CNN star Kaitlan Collins has heated exchange with President Trump aboard Air Force One

Donald Trump took aim at CNN's Kaitlan Collins after being hit with a series of questions about the conflict erupting between Israel and Iran.
The flurry of questions were floated aboard Air Force One Monday afternoon after Trump left the G7 summit early.
As he did, the president urged on social media, 'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!'
Collins's first question honed in on a separate Trump Truth Social post - one that saw Trump slam theories he'd left to secure a 'ceasefire'.
Collins pressed the president to 'elaborate' on what he was working on instead.
At a point, the Trump cut a persistent Collins off to say, 'Who else has a question other than CNN fake news?', as the correspondent continued to pepper him with questions.
A hectic back-and-forth ensued, in full view of other journalists.
'We're not looking for a ceasefire,' Trump first told Collins. 'I didn't say it was going to be a ceasefire… I think we're looking for better than a ceasefire.'
'Do you plan to send the vice president and [Special Envoy, Steve Witkoff?' Collins, 35, asked, speaking over other journalists.
An increasingly impatient Trump, 79, shot back: 'Not sure yet. I may. Depends on what happens when I get back.'
Collins then asked whether 'a US Bomb' could theoretically destroy Iran's nuclear program and facilities if the US did get involved in the escalating conflict.
'There's no guarantees on everything or anything in life, you know that,' Trump quipped, before seeking clarification. 'Right? There's no guarantee.
'But you're saying a guarantee - of what?'
Collins, at this point, articulated. 'Do you think if the US got involved militarily it would actually wipe out Iran's nuclear program?'
The president shot back: 'I hope their program's going to be wiped out long before then - but they're not going to have a nuclear weapon.'
The president also urged on social media, 'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!'
Collins then attempted to ask a follow-up before being interrupted herself.
'Who else has a question other than CNN fake news?' Trump proclaimed.
But Collins kept at with her line of questioning, asking more after the dust had settled.
'How close do you personally think that [Iran] were to getting [a nuclear weapon],' she asked a few minutes later, bringing up how National Intelligence boss Tulsi Gabbard in March said the country wasn't close to doing so.
'I don't care what she [Gabbard] said,' Trump responded. 'I think they were very close to having nuclear weapons.'
The Israeli military strikes on Iran last week stunned many of Trump's supporters, with the move seemingly coming without his blessing.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio maintained the US was not involved. Trump has expressed support for Israel since, reiterating his belief that 'Iran must not have nuclear weapons.'
Bombing continued in Tehran Monday. The White House continues to mull whether to wade into the conflict.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

BBC News

30 minutes ago

• BBC News

Suicide bombing at Damascus church kills 20, authorities say

At least 20 people have been killed and 52 others wounded in a suicide bombing at a church on the outskirts of Damascus, Syria's interior ministry has said. The attacker entered Mar Elias Church in Dweila during a service and opened fire with a weapon before detonating an explosive vest, the ministry said in a statement. It added that he was affiliated with the jihadist group Islamic State (IS). There was no immediate claim from the group Syrian Civil Defence - whose emergency teams are widely known as the White Helmets - posted photos and video from inside the church showing a heavily damaged altar, pews covered in broken glass and a bloodied floor. One person told AFP news agency outside Mar Elias that "someone entered carrying a weapon" and began shooting. "[People] tried to stop him before he blew himself up," he added.A worker at a nearby shop said: "We saw fire in the church and the remains of wooden benches thrown all the way to the entrance."Security forces have condoned off the area around the church and are investigating the attack, according to the interior was the first such attack in Damascus since Bashar al-Assad was overthrown by rebel forces in President Ahmed al-Sharaa - whose Sunni Islamist group, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), is a former al-Qaeda affiliate in Syria - has repeatedly promised to protect religious and ethnic the country has been rocked by two waves of deadly sectarian violence in recent months.

The Guardian

36 minutes ago

• The Guardian

How the carefully planned US bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities unfolded

Late on Friday night, eight US B-2 bombers took off from Whiteman air force base in Missouri and turned westwards towards the Pacific. Amateur flight trackers plotted their progress on social media as the black flying-wing warplanes joined up mid-air with refuelling tankers and checked in with air traffic controllers once they had reached the open ocean. The movement of the B-2 bombers towards the US Pacific base on Guam triggered speculation that Donald Trump was arranging pieces on the board before a decision on whether to join Israel in bombing Iranian nuclear facilities. On Thursday, Trump had let it be known that he would make that decision over the following two weeks, suggesting a window remained open for some last-ditch diplomatic alternative to war. He angrily denied a Wall Street Journal report that he had already approved a strike plan. The British, French and German foreign ministers seized the opportunity to meet their Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi, for talks in Geneva on Friday but to little or no avail. Trump himself was characteristically dismissive of European efforts. 'Nah, they didn't help,' he told journalists. We know now that and the B-2 flights over the Pacific were part of the same elaborate ruse to ensure Iran was off its guard and looking the wrong way, and that the president's declared two-week diplomatic window was likely to be part of the same ploy. The Pentagon described the eight bombers that were spotted flying west as a decoy, a deception effort known only to an extremely small number of planners and leaders in Washington and at central command headquarters in Tampa, Florida. As they were tracked across the western states and then the Pacific, another seven B-2s took off from Whiteman base and headed in the opposite direction – eastwards. These seven planes made no communications with each other or with the ground as they crossed America and flew unnoticed over the Atlantic. The planes and their two-pilot crews flew all day and into Saturday night, refuelled mid-air along the way by tankers that had been deployed to Europe over the previous week. The careful orchestration and prepositioning, some of it predating the Israeli surprise attack on Iran on 13 June, raises questions over how early Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu decided to join forces to go to war against Iran, and over how much of the US president's professed interest in a diplomatic solution, and apparent effort to discourage an Israeli attack, was all part of the charade. As far back as May, during a visit to Doha, Trump went out of his way to denigrate the B-2's design, declaring 'I'm not a huge believer in stealth', because it made for an 'ugly plane'. By the time the flight of seven of these ugly planes arrived in the Middle East at the eastern edge of the Mediterranean, it was midnight local time on Saturday. The mission they had been assigned was codenamed Midnight Hammer, and to carry it out the bombers were joined by an escort of US fighter jets, surveillance and reconnaissance planes deployed in the region earlier – 125 aircraft in all. Together they flew on eastwards, with hardly a word exchanged between the pilots, to maintain the all-enveloping secrecy surrounding the operation. At the same time as the warplanes reached the Lebanese coast, a US submarine loitering somewhere in the Arabian Sea launched Tomahawk cruise missiles, synchronised to reach their targets in Iran at the same time the bombers arrived. The Tomahawks flew low over the Gulf of Oman and up over south-east Iran as seven B-2s and their accompanying fighters crossed Lebanon, Syria and Iraq (according to a map provided by the Pentagon on Sunday) and entered Iran from the north-west at about 1.30am local time. The chair of the US joint chiefs of staff, Dan Caine, described the whole operation as 'a complex, tightly timed manoeuvre requiring exact synchronisation across multiple platforms in a narrow piece of airspace, all done with minimal communications'. The primary target was the farthest north, near the Shia religious centre of Qom, the underground enrichment facility at Fordow, generally thought impregnable to every conventional weapon with the possible exception of America's biggest bomb, the 30,000lb (13,500kg) GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator. The seven B-2s approaching from the north were each carrying two of them. The second target was Natanz, Iran's first enrichment facility, and the third was a complex of facilities outside the ancient city of Isfahan, which is linked to other parts of the nuclear fuel cycle, and which had already been partly damaged by Israeli bombing. Before the bombers arrived at these targets, according to Caine's account, their fighter escort swept the area for any sign of Iranian warplanes, released decoys and opened fire on air defence sites on the ground. Apparently, there was no return fire. The Pentagon was 'unaware of any shots fired at the US strike package'. Iran's defensive shield had been flattened over the preceding week by relentless Israeli sorties. The bombers struck between 2.10am and 2.35am Iranian time, the Pentagon said, hitting Fordow at 'several aim points'. It was the first time the enormous GBU-57 bunker-busting bomb had been used in a US operation. It is unclear how many of the total of 14 were dropped on Natanz or Isfahan. The Tomahawk missiles fired by the navy were all aimed at Isfahan, Caine said, and landed slightly after the other two facilities were struck. The US warplanes turned around and headed back the way they had come, leaving Iranian airspace at 3am. By that time, reports had surfaced on Iranian media of explosions in the region of the nuclear facilities, and a quarter hour later, Trump confirmed the operation in the way he has made most of his presidential announcements – on his private online platform, Truth Social, complete with key words in all-capitals. 'A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow,' Trump wrote. 'All planes are safely on their way home. Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!' Addressing the nation a little later on television, Trump said the targets had been 'totally and completely obliterated', a claim that was modified over the course of Sunday to 'severely damaged'. The president appealed once more for Iran to sue for peace, which he has made clear would involve a surrender of all its nuclear programme. The message was repeated by other members of the administration throughout the day. Midnight Hammer would be a one-off US intervention, as long as Iran did not try to fire back and complied with the terms laid down by him and Netanyahu. Any retaliation, Trump said, returning to all caps on Truth Social, would be met with 'FORCE FAR GREATER THAN WHAT WAS WITNESSED TONIGHT'. By the end of Sunday, however, there was no sign of compliance from Tehran. Araghchi, vowed that Midnight Hammer would have 'everlasting consequences' adding that Iran reserved the right to 'all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people'. Iran played down the impact of the US bombs, saying that the country's reserves of high-enriched uranium had been removed from Fordow long before, and all the damage inflicted could be repaired. On Sunday morning, Iran launched a new salvo of missiles at Israel, one of which flattened most of a city block in north Tel Aviv. By the end of the day, Iran's parliament had approved a bill calling for the closing of the strait of Hormuz, the gateway to the Persian Gulf, through which over a fifth of the world's oil needs flows daily. Iran's president, Masoud Pezeshkian, warned that the US must 'receive a response' to its attacks. Tehran has previously threatened to target US bases spread across eight countries in the region, if the US were to join the Israeli attacks. In reality, its military capabilities are constrained by the withering attacks of the past 10 days, but late on Sunday the regime was saying it would explore all its options, while making clear that submission was not one of them.

Times

44 minutes ago

• Times

Oil ‘will surge above $100 a barrel' if Iran blocks Strait of Hormuz

Oil prices will surge above $100 a barrel if Iran blocks the world's most important crude shipping route in retaliation for America bombing its nuclear sites, analysts believe. Iran's parliament voted on Sunday to close the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial chokepoint through which tankers carry about a fifth of global oil supplies. All eyes are on whether Iran's Supreme National Security Council decides to approve the often-threatened but never-implemented step, which analysts described as a 'worst-case scenario'. Kallum Pickering, chief economist at Peel Hunt, said an attempt by Iran to attack or mine the strait would cause 'a significant global supply and price shock, depressing global GDP and pushing up inflation'. Brent crude, the global benchmark oil price, has already risen by about $10 a barrel to more than $77 since Israel began its strikes on Iran on June 13, amid fears that Iran could block the strait. Weekend betting markets forecast that Brent would jump by another $4 to $5 a barrel when markets resumed trading late on Sunday night, taking prices above $80 a barrel for the first time since January. Sir Niall Ferguson, the historian, has warned that markets have been 'complacent' about the risk of Iran blocking the strait, as Tehran could strike out in its 'death throes'. That would send oil 'way above' $100 a barrel and cause a huge economic shock on a scale not seen since the 1970s, he told The Times CEO Summit. • 'Iranian regime in death throes risks a major economic shock' David Fyfe, chief economist at Argus Media, has said that closure of the strait could send prices to between $100 and $150 a barrel. The Arab oil embargo of 1973-74 led to prices roughly quadrupling, from about $3 to almost $12 a barrel, while the Iranian revolution of 1979 and the subsequent Iran-Iraq war, which reduced output from both countries, resulted in oil prices more than doubling from $14 in 1978 to $35 in 1981. More recently oil prices spiked as high as $139 a barrel at one point in the aftermath of Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Many analysts still do not expect Tehran to follow through on its threats to block the strait, in part because it would be likely to harm Iranian allies and customers more than it would hurt America. Pickering said it was 'worth noting that China is heavily dependent on the Strait of Hormuz for its trade'. • Iain Macwhirter: Leaving oil and gas in the ground was always a pipe dream 'If Iran tries to block that stretch of water, it risks an all-out war with the most powerful country in the world [the US] and badly antagonising the second most powerful [China],' he said. 'Headlines predicting oil prices above $100 a barrel should be viewed as forecasts for worst-case scenarios at this stage.' As well as a crucial shipping route for oil tankers, the strait between Iran and Oman, which is only 21 miles wide at its narrowest point, is also the route taken by about a fifth of global exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG). Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy at Saxo Bank, said he had 'long held the view that strategic considerations, particularly toward Iran-friendly Qatar and its vital LNG exports, and Iran's dependence on China — its largest oil customer — would act as a restraining force', as long as Iran's own oil export facilities were not targeted. However, he added that 'even without a full-scale disruption, the mere threat of interference in the strait could delay shipments and trigger a sharper-than-expected short-term spike in prices'. He said that the US and China could release strategic oil reserves to ease prices, and Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates could redirect some of their exports via pipelines to facilities outside the strait. James Bambino, senior oil analyst at S&P Global Commodity Insights, said the world had sufficient oil supply to meet demand even if Iranian exports were affected — 'so long as the Strait of Hormuz remains open — and we expect that it will'.