The Bin Laden manhunt on Netflix
Listen to article
Many movies, shows and books exist about the circumstances surrounding the Bin Laden killing in Abbottabad, Pakistan. As with any other major story, this one is not conspiracy theory resistant either.
Seymour Hersh, a leading and very credible journalist, has his own account of how it all happened but not much discussion ever happened on that one. The US mainstream media as well as Hollywood have always been in the habit of repeating the official account of any story so many times that it somehow becomes the established truth even when it is not.
This latest and almost widely watched Netflix show on the manhunt of America's most wanted enemy has repeated the same official narrative about how Bin Laden was tracked through his trusted courier. In this show, Netflix brought in front of cameras and lights the members of the notorious Alec Station of the CIA.
There was one such tight group of girls who very obediently followed the directions of their boss and mentor Martin Schmidt. They were infamously quipped as the Manson's family. Some of those girls talk in the show. One of the Navy Seals, who was a member of the team that went to the house in Abbottabad, was also interviewed who shared some stark details. Actually, this one was exactly the soldier who actually came face to face with Bin Laden and actually shot and killed him.
The most interesting part about this entire film is not the revelations or the entertainment aspect of it but rather the stuff it doesn't touch upon at all. The show depicts the dehumanised mindset of the American intelligence and military communities.
They enjoy reliving the circumstances and the night when they killed Bin Laden. They brag about how the hunt was executed, how young occupants of the house, where Bin Laden was, were shot and killed. Most disturbingly, they sanitise their version of the acts of terror in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere in their pursuit of Bin Laden.
Minute after minute while watching the show one cannot help but ask the simple question: how do your violent actions make you any different than Bin Laden? Why is it terrorism when Bin Laden did it but not terrorism when you killed more than 10 times more people just while looking for this one man? The arguments presented are that Bin Laden was the enemy of the American people who had declared war on America and for America to go after him and invade lands and unleash bombs on foreign soil was somehow kosher from the international laws standpoint.
Well, Bin Laden would agree with that rationale because that is the same rationale he had used as well while justifying his terrorist attacks against the innocent American people who perished on September 11, 2001. To him, the American people were the enemies and in destroying the American symbols of economic and military pride, killing innocent civilians was alright. Do an experiment; try listening to English only translations of the arguments of both sides and you would probably not be able to tell one side from the other.
No remorse is felt for the loss of innocent lives. No realisation occurs where one can see that the actions of their side were illegal, immoral, the sheer force employed unnecessary, that those targeted and killed had nothing to do with what this war was all about. America supporting Israel doesn't justify an attack against America where innocent lives are lost just as much as an attack on American soil by Al-Qaeda doesn't justify invading Afghanistan and Iraq.
The Taliban at the time were hosting Bin Laden. America accused Bin Laden of 9/11 attacks. The Taliban asked to provide proof of Bin Laden's involvement in order for them to hand him over to the Americans. That was quite a reasonable demand. Isn't that what the Americans would ask for if tables were turned? Instead, Bush announced the decision to invade Afghanistan. The rest is history. The clean shaven white barbarism is somehow treated differently than the one committed by the brown skinned bearded barbarians.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Art Basel opens to subdued market
The world's biggest art fair takes place in Switzerland this week, with global crises creating a more sombre mood, according to participants, and galleries showing less expensive works amid a slump at the top end of the art market. A fixture since 1970, Art Basel is widely viewed as a key barometer for the health of global art sales. Works by over 4,000 artists are on show, including a Pablo Picasso painting valued at over $30 million shown by US gallery Pace. Global art sales fell 12 per cent last year, the second annual decline in a row, according to a report by UBS. The drop was particularly sharp at the top end - defined as works selling at auction for over $10 million - where sales tumbled by 39 per cent. "It's true the galleries are bringing material that is in a different price point to what it used to be," said Vincenzo de Bellis, Chief Artistic Officer and Global Director of Art Basel Fairs. "And it's natural, there's a different expectation." One artwork had sold for between $13-17 million by Wednesday, the only one to fetch at least $10 million over the first two days, sales confirmed by exhibitors show. Last year, four pieces worth $10-20 million sold during the same period. "I think the mood is very subdued," said Gaurav Madhok, a visitor from London who has been going for over 12 years. More than five gallery representatives said there were fewer American clients at stalls than in previous years. A separate UBS report showed a 4.6 per cent jump in private individuals' wealth in 2024, with the US faring especially well, creating over 1,000 new dollar millionaires daily. "We've seen a lot of European curators," said Georgia Lurie, a director of the Pippy Houldsworth gallery. "But Americans are thin on the ground, both collectors and museum people."
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Laura Marcus, Percy Daggs IV, Rada Rae and Jhaleil Swaby join cast of hunger games prequel
A fresh wave of tributes has been announced for Lionsgate's The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping. Laura Marcus, Percy Daggs IV, Rada Rae, and Jhaleil Swaby will join the previously revealed cast, including Glenn Close, Kieran Culkin, Elle Fanning, Ralph Fiennes, McKenna Grace, and others. Marcus has been cast as Silka, a career tribute from District 1. She is currently seen in Andor as Beela and will play Mollie Garfield, daughter of former U.S. President James Garfield, in Death By Lighting for Netflix later this year. Her past credits include The Serpent Queen on STARZ, BBC's Bad Education and The Jetty, and The Devil's Hour for Amazon Studios. Daggs portrays Beetee's son, a tribute from District 3. Recently, he starred in Never Let Go alongside Halle Berry and is a series regular in Hulu's Paradise. He also appeared in AppleTV+'s The Last Days of Ptolemy Grey alongside Samuel L. Jackson. Rada Rae will take on the role of Wellie, a tribute from District 6. Rae's recent work includes starring in the Netflix film Exterritorials and TV series House of David and Nine Perfect Strangers. Swaby, cast as Panache, a career tribute from District 1, has appeared in The Lake on Amazon Prime Video, Supergirl on CW, and The Next Step. The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping, based on Suzanne Collins' novel, explores the origins of the Quarter Quell. The movie, directed by Francis Lawrence and set for a November 2026 release, is currently in pre-production. The book has already seen massive success, selling over 1.5 million copies in its first week. Lionsgate's Hunger Games franchise has grossed over $3.3 billion globally from its five films.
Express Tribune
9 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Outer Banks season 5 begins filming with cast set for the final adventure
Netflix has officially kicked off production on the fifth and final season of Outer Banks, with new behind-the-scenes images showcasing the cast. The release date for Season 5 remains unconfirmed, but the show is expected to premiere sometime in 2026, likely in the latter half of the year, as filming will continue through 2025. Outer Banks, a fan-favorite series that has amassed over 200 million views, will conclude with its upcoming season. The decision to end the series after five seasons is likely influenced by rising production costs and the increasing fame of its stars, making it more expensive to continue the show. Co-creators Jonas Pate, Josh Pate, and Shannon Burke had always planned for a five-season arc, and they remain on board as executive producers for the final season. The new season will bring back key cast members, including Chase Stokes (John B. Routledge), Madelyn Cline (Sarah Cameron), Madison Bailey (Kiara Carrera), Jonathan Daviss (Pope Heyward), Drew Starkey (Rafe Cameron), Carlacia Grant (Cleo), Austin North (Topper), and Fiona Palomo (Sofia). However, Rudy Pankow, who plays fan-favorite JJ, is absent from the newly released images, suggesting that his character may not return for the final season. The series will also continue the plotline from the end of Season 4, where Sarah Cameron is revealed to be pregnant with John B.'s child, adding a new dimension to their relationship. Although Pankow is not involved in Season 5, he has landed a leading role in the upcoming film adaptation of Reminders of Him by Colleen Hoover. Meanwhile, Cline is set to star in I Know What You Did Last Summer, a new horror film. Despite the loss of Pankow, the remaining cast is ready to wrap up the Pogues' journey with a thrilling conclusion. Fans of the show can expect more updates as production continues, with Outer Banks Season 5 set to premiere in 2026 on Netflix.
