Trump travel ban targets nations mired in civil wars or armed conflicts
When President Donald Trump announced his new and expanded travel ban this week, the list of countries facing restrictions exhibited few obvious through lines. A closer look, though, reveals that many of the countries are united by a harsh recent history of civil war or armed conflict.
Of the 12 countries from which travel is fully restricted, three are embroiled in bloody civil wars: Yemen, Myanmar and Sudan.
Myanmar is considered among the most extreme conflicts in the world because of the number of armed groups involved in the civil war there, ranking behind only Gaza and the West Bank in an assessment by Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED), a nonprofit analysis and crisis-mapping project. The country's military has faced an intense internal conflict since forcibly seizing power in 2021 and only controls about 21 percent of the country, according to the Council on Foreign Relations.
ACLED lists Sudan as the eighth-most extreme conflict zone amid a ruinous civil war between the country's army and a rival paramilitary force. The fighting has led to more than 150,000 fatalities and a mass humanitarian crisis that numbers among the worst in the world.
Yemen, considered by ACLED to have high but not extreme levels of conflict, has been threatened by the presence of Houthi militants. The Trump administration re-designated the Houthis as a foreign terrorist organization in early March.
These conflicts and others around the world have prompted mass migration from the violence and into neighboring countries or places deemed to be more stable — sometimes prompting political backlash aimed at refugees. In some cases, migrants don't have homes to return to or cannot return because of instability or the presence of a hostile regime.
Many of the remaining countries on the total-ban list — Afghanistan, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya and Somalia — are also undergoing conflicts of varying degrees of intensity.
In Haiti, the government is struggling to regain authority after gangs seized vast control of its capital, Port-au-Prince. Ten percent of the Haitian population has been displaced as a result of gang violence. Neighboring Dominican Republic implemented a plan in 2024 for mass deportations of Haitians back across the border.
Haiti's Foreign Affairs Ministry said in a statement Thursday that it was working to find a swift solution to the ban, given the consequences on Haitian families living inside and outside the country.
'This decision comes at a moment when the Haitian government is striving, with the help of its international partners, to fight the insecurity and to strengthen border security,' it said.
In Somalia, a fractious government emerging from a multi-decade legacy of civil war, is seeking assistance from international partners to fight against al-Shabab insurgents, who are global affiliates of al-Qaeda. The group, which previously led a fatal assault on a U.S. airfield in Kenya, has retaken crucial areas from Somali forces over the past three months.
Farther north in Africa, Libya is at risk of political instability over its oil fields, just five years out from a six-year civil war that broke the country in two.
In most cases, the White House cited visa overstays as the justification for putting countries on a full travel ban, including Muslim-majority nations such as Iran, Somalia and Yemen. While the overstay rate was high in some instances, the total number of visas issued was relatively small, The Washington Post reported. It was not immediately clear why some countries with higher overstay rates were left off.
A handful of countries impacted by the ban — including Cuba, Venezuela and Iran — were tied together by historically adversarial relationships with the United States. Human rights organizations condemned the move, referencing the confusion and turmoil that was suffered under the first Trump administration's travel ban.
'This brings back all the tragic stories … people who were unable to see a dying relative or the birth of a new child and had to attend weddings on Zoom,' Jamal Abdi, the president of the National Iranian American Council, a U.S.-based advocacy group, previously told The Post.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court sides with Trump on National Guard deployment in LA
The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has sided with President Donald Trump after California Governor Gavin Newsom sued his administration for deploying 4,000 National Guard troops during mass anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles that erupted earlier this month. 'We conclude that it is likely that the president lawfully exercised his statutory authority' by deploying the Guard, the appeals court wrote in a ruling late Thursday. The judges cited a federal law allowing the federalization of the Guard when 'the president is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.' Additionally, the judges wrote that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth notifying the Adjutant General of the California National Guard, 'likely satisfied the statute's procedural requirement that federalization orders be issued 'through' the Governor.' The appeals court order indefinitely blocks a previous order from U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer. Breyer ruled last Thursday that Trump's actions 'were illegal—both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.' 'He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith,' the judge wrote. The Trump administration quickly appealed Breyer's order, prompting the appeals court to temporarily pause the ruling the same night Breyer handed it down. During a previous hearing before Breyer, an attorney for California claimed the Trump administration was attempting a 'dangerous expansion of executive power' with its deployment of the Guard. Trump's team argued that the president rightfully used his powers as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, and it communicated its orders to the state official responsible for the Guard. At one point in the hearing, Breyer suggested political leaders making decisions without checks and balances were more like the king against whom the 13 colonies revolted during the American Revolution. 'That's the difference between a Constitutional government and King George,' Breyer said, per Politico. 'It's not that a leader can simply say something and it becomes it.' The Independent's Alex Woodward contributed reporting.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance bolts from DC to review the troops deployed by Trump in LA over ICE raid protests
Vice President JD Vance is traveling to Los Angeles Friday on a last-minute tour of facilities established for the Trump administration's mass deportation push and the crackdown on protests against those efforts using National Guard soldiers and active duty Marines. Vance's office said he will fly to the country's second-largest city on Friday to 'tour a multi-agency Federal Joint Operations Center, a Federal Mobile Command Center, meet with leadership and Marines and deliver brief remarks.' The announcement of his visit to California was made on Friday morning, and Vance's office did not release any information on the exact timing of his departure from Washington nor that of his planned arrival in California or the venue for his remarks. Although the White House traditionally makes the president and vice president's schedule public during travel within the United States, a source familiar with the administration's plans said the last-minute nature of the announcements and the lack of information about the trip was due to what they described as safety concerns. Vance's visit to the country's second-largest city comes less than a day after the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals sided with the Trump administration by allowing President Donald Trump to maintain control over 4,000 National Guard soldiers called into federal service as a result of mass protests against the Trump administration's immigration enforcement efforts. California Gov. Gavin Newsom had filed a lawsuit seeking to return the Guard to state control, arguing that Trump was bound to issue orders through him as the state's chief executive, and U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer had previously issued an order directing the Guard back under Newsom's control after he found that Trump's actions 'were illegal—both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.' After hearing the government's appeal, the judges said Trump could maintain control while the case moves forward, citing a federal law allowing the federalization of the Guard when 'the president is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.' They wrote that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth notifying the Adjutant General of the California National Guard, 'likely satisfied the statute's procedural requirement that federalization orders be issued 'through' the Governor.' The Trump administration is expected to continue aggressive deportation efforts in Los Angeles, as well as other large cities run by Democratic mayors as part of what the president has described as an effort to punish those cities for their failure to implement harsh anti-immigrant policies. In a Truth Social post on Sunday, Trump said he was ordering Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials to 'expand efforts to detain and deport Illegal Aliens in America's largest Cities, such as Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York, where Millions upon Millions of Illegal Aliens reside." "These, and other such Cities, are the core of the Democrat Power Center, where they use Illegal Aliens to expand their Voter Base, cheat in Elections, and grow the Welfare State, robbing good paying Jobs and Benefits from Hardworking American Citizens," the president added.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Nebraska federal delegation supports defending Israel, even if it means U.S. joins war with Iran
Israel has asked the Trump administration to broaden the U.S. involvement in the war in order to eliminate Iran's nuclear program. (Courtesy of U.S. Navy, Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Janweb B. Lagazo) LINCOLN — As President Donald Trump decides whether the U.S. will play a larger role in the decades-long conflict between Israel and Iran, the Nebraska federal delegation says it will support whatever the president decides. Israel launched an attack last week with aerial attacks in Iran's capital targeting its nuclear and military infrastructure. Since then, Israel and Iran have continued to exchange bomb strikes with no end in sight. Israel has asked the Trump administration to broaden U.S. involvement in the war to eliminate Iran's nuclear program. The Nebraska federal delegation says they support Trump's handling of the conflict and that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon, though there's no public evidence that Iran is currently building one. U.S. intelligence officials have said Iran could shift toward producing a nuclear weapon. Unlike other federal lawmakers and some prominent populist pundits, the delegation hasn't joined in the Republican rift between isolationists and the more hawkish wings of the Trump coalition. Omaha-based 2nd Congressional District Rep. Don Bacon hinted at a preference as he told the Nebraska Examiner, 'It is preferable for us to stay out of the offensive operations over Iran and reduce risk of escalation.' Bacon said it depends on whether Iran stops its 'nuclear weapons program' and whether Israeli forces can destroy the country's nuclear facilities on their own. The reason Israeli officials are lobbying for more U.S. involvement is because only the U.S. has the military capacity to destroy more of Iran's nuclear program with its 30,000-pound bombs – often referred to as 'bunker busters.' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday that his country has the capability to achieve its goals alone. 'We may have no other choice than to finish the job,' Bacon said. 'A nuclear-armed Iran is a dire threat to America and our allies.' After days of speculation and conflicting reporting, White House's Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump would decide over the next two weeks whether the U.S. will strike Iran. Leavitt also told reporters that Iran 'has never been closer to a nuclear weapon.' 'Iran has all that it needs to achieve a nuclear weapon … All they need is a decision from the supreme leader to do that, and it would take a couple of weeks to complete the production of that weapon,' Leavitt said. In March, the U.S. intelligence community said Iran was not building a nuclear weapon, according to the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard. Trump dismissed her comments this week, saying he doesn't 'care what she thinks' and believes Iran is 'very close to having one.' U.S. Rep Mike Flood, R-Neb., who represents eastern Nebraska's 1st District, said he supports Trump on this 'significant decision,' because he has access to intel that could help inform America's strategy in the conflict. 'We must ensure that Iran never gets a nuclear weapon,' Flood said. U.S. Rep. Adrian Smith, who represents Nebraska's largely rural 3rd District, said, 'If Iran's nuclear ambitions were realized, it would be catastrophic for both Israel and the United States.' Because of recent developments in the conflict, U.S. intelligence officials have said Iran could shift toward producing a nuclear weapon if the U.S. attacked its central nuclear facility or if Israel killed the nation's supreme leader. But it would take months, not days — as Israel's intelligence claims — to make a weapon. U.S. Sen. Pete Ricketts told Fox News earlier this week that Trump would 'absolutely' have his support to use military action if negotiations failed. Ricketts also told reporters Wednesday that the decision should be Trump's. U.S. Sen. Deb Fischer said the U.S. 'must continue to stand strong with Israel as [it works] to ensure that Iran does not acquire a nuclear weapon.' Even Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen released a video on social media emphasizing that 'it is imperative for global peace that Iran never possesses a nuclear weapon,' and he had to cancel a scheduled trip to Israel because of the renewed conflict. The possible threat of an autocrat having access to a weapon of mass destruction could lead to the widening of another foreign war, like the precursor to the invasion of Iraq over two decades ago. The newly established two-week timeline from the White House gives more time for diplomacy as Europe makes a late push to de-escalate the conflict. 'I fully support our defensive operations helping Israelis shoot down Iranian missiles and drones. I also support Israel's actions to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons that would threaten all of us. It is preferable for us to stay out of the offensive operations over Iran and reduce risk of escalation. But if it turns out that only our bunker-busting bombs can destroy the deep underground nuclear facilities and that Iran refuses to stop its nuclear weapons program, then we may have no other choice then to finish the job. A nuclear-armed Iran is a dire threat to America and our allies.' – U.S. Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb. 'We must be clear-eyed about the threat posed by Iran and adversaries globally and on the home front … I am grateful President Trump and negotiators from his administration have been robustly engaged in neutralizing Iran's nuclear program and Iran's funding for its allied enemies of Israel. If Iran's nuclear ambitions were realized, it would be catastrophic for both Israel and the United States, who their leaders have sworn to destroy.' – U.S. Rep. Adrian Smith, R-Neb., from a recent column 'I support President Trump as he weighs this significant decision. He has access to intel that will help inform America's strategy — we must ensure that Iran never gets a nuclear weapon.' — U.S. Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb. 'As President Trump weighs all options on the table, we must continue to stand strong with Israel as they work to ensure that Iran does not acquire a nuclear weapon.' — U.S. Sen. Deb Fischer, R-Neb. 'We cannot allow Iran to have an enrichment program or to be able to get a nuclear bomb and Iran was just using the same old tactics of delaying the peace talks,' — U.S. Sen. Pete Ricketts, R-Neb. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
