps
VIENNA, June 23 — US bombing probably caused 'very significant' damage to the underground areas of Iran's Fordow uranium enrichment plant dug into a mountain, though no one can yet tell the extent, UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said today.
The United States dropped the biggest conventional bombs in its arsenal on Iranian nuclear facilities on Sunday, using those bunker-busting munitions in combat for the first time to try and eliminate sites including the Fordow uranium-enrichment plant dug into a mountain.
'At this time, no one, including the IAEA is in a position to have fully assessed the underground damage at Fordow,' Grossi said in a statement to an emergency meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency's 35-nation Board of Governors.
The IAEA has not been able to carry out inspections in Iran since Israel started its military strikes on nuclear facilities there on June 13.
'Given the explosive payload utilised and the extreme(ly) vibration-sensitive nature of centrifuges, very significant damage is expected to have occurred,' Grossi added.
Beyond the level of damage done to Fordow's underground enrichment halls, one of the biggest open questions is the status of its stock of enriched uranium, particularly its more than 400 kg of uranium enriched to up to 60 per cent purity, a short step from the roughly 90 per cent that is weapons grade.
That is enough, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick, though Iran says its intentions are peaceful and it does not seek atom bombs.
Iran did, however, inform the IAEA on June 13 that it would take 'special measures' to protect its nuclear materials and equipment that are under so-called IAEA safeguards, the oversight provided for by the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Grossi said. — Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Will Iran give US a 'political grenade'?
THE United States' strikes on Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday raised two major questions: how effective were they and what will Iran do next? US President Donald Trump said the air raids "totally obliterated" the main nuclear sites, calling them a "spectacular military success". So far, Teheran has given little away about its response, although Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the US had "crossed a very big red line". The US targeted Iran's three main nuclear sites, including Fordow, a uranium enrichment facility buried 90m underground. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said the strikes "devastated the Iranian nuclear programme". The extent of the damage has not been confirmed, but there is speculation nuclear material had already been moved away. Heloise Fayet, a nuclear expert at the Institut Francais des Relations Internationales, said satellite images showing activity around Fordow "suggests enriched uranium stock may therefore have been transferred to sites not monitored by the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency)". "We previously had knowledge, albeit imperfect, of the programme thanks to the agency's inspections; now no inspections are possible," she said. "As for Iran's technical expertise, it cannot be destroyed, knowing that thousands of people have participated in Iran's nuclear programme." Andreas Krieg, a senior lecturer at King's College London, called the US action a "high-risk operation that delivers unpredictable outcomes", given the facility was deep underground. "Trump has been using OSINT (open-source intelligence) accounts to say Fordow is gone while the Iranians claim there is only surface-level destruction." Ali Vaez, Iran project director for the International Crisis Group, said destroying Fordow "won't necessarily end Iran's nuclear programme". "Teheran has produced hundreds of advanced centrifuges in the past few years that are stored in unknown locations," he said. According to Krieg, Iran will seek a "calibrated response — loud enough to resonate, but measured enough to contain". Michael A. Horowitz, a geopolitics and security analyst, said its options included attacking US assets, closing the Strait of Hormuz — a vital conduit for the world oil trade — or even attacking energy facilities in the Gulf, which hosts several US military bases. "None of those are good options that achieve anything — this is mostly about saving face," he posted on X. "The risks, on the other hand, are great." However, Horowitz said there were other ways to respond, including a limited retaliation against the US before returning to strikes against Israel and finally negotiating a settlement. The Iranian government now realised its very existence was at stake, said Renad Mansour, senior research fellow at the Chatham House think tank, casting it back to the days of the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq war. "It's survival mode," he said, predicting "more violence" in the short term with the prospect of a "managed de-escalation" and eventual negotiations. Hamidreza Azizi, visiting fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, said Iran might allow Trump a "symbolic win" and retaliate against Israeli targets instead. "This keeps Washington out of the war while intensifying pressure on Tel Aviv. The risk of drawing the US further in would now rest on Trump's next move," he posted on X. "If Trump continues to strike Iran without new provocation, it looks more like going to war on Israel's behalf. That's politically costly, given domestic opposition to war with Iran." Meanwhile, Iran could deny knowledge of what happened to its enriched uranium, avoiding IAEA inspections, and later leave the Nuclear Non-Profiferation Treaty. "Trump may have scored a tactical win but if Iran plays this smart, they hand him a political grenade, all while shifting the nuclear game into murkier, more dangerous territory," wrote Hamidreza.
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
IAEA urges halt to military operations in Iran to allow inspections
BERLIN: Military operations in Iran must be stopped to allow inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to safely access nuclear facilities and assess the situation on the ground, Russian news agency TASS reported, citing IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi. "There needs to be a cessation of hostilities for the necessary safety and security conditions to prevail so that Iran can let IAEA teams into the sites to assess the situation. "IAEA inspectors are in Iran and they are ready," Grossi said during an emergency meeting of the IAEA Board of Governors. Grossi stressed that establishing the facts on the ground is a prerequisite for any agreement - and this can only be achieved through IAEA inspections. He acknowledged that while Iran has the right to take emergency measures to protect its nuclear facilities, such actions must be carried out per the country's obligations to the agency. Grossi said any transfer of nuclear materials or related equipment within Iran must be formally notified to the IAEA. He added that inspectors must first verify the status of 400 kilogrammes of uranium enriched to 60 per cent. Grossi also noted that Iran had informed the agency of its plans to implement special measures to safeguard nuclear materials and equipment in the event of a threat. He thanked Iranian authorities for their cooperation in monitoring the condition of the country's nuclear facilities, and also expressed appreciation to the relevant United Nations bodies. On the night of June 22, the United States military launched airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities - Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. US President Donald Trump has called on Tehran to agree to end the conflict. Since June 13, Israel has been conducting daily attacks in Iran as part of an operation targeting the country's nuclear programme. — BERNAMA
New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Russia ready to assist Iran amid Middle East escalation
ISTANBUL: Russia is ready to assist Iran in various ways amid the ongoing escalation in the Middle East, depending on Tehran's needs, the Kremlin said on Monday. According to Anadolu Agency, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia had offered mediation, but it would depend on what Iran required. "We have stated our position; this is also a very important manifestation — a form of support for the Iranian side," he said. Israel and Iran have been engaged in aerial combat since June 13, when Tel Aviv launched a surprise attack on several sites across Iran, including military and nuclear facilities, prompting retaliatory strikes from Tehran. Meanwhile, the United States struck three main Iranian nuclear sites early Sunday, with US President Donald Trump claiming severe damage to the facilities and their "obliteration." Commenting on the meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Moscow, Peskov said the talks would allow both sides to exchange views and give Tehran an opportunity to convey its proposals and position on the current situation. Peskov added that the growing number of actors involved in the conflict was deeply regrettable and condemned by Russia. "Iran was repeatedly discussed between Putin and Trump during their recent conversations, but the Russian president was not informed of Sunday's strikes. "We believe that the fate of a country's leadership should be decided by its own people — not by third countries or their leaders," he said, in response to a question about Trump's remarks regarding regime change in Iran. He added that the US strikes would not affect dialogue between Moscow and Washington, as these were "independent processes". "It remains to be seen what happened to these nuclear facilities, and whether there is a radiation hazard. Although the IAEA has said there are currently no signs of radiation contamination, these developments are, of course, cause for legitimate concern," Peskov said. — BERNAMA
