Google, Amazon, Others Respond to Senators' Inquiry About Funding CSAM Via Ads
Under pressure from bipartisan lawmakers, Google, Amazon, and other major ad industry players have shared the actions they're taking after they inadvertently helped facilitate advertising on a site known to host child sexual abuse material (CSAM).
Amazon has issued refunds to advertising customers whose ads appeared on the website. Google has blocked advertising on the site but did not clarify whether it will reimburse advertisers who were affected.
"We have always strictly prohibited ads that we serve from appearing next to content of this nature–this was a clear breach of our policies," Amazon's vice president of public policy Brian Huseman wrote in a letter addressed to Senators Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), obtained by ADWEEK.
Earlier this month, the two senators demanded answers from the tech giants and other advertising groups after an Adalytics report found that, through advertising networks operated by Google and Amazon, ads from Fortune 500 brands appeared on an image-hosting site and a sister site that had been flagged by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) for publishing CSAM.
In his letter to lawmakers, Amazon's Huseman said the company "immediately blocked these websites from any further ads through our systems." The company has refunded all advertisers whose messages appeared on pages on the site in question, ibb.co and the associated img.bb, he said.
Only "a tiny portion of advertising spend for a small number of advertisers" was impacted, and the company has refunded all advertisers whose content appeared on the website in question, an Amazon spokesperson told ADWEEK.
"We regret that this occurred and took swift action to block these websites from showing our ads," the spokesperson added. "We have strict policies in place against serving ads on content of this nature, and we are taking additional steps to help ensure this does not happen in the future."
Meanwhile, in a response to senators issued by Google's head of U.S. federal government affairs and public policy, Anne Wall, the company said it has "invested significant resources-in technology, specialized teams, and time-to deterring, detecting, removing, and reporting child sexual exploitation content and behavior."
Google said it demonetized ibb.co in January 2024, and the site has generated no ad revenue since then. The associated imgbb.com, the company said, was demand-restricted last July, meaning that most ads were already disallowed on Google's ad network. Google fully demonetized imgbb.com when it learned about the forthcoming Adalytics report.
The company also emphasized its strict publisher monetization policies, enforcement measures, and advertiser controls. Google did not announce any policy or product changes, but said it will "continue to holistically evaluate our processes to determine whether any additional steps should be taken."
Google declined a request for comment and did not respond to questions about whether it would reimburse affected advertisers.
The senators also questioned verification vendors DoubleVerify and Integral Ad Science (IAS) over apparent brand safety failures, as well as the Media Rating Council (MRC) and the Trustworthy Accountability Group (TAG), which issued stamps of approval for their technology.
All six organizations-Google, Amazon, DoubleVerify, IAS, the MRC, and TAG-have responded to senators' inquiries in letters obtained by ADWEEK.
In its letter, DoubleVerify claimed that its tools function based on advertiser preferences and that technical limitations contributed to ads appearing alongside explicit content on the site in question.
Following the scandal, DoubleVerify has rolled out a handful of brand safety updates, expanded its blocklists, and begun working more closely with law enforcement and NCMEC to enhance detection and prevention measures. The firm has also enabled access to full URL-level reporting for clients, which allows brands to understand the exact pages on which their ads appear, not just the domains.
IAS, for its part, said it has blacklisted the flagged domains-which it found represented less than 0.00025% of its monitored impressions-and is reassessing how it classifies image-hosting sites. The verification company also outlined limitations in monitoring image-only pages, but reaffirmed its commitment to industry safety standards.
Earlier this month, IAS also expanded its exclusion list, adding domains flagged in five years of NCMEC reports. It's also improving its user-generated content filtering tech and boosting URL-level reporting to improve transparency for advertisers.
"We are committed to working in partnership with the industry and other companies to reduce the proliferation of bad actors while preserving the open internet," wrote IAS CEO Lisa Utzschneider.
Meanwhile, MRC head George Ivie took the opportunity to explain that both DoubleVerify and IAS hold MRC accreditation for 'Property Level Ad Verification,' which examines text and keywords rather than visual content. This distinction is significant, he said, as the CSAM-hosting site in question typically contains minimal text, making the content undetectable through current accredited methods.
Moving forward, Ivie wrote, "MRC encourages services to submit Content Level Brand Safety products for audit and accreditation." He also said MRC will consider strengthening disclosure requirements about the limitations of current verification technologies.
In a 23-page response to senators signed by vice president of policy and compliance Todd Miller, TAG claimed to be "the leading global initiative fighting criminal activity and increasing trust in the digital advertising industry."
The company pushed back against Blackburn's and Blumenthal's broad labeling of platforms as 'CSAM sites' merely for receiving NCMEC notifications, adding that operating on this standard would have negative implications for user-generated content platforms like Amazon, Facebook, Pinterest, X, and others.
TAG said it has reached out to NCMEC to "understand whether there is a list or tool providing actionable intelligence that TAG and its member companies could employ to ensure the avoidance of association with or monetization of CSAM content."
In the fallout since the initial report was published, the MRC and TAG have come under fire from ad industry leaders who view their approaches as insufficiently stringent.
The six letters from industry players have not been published publicly.
DoubleVerify, IAS, MRC and TAG did not respond to requests for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TechCrunch
37 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Moratorium on state AI regulation clears Senate hurdle
A Republican effort to prevent states from enforcing their own AI regulations cleared a key procedural hurdle on Saturday. The rule, as reportedly rewritten by Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz in an attempt to comply with budgetary rules, would withhold federal broadband funding from states if they try to enforce AI regulations in the next 10 years. And the rewrite seems to have passed muster, with the Senate Parliamentarian now ruling that the provision is not subject to the so-called Byrd rule — so it can be included in Republicans' 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' and passed with a simple majority, without potentially getting blocked by a filibuster, and without requiring support from Senate Democrats. However, it's not clear how many Republicans will support the moratorium. For example, Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee recently said, 'We do not need a moratorium that would prohibit our states from stepping up and protecting citizens in their state.' And while the House of Representatives already passed a version of the bill that included a moratorium on AI regulation, far-right Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene subbsequently declared that she is 'adamantly OPPOSED' the provision as 'a violation of state rights' and said it needs to be 'stripped out in the Senate.' House Speaker Mike Johnson defended the provision by saying it had President Donald Trump's support and arguing, 'We have to be careful not to have 50 different states regulating AI, because it has national security implications, right?' In a recent report, Americans for Responsible Innovation (an advocacy group for AI regulation), wrote that 'the proposal's broad language could potentially sweep away a wide range of public interest state legislation regulating AI and other algorithmic-based technologies, creating a regulatory vacuum across multiple technology policy domains without offering federal alternatives to replace the eliminated state-level guardrails.' Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW A number of states do seem to be taking steps toward AI regulation. In California, Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed a high-profile AI safety bill last year while signing a number of less controversial regulations around issues like privacy and deepfakes. In New York, an AI safety bill passed by state lawmakers is awaiting Governor Kathy Hochul's signature. And Utah has passed its own regulations around AI transparency.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Senate Can Keep Ban on State AI Rules in Trump Tax Bill
(Bloomberg) -- A Republican effort to block US states from enforcing new artificial intelligence regulations will remain in President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending package for now, marking a win for tech companies pushing to stall and override dozens of AI safety laws across the country. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports In a surprise decision, Democrats said the Senate parliamentarian ruled the provision aligns with the special budgetary process Republicans are using to consider the tax package. That process allows the GOP to avoid making concessions to Democrats, who otherwise could filibuster legislation. The Senate version of the AI moratorium would deny states federal funding for broadband internet projects if they enforce AI regulations. The provision will likely still be challenged on the Senate floor, where stripping the provision would need just a simple majority. Some Republicans in both the House and Senate have pushed back on the AI provision. 'We do not need a moratorium that would prohibit our states from stepping up and protecting citizens in their state,' Tennessee Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn said last week. Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough has advised lawmakers that many other provisions have failed to pass muster for the budget process, including language requiring state matching funds for food stamps and a requirement that people suing the federal government post enormous bonds to obtain temporary restraining orders, Democrats said. Republicans are racing to pass the fiscal package by July 4, with Senate leaders planning to vote on it this week. The bills' provisions are being litigated by staff in a closed-door process, with Senate Budget Committee Democrats releasing periodic updates to the media. The AI provision would benefit many of the US's largest tech and AI companies, some of which have lobbied against a state-by-state 'patchwork' of rules governing AI. California, New York, Utah and dozens of others have introduced or enacted AI laws in recent years, including bills to address concerns about data privacy, copyright and bias. Congress has yet to pass a federal framework on AI, which has effectively left the states to figure out how to set rules around the technology. The House passed its version of the bill, which would impose a 10-year moratorium on any state law regulating artificial intelligence or automated decision systems. House Speaker Mike Johnson said June 9 that the AI provision had the full backing of the White House, including AI and crypto czar David Sacks. More than 200 state lawmakers from both parties urged Congress to scrap the measure, which could have nullified a wide range of consumer protection laws on topics including children's online safety, generative AI harms, and government AI adoption and deployment, according to the AI safety think tank Center for Responsible Innovation. Senate Republicans also made progress on the broader bill as the Joint Committee on Taxation — the key congressional scorekeeper on tax matters — found the new tax provisions in the bill would add a net $441 billion to deficits through 2034. The Senate GOP's preferred 'current policy' baseline assumes that trillions of dollars in expiring Trump tax cuts are free. The score gives lawmakers room to negotiate final agreements on the broader package, including setting the level of the state and local tax deduction and how fast to end green energy tax credits. --With assistance from Erik Wasson. Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Iran strikes draw reactions from Mid-South leaders
MEMPHIS, Tenn. — Political leaders who represent the Mid-South are responding after President Donald Trump announced the bombing of three nuclear sites in Iran. On Saturday evening, Trump announced that the United States had completed a 'very successful attack' on the Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan nuclear sites in Iran. Trump claimed that a 'payload of bombs' was dropped on Fordow. US bombs three Iran nuclear sites, entering war Soon after the announcement, leaders from the Mid-South began releasing statements on the attack. Tennessee Governor Bill Lee called the move a 'courageous decision to seek peace through strength.' '@MariaLeeTN and I pray earnestly for the safety of our troops across the Middle East and for the sovereignty of Israel,' Lee posted on X. Congressman David Kustoff celebrated the strike, saying in part, 'This victory was executed with precision by our great U.S. military.' Tennessee Senator Marsha Blackburn said that the attack is a 'victory for the United States' and that Trump 'knows peace can only be achieved through strength.' Tennessee State Senator London Lamar disagreed with the attack, citing the 'lack of congressional authorization at the time of the strike.' Lamar released a lengthy statement on Saturday. I am deeply alarmed by the U.S. decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan on today. President Trump described the strikes as 'very successful,' conducted by B‑2 stealth bombers . While the military objective was to disrupt Iran's nuclear capabilities, this action marks a dangerous escalation: the United States has now entered a war that was previously between Israel and Iran . I am profoundly concerned about the lack of congressional authorization at the time of the strike—raising serious constitutional and democratic questions . Beyond the legal issues, this military strike risks triggering a broader regional conflict. Iran is already signaling retaliatory measures, and key international actors have warned that further escalation could be catastrophic. I urge our leaders to pursue immediate diplomatic channels, work through international institutions, and seek de-escalation to prevent this from spiraling into a full-scale war. Military action should be a last resort—not a first. Mississippi Senator Roger Wicker supported the decision. 'Our commander-in-chief has made a deliberate —and correct— decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime,' Wicker posted on X. 'We now have very serious choices ahead to provide security for our citizens and our allies and stability for the Middle East.' Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton stated that Iran 'has waged a war of terror against the United States for 46 years' and urged that 'We could never allow Iran to get nuclear weapons.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
